×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: U.S., Japanese Publishers Unite Against Manga Scan Sites


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:46 am Reply with quote
PetrifiedJello wrote:
It's already too late. Digital lockers are now replacing aggregator websites, and their use is exploding.

What makes it more difficult for the gatekeepers is gaining access to these lockers, because the key is in control of those who upload the content.


Forcing the piracy into dank back alleys where its harder to find and harder to view is the goal of an enforcement sweep.

If making enforcement difficult requires making it difficult for anonymous browsers to gain access to the lockers, that's a win for legit distributors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PetrifiedJello



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 3782
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:35 am Reply with quote
littlegreenwolf wrote:
... Goes to the retailer...

Retailer?

In what way does the retailer have anything to do with print on demand?

The entire point of on demand is to remove the retailer. If retailers are used in this model, then I'll confess it's complete news to me.

If true, then that's an even bigger problem and it's a good reason why this model failed. Why the hell should anyone pay for retailer cost when the on demand shop would have shipped directly to the customer? That's the entire point of on demand.

Goodness. No wonder this industry is dying slowly and painfully. They're too busy paying too many people which don't deserve it.

More power to them.

agila61 wrote:
Forcing the piracy into dank back alleys where its harder to find and harder to view is the goal of an enforcement sweep.

You just don't get it, agila61. This is not forcing them into dark alleys. Digital lockers were in dark alleys. Now, they're coming into the light and used in conjunction with sites.

Here's how it works:
Person loads content into digital locker, which is purposely kept from Google's indexing robots.

Person creates many websites. Some offer content directly. Some offer subscription models. Some offer direct buy option.

Unsuspecting person. Sees that it's professional looking, especially since many are built with subscription and/or download payment requests. Hey, if you have to pay for it, it has to be legit, right?

MPAA/RIAA sees site. Freaks the [bleep] out. Again. Rushes lawyers to DMCA their ass. The site laughs. Lawsuit ensues. Laughingly, site is purposely taken down and a new one added. By the time the MPAA/RIAA finds all the sites, the new ones have time to blossom and hit that infamous Google indexing robot.

Now multiply the above example times 50. 100. 1000.

Do you understand now? The digital locker is the absolute worse thing these industries face because the content never gets taken down, unlike aggregator/file-sharing sites.

Filesharing sites have traceable IP addresses. Digital lockers don't.

These lockers have been around for nearly 10 years. I'd say that's "dark alley", wouldn't you?

They're not anymore, all thanks to businesses freakin' out over the internet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CCSYueh



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 2707
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:59 pm Reply with quote
PetrifiedJello wrote:
Right here is the crux of the problem, CCSYueh. There is no difference. The problem is, the industry says it's okay here, but not there, so they're causing confusion which circumvents the very laws they enacted.

Where do you suppose those Naruto pics come from? Let's say Viz uploaded them to their official website. Someone comes along, copies, and posts elsewhere. Then, someone else gets creative and turns it into a dancing avatar.

Does it hurt financially? Probably not, which is why they don't care. Now, Little Johnny thinks it's okay to do Naruto pics, so now he does a digital art designer's wallpaper they're trying to sell at $0.99.


That's where it stops. If you are charging for creating a wallpaper just because you added some effects to a picture or a bunch of pictures you are over the line. Most of the wallpapers I've stolen are off the official sites where they are up for free. It's advertising. I have some old 3X3 Eyes wallpapers someone created & put a signature on, but they were also free.

My daughter would sell pictures to other kids at school she had drawn herself (I didn't approve, but no one said she couldn't so whatever). Most were original, but she'd draw freehand anime characters when asked for a couple bucks. This was fanart basically so she wasn't really stealing though it was copyright infringement, but on a pretty small scale (one school). She eventually reached a point she really disliked drawing other people's characters & only wanted to draw her own so the issue went away. There was once incident that bothered her when a girl bought a picture, then went around claiming she had drawn it herself. I pointed out the girl was cutting her own throat because there should be no way for the girl to draw in my daughter's style.
And now my daughter spends her days playing WoW & creating art of WoW types (her original Blood Elf, etc) and going to college.

PetrifiedJello wrote:
The gray line becomes so obscure, these tend to increase in explosiveness. Even the very industry causes this confusion when they upload their legal wares to sites hosting illegal content.

No one knows anymore. Sure, I get the gist of full episodes, but guess what? Crunchyroll was an illegal site once too.

Someone hits FUNimation's website, captures the videos, then spreads them around is now no different than stripping the thing off the DVD.


I thought most fansubs were recorded off Japanese broadcast, subbed & posted. This is not getting a clip off Funi & posting it. This is recording a show & sharing it with other which, in the US at least, isn't legal as I understand the Sony decision (for personal home use only one can record a show).
I've never gone to Hula or Crunchyroll. Even if I had the time, I dislike Crunchyroll's origin. I've only ever watched one anime ep online & that was a Sgt Frog here to hear the voices on the first ep. (Maybe it was the Funi site...Can't recall. I linked from here is all I remember). I just started One Piece Season 2 Set 7, then I have the Persona & Toradora sets to check out to see if they need to go back, Shura No Toki, Gundam whatever Stardust memories, Gundam 00 Season 2 set 1, & Xenosomething-or-other. Oh & Aquarion. I might manage to get thru them all when I go on vacation in a couple weeks.

PetrifiedJello wrote:
There simply is no stopping it now. Well, there is, and that is artists keep their works to themselves from now on.


That's only because the people doing this aren't respecting the rights of the owner. Just because you like Naruto doesn't mean you have any right to the dvd's content, much less the fansub you downloaded, so you have no right beyond viewing & maybe backing up that dvd. You have no right to loan it to your friends for 3 bucks. You can't charge people to show it at a party unless you get permission. These are all laws well known to most anyone who cares to ask. ComicCon International will not show any anime without the permission of the licensee of the product because they don't want the various licensees to cease doing business with them for future cons. (They also likely don't want to get into legal hassles)
It's a mindset, really. We all see those cars on the side of the road selling stuff we know is likely illegal somehow. There's a reason the seller isn't going through an official channel & very often the buyer is not getting the "steal" he thinks he's getting.

PetrifiedJello wrote:

I'm nitpicking, but you don't have rights. This is proven more every day. When Amazon pulled "1984" from Kindle readers, this went well beyond what rights we have. Buy a PS3 for the "Other OS" feature? Gone. Just like our "rights".
See how that digital file law gets tricky? Crap like this is growing every day.


That's what makes me iffy about ITunes & stuff. I pay for it & they store it for me, but what happens if they go away? (Hey, could happen.) I have my cds. I don't really trust a digital copy I don't have a solid copy of.
But as I recall the issue was someone was selling some titles they thought were public domain & they weren't. That's sort of fansubbers territory (not properly securing rights) I was looking at Wiki's entry on Woodie Guthrie the other day & apparently some corporation had swooped in & bought the copyright to a bunch of his titles & tried to say they owned some of his songs they actually didn't own-the songs in question had lapsed into public domain. (If a company can afford a high-priced lawyer to advise them to do stuff like that one would expect that lawyer to research before he embarrasses the company with a wrong lawsuit).


PetrifiedJello wrote:

You're absolutely right. So why do these industries insist on fighting the inevitable? Boggles my mind.


I have no problem with letting them move at their own speed. If they don't change, they will become extinct, but I fully disagree they owe the public digital content or whatever.
I finally got a cell phone last month (because there are no public phones left). I fought it forever because, having been an operator, the idea of dragging a phone around on my person (ie-one can't get away from whatever) was the last thing I wanted, plus the idiots who try to kill me on a daily basis with the stupid things glued to their ears as I slam on my brakes to avoid them was hardly a shining advertisement. In that month, I have made 1 call & taken 1 call. I actually have a portable telegraph device for texting! (Wild Wild West! Yeah!) And I don't have to know Morse Code!

Quote:
He's getting snipped in August. Hopefully that will nip it in the bud. Maybe not.

Not. He's male. It's always on the mind, whether he gets it or not. Razz

PetrifiedJello wrote:
Thankfully, no, but let's just say the military wised up and realized putting the press in action was a very, very, very stupid thing to do to begin with. I'm a veteran, and this even pissed me off. The ones who got punished were the ones who should have been punished, all the way up to the White House.


I thought there was something about a video posted on some whistleblower website which allegedly showed civilians getting killed (although how one can tell a civilian in a grainy video is beyond me. Look at those spies they busted this week.)
It's also the change in attitude. In the past the press was a bit more willing some stuff needed to be left unseen/unsaid (like Kennedy's alleged ladies traipsing into the White House) while now they're not above staging or editing to make more sensational clips they air.
Going back to Zac & the Funi guy, ANN knows they can't burn Funi printing leaked info. Look at the comment they knew about this a couple weeks before it broke & were trying to get official word. ANN isn't some tabloid willing to post any tidbit for the scandal & not worried about having to print a retraction later. That's why I trust stuff I see here presented as news vs stuff some thread on some board by some poster claiming to work for one of the companies.

PetrifiedJello wrote:
You see, this is exactly my approach to music and movies. I don't buy them nor do I download them. Explain how this helps "the artists"? It doesn't. In fact, my solution is the worst possible outcome moreso than those who read for free! Why? Because any potential to get me to buy is lost. Those who read for free are potential targets to buy.

I am the industry's worst fear: the lost sale. To get me back, you best believe they'll bow to me while apologizing. Until then, everything they get... they deserve..


You've made your choice. You are likely a small percentage. A lot of adults do grow out of buying music, etc. I know I bought way more before my daughter was born & since she was born, I've probably bought a dozen cds for myself (she's almost 20. Yeah, I bought her a lot of cds). Suddenly parenthood infringed on spare cash for entertainment. The radio works for fresh music. I have my cds from the '80's & the handful I've bought since(Metallica, Nickelback, Creed, Foo Fighters, Goo Goo Dolls, Staind).

It is cheaper for mass printing. THe whole vanity press thing has been around foever. I have a family history of a branch of the family that was $50 per volume to cover the cost of the small print run. I have vague memory of Poe doing some vanity presses in a bio I read.
But the whole cost thing isn't set in stone. TRSI regularly sells manga for $6. I've always assumed this is because they've cut a deal for those manufacturer sales to allow both parties to make some sort of money on the deal not unlike Coke or Pepsi offering deals to grocery stores for their product to be sold at a reduced rate. When I told a local retailer what I pay regularly for manga from TRSI he was flabbergasted because that would be below cost to him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 3:55 pm Reply with quote
PetrifiedJello wrote:
Here's how it works:
Person loads content into digital locker, which is purposely kept from Google's indexing robots.

Person creates many websites. Some offer content directly. Some offer subscription models. Some offer direct buy option.

Unsuspecting person. Sees that it's professional looking, especially since many are built with subscription and/or download payment requests. Hey, if you have to pay for it, it has to be legit, right?

MPAA/RIAA sees site. Freaks the [bleep] out. Again. Rushes lawyers to DMCA their ass. The site laughs. Lawsuit ensues. Laughingly, site is purposely taken down and a new one added. By the time the MPAA/RIAA finds all the sites, the new ones have time to blossom and hit that infamous Google indexing robot.

Now multiply the above example times 50. 100. 1000.

Do you understand now? The digital locker is the absolute worse thing these industries face because the content never gets taken down, unlike aggregator/file-sharing sites.


How is this different from any other pure aggregator site? You don't bother DCMA'ing the pure aggregator, you use it as a database for the storage location of the bootleg content.

If the site makes the stream available to any anonymous browser, it publicizes the storage location of the stream. When the storage location of the stream is be taken down, the front end shell that the leech streaming site presents to the world is suddenly full of dead or "taken down for copyright infringement" links.

Hiding the storage location from the search engines does not hide the contents - either the streaming site hides itself, or it publicizes itself and provides the contents of the storage location already sorted and indexed by which infringing property is being bootlegged in which file.

Once the script for a streaming site is written, one person working one day can mine thousands of links to storage locations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ohoni



Joined: 10 Jun 2003
Posts: 3421
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 6:28 pm Reply with quote
Quote:

I have no problem with letting them move at their own speed. If they don't change, they will become extinct, but I fully disagree they owe the public digital content or whatever.


It's not that they owe the public digital content. It's that they owe it to themselves to provide the public with what they want, otherwise the public is just going to go elsewhere to get it. They don't have the option of digital content not being available, all they can control is whether they're a source for it (with an attached revenue stream), or not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paploo



Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 1875
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:32 pm Reply with quote
Actually, some limited run/selfpublished use POD technology and are distributed to mass market retailers. It's more economical for some publishers/writers who are just starting out, though many still use offset printers because it's cheaper.

And you're still ignoring the point I made re:where the 9 bucks goes. Unless this was your reply to that-

PetrifiedJello wrote:

Goodness. No wonder this industry is dying slowly and painfully. They're too busy paying too many people which don't deserve it.


.................. so should we tell your boss that? [no idea what quality of work you provide, just pointing out to you what a callous statement the above is]

Anyhoo, if anyone's looking for an update on the situation, blogger Kimi has posted short interviews with some scanlators regardding Mangageddon- http://reddeerforum.co.uk/?p=211

http://manga.about.com/b/2010/07/01/anime-expo-2010-thursdays-manga-highlights.htm And also, I imagine some news will come out of AnimeExpo regarding the plans for Mangageddon. I imagine ANN will posts any big news if it does pop up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sweetbb



Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 2
PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:48 am Reply with quote
I don't understand news ANN :

Quote:
The organization currently includes Japanese publishers Kodansha, Shogakukan, Shueisha, Square Enix, and the Tuttle-Mori Agency, as well as North American manga publishers Vertical Inc., Viz Media, Tokyopop, and Yen Press.

Source: Publishers Weekly


and after we can see :

Quote:
Update: According to a press release issued by Viz Media on Tuesday, the coalition's members include Square Enix, Viz Media, TOKYOPOP, Vertical, Inc., the Tuttle-Mori Agency, Yen Press, and the members of the Digital Comic Association: Akane Shinsha, Akita Shoten, ASCII Media Works, East Press, Ichijinsha, Enterbrain, Okura Shuppan, Ohzora Shuppan, Gakken, Kadokawa Shoten, Gentosha Comics, Kodansha, Jitsugyo No Nihonsha, Shueisha, Junet, Shogakukan, Shogakukan Shueisha Production, Shodensha, Shonen Gahosha, Shinshokan, Shinchosha, Take Shobo, Tatsumi Shuppan, Tokuma Shoten, Nihon Bungeisha, Hakusensha, Fujimi Shobo, Fusosha, Futabasha, France Shoin, Bunkasha, Houbunsha, Magazine House, Media Factory, Leed sha, and Libre Shuppan.


So, the organization includes japanese publisher Square Enix but the company is not a membrer of the Digital Comic Association ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROFLMAN



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:16 am Reply with quote
omg i can't stop laughing owww my sides hurt. iv read most of the posts in this thread and i rofl at just how many people are playing the goody too shoes. lol once again and hears the really funny thing. theses sites will always pop up. you shut one down and 10 new ones pop up. forcing these sites to shut down is not going to solve the problem. if you really want to stop illegal scanning of manga. perhaps you should make it available to everyone. as many of you know. most manga does not make it to an English version. there are many older manga that i so do enjoy. and as stated by many of you on this thread there just about impossible to find. well anyway its because of these sites that many people find and fall in love with manga. i for one admit that if it were not for onemanga i would probably not have an interest in it for the fact that it is not so easily found where i live. well hears what I thin k should happen. 1. work with known sites to bring new and old manga. i feel it should be up to the Manga's CREATOR to decide what happens next.

as you can see im not a fan of Licencing as it restricts who can enjoy the manga.

REMEMBER this is my honest opinion.

P.S. i recently bought myself a flame suit now it's time to see if it works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:36 pm Reply with quote
This is hilarious:
ROFLMAN wrote:
i feel it should be up to the Manga's CREATOR to decide what happens next.

as you can see im not a fan of Licencing as it restricts who can enjoy the manga.


"Leaving it up to the Manga's creator" includes giving the creator the right to contract that out to publishers so the mangaka can focus on creating manga.

If the creator does not have the right to restrict the manga to distributors who pay for the privilege ... that is the opposite of leaving it "up to the Manga's CREATOR to decide what happens next."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
shoshanna_mozzor



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:57 pm Reply with quote
spartydragon wrote:
Wellp, it was fun while it lasted.



it dosnt have to be over.

tell every one!
sign the petition

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/SaveManga/sign/
Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dcw2021



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:35 pm Reply with quote
If someone has to step up and admit themselves to be the bad guy, then I will. For years I have read manga for free online that I have known, or at least believed to be, pirated. The number of series I have read is over 50 while the number I have purchased is only 4.

In my defense, I am currently a college student with no job so spending money is hard to come by. But boo-hoo, I could spend more time studying and less time fantasizing over the panty flashes and nose bleeds of ecchi manga. I do occasionally comfort myself by promising to pay the creators back, either by buying the manga after college or a donation of some kind, but whether or not I keep good on those promises is to be seen.

I also try to place blame on the publishers for not making the manga more available. After all, I did not start out pirating. No, my first manga experience was simply barrowing one from a friend in school, “Ranma ½” if you must know. I was hooked by the second volume and when to the store to by the third but they didn't have it. Granted they had other volumes in the series, but I wanted to know what happened next, not what I just read and not what will happen later. Yes, I could have requested they call me when the next shipment came in or order it online. But I was addicted and I wanted to know what happened next now! So what did I do? I searched for it on Google and behold, my first pirate site. It was just a slippery slope from there. It wasn’t my fault, they didn’t have what I wanted. Bull…, exercising a little patience could have gotten me what I wanted. Let’s face it, I am impatient, but that does not make pirating right, does not necessarily make it wrong but definitely not right.

Did reading the pirated manga make me any more or less likely to buy manga? Yes and no, hard to say. I am not really a good judge because I am more of an anime person, and I am rather good about purchasing anime once it has become dubbed, even after watching it fan subbed. But I say no because manga is different than anime. Manga does not change much from its pirated version to its English release like anime does; anime gets new voices and you don’t have to read while manga generally only gets a slightly different translation. And I say yes because you cannot want something you do not know about. I read originally read “He is my Master” from pirate sites and loved it so much that I bought it the moment I saw it on books shelves; and I would have bought the anime if they bothered to dub it, I am still sore over “He is my Master” and “Hayate the Combat Butler” and I refuse to buy un-dubbed anime. At what point manga scans change from good advertisement to out-right pirating is not always clear and it varies between people and manga.

Another issue that needs to be dealt with is, let’s face it, there are some manga that will never make it to the states legitimately. If a manga does not do well in Japan, it is unlikely that it will be worth the time, money, and effort to translate it and put it on shelves. If the author is not going to make any money off of it anyway, is it really fair to deny it to anyone who might become interested with just a passing glance? I know of a few manga that I got into with only a glace which might not make it to America, “Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen” is one that comes to mind off the top of my head.

However, manga writers have a right to make money off their works just as singers have a right to make money off their songs, authors off their books, artist off their paintings, and so on and so forth. If they cannot make any money then there is less incentive to create the work which means less for everyone to enjoy, and I don’t want that. I do not care about the big companies and you may be able to argue that they do not lose money from the pirating; but if the original creators end up hurting because of pirating, then by all rights it should stop.

But one has to wonder, with all the useless junk we as American’s buy, why do we pirate in the first place? We buy T-shirts, giant foam fingers, we will even pay just so we do not have to walk, why do we draw the line at music, videos, and manga? I occasionally try to answer this question during a brief moment of guilt that occurs after months of reading pirated manga without as much as a second thought. The reason, I believe, is because we get mixed messages; we pay for the cable once a month but otherwise watch as much TV as we want for free, we buy a radio but otherwise get to listen to the music played on it for free, and we can go to the public library to read for free. We pay for internet, read thousands of articles off various websites, why are manga scans and music downloads not perfectly fair and legal? Because, my little children, advertisement pays for our TV and radio, and why manga companies have not decided to make and expanded version of what pirate sites do to pay for their hosting fees is beyond me.

Another question that pops up is when does sharing turn into pirating? Sure one person passing a good manga around a class room is innocent enough, but what about scanning your favorite manga onto your MySpace page for your two thousand friends to view? And why not? You paid for it, so it is yours to share with whoever you want; even if you want to share it with the whole world, it’s a good book and you believe everyone must read it. Even with various copyright laws, it can be hard to tell exactly how you are allowed to share something, especially with the internet involved. The question is where to draw the line? Will it eventually become illegal to read over someone’s shoulder? You can call me a socialist, but I believe that certain things should be free and I believe information is one of them and everything that ends up on the internet is nothing more than information.

The problem of the internet making it so easy to illegally copy and distribute information is only one of many vastly connected problems in the world today. If someone asked you, “what does technology do?” you would probably respond, “it makes life easier.” And it does, so long as it is making everyone’s life easier and not just someone’s life easier. I don’t want to stray too far from anime and manga, so I will end by simply saying that the world as a whole has to change the way things are done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shiroi Hane
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 25 Oct 2003
Posts: 7580
Location: Wales
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:57 pm Reply with quote
ROFLMAN wrote:
as you can see im not a fan of Licencing as it restricts who can enjoy the manga.

I'm not a fan of ticket booths because they restrict me from walking into cinemas and theme parks. Besides, I don't think you understand what licensing means at all. Something being "unlicensed" doesn't make it free game any more than it becoming "licensed" suddenly makes it "more illegal"* to partake of for free.

Licensing something serves to make it available in the area or language for which it is licensed. Before the internet there would be very few people who would even know a title existed before it was licensed and released in English**

Just because information is now widely available and it is possible to bypass the normal distribution channels doesn't make anyone entitled to have something in the shortest time possible and at no cost.

* I use the term "illegal" loosely, because I am not a lawyer and "more of a copyright infringement" is a mouthful.

** ..and when I first had internet access in University in the late 90s I looked up some titles on Altavista I was familiar with from seeing them as a child - I found a single page on Laputa, a single page on Cities of Gold and a single mention of Ulysses 31.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
Desthion



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:51 pm Reply with quote
I understand the fact that it is wrong to read manga scans but listen from the point of view from someone who used to read them. The manga release time in America is to long a wait for really good title such as naruto one piece bleach. I would buy manga from stores if the would release them weekly such as some sites such as one manga do but listen what is the point of buying the manga even if you enjoy it and like the series whats the point if you're only going to read it once i mean sometimes i reread manga but most of the time people only read a chapter once .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mad mac



Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Posts: 186
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:07 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
I understand the fact that it is wrong to read manga scans but listen from the point of view from someone who used to read them. The manga release time in America is to long a wait for really good title such as naruto one piece bleach. I would buy manga from stores if the would release them weekly such as some sites such as one manga do but listen what is the point of buying the manga even if you enjoy it and like the series whats the point if you're only going to read it once i mean sometimes i reread manga but most of the time people only read a chapter once .


Well, that's the second issue. Obviously there is a sizable amount of people who can't stand waiting two years to catch up to the Japanese release (which is then another two years ahead) and so you get kids who just really liked some manga they bought in the store evolving into another scan reader.

(Personally I'll read ahead and then buy it when it comes out, but I don't read many series to begin with and I'm not going to pretend everyone does the same.)

It's not feasible (or desirable) for Publishers to print every series at a rate where it can catch up to the Japanese release. Hopefully, a digital initiative can bridge the gap and reduce the lag times between U.S. and Japanese release times.

Everyone likes to talk about those noble, obscure, unlicensed series and I can fully empathize, but lets face it. Putting out the hottest chapters of Naruto, Bleach, and so on is what drove the success of the aggregate sites to begin with and providing a legal alternative really should be a top priority for U.S. publishers if they want to drain the swamp in the long term.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
akidra



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:32 pm Reply with quote
Although I understand why they'd want to take out sites like onemanga and mangafox, I'd be sad if they did. I do tend to get manga straight from the scanlators, but it can be hard to keep track of all of the little groups.

I buy the manga I like when they're released in English, but most of what I read is shoujo-ai or yuri which simply doesn't seem to get released. When they do release manga in English it all seems to be shoujo manga, which I generally don't like because the stories seem the same to me. I buy it if I like the author though, because I feel bad for reading their work online.

If they released shoujo-ai manga in English I'd gladly buy it and stop reading it online completely. If I could, I'd even try to learn Japanese, but learning online just doesn't seem to work well for me and there are no classes in my area.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 40 of 43

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group