×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
EP. REVIEW: CROSS ANGE Rondo of Angel and Dragon


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5823
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:31 am Reply with quote
JesuOtaku wrote:
If I see anything that could remotely be construed as a personal attack or exclusionary language in this thread, and I mean anything, the thread will be locked immediately and punitive measures for harassers will be enforced


I think this was what Rederoin was referring to. Where everyone is punished for the actions of a few. Just like at school, where all the students are punished, because a couple of students wouldn't stop talking and the class teacher didn't want to send them to the principal, so the teacher takes away recess or some other perk at school.

@jroa
I don't know anything about pre-sale figures for the show, but controversy and fan service do sell. As long as the story and especially the animation aren't dismally bad, it should do well. As this show is marketed to the Japanese, whatever PC problems it has in the West will be meaningless in Japan.

As to the West, it might do well over here too (as long as it is not censored). After all, everyone is talking about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Izanagi009



Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:56 am Reply with quote
Rederoin wrote:
Engineering Nerd wrote:
I was shocked...I mean totally shocked to see this show is actually doing remarkably well on BD/DVD pre-orders. I mean…sure, consider this show features numerous famous seiyuus (that means considerable boost from Event Tickets inserted in early volumes) and production-values are pretty good (although I do believe sunrise could do better, but no complaints); I do think this controversial show suddenly becomes a solid contender for 10K+ seller is somewhat surprising.


Can't wait to see how people would react to this show's eventual commercial performance (I am honestly neutral on this).

Its only controversial in the US. The OP already sold 40k in wk1(which is related more to Nana than the anime itself, just a sidenote). So it already has some form of success. Not to mention we'll probably won't get numbers on how much the merch will sell.


Three comments:

One- I am intrigued as to why it is not controversial over in Japan. Is it because of separation between the anime watching community and the majority of society in Japan in terms of world views and society obligations or is there something else that I am not seeing. I know that Japan typically is more accepting of sexuality at least in media given a long tradition of bara, yuri and erotica in ancient times dating back to the Tale of Genji but I also believe that the human response to framing of violent acts such as rape is relatively uniform across cultures.

Two-Honestly, after Infinite Stratos's profitable BD/DVD sales, I don't think that quality is what sells shows but more pandering aspects of anime like fanservice and self-insert(the two elements of anime i despise). I swear, if this sells more than Psycho Pass 2 or Fate/ Stay Night Unlimited Blade Works, I will be one of the angriest otaku in the western world.

Three- I guess the OP would sell this much. Nana Mizuki is one of the most popular singers in Japan, Oricon has her constantly in top 10 and honestly, she deserves it. The song is really good too, one of the few elements I will call an absolute positive of the show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chagen46



Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:56 am Reply with quote
Quote:
Nominally a mech show? Funny, they spend a lot of time in mechs for it to only nominally be a mech show. In fact, I bet you that they spend more time on mechs in the first 3 episodes of this than Turn-A Gundam did in its first 3 episodes. I guess that isn't really a mech show either.


Cross Ange may be a mecha show, but it is also designed to peddle women suffering for the enjoyment of the audience. The mecha are simply vehicles for that.

Quote:
And obviously everyone who watches this and doesn't instantly hate it is a misogynist and loves to see / gets off on women get raped and suffering...


I literally never said this.

Quote:
Murder you say? Absolutely no women were murdered in Cross Ange (so far). Do you even know what that means? There was even only 1 woman who was even killed by another person so far, and that bullet was fired by a police officer / guard in response to the drawing of and showing of intent to use a lethal weapon (a sword) which wouldn't qualify as murder pretty much anywhere.


They were murdered by the creators, for the express enjoyment of the viewer. Stories do not exist in a vacuum. They are explictly created with certain intents.

Quote:
As for the pilots, you're just putting your sensationalist spin on things. Its women being brutally mutilated and killed because they're all women. If you think its dumb or sexist for only women to be present so they can milk it for fan service, I would still disagree but ok, fine. But the show clearly wants to use gory shock factor as an appeal... well now it has to be a woman they use for that because that is all there is to choose from. It isn't like there are men there but only the women are being brutally mutilated and killed.


Rextyn's response already pretty much said what I was going to say.

As I said before, though: stories do not exist in a vacuum. The show isn't "just using" women because they happen to be there. It's "just using" women because it has been intentionally built to peddle sexualized violence towards female characters. Normas can only be female. Normas are who pilot the mecha. Normas are treated barely above animals. Every aspect of this show has been fit together to ensure that only female characters are the the ones suffering. Why? Because the show wants you to get off to that.

Quote:
Nothing else to the suffering? Wait really? Stories centered on characters triumphing over suffering isn't something Cross Ange thought up.


Except the characters have, as of now, triumphed over nothing. It's been three episodes and almost nothing important has happened. And no, two one-note characters dying does not count as anything important happening.

Come on, dude, you're defending a show where in three episodes a girl has suffered a brutal cavity search, another one got brutally mutilated, and a third has pissed herself on screen. Is this the hill you want to die on?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MexicanAnime



Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Posts: 23
Location: Houston, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:14 am Reply with quote
This show is entertaining for all the wrong reasons, which I'd expect from the guy who brought us Gundam Seed Destiny. Not surprising (unfortunately) seeing those sales numbers already given that this is one of those roller coaster shows some people will love.

The best character is the dog with the cute helmet, he feels the most human to me so far. I can see him going far in life, even if he is surrounded by tomb stones that have random English gibberish written on them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jroa



Joined: 08 Aug 2012
Posts: 537
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:18 am Reply with quote
MexicanAnime wrote:
This show is entertaining for all the wrong reasons, which I'd expect from the guy who brought us Gundam Seed Destiny. Not surprising (unfortunately) seeing those sales numbers already given that this is one of those roller coaster shows some people will love


This is precisely the sort of confusion that I was afraid would start to happen. At this point there are absolutely no sales numbers for anything except for the OP song. People who have no interest in the show will still buy the opening and closing songs if they like artists or just think the theme sounds nice.

Rederoin wrote:

I think its obvious the OP of the anime was just ment to promote the song, just like symphogear exists to promote her music. But it can be argued that the anime worked in promoting that single, in the same way symphogear does. But I never said it gives us any proof of how well the anime itself will sell. But Sunrise knows how to make mecha anime sell well, so its got a good studio behind it.


Sunrise doesn't always make hits with their new series. In recent memory, Buddy Complex did not sell well for them at all. Neither did Gundam AGE, despite having the Gundam name. They both failed spectacularly.

Even Valvrave had mediocre sales in general. The first volume sold something like 8k. The OP themes sold a lot more, but that didn't make a difference in the long term. Each subsequent volume of the anime increasingly fell, with the final average for both seasons settling around 4k.

If we are going to be speculating about this here, then the best case scenario for Cross Ange is likely to follow a similar downward pattern. Nothing compared to the sales of their actually successful productions from even just a few years ago, which have easily cleared 10k, 20k or 30k. Not to mention their recent success with Unicorn or Love Live, though I admit they each have special circumstances in their favor.

TarsTarkas wrote:

@jroa
I don't know anything about pre-sale figures for the show, but controversy and fan service do sell. As long as the story and especially the animation aren't dismally bad, it should do well. As this show is marketed to the Japanese, whatever PC problems it has in the West will be meaningless in Japan.

As to the West, it might do well over here too (as long as it is not censored). After all, everyone is talking about it.


Controversy guarantees that people will talk about your show and, if they're curious enough, watch it for free. Fanservice does essentially the same, just with more primitive instincts at work.

Not necessarily that they will actually pay a lot of money to collect it. Controversy is also a trait of limited value when it is almost all that a particular series has in its favor. Cross Ange doesn't seem like it has much of anything else of worth so far. I guess it could magically turn into a much better show in the future, but I am not going to bet on that.

Like I said, this isn't just a matter of "Western PC" when there are also plenty of Japanese people who have said they think this is a bad show for their own reasons. I'd even say that if it had the same level of fanservice but lacked the controversy, it would be better received.


Last edited by jroa on Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Key
Moderator


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 18182
Location: Indianapolis, IN (formerly Mimiho Valley)
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:42 am Reply with quote
Raneth wrote:
But the presentation of that content as titillating material is not justified by the narrative. The camera in AOT does not linger on the survey corp's shapely asses or bouncing breasts as they are being munched by titans. The justification of pornographic material is inherently that viewers should get off on it. The treatment of the scene in episode 1 was not meant to be shocking or to create anger in the viewer on the behalf of Ange, it was meant to arouse. That is why it's objectionable, and, as Theron said, "trashy." My reaction to being expected to get off on a character's degradation was instant disgust and dismissal of the show.

And I can certainly understand that interpretation. However, others who have a high appreciation for fan service have commented that they do not see that scene in episode 1 as arousing, and as such a person myself, I agree with them. You're certainly within your right to be disgusted by the scene regardless, as that scene was certainly meant to be provocative, but when the alleged target audience is saying that a scene isn't what the non-target audience is claiming it to be, I don't think that's insignificant.

And apparently I was in error about how I described that scene in the review. According to what I'm hearing from people who know the manga, she wasn't actually being "probed" (as in a body cavity search), she was being outfitted for the tail-like connections that the Para-Mail pilots can be seen hooking up in episode 2 (see picture below):



Now, frankly, if this really was what was going on then the anime version did a piss-poor job of making that clear and can definitely be faulted for that. One could certainly also quibble about how it's entirely unrealistic to do that way something that would presumably involve delicate nerve connections. (Unless it doesn't actually have to directly connect to the spinal cord or is somehow automated in installing once in the flesh?) Details are definitely lacking there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
ChibiKangaroo



Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 2941
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:57 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
JesuOtaku wrote:
If I see anything that could remotely be construed as a personal attack or exclusionary language in this thread, and I mean anything, the thread will be locked immediately and punitive measures for harassers will be enforced


I think this was what Rederoin was referring to. Where everyone is punished for the actions of a few. Just like at school, where all the students are punished, because a couple of students wouldn't stop talking and the class teacher didn't want to send them to the principal, so the teacher takes away recess or some other perk at school.


I think Hope's preemptive warning was completely warranted. It is perhaps quite appropriate that she used the terminology of the "bad apple," because the proverb says that "one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch." This is something that we see play out often in internet forums. You have one or two bad apples, and their actions have a negative influence on others who might normally be on good behavior. Those others become more egregious in their own conduct due to the influence of the bad apple(s). Shutting that down as definitively as possible is good for everyone. At a minimum, it should remove the possibility of people being influenced in such a manner if more bad apples do pop up.

In regard to Theron's review, I have two thoughts on this.

First of all, I thank Theron for his honesty. I believe him when he said he spent a lot of time agonizing over the preparation of this review, since he probably knew he would get some blowback. I think his review is very honest. He's trying to walk a fine line of giving the show its proper due for whatever it manages to accomplish for its target audience without overtly praising the most objectionable content. Well, at least that's my take. I have to give him credit for that.

Also, in response to some people's feelings about general hypocrisy in covering some of the controversial content in different anime, yes there is some inconsistency in how things get covered. I suppose in some ways that is just the nature of subjective reviews. We had a whole argument about this in another thread where I was complaining about the positive coverage of Kill la Kill compared to Akame ga Kill, despite some of KlK's very objectionable content (much of which also involved rape). I suppose the takeaway there was that some (non-hentai) shows can get away with very overt rape scenes, even ones played for titilation. So in that vein, perhaps Theron is standing on firmer ground in his analysis of Cross Ange's rape scenes than we might be willing to acknowledge.

I could really go off on a whole different tangent here, because if I am being totally honest and allowing for self-reflection, I might be able to say that I am part of the hypocrisy too. I enjoyed Kill la Kill. I don't think I enjoyed it quite as much as a lot of other people, but I did enjoy it. Yet, as I said, it did have rape scenes that I think were played for titilation. At the same time, I do feel offense at the similar scenes in Cross Ange. I suppose I could just say it is a style thing. Maybe KlK was able to immunize itself in some way from real piercing criticism by appearing to be so ridiculous and over-the-top that it could get away with things other anime couldn't. So there's that. At the same time though, maybe a show like Cross Ange will force me to re-evaluate my thoughts on a show like KlK. Maybe I was being too soft on KlK, because it was so stylish and bouncy and whatnot.

So yea, trying to be as self-critical as I possibly can be, I could consider that my aversion to Cross Ange is not fair and I'm just being hypocritical like I claimed other people were in the AgK thread.


Then there's my second thought on this. That thought is maybe more of a hyper analysis of what is happening in Cross Ange, and it's based on what some of the previous posters said about the idea that sexual violation is used in Cross Ange to reform the protagonist. Perhaps there is something about that which is making me more uncomfortable than what I have seen in other shows. For example, in KlK the sexual violation against Satsuki (mainly) and Ryuko (partially) was played more as an attempt to corrupt, dominate or control them. (There was of course that separate scene with Takarada that I won't go into again, but yea that was used for joke purposes.) Maybe it's easier for me to get over that. I mean, yea I was still pretty uncomfortable during those scenes while I was watching KlK, but not in the same way that I feel with Cross Ange. You could also look at the recent controversy over SAO2, where I was complaining a lot about the scene where Sinon is almost raped, but that also feels different. Again, that didn't involve the rape being used to reform the female character and essentially improve her in some way.

I don't know if anyone has a bunch of examples of other shows where rape was used in that manner (other than hentai). I.e., the female lead is a terrible person, and she needs to be broken down to be reformed, and sexual violation is part of that process of breaking her down. Maybe that's really rare outside of hentai, and this show is bridging the gap a bit more than normal between more hard core hentai fantasies and regular shows.

Well, that's a very long-winded analysis.

tl;dnr

I give Theron credit for attempting to be as fair as possible to this show. I think a lot of people, including myself, might be somewhat hypocritical in our analysis of this show. But, I also think there is a good chance that there is something distinctly different about Cross Ange that deserves the more harsh critique.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mangamuscle



Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 2658
Location: Mexico
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:22 pm Reply with quote
jroa's post looks to me like someone who vehemently wants Cross Ange to fail. There has been anime I have vehemently wanted to fail *cough* Toriko *cough* but I will never understand the mindset where people go into forums to try to convince people to "move along, nothing to see here".

Of course CD sales are independent from DVD/BD sales, but they do provide free publicity for the series. Of course controversy in itself is not enough to sell a series, but the stalker numbers provide a pretty good estimate of the kind of sales are to be expected. Of course stalker numbers will change as the plot unfolds and even the last estimate can be 50% under or overestimated, but I think it is safe to say Cross Ange is far from being a total fluke.

Key wrote:
Now, frankly, if this really was what was going on then the anime version did a piss-poor job of making that clear and can definitely be faulted for that.


It reminds me of the time when Ranma 1/2 was broadcast on TV over here a decade ago, they censored the boobies in such a way that people thought something else was going on. In both cases is anybodies guess whether that was the original intention or an unintended effect.

Quote:
One could certainly also quibble about how it's entirely unrealistic to do that way something that would presumably involve delicate nerve connections. (Unless it doesn't actually have to directly connect to the spinal cord or is somehow automated in installing once in the flesh?) Details are definitely lacking there.


If fan and critics acclaimed Full Metal Alchemist (which is set in a parallel 19th century setting) can get away with it, then I see no reason why a setting which has both technology more advanced than ours (those mechs are the wet dream of many air force generals) and magic can get away with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rederoin



Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 1427
Location: Europa
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:27 pm Reply with quote
Quote:


Sunrise doesn't always make hits with their new series. In recent memory, Buddy Complex did not sell well for them at all. Neither did Gundam AGE, despite having the Gundam name. They both failed spectacularly.


Did I say that? You keep on misunderstanding what I say.


This is pointless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SilverTalon01



Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 2402
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:52 pm Reply with quote
Raneth wrote:
But the presentation of that content as titillating material is not justified by the narrative. The camera in AOT does not linger on the survey corp's shapely asses or bouncing breasts as they are being munched by titans. The justification of pornographic material is inherently that viewers should get off on it. The treatment of the scene in episode 1 was not meant to be shocking or to create anger in the viewer on the behalf of Ange, it was meant to arouse. That is why it's objectionable, and, as Theron said, "trashy." My reaction to being expected to get off on a character's degradation was instant disgust and dismissal of the show.

From the review, it sounds like the rest of the show is equally trashy.


So let me get this straight, you've only seen episode 1 and are just getting the rest from the review? Because the camera in Cross Ange does not linger on the pilots breasts or butts while they are being killed by dragons. You'd have to actually have watched it to realize that it like AOT doesn't have sexualized gruesome combat deaths, just gruesome ones.

If you have only seen one episode, that is quite presumptuous I'd say to think you can already tell how the director likes to end episodes. The next episode also ends with a shocking scene. I bet you that we see more of those since he already did it twice in three episodes.

And then if what Theron said is true and they were just fitting her for that cord to control the paramail, I don't even know if I think that scene is that trashy anymore... though perhaps makes it even more poorly done as I have no idea how you could come to that conclusion from only the anime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5823
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:58 pm Reply with quote
ChibiKangaroo wrote:

I think Hope's preemptive warning was completely warranted. It is perhaps quite appropriate that she used the terminology of the "bad apple," because the proverb says that "one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch." This is something that we see play out often in internet forums. You have one or two bad apples, and their actions have a negative influence on others who might normally be on good behavior. Those others become more egregious in their own conduct due to the influence of the bad apple(s). Shutting that down as definitively as possible is good for everyone. At a minimum, it should remove the possibility of people being influenced in such a manner if more bad apples do pop up.


Punishing everyone doesn't make sense. That is what bans are for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zac
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 7912
Location: Anime News Network Technodrome
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:00 pm Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:


Punishing everyone doesn't make sense. That is what bans are for.


You have not been "punished" in any tangible way. You didn't have the permission to personally attack anyone before and it wasn't suddenly taken away from you now.

Hope is saying "follow the rules, this thread will be watched closely because things are already getting crazy". Not unreasonable at all. The "something's been taken away from me, I'm being punished for something someone else did" makes zero sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:53 pm Reply with quote
mangamuscle wrote:

Of course CD sales are independent from DVD/BD sales, but they do provide free publicity for the series.


A very little bit, I suppose. Usually it's the other way around and when more mainstream popular artists are used for the music, the CDs sometimes minimize the connection to the anime. And keep in mind that Mizuki Nana is super popular, so pretty much any CD she makes right now is guaranteed to sell at least moderately well.

Quote:
Of course controversy in itself is not enough to sell a series, but the stalker numbers provide a pretty good estimate of the kind of sales are to be expected. Of course stalker numbers will change as the plot unfolds and even the last estimate can be 50% under or overestimated, but I think it is safe to say Cross Ange is far from being a total fluke.


Stalker estimates are rarely that much off from the estimates near release, or at least not for the decent to big sellers (if that 50% is only 1000-2000 copies, it's clearly not a huge hit; if something is projected to sell around 10k, it's rarely going to end up selling 15k or only 5k). It's usually the ones that are clearly going to be big hits and are in the top ranks for long periods of time that are off by a lot due to a quirk of how the point system works. I know some things recently (like Amazon-exclusive versions of discs) have made Stalker a bit less accurate in some cases, but it's not that unreliable.

You can't use Stalker estimates from the first few weeks a show comes out. Shows usually taper off at some point, especially after the first two weeks. Using those early numbers are what get people to think that Attack on Titan was going to sell over 100k. This is less of an issue for original anime, since fans of existing works are what usually account for preorders in the first week or two which is often before the show has aired, but it still applies to some degree.

Now, sometimes while a show is airing there can suddenly be a spike in preorders due to events in the show. This pretty much never happens right at the end (I'm not aware of any such spikes happening within the last 2 or 3 episodes, but there may be one or two), but it's entirely possible it could happen in the next few weeks. I think the shows that sell 30k+ always or almost always show those indications within the first few episodes, but I think it's a bit more common for shows to make those jumps on the lower end, where a 3-10k jump is a massive change in prospects.

And some shows see spikes when event tickets are announced. If Cross Ange gets one, you'll likely see a huge spike for that, but it probably won't benefit the other volumes much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
msgundam2



Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 271
Location: Indiana USA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:20 pm Reply with quote
I like this show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryanvamp



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 416
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:35 pm Reply with quote
ChibiKangaroo wrote:

Also, in response to some people's feelings about general hypocrisy in covering some of the controversial content in different anime, yes there is some inconsistency in how things get covered. I suppose in some ways that is just the nature of subjective reviews. We had a whole argument about this in another thread where I was complaining about the positive coverage of Kill la Kill compared to Akame ga Kill, despite some of KlK's very objectionable content (much of which also involved rape). I suppose the takeaway there was that some (non-hentai) shows can get away with very overt rape scenes, even ones played for titilation. So in that vein, perhaps Theron is standing on firmer ground in his analysis of Cross Ange's rape scenes than we might be willing to acknowledge.

I could really go off on a whole different tangent here, because if I am being totally honest and allowing for self-reflection, I might be able to say that I am part of the hypocrisy too. I enjoyed Kill la Kill. I don't think I enjoyed it quite as much as a lot of other people, but I did enjoy it. Yet, as I said, it did have rape scenes that I think were played for titilation. At the same time, I do feel offense at the similar scenes in Cross Ange. I suppose I could just say it is a style thing. Maybe KlK was able to immunize itself in some way from real piercing criticism by appearing to be so ridiculous and over-the-top that it could get away with things other anime couldn't. So there's that. At the same time though, maybe a show like Cross Ange will force me to re-evaluate my thoughts on a show like KlK. Maybe I was being too soft on KlK, because it was so stylish and bouncy and whatnot.

So yea, trying to be as self-critical as I possibly can be, I could consider that my aversion to Cross Ange is not fair and I'm just being hypocritical like I claimed other people were in the AgK thread.

...

tl;dnr

I give Theron credit for attempting to be as fair as possible to this show. I think a lot of people, including myself, might be somewhat hypocritical in our analysis of this show. But, I also think there is a good chance that there is something distinctly different about [b]Cross Ange that deserves the more harsh critique.[/b]



I applaud you for making this post. I don't know about the others complaining, but this is EXACTLY what I was asking of the reviewers. Forum users/visitors & reviewers might disagree on a lot of things, and that's perfectly fine. I dare say it's even healthy if it leads to interesting discussions. But just like not every user will post something constructive and intelligently structured, not every reviewer will be exempt of falling in the trap of being "too" subjective about what they're saying and how. Contrary to a regular viewer watching some anime streamed by himself, you could say a reviewer has to always keep his/her bias as controlled as possible, because afterwards the written analysis will have to adress several kinds of individuals.

I completely agree on the Akame ga Kill vs KLK comparison and how both are regarded.

I also didn't want to minimize your whole argument and therefore I included the part in which you play with the hypothesis that indeed Cross Ange truly has content that is presented in a way that you find personally offensive which also leads to a bad reception of the material.
And I have nothing to say about that except that it's quite understandable.

I guess anime is a very tricky medium; there are TONS of series that would make this debate endless and what's most important IMO is to admit that the show might not be targeted at people who enjoy "women's suffering" just like I hope shoujo smut isn't read by women who approve of the rampant unappropiate story beats going on in them.

I mean I doubt most girls find truly acceptable something like "submissive girl who ends up falling in love with a violent asshole that forces himself on her".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 5 of 43

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group