Forum - View topicNEWS: Anime BitTorrent Users Reportedly Sent Notices by ISPs
|
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohawk52 Posts: 3862 Location: Celebrating Lindsey Hawker murder suspect arrest, in Basingstoke, UK. |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
| Fallout2man Posts: 271 Location: San Diego, CA |
||||||||
You're hard to please good sir. Maybe you just don't want to respond when you don't feel you need to moderate the discussion, but it seems like you've yet to really say anything positive. .....Someone needs a hug! :p |
||||||||
MokonaModoki SubscriberPosts: 417 Location: Austin, Texas |
||||||||
The licensing aspect has been a point of confusion with this whole issue, but it actually doesn't factor in. Odex does, in fact (at least as far as they say), have designated agent status from the original copyright holders for some 400 titles via their situation with AVPAS, not from licensing those titles. The fact that the focus of their actions has been (intended to be) Singapore doesn't change that in any way except what their intent is. They just aren't intending to expend resources (i.e. money) on enforcement outside of Singapore, but if they did it should be valid. |
||||||||
| Zac ANN Executive Editor Posts: 4298 Location: Death Star Cocktail Lounge |
||||||||
Say something positive? I didn't realize that was a requirement. Alright, how about this:
I agree with all of this. |
||||||||
| indrik Posts: 365 Location: yonder |
||||||||
Ah yeah- forgot about that. But I thought it was under dispute whether Odex actually had designated agent status for those? |
||||||||
MokonaModoki SubscriberPosts: 417 Location: Austin, Texas |
||||||||
Honestly, we're reaching the limits of what I can pretend to know about the issue, but I think most of the dispute in the past has been with regard to the status of Odex/AVPAS having any right to subpoena identity information associated with IP addresses under Singaporean copyright law (since they lost a court ruling in one case for not being an exclusive licensee of the titles in question). It may be a bizarre twist here that their position could be interpreted as stronger under US (DMCA) law. That's sheer conjecture though. In any case, Odex (as AVPAS) claims to have precisely the required status for the purposes of the DMCA, unless that authorization is limited to southeast asia in any way (and if it is then they certainly aren't saying so). |
||||||||
| Dargonxtc Posts: 4154 Location: Nc5xd7+ スターダストの海洋 |
||||||||
Ah, I see. So in other words, they were looking at everyone first, then determining out of that bunch which would qualify for notices. To where the way I said it, it sounded like they had a certain group in mind first (which they didn't since they were looking at everyone in Singapore), and they were just going the extra step of getting some evidence. Is that right? Better? |
||||||||
| Aresef Posts: 174 Location: MD |
||||||||
| Funnily enough, I'm getting Verizon FiOS installed Saturday.
And you know the situation is desperate when Verizon seems like a relatively responsible company. |
||||||||
ikillchicken SubscriberPosts: 2517 Location: Vancouver - Go Canucks Go! |
||||||||
Well, it may be the turth that very little will come of this and it will be pointless. I'd advise the fansub haters not to start breaking out the champagne just yet. As people have said, theres a solid posibility that this is just a result of a stupid mistake on Odex part. If so, they really have no reason or even ability to actually sue anyone. Also, theres the possibility that this is just a scare tactic. To actually take people to court would take much more time and effort. Infact, IMO the fact that they reported them to the ISP instead if just going right to suing them seems to indicate they won't be at all. Its really just semantics as to wether you should call it likely/possible/etc. but I personally would say that this tells us nothing more than what we already knew about Japan and/or North American companies plans to take action against piracy. |
||||||||
| missing_soul Posts: 44 |
||||||||
| (I still don't speak English so be nice and don't point out my faults.)
Disclaimer: I don't want to defend the fansubbers. However... it's interesting to check out the list of the animes in question: - Suteki Tantei Labyrinth - Mobile Suit Gundam 00 - Seto no Hanayome - Nagasarete Airantou - Shugo Chara! - Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni Kai. I can't say anything about most of them (sorry just not my style) but Nagasarete Airantou and Seto no Hanayome are two series I tried out and failed to finish to watch. As you are all fans here, you can imagine how that feels. No I am not berserk on quality. I will buy Lucky Star, because I find it entertaining and I can list the low cost solutions of that show on two A4 pages (both sides written). No, I am not a moe fan either, usually I don't even think to watch a show like Lucky Star (whatever moe is). However if some studio out there would make another Lucky Star, just copying the script, it'll be quite annoying to watch it. Of course there's a high probability Lucky Star itself is already reusing elements from another storyline, because there's only so much things witch preoccupies a student. But then usually I don't watch shows like Lucky Star, so I suppose that's all right. Perhaps you don't get my point, so... Let's speak about another product from that list. Mobile Suit Gundam 00. Also a series I usually don't watch but for the shake of this discussion. Did you noticed they reused the back story of Sosuke Sagara of FMP (also a fairly recent show) for their principal protagonist with almost no change? It's a blessing Chidori doesn't appears in the show, but after all Mobile Suit Gundam 00 is not a comedy. Also they're mentioning "Celestial Beings' (and the keyword Gundam) in every few minutes with nauseating effectiveness. Besides filler conversations and scenes, the best you can say of the show: the CGI is good. Lost interest after the fifth chapter. I think the industry doesn't really estimates the effect on a fan of buying a show he doesn't like at all. I imagine the response is ready: there are so much bad products and after the great shows we need to sell those too. Isn't that the whole story of Geneon in ten words? Miyazaki doesn't have a problem with his sales. A studio could make bad shows for TV, that's all right, after all there's always another channel or you can take off a book or a DVD from the shelf. But no one should ever try to sell bad shows on DVD because that will kill the fan base. Just as someone who was cheated in a restorant witch serves bad food, your anime fan won't buy the next show if you deliver him a patchwork cut together from other people's ideas and characters. Or deliver a horribly boring "show". I think anime should be labelled. "Just for hardcore Gundam fans who buy everything with the Gundam word on it" "Just for guys who laugh on someone kicked in the balls" (Seto no Hanayome) "Just for fans who like harem anime with no story" (Nagasarete Airantou) etc. The problem is, there's no such a thing as an anime quality label. Remember Haruhi Sizumiya? And the melancholy? After the fifth chapter the show turns out to be boring and low quality, but the distributor succeeded to generate great "buzz" around it. Check out the description made by a fan? But supposedly he is a fan so his opinion is probably biased. Check out ANN's encyclopedia? ANN really has a whole encyclopedia... of backcover descriptions. By the by, streaming the few first chapters won't help to raise the popularity of a bad show. It would only motivate the studios to put more work into the first few chapters. Just like in the case of the terribly boring Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya (it could also motivate them to make a first good DVD then let the fan wait for better episodes and buy the DVDs, like in the case of the terribly boring...). The solution is obvious: stop the fans watching the series. Make them buy it, then feel very sorry about it. Who cares about future sales of someone else's product? |
||||||||
MokonaModoki SubscriberPosts: 417 Location: Austin, Texas |
||||||||
Yep. |
||||||||
Psycho 101 SubscriberPosts: 5229 Location: In the Grumpmobile with Grumpyman fighting crime one pot of coffee at a time. |
||||||||
What a nice image. I honestly have one of those Snapple bottles in my fridge as we speak but now all I can imagine is some English bloke pissing in a urinal and then bottling it. Yum. And I do agree that there should be no milk in your tea. Bleh.
It would be nice if more came of this but even if nothing does it's still a step up then what's gone on so far. To me this shows that the companies are taking this seriously and finally starting to step up to the plate and try and curb fansubs and lessen their problem. Hopefully the companies won't stop here or worse yet start backing down again and heading backwards in terms of progress. |
||||||||
| fighterholic Posts: 9194 |
||||||||
Yes but do you realize how much the Japanese pay for their anime when it's R2? We're talking about two to three times the amount of what you might pay per DVD over here, and often times with less episodes. I agree that fansubs allow people to "sample" the series, but you have to download the entire thing when it comes to Bleach or Naruto? Or even some of the other big name series when their DVDs are out? |
||||||||
| Murasakisuishou Posts: 1469 Location: NE Ohio |
||||||||
In theory, unless (like me) you live in a town that despises young people, and if you politely go to the front desk to ask if they can get a few volumes of manga from another library they look at you like you've just asked for crack, say they're not familiar with the title, and then, when you say something to the effect of "That's why I'm asking you to look for it in another library", all still politely, threaten to kick you out for 'raising your voice'. Tried that once, never did it again. My library is one of those libraries that doesn't believe in books unless the name of the author is bigger than the title. But if you're lucky enough to live in a district with a library that actually wants people under age 40 there, I assume it can be a great resource for trying anime titles without buying. And in regard to the article:
Any more news on this? |
||||||||
| Furudanuki Posts: 1004 |
||||||||
Yes, and it appears darkmirage's info was correct. Here is a newspaper article from Singapore. More info is available on another anime site that I am not allowed to link to here. http://a.imagehost.org/ |
||||||||
| All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group



Subscriber