| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
Abdallah
Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Doha, Qatar
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:51 pm |
|
|
Wow! Library War enters top 10 . Amazing. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Hed

Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 803 Location: Singapore/Melbourne, Australia (Actual join date: February 2008)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:54 pm |
|
|
Yeah that's what I was thinking. If I had to guess that anything from this season was going to break into the list, I would've said Code Geass R2 or Soul Eater.
Anyway, go Library War! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Megiddo
Subscriber
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 560
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:11 pm |
|
|
Looks like Noitamina is still strong =)
Good too, cause I'm really enjoying Library War. |
| Back to top |
|
|
bobber205

Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:06 pm |
|
|
| As others have said, it's great to see Library War in the top 10. |
| Back to top |
|
|
marie-antoinette

Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 2626 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:21 pm |
|
|
| Big Hed wrote: | | Yeah that's what I was thinking. If I had to guess that anything from this season was going to break into the list, I would've said Code Geass R2 or Soul Eater. |
I don't know about Soul Eater, but I know Code Geass R2 hasn't been getting very good ratings. Though of course the strength of the original series was in DVD sales, IIRC. |
| Back to top |
|
|
hikaru004

Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 1833
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:47 pm |
|
|
| Did Soul Eater have a week off? |
| Back to top |
|
|
Zoe

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 893 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:26 pm |
|
|
| hikaru004 wrote: | | Did Soul Eater have a week off? |
No, Soul Eater has never charted. |
| Back to top |
|
|
D Dubbs
Joined: 08 Jan 2008 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:10 pm |
|
|
| Soul Eater's premiere was really bad, actually. It didn't even break a 2.0. But the following week it got in the 2.0s, so thankfully it didn't get prematurely pulled. |
| Back to top |
|
|
hikaru004

Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 1833
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:38 pm |
|
|
| So why is Soul Eater that unpopular given its timeslot? |
| Back to top |
|
|
Ramadahl
Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 323 Location: MK, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:00 pm |
|
|
| hikaru004 wrote: | | So why is Soul Eater that unpopular given its timeslot? |
Because innate quality has a habit of shining through - and vice versa.
I'm surprised to see Library War do so well, considering how mundane it is... but then again, considering other stuff on the list maybe it's not so surprising. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Zoe

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 893 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:06 pm |
|
|
| hikaru004 wrote: | | So why is Soul Eater that unpopular given its timeslot? |
My guess is cause the manga's been around for a long time, and it's not exactly the most kid-friendly show (though it has been toned down a tad). |
| Back to top |
|
|
testorschoice
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 465
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:27 pm |
|
|
| hikaru004 wrote: | | So why is Soul Eater that unpopular given its timeslot? |
Soul Eater actually airs twice a week--once at 6 in the evening, and again after 2 in the morning. You have to add up the ratings of both showings to get a better sense of how well it is doing. Anyways, the 6:00 premiere of Soul Eater did get above 2.0 (2.4) by itself. |
| Back to top |
|
|
kgw

Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 60 Location: Madrid, Spain, EU
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:06 am |
|
|
| You know, it's quite difficult to any series to reach top 10. They need, at least, a 6% share, which is quite difficult. When I looked at Japanese ratings (and I mean surfing through obscure Japanese webs), most "popular" series won't reach 3% or 4% at its best. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Xenofan 29A

Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 374
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:23 am |
|
|
| Evangelion got a 10% at its height, and averaged a 7%, but that's an exception. Generally, the only shows with real popularity are intended for young children. |
| Back to top |
|
|
|