Forum - View topicNEWS: All But 1 Defendant Dropped From Funimation's One Piece Lawsuit
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
enurtsol
Posts: 14746 |
|
|||||
In his FUNimation order severing 1,336 of the 1,337 defendants, Judge Ferguson objected, saying that the defendants had nothing material in common. "There are no allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint that the Defendants are in any way related to each other, or that they acted in concert or as a group in their allegedly infringing actions… Indeed, it seems that the copyright infringement claim against each Defendant is based on the individual acts of each Defendant." Simply saying that everyone used BitTorrent isn't enough to join defendants, and the judge notes that each defendant "will also likely have a different defense." He then cited a judicial decision from West Virgina in which a judge took an axe to a host of P2P porn cases filed there last year. If Stone wants to pursue file-sharing litigation, he can do so—but only by filing "individual complaints against those Does" in the next 30 days. That means a $350 filing fee per defendant, plus mountains of paperwork for each case. In other words, even though the defendants acted identically, they still acted individually. Funi could still go after any number of them - they just have to pay for each separately.
No, that's trademarks, not copyrights.
COICA is coming: Today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing was all about COICA, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act. The bill would give the government legal tools to blacklist a "rogue" website from the Internet's Domain Name System, ban credit card companies from processing US payments to the site, and forbid US-based online ad networks from working with the site. It even directs the government to keep a list of suspect sites, even though no evidence has been presented against them in court. Everyone loves the idea. Democrats love the idea (well, except for Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), who said it was "like using a bunker-busting cluster bomb when what you really need is a precision-guided missile"). Republicans love the idea. And rightsholders really love the idea. In other words, Google could be sued for returning infringing results from The Pirate Bay. In fact, every file-sharing site in the world would have to comply with US law or risk being blackballed from Google, Bing, Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T (who aren't about to risk billions of dollars in potential legal exposure just to provide access to such foreign sites). Even sites already declared legal in other countries—such as Spain's Rojadirecta—could suddenly find themselves curtailed from ad networks and credit card processors, and their domains blocked in the US. Rightsholders won't get everything they want, but it looks increasingly like they'll get something. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) opened the hearing by saying, "I am confident that we will pass legislation to target rogue websites this year. I want to hear from all sides as we move forward, but I refuse to accept that addressing the problem is too difficult because people who want to steal will always find a way." Even Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), an ardent champion of net neutrality and a foe of media consolidation, supports COICA—though he has some concerns. "We need to work together to make sure that any legislation that is introduced this Congress is narrowly tailored and will not unwittingly lead to the blocking of legitimate speech that is protected by the First Amendment," he said. "We also need to make sure that we are giving legitimate US businesses and domestic blogs sufficient due process protections before their sites are suddenly shut down." And when it comes to ISP domain name blocking, he said, "I also think it is essential that we move cautiously before we create a structure that will direct Internet service providers to block content at the domain name level." Still, COICA looks set to advance out of committee, much as it did last fall on a 19-0 vote. |
||||||
SonicRenegade84
Posts: 630 Location: Atlantis! |
|
|||||
Well, nice try, Funimation. But people will be not-so-nice-people and torrent whatever they like. The internet has plenty of spots to torrent anime from. And that's the sad thing.
|
||||||
taster of pork
Posts: 594 Location: My House |
|
|||||
Maybe Funimation should start asking for donations so they can take all 1,336 people to Court. Love to see how the public would react to that.
|
||||||
Melanchthon
Posts: 550 Location: Northwest from Here |
|
|||||
Oh! Who called it? I did! I said way back when this first happened that these joint lawsuit always get thrown out. The judges won't let you sue a thousand random people at once. Man, sometimes I hate being right all the time.
Sorry 'bout that Funimation. You have every right to sue people who violate copyright law. But people have rights too. You just can't just mass sue the internet. /Must suck to be Doe 1 right now |
||||||
person of awesomeness
Posts: 4 Location: Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|||||
Man, I so lucky don't download One Piece, or else i'll be in big trouble, because I see the ISP I use on the list...
|
||||||
PetrifiedJello
Posts: 3782 |
|
|||||
I'm quite sure Techdirt, Ars, EFF, Slashdot, and many other sites called it long before you did. On topic now: LOL @ posts in this thread. Some of you need to be slapped upside the head for even thinking about allowing copyright to be a criminal offense. Rue the day cops ever bust down my door for allowing a group of anime fans to watch my purchased BD on my 60" TV just because the group consisted of 6 people. Yeah, that's in copyright. Perhaps you actually read the thing before you make such foolish statements. |
||||||
prime_pm
Posts: 2333 Location: Your Mother's Bedroom |
|
|||||
I'm kinda glad that I haven't used a P2P program for over a year now. Haven't had a single virus since quitting.
Not that I plan to toss the dvds I made before my hard drive crashed a year ago, of course. That's just silly. |
||||||
noobiesnack
Posts: 34 |
|
|||||
on the topic of COICA,
I cannot wait for them to pass it, even though I doubt it will pass. reason being: because the wording of it means sites like Google, Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, hell even Amazon could be targeted. I want to see the worlds reaction to all of those sites getting backlogged by the government because of copyright claims. I wonder which crazy geek will suicide bomb a government office first when the Internets get taken away from him. You might ask why all those sites can be targeted by the the new COICA bill? Simply because all that is required by the bill is for a site to have the possibility to cause piracy and for a company to claim copyrights against that site. No questions asked, the site will get taken down in a matter of 'guilty before proven innocent'. You may also ask, 'why the hell would anyone suicide bomb over the internet?' Simply because people are crazy. The internet has become a huge place and those websites are some of the top sites. Those sites getting taken down by the government will spring up anger against the government and may cause some crazy geeks who have no lives other than the internet to feel its an attack on their live and will attempt to defend it by any means. (even if it means setting an example by means of explosions) Now, you might think im crazy, but you cannot deny that people have killed and blown up things over less. You piss off a person with a brain, bad things are bound to happen. At the least, even if that stuff doesnt happen I almost guarantee there is going to be a mass march on the Capitals involving millions of people in protest once people realize just what these laws can accomplish. As for me, I cant wait to just sit here and watch as things happen. There are plenty of productive things I can do while the internet is in Chaos thanks to the government becoming more controlling, just like dem communist that we spent 4 decades fighting against. Oh well, im done now... |
||||||
mangamuscle
Posts: 2658 Location: Mexico |
|
|||||
I hope you are under the influence of powerful drugs, otherwise you have lost it. In the real world geeks do DDoS attacks, infect corporate network with worms, sign petitions, call their representative. Wait, maybe there is a chance, maybe some geek will implant a bomb in your neck and make you walk into a government building, that might do the trick. |
||||||
cyberbeing
Posts: 135 |
|
|||||
ANN's list of ISPs is missing a few entries. The full list had 50 ISPs, ANN's list only has 46?
The missing 4 appear to be: Alaska Communications Systems Group Everest Connections, LLC GCI Communications SureWest Broadband Full list below:
|
||||||
staroconner
Posts: 2 |
|
|||||
It will be interesting to see how Funi reacts to this. In the ars interview with Stone (the lawyer representing Funi), Stone made it sound like Funi was experimenting with this lawsuit, which suggests they would pursue more suits if it worked. Will Funi consider the publicity from this case as a success?
The bigger question I wish someone (read:ANN) would ask Funi is: Given what happened with the RIAA/MPAA lawsuits why did you think this would stop piracy? More importantly, why do you think this will increase sales? Ending piracy does little good if sales don't increase. |
||||||
FanFicGuru
Posts: 159 |
|
|||||
$350 filing fee X 1,336 defendants= $467,600 just to bring them all to court.
Yeah...no. Don't think that's going to happen. Unfortunately no company has the money to really go after all of the people who torrent and download this stuff illegally, especially not the anime industry (sadly...) So what will happen instead is they will try to make an example of this one person as a cautionary tale for the individuals out there who continue to download anime illegally. The cycle continues. |
||||||
Kruszer
Posts: 7981 Location: Minnesota, USA |
|
|||||
That also seems like a logical choice too. |
||||||
ZipZapZopTitania
Posts: 132 |
|
|||||
Oh gawd, Penn State is on that list. You naughty Nittany Lions. I punish you with my fail alliteration.
I always crack up when I hear that they sued 1337 h4ck325. Extra five points awarded to your house, FUNi, that was win~ Although it was a bit fail dropping 1336 of them, I'm interested to see how it plays out with that poor Kearny guy. (C'mon, guys, you know I'm on the industry's side. By "poor," I just mean he's all awone in da wawsuit...) |
||||||
Hiyugi
Posts: 59 |
|
|||||
He/She had it coming. He/She Knew they were the one uploading all that stuff. I wonder what kind of person that did that like occupation, background, any previous criminal acts and such. Maybe it might be easier to narrow down those kindof people in the future that are most likely to upload files like that. |
||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group