×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Naruto.com, Crunchyroll, Hulu Begin Shippūden Streams


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dragon695



Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Posts: 1377
Location: Clemson, SC
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:46 pm Reply with quote
Brass2TheMax wrote:
This free service thing is a bit deceiving. You only really get to see EXACTLY what the Japanese viewers see if you pay, because if you don't you can't see it in 480p as they do, you see a lesser product of lower quality. So it's fine for a pay service, but it's far from the equivalent of seeing it just as the Japanese people do for free. Also, even though you choose "H264" in the viewing options, you're not seeing the video encoded in H264, you're seeing a flash format video encoded from an H264 source, which will ALWAYS be lower quality, having gone through the extra conversion. Not to mention the fact that on a lightning-fast internet connection and a monster machine, the softsubs are still badly out of sync and look horrible.

It would be more cost-effective to buy the DVD's rather than to pay for a membership on Crunchyroll to be able to watch the videos in full 480p (as they are broadcast in Japan) as many times as you want, while owning a copy. With this service, sure, pay ~$60 to watch all you want for about a year, but in the end, you don't have a copy to watch again a few years into the future should you want to relive the experience (this goes for any show on Crunchyroll). Basically, you have nothing but your memories of the show, which will of course, eventually fade. In that regard, it's a total no-brainer to just buy the DVD's.

Unfortunately, for me, I won't buy the DVD's for this show, because I find most fansubs to produce a higher quality product than a "slap-and-go" operation like, say, Unfunimation.

Fansubs are still here to stay, and it'll be a heck of a long time before their quality can be matched by official vendors. I pray the day comes, but I just don't see it happening soon.

I know this place is full of dub-whores, so I bet I'll get flamed due to tl;dr and assumptions about myself that probably aren't true. You know, the usual stuff.


I couldn't agree more. In fact, I am getting a little sick of the morality police posting in all these threads lecturing us about how we need to pay the Japanese for this content. Pay who? Studio Pierrot? TV Tokyo? Shueisha? I don't and I won't pay them a dime because I know that the advertising from the initial broadcast pays for all costs of production x 20. A 30-second spot during TV Tokyo prime time costs a small fortune.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samuelp
Industry Insider


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: San Antonio, USA
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:23 pm Reply with quote
dragon695 wrote:
Brass2TheMax wrote:
This free service thing is a bit deceiving. You only really get to see EXACTLY what the Japanese viewers see if you pay, because if you don't you can't see it in 480p as they do, you see a lesser product of lower quality. So it's fine for a pay service, but it's far from the equivalent of seeing it just as the Japanese people do for free. Also, even though you choose "H264" in the viewing options, you're not seeing the video encoded in H264, you're seeing a flash format video encoded from an H264 source, which will ALWAYS be lower quality, having gone through the extra conversion. Not to mention the fact that on a lightning-fast internet connection and a monster machine, the softsubs are still badly out of sync and look horrible.

It would be more cost-effective to buy the DVD's rather than to pay for a membership on Crunchyroll to be able to watch the videos in full 480p (as they are broadcast in Japan) as many times as you want, while owning a copy. With this service, sure, pay ~$60 to watch all you want for about a year, but in the end, you don't have a copy to watch again a few years into the future should you want to relive the experience (this goes for any show on Crunchyroll). Basically, you have nothing but your memories of the show, which will of course, eventually fade. In that regard, it's a total no-brainer to just buy the DVD's.

Unfortunately, for me, I won't buy the DVD's for this show, because I find most fansubs to produce a higher quality product than a "slap-and-go" operation like, say, Unfunimation.

Fansubs are still here to stay, and it'll be a heck of a long time before their quality can be matched by official vendors. I pray the day comes, but I just don't see it happening soon.

I know this place is full of dub-whores, so I bet I'll get flamed due to tl;dr and assumptions about myself that probably aren't true. You know, the usual stuff.


I couldn't agree more. In fact, I am getting a little sick of the morality police posting in all these threads lecturing us about how we need to pay the Japanese for this content. Pay who? Studio Pierrot? TV Tokyo? Shueisha? I don't and I won't pay them a dime because I know that the advertising from the initial broadcast pays for all costs of production x 20. A 30-second spot during TV Tokyo prime time costs a small fortune.

You have no idea what you are talking about. 95% of anime makes nearly 0 television advertising revenue. Naruto in particular makes up almost all of its profit on merchandise sales, not on advertising, which consists almost entirely of products from the company who makes the anime itself anyway. The business model in Japan is way different than it is in the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Top Gun



Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 4575
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:52 pm Reply with quote
dragon695 wrote:

I couldn't agree more. In fact, I am getting a little sick of the morality police posting in all these threads lecturing us about how we need to pay the Japanese for this content. Pay who? Studio Pierrot? TV Tokyo? Shueisha? I don't and I won't pay them a dime because I know that the advertising from the initial broadcast pays for all costs of production x 20. A 30-second spot during TV Tokyo prime time costs a small fortune.

Tell me how that works when the series' production companies/partners are generally the ones paying for that very advertising space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xanas



Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 2058
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:58 pm Reply with quote
It's really surprising people can know so little and refuse to buy because of it.

You know I'm not opposed to fansubs (and I'm pretty anti-copyright generally) but you really need to get facts straight before you start talking about what prices are too high.

Subscription services online will be a great way to watch things in higher definition in the future. Right now I think the quality is still a bit low, but I don't think that will always be the case.

The bad thing about it would only be if they started using it instead of DVDs, but I don't see that ever happening so everyone should look at it like they look at the fees they pay for cable service. (And you get the added bonus that it's on demand, unlike cable where you have to pay attention to a stupid schedule).

The quality will increase given time. Selection will also increase (and has quite a bit already). I'm not personally using these services yet, though I've intended to be watching Shikibane Hime on them (there were more interesting shows not on them like Toradora! and ef - a tale of melodies).

I think eventually this will be a great thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
sdhd



Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 169
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:16 am Reply with quote
Are people in denial of the Japanese people paying to watch anime in their country? In the states we would have to pay for cable to watch anime on Cartoon Network/Adult Swim and Sci-fi. The only place where people are not paying for anime is on the internet watching fansub.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:26 am Reply with quote
sdhd wrote:
Since fansubs have been around a long time. People are used to fansub's quality and translation. That is the standards many people are basing Crunchyroll quality and subtitles to those of fansubs. This is a starting point that the Japanese companies need to improve and improve fast. Otherwise their sole purpose of partnering with Crunchyroll is meaningless. People will prefer to watch fansub over theirs.

There are a lot of different types of anime fan in the fandom so everyone have their own ideas as to what is perfect quality and transalation. Plus, the people who like watching dub in the Japanese sense or Americanized version.

Unless the Japanese release 4 types of subtitles translation which will satisfied 4 different groups of people, people will never be happy.

(1) wants the karaoke opening and ending song, the Japanese translation with honorifics, and footnotes
(2) wants translation of the opening and ending songs, with Japanese translation to be accurate as possible
(3) opening and ending songs not necessary be translated, the Japanese translation to be accurate as possible
(4) opening and ending songs to be Americanized, and localized the translation

The video quality to be top notch.

It's hard to please the fandom.

This is my observation of the fandom. Sorry if I forgot anyone. No need to take it personally.


Well, I support both CR (even though I think there are issues) and fansubs so I don't think they're mutually exclusive Very Happy But the fact that they're using real softsubs (rather than a very limited format like dvd vobsubs) would allow for that flexibility. Although I think the main rationale is to allow effecient translations and subtitle delivery for other languages which they plan to expand on. But that flexibility would allow them to offer a v2 release for example of a version with translated signs "in-place" (next to the actual sign on screen) if there was demand for it. They could also offer an extra subtitle track that could contain extra notes as another example.

It's actually an industry-first as far as I know and it seems like they're also using the same methods used in fansubbing.. the whole { comments } bug reminds me of VLC.. which I hope they're not using
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samuelp
Industry Insider


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: San Antonio, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:50 am Reply with quote
configspace wrote:
sdhd wrote:
Since fansubs have been around a long time. People are used to fansub's quality and translation. That is the standards many people are basing Crunchyroll quality and subtitles to those of fansubs. This is a starting point that the Japanese companies need to improve and improve fast. Otherwise their sole purpose of partnering with Crunchyroll is meaningless. People will prefer to watch fansub over theirs.

There are a lot of different types of anime fan in the fandom so everyone have their own ideas as to what is perfect quality and transalation. Plus, the people who like watching dub in the Japanese sense or Americanized version.

Unless the Japanese release 4 types of subtitles translation which will satisfied 4 different groups of people, people will never be happy.

(1) wants the karaoke opening and ending song, the Japanese translation with honorifics, and footnotes
(2) wants translation of the opening and ending songs, with Japanese translation to be accurate as possible
(3) opening and ending songs not necessary be translated, the Japanese translation to be accurate as possible
(4) opening and ending songs to be Americanized, and localized the translation

The video quality to be top notch.

It's hard to please the fandom.

This is my observation of the fandom. Sorry if I forgot anyone. No need to take it personally.


Well, I support both CR (even though I think there are issues) and fansubs so I don't think they're mutually exclusive Very Happy But the fact that they're using real softsubs (rather than a very limited format like dvd vobsubs) would allow for that flexibility. Although I think the main rationale is to allow effecient translations and subtitle delivery for other languages which they plan to expand on. But that flexibility would allow them to offer a v2 release for example of a version with translated signs "in-place" (next to the actual sign on screen) if there was demand for it. They could also offer an extra subtitle track that could contain extra notes as another example.

It's actually an industry-first as far as I know and it seems like they're also using the same methods used in fansubbing.. the whole { comments } bug reminds me of VLC.. which I hope they're not using

They've actually already fixed that bug, and the font rendering has improved as well... (still not perfect, though).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
britannicamoore



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 2618
Location: Out.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:03 am Reply with quote
Whoa. Not feeling their text at all.
Also: was it just me because mine skipped, and when I restarted the video if I tried to skip ahead it'd end up on the right scene but three or four lines ahead.

Normally, I really don't have a problem with quality. But I can get better for free (not their free either) so i'll stick with that.

Good luck to them though, some people might actually want or need their service.

And these posts have been tame. Wait until you see the real morality do-it-my-way-or-the-highway folks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
bayoab



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Posts: 831
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:22 am Reply with quote
configspace wrote:
Given CR's removal of user content and some people's screams here to do the same on youtube and veoh, I find the recent news of Kadokawa's revenue from user-uploaded content on youtube pretty ironic. Maybe CR could do the same where they can strike a deal with the studios themselves if possible (bypassing large capital entities like d-rights and MFI) to allow user content and have a major portion of the ad revenue be funneled back to the studios.

When they say user-uploaded content for Kadokawa, they mean MAD videos, fan creations based on existing material (Gender-changed Haruhi), AMVs and the like. They do not mean the uploading of full episodes which are what most people are calling to be removed (and was 99% of CR's content). Most places would probably would love to have this kind of material too but not all studios agree about this and, as Kadokawa discovered, there are many pitfalls and issues that pop up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brass2TheMax



Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 65
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:45 am Reply with quote
A typical fansub group of rag-tag people using their own spare time (without being paid to do so) can put in a days work and churn out a really high quality product. Then why can't a service like Crunchyroll whose existence is pretty much now dedicated to such a similar service keep up with the competition? Someone made an example referring to how digi-subs used to be way back when as an example of how this service is new and has room to evolve. NOT SO. The technologies used by CR to churn out this product has been around for years now, there is really no excuse not to be able to competently match exactly what we have with fansubs right now. If there is any limitation present, it's that fact that they play their videos through a flash player, and you don't have (legal) access to the physical files for download.

The day I start getting my anime from sites like Crunchyroll is the day that they start releasing episodes for download via BitTorrent, encoded in H264 at the native airing resolution with AAC or Vorbis audio, with softsub tracks. I'll accept nothing less, when it comes to my anime viewing experience, this is my minimum expectation (higher expectations would include Blu-Ray releases). I won't consider a streaming solution at all.

Besides, if I pay for the service and get closer to what I'd like to see, in a few years time, CR might not even exist anymore for all we know, and the content I payed to see will be gone forever. Literally, cash disappears into thin air. At least if I buy DVD's I have something tangible years down the road. That's much more valuable to me. At worst, I can at least archive fansubs for future viewing.

The concept of renting intangible things like computer files is complete BS, and companies only offer such services because they know people will pay for them... Most of which do later regretting it. Just like WoW subscriptions, hehe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samuelp
Industry Insider


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: San Antonio, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:50 am Reply with quote
Brass2TheMax wrote:
A typical fansub group of rag-tag people using their own spare time (without being paid to do so) can put in a days work and churn out a really high quality product. Then why can't a service like Crunchyroll whose existence is pretty much now dedicated to such a similar service keep up with the competition? Someone made an example referring to how digi-subs used to be way back when as an example of how this service is new and has room to evolve. NOT SO. The technologies used by CR to churn out this product has been around for years now, there is really no excuse not to be able to competently match exactly what we have with fansubs right now. If there is any limitation present, it's that fact that they play their videos through a flash player, and you don't have (legal) access to the physical files for download.

The day I start getting my anime from sites like Crunchyroll is the day that they start releasing episodes for download via BitTorrent, encoded in H264 at the native airing resolution with AAC or Vorbis audio, with softsub tracks. I'll accept nothing less, when it comes to my anime viewing experience, this is my minimum expectation (higher expectations would include Blu-Ray releases). I won't consider a streaming solution at all.

Besides, if I pay for the service and get closer that what I'd like to see, in a few years time, CR might not even exist anymore for all we know, and the content I payed to see will be gone forever. Literally, cash disappears into thin air. At least if I buy DVD's I have something tangible years down the road. That's much more valuable to me. At worst, I can at least archive fansubs for future viewing.

You realize that even the Japanese don't get that. Digital broadcasts are interlaced mpeg2 files that are digitally encrypted and cannot be legally copied in full HD quality except to a single blu-ray (which is then not copyable).
The transport streams (which you seem to think you deserve) are illegal to obtain unencrypted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Brass2TheMax



Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 65
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:57 am Reply with quote
samuelp wrote:
Brass2TheMax wrote:
A typical fansub group of rag-tag people using their own spare time (without being paid to do so) can put in a days work and churn out a really high quality product. Then why can't a service like Crunchyroll whose existence is pretty much now dedicated to such a similar service keep up with the competition? Someone made an example referring to how digi-subs used to be way back when as an example of how this service is new and has room to evolve. NOT SO. The technologies used by CR to churn out this product has been around for years now, there is really no excuse not to be able to competently match exactly what we have with fansubs right now. If there is any limitation present, it's that fact that they play their videos through a flash player, and you don't have (legal) access to the physical files for download.

The day I start getting my anime from sites like Crunchyroll is the day that they start releasing episodes for download via BitTorrent, encoded in H264 at the native airing resolution with AAC or Vorbis audio, with softsub tracks. I'll accept nothing less, when it comes to my anime viewing experience, this is my minimum expectation (higher expectations would include Blu-Ray releases). I won't consider a streaming solution at all.

Besides, if I pay for the service and get closer that what I'd like to see, in a few years time, CR might not even exist anymore for all we know, and the content I payed to see will be gone forever. Literally, cash disappears into thin air. At least if I buy DVD's I have something tangible years down the road. That's much more valuable to me. At worst, I can at least archive fansubs for future viewing.

You realize that even the Japanese don't get that. Digital broadcasts are interlaced mpeg2 files that are digitally encrypted and cannot be legally copied in full HD quality except to a single blu-ray (which is then not copyable).
The transport streams (which you seem to think you deserve) are illegal to obtain unencrypted.


1. I never said I "deserved" anything. I acknowledge that I'm leeching via fansubs and that it's wrong. Don't make assumptions about me please.

2. What the Japanese DO get is much better than what Crunchyroll can offer. Interlaced MPEG-2 beats the crap out of what CR has to offer, other details aside. I'd like to get as close to that kind of experience as I can when watching anime, no matter what the means, and CR, even as a legal alternative to fansubs, cannot offer me that.

I'm not looking to talk about right and wrong, simply (details aside) how I can see what they see, or as close to that as possible. Legal or not. I'd LOVE to embrace a legal solution, but there isn't one. Trust me, I'm on your side when I say I hope there is one someday for those of us trapped overseas here in Canada (or the US if it applies). CR is off to a good start, but it's not there yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:55 am Reply with quote
samuelp wrote:
You realize that even the Japanese don't get that. Digital broadcasts are interlaced mpeg2 files that are digitally encrypted and cannot be legally copied in full HD quality except to a single blu-ray (which is then not copyable).
The transport streams (which you seem to think you deserve) are illegal to obtain unencrypted.


For all channels or just the cable/premium ones? In the US, OTA HD signals are still fine. As far as legality goes..... well, all I have to say is that legality != ethics
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:35 am Reply with quote
bayoab wrote:
When they say user-uploaded content for Kadokawa, they mean MAD videos, fan creations based on existing material (Gender-changed Haruhi), AMVs and the like. They do not mean the uploading of full episodes which are what most people are calling to be removed (and was 99% of CR's content). Most places would probably would love to have this kind of material too but not all studios agree about this and, as Kadokawa discovered, there are many pitfalls and issues that pop up.


Well we don't know the breakdown of the revenue by content and I'm sure as time passes more would shift towards the MAD/AMV type content as more people would have seen the full eps. But they would receive revenue from fan uploaded episodes just as well, so it makes no difference if you look at it from a black box perspective. And they certainly seem to tolerate such uploads it seems...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samuelp
Industry Insider


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: San Antonio, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:24 pm Reply with quote
configspace wrote:
samuelp wrote:
You realize that even the Japanese don't get that. Digital broadcasts are interlaced mpeg2 files that are digitally encrypted and cannot be legally copied in full HD quality except to a single blu-ray (which is then not copyable).
The transport streams (which you seem to think you deserve) are illegal to obtain unencrypted.


For all channels or just the cable/premium ones? In the US, OTA HD signals are still fine. As far as legality goes..... well, all I have to say is that legality != ethics

All of them. All digital TV, even free to air stations, is encrypted. Normally you get a BCAS card with the purchase of any TV that has a digital tuner included with it for decoding purposes, but no legal hardware manufacturer makes something that lets you rip the streams.
That sort of thing might actually be illegal in the US (it'd be considered a violation of the freedom of the public airwaves) but in Japan they're locked down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 6 of 9

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group