| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
StudioToledo
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 847
Location: Toledo, U.S.A.
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:47 am
|
 |
|
| The Goron Marshall wrote: | |
That's slightly different though. The nude picture didn't show in the original theatrical release, but was added in the first editions of the VHS tapes. This is different because the word "condom" was apparently included in the very original episode, and not added later. |
No, it was on the original camera negatives itself, I know a few who told me that personally.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polycell
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:39 am
|
|
|
|
At any rate, it doesn't really matter when the offending elements were introduced; what matters is how the company reacts when informed: if they refuse to change it, there'd be a major ruckus because ultimately we're talking about a kids' show; by replacing the offending frames, they can avoid damage to their reputation by blaming some prankster and playing innocent(after all, the change quite literally has zero impact on the show itself). Simply put, it's just good business sense.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
dewlwieldthedarpachief
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 751
Location: Canada
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:51 am
|
|
|
|
The sentence in question appears to be "負荷がコンドームの時", preceded by what looks like "交尾回路で…電". So, "The (electrical?) load is (at?) the time of the condom" and something about a "copulating circuit".
This sounds like an amazing invention, or perhaps it's touching on robocat reproduction? Why isn't this a documentary?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Wooga
Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 916
Location: Tucson
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:46 am
|
|
|
| GATSU wrote: | So it's basically like Lion King and "sex".  |
Naww, it was spelling out sfx, or special effects, since it was a special effects animation. ('but it was in the da vinci code it must be true!')
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polycell
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:08 am
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised if they stuck it there expecting people to see an extra line.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Sunday Silence
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 2047
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:16 am
|
|
|
| dewlwieldthedarpachief wrote: | | The sentence in question appears to be "負荷がコンドームの時", preceded by what looks like "交尾回路で…電". So, "The (electrical?) load is (at?) the time of the condom" and something about a "copulating circuit".
This sounds like an amazing invention, or perhaps it's touching on robocat reproduction? Why isn't this a documentary? |
Seeing it in that context, I'd just as easily dismiss it as bad engrish.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Zin5ki
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 6680
Location: London, UK
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:09 pm
|
|
|
| enurtsol wrote: | Hahaha.......... Animators do these all the time. They can get pretty bored and have a sense of humor too! |
An infamous urban legend concerning Jessica Rabbit springs quite readily to mind.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
StudioToledo
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 847
Location: Toledo, U.S.A.
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:45 pm
|
|
|
| Sunday Silence wrote: |
| dewlwieldthedarpachief wrote: | | The sentence in question appears to be "負荷がコンドームの時", preceded by what looks like "交尾回路で…電". So, "The (electrical?) load is (at?) the time of the condom" and something about a "copulating circuit".
This sounds like an amazing invention, or perhaps it's touching on robocat reproduction? Why isn't this a documentary? |
Seeing it in that context, I'd just as easily dismiss it as bad engrish. |
Seems like it, I'm still not sure what Astrid Lindgren had to to with this assignment being written out.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
dewlwieldthedarpachief
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 751
Location: Canada
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:16 pm
|
|
|
| Sunday Silence wrote: |
| dewlwieldthedarpachief wrote: | | The sentence in question appears to be "負荷がコンドームの時", preceded by what looks like "交尾回路で…電". So, "The (electrical?) load is (at?) the time of the condom" and something about a "copulating circuit".
This sounds like an amazing invention, or perhaps it's touching on robocat reproduction? Why isn't this a documentary? |
Seeing it in that context, I'd just as easily dismiss it as bad engrish. |
It might be just nonsensical, but dismissing Japanese phrases for their poor English may also not be above reproach.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
