Forum - View topicANNCast - Moe Money, Moe Problems
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dorcas_Aurelia
Posts: 5344 Location: Philly |
|
|||||||||||
Quotes taken from the Moon Phase liner notes of volumes 3 through 6 respectively. Not responding to anyone in particular, just copied these from an old post I made because they seem relevant. |
||||||||||||
Ojamajo LimePie
Posts: 765 |
|
|||||||||||
Osaka was the Runner-Up in the 2002 SaiMoe Tournament. She only lost to Kinomoto Sakura (by less than 50 votes!) |
||||||||||||
CareyGrant
Posts: 453 |
|
|||||||||||
Why isn't Mike Toole announcing for pro football or baseball? He's got the pipes for it.
I'd rather listen to him announce a game than Ken "Hawk" Harrelson for the Chi Sox. Although, I'd rather listen to anyone besides Ken Harrelson announce. |
||||||||||||
agila61
Posts: 3213 Location: NE Ohio |
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Deviant_scarlet
Posts: 21 |
|
|||||||||||
Its no surprise that "Moe" has become a sub-genre in Anime. Let's not forget Japan's culture places a lot of emphasize in all things cute. Hello Kitty, anyone?
Also, the reason why so many Western anime fans(especially guys) are hostile to moe is because of how we still associate "cuteness" with "femininity" in the Western World. For instance, something like "Clannad" would easily be perceived as being "girly", because of our perception of what is "Feminine", and/or "Masculine." Same would apply to 30-50% all anime. Its going to take a while for our social norms to change. (Let's not forget that our views on sex have still yet to evolve in part thanks to our religious roots) Anyway, I don't mind moe. In fact, I'm quite a sucker for it. Just so long as it has humor and/or story, I don't mind moe being present in the medium. But of course, anime should remain diverse at all times. I don't want it to be dominated by one genre over another(whether its Moe, Ecchi, Fanservice, Shonen, Shoujo, Seinin, etc). Last edited by Deviant_scarlet on Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:44 am; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||||
GATSU
Posts: 15296 |
|
|||||||||||
Can I throw in my two cents now, Keonyn? :P Pretty please?
unready: Leo said he was into Kurosawa and Miyazaki. Nolan's only indirectly acknowledged Paprika. [I.E. they got someone who said he said it, but no direct quotes.] But since he hasn't challenged that story, we're to assume he was inspired by it for now, even though he won't openly admit it. In fact at Deadline, he still referred to Inception as "something the audience hadn't seen before". :roll: brand: Yeah, but Ikuhara didn't call Utena "original". And Scott Pilgrim looks like every other early 2000s manga-inspired web-comic, except that it's targeted to hipsters. Ironically, though, I did dig the movie. Zac: Um, Darren himself acknowledged that there are similar elements to both films. |
||||||||||||
feitian
Posts: 27 |
|
|||||||||||
I love you guys and all, but this episode makes me head hurt.
Its rare but its somewhat refreshing for once I feel like everyone on the show as pulling it out of their butt, like one of those moral panic round table in the news. Personally I define "moe" as "cute". If you replace all the instance in which a character is described as "moe" with "cute", the meaning probably will not change. This is where I leaves this term. In general though, I dislike this particular label being used to describe a show. It makes them too easily dismissed for someone to make substantive critical analysis of its problems. Though considering some of the crap that came out, I can't really blame people for being dismissive. >.>; |
||||||||||||
Kaioshin_Sama
Posts: 1215 |
|
|||||||||||
One point that the crew for this podcast mentioned that I tend to agree with and yet somehow still baffles me even with the explanations provided in the podcast is how it seems like some moe fans (particularly those on the internet ) will take what is a niche interest and try to sell it as top shelf masterpiece quality craftsmanship. This to me just seems equally as bizarre and foreign as it seems it is to Zac.
Case in point, the Kyoani catalogue of moe shows. From the Key stuff to Lucky Star and K-On to even Haruhi I just cannot grasp how these works are consistently held up, seemingly by the majority of the current fandom of the day, as a defining gold standard to which all anime ought to aspire, and I just don't get it or how I'm supposed to react to that other than to say, "wait a minute, these shows have their appeal to certain sects and their various merits, but that's disrespectful to all the other works that have come before it". It doesn't help that the internet anime fandom of the day seems to refuse to critique these Kyoani moe shows the same way any average fan I know off the internet will, and that they regularly go so far as to vehemently attempt to defend them when I can pinpoint various issues with them from the character portrayals to inconsistent pacing and plotting that don't stand up to any real counterarguments. To make matters worse, after vaguely responding to my points about these works pitfalls, these fans are often willing to go so far as to turn around yet again without even blinking and call these shows "perfect". Even more bizarre to me is how they seem to regularly turn around yet another time shortly after to heap criticism on just about every other work they come across, even if those shows have the same issues I pointed out with the Kyoani moe shows. Like how Zac describes it it all feels extremely alien and I swear if I had any other friends who were still interested in anime I would probably take my fandom off the internet and just hang out with them and enjoy the works we used to watch back in the day because it seems like I have nothing in common with the anime fans of today that make the internet their forum. |
||||||||||||
SonicRenegade84
Posts: 630 Location: Atlantis! |
|
|||||||||||
I honestly don't know anyone that thinks Osaka is "cute" or "moe" itself. She's just that lovable ditz that............wait, let me guess. That's moe too. And wait, 2002? Well, of course she'd come in second. She came from the one of the most popular animes of that yeah. |
||||||||||||
Megiddo
Posts: 8360 Location: IL |
|
|||||||||||
Heh, as vehement as my support has been of Air TV (as I said it's one of my favorite series), ironically I have recently felt the vitriol of some KyoAni/Haruhi fans when I said that Disappearance of Haruhi Suzumiya may be the most boring anime movie I have ever watched. After all, at least Angel's Egg was less than an hour and a half long. So I can certainly agree with you that there are a lot KyoAni fans who seem to put their works on a podium.
|
||||||||||||
MorwenLaicoriel
Posts: 1617 Location: Colorado |
|
|||||||||||
Lovable ditz is hella moe from what I've seen. |
||||||||||||
SonicRenegade84
Posts: 630 Location: Atlantis! |
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
MorwenLaicoriel
Posts: 1617 Location: Colorado |
|
|||||||||||
You could probably find someone that thinks of cheese as moe, I guess, although the anime producers who bank on the term to sell product have probably not thought of that yet. As far as I know. (Now just watch, someone will come along and prove me wrong.) you've lost me on your logic, though. Anything is moe, and...thus...that's what's....destroying anime? Because that honestly doesn't sound smart at all. That makes it sound like even genuinely good shows are destroying anime. Because of a label. Again, I think part of the problem with moe as a marketable concept is that it's trying to take something that used to (perhaps?) mean a personal reaction to something and trying to boil that down to traits as a way to find a sure-fire, and...well, a group of the fandom eats it up. It's not that people find things moe, is that it's being used as a way to promote an anime outside of, say, good storytelling. To use a personal example, I like megane guys. So when I see a character like Seishin from Shiki or Kyouya from Ouran High School Host Club I'm way more likely to pay attention to them. That's silly, probably, but it's not going to really hurt anime in any way. The problem would be if I went out and went gaga over, say...Four-Eyed Prince for the sole fact that it features a megane character as the main love interest, regardless of the fact that the plot is pretty cliché and there's been dozens of shoujo manga that have told similar plots much more skillfully, that would be kinda bad. Particularly if I pour a bunch of money into that product and demand that more bishounen with glasses pop up into works, and if it's revealed later in the backstory that the character doesn't actually need glasses but wears them as a fashion accessory and I threaten to cancel my pre-order of the plushie version of Megane Character No. 9 unless the purity of his glasses-wearing-ness is conformed to, and then the creator of the work buckles...that would be the cancer killing anime. ...That example went to a really insane place, but...does that make any sense at all? (Maybe?) tl;dr - It's the market (fans and the industry) that made moe a problem. Not the pure fact that the concept of moe exists. |
||||||||||||
Kaioshin_Sama
Posts: 1215 |
|
|||||||||||
You actually went and told them that?! Truth be told I said about the same thing and they could not grasp that anyone could find that movie unevenly paced and dreadfully lacking in engaging material for large chunks at a time. People legitimately point to that movie as an example of how adaptations should be done in the future and my response tends to be, "perhaps, but only if it's an adaptation of something that actually has enough material of interest to work as a movie of that length". Off the top of my head Lawrence of Arabia and Das Boot are good examples of 3 hour plus long movies that I think work because of the material they cover and the cinematography that goes into them. Then again as far as I know those movies started life as a screenplay so they were designed from the beginning to be that length out of necessity. There's no room for verbatim adaptations in movies in my opinion. You can try to fit everything in, but if it's just one long monologue by a character for a good chunk of it you damn well better make it the most interesting monologue since the days of Shakespeare instead of some teenager whining for 40 minutes about how boring his life is now that that crazy girl is out of the picture. |
||||||||||||
Zin5ki
Posts: 6680 Location: London, UK |
|
|||||||||||
The suitability of such an identification can be contested. I shall demonstrate this. There exist central cases of "moe" characters to which very few would hesitate to ascribe the term. The main character from Air is one of these. In view of these straightforward examples, a standard counterexample against your proposal can be presented. We can easily conceive of a person, one who is highly exposed to the appropriate niches and trends within the anime industry, who holds that central cases such as the protagonist of Air is a "moe" character but doubts that she is cute in any way. Let us propose that this person utters the following sentence: "Misuzu is clearly a moe character, but I don't find her to be at all cute". This utterance does not strike us as meaningless, or at least not to the same degree as the utterance "Misuzu is clearly a cute character, but I don't find her to be at all cute". Because only one of these sentences is obviously meaningless (or otherwise obviously contradictory), we have arrived at a conceivable and utterance of "moe" which cannot be substituted with "cute" salva veretate. Moreover, we have arrived at a conceivable utterance that does not suggest any ineptitude on behalf of the speaker to apply the relevant terms. One may object to this counterexample by suggesting we can identify moe characters as those that are supposed or intended to be cute, though such a thesis is quite distinct from that which you propose. A separate objection would involve noting, quite rightly, that both of the terms "moe" and "cute" are semantically subjective. Such a view does not, however, prevent us from being able to conceive of the person in the counterexample. Even if the meaning of the speaker's terms somehow depend on facts concerning the speaker herself, we can still reach an example in which she uses each term in a distinct manner. |
||||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group