Forum - View topicNEWS: Fractale Production Committee Halts N. American Simulcast
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bayoab
Posts: 831 |
|
|||||||
1/25 @ 25:35 JST = 1/25 @ 11:35 AM EST |
||||||||
agila61
Posts: 3213 Location: NE Ohio |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
yuna49
Posts: 3804 |
|
|||||||
Note I specifically said DVD licensing, not simply streaming. I believe my earlier comment is still correct.
The Noitamina article on Wikipedia has been pretty reliable over the years. I check it regularly. I don't see anything in your list that contradicts either the article there or my earlier comment.
I wish I were as optimistic as person as you, Paploo. As others have repeatedly pointed out, Funimation does not appear to hold DVD rights for their Noitamina streams.
Actually I believe it was produced in Asia and carried by Animax. For whatever their reasons, Sony appears unwilling to license this for R1 DVD release. (You also omitted a few other Noitamina shows that have not been releassed in any form in R1, Hataraki Man, Hakaba Kitarou, and Genji Monogatari Sennenki.) Let me reiterate that I'm not surprised by these licensing decisions. Noitamina shows typically aren't ones that appeal to mainstream anime fans who buy DVDs. Look at the viewing counts for Hoiuse of Five Leaves on YouTube. 35,000 people watched episode one; fewer than 6,000 watched episode two, and it trailed off quickly from there. Hulu doesn't post viewing figures, but I'd guess they followed the same pattern. If only a few thousand people will watch this show when it's offered for free, it's probably uneconomical to release a DVD series. (I've seen estimates that the break-even point for an anime DVD is about 5,000 units.) In general there's an inverse correlation between the shows I find appealing and those that are licensed in R1. Thus I was pleasantly surprised by Funi's decision to stream Noitamina and disturbed by this latest, rather ridiculous, move by the Fractale Production Committee. |
||||||||
Xanas
Posts: 2058 |
|
|||||||
In short term I advocate giving up as you say because I think it serves no one to try your method. Their attempts to protect their stream will cost money and they will still fail. They will be hiring people to do entirely unproductive work which will cause others to do unproductive things like cracking their DRM and/or obfuscation scheme. I don't advocate "Big Brother" to do anything at all because I'm an anarchocapitalist. I really think having no IP laws at all is better for everyone. IP law provides the illusion of control that does not exist, and creates the incentive to expend much energy on protecting what is ultimately unprotectable. |
||||||||
Paploo
Posts: 1875 |
|
|||||||
Well, technically, Antique Bakery was licensed after JyuOhSei and is getting a dvd release, so I wasn't totally off. Though it does sound as if Funi may not have dvd rights for the Noitamina shows they've streamed- still from what Agila says, I'm not going to totally ignore the possibility. I leftoff the other shows since I used ANN's listings, which didn't include those for some reason- I'd love a release of Hattarakiman myself. Still, a show not having a dvd release isn't the end of the world- I'm happy Funi's streaming them nonetheless. It does sound as if Nodame's rights are complicated, but that's never made a release impossible for other shows with strange licensing issues- Kodocha, "the masters were in a fire" DNA 2 , and Dirty Pair TV all found their way to a legit dvd release. Anyhoo, still nice it's available legally in some form. And again, they can't release info about most of these shows potential dvd releases till after the dvd releases in Japan have finished. Checking CDJapan- Kuraghime- won't have it's last dvd volume out till April 2011 Fractale- will finish in July Shiki- won't finish till April House of Five Leaves finished in November, but Funimation's schedule is pretty full and has been announced well into April, so I imagine we won't see many of these titles on dvd if they opt for them until mid 2011/2012. So I'm guessing we'll just have to watch Funimation's schedules for it from May to the New Year to get an idea of what exactly Funimation's plans are for these titles. They haven't really set a predecent yet of not releasing a show they've streamed. Last edited by Paploo on Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:24 am; edited 2 times in total |
||||||||
agila61
Posts: 3213 Location: NE Ohio |
|
|||||||
Still if, optimistically, the hits at YouTube were generating $0.01 an episode in ad revenue, that would be ~$300 for episode one, but only around $30~$40/episode after episode 2. Will that cover a number of hours of work for prosecuting IP cases? Perhaps, but only if that number happens to be one, or maybe two. |
||||||||
ikillchicken
Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
|
|||||||
I myself would certainly agree at least as far as Lazysubs goes but given the vast quantity of English speaking fans that are blocked out of Funi's streams, I am not willing to throw all pirates of streamed shows under the bus without question. In any case though, the point I want to make here is that it really doesn't matter what you think of the pirates. He's trying to convince people that we should blame the them instead of the FPC. However, whether one accepts that these pirates are 'contemptible vermin' or not, it does not absolve the FPC of a significant portion of the blame here. |
||||||||
agila61
Posts: 3213 Location: NE Ohio |
|
|||||||
A Funimation rep agreeing that FPC also deserves blame would then ensure that the stream does not continue, which would ensure a bootlegger exclusive in North America. And ensuring a bootlegger exclusive for the length of the ban is exactly why I am angry at FPC, so how could I insist that Funimation does exactly the same thing?
Nothing that the FPC has done reduces the blame attached to the actions of the bootleggers.
But looking at the YouTube hits, Jellyfish Princess seems more likely. Ho5L has always looked to me a lot more like a Nozomi release than a Funimation release, but if Funimation is making a good faith effort to see if the numbers can work out, this seems like it would be a bit early to pass on Ho5L ~ it hasn't even been a full year yet. |
||||||||
Tuor_of_Gondolin
Posts: 3524 Location: Bellevue, WA |
|
|||||||
I just saw on Hulu that Fracale Ep2 will be available on Monday, Jan 24th. Anyone know anything else about this?
|
||||||||
ArsenicSteel
Posts: 2370 |
|
|||||||
Securing or putting up a front that a business is securing their property is the cost of doing business. Security has never been about eliminating criminal activity. It is about making it difficult for the criminal to obtain a product and making it easier for legal entities to catch criminals. Adding security measure may increase the steps a legal consumer of goods has to endure but well planned security layer(s) eventually blend into legal consumer's day to day. The inevitable defeat of digital security is not reason enough to give up on doing so. IP laws may need tweaking to accommodate the global economy but a completely removing them just would not work globally no matter how idealistic the notion sounds when advocated from a podium. |
||||||||
braves
Posts: 2309 Location: Puerto Rico (but living in Texas) |
|
|||||||
http://www.hulu.com/fractale
Well, that sure would be an interesting turn of events. Does a FUNimation rep want to comment on this (assuming they're still reading)? |
||||||||
Tuor_of_Gondolin
Posts: 3524 Location: Bellevue, WA |
|
|||||||
braves, I hope it's true. I don't mind a week long delay and I'll be happy to wait if it means I can watch the stream legally.
If the FPC wants Funimation/Hulu to wait longer after the Japanese broadcast before putting out a subbed stream of it, that's fine. It's the whole unknown aspect of it that bugged me the most: not knowing *if* or when Funimation would be allowed to stream the show. If Hulu is right, we'll only have to wait a few days, and I'm cool with that. |
||||||||
Xanas
Posts: 2058 |
|
|||||||
Security of tangible goods is relatively easy to provide, as even naturally such goods can be of inconvenient size or bulk to allow for theft, and additionally there is a natural predisposition among people not to steal from others. People are naturally inclined to believe in property because not having property will lead to tragedies of the commons or violent conflicts over that which is clearly scarce/rivalrous. So at the outset, security is significantly easier to provide for physical things. And even in discussing the intangible, security is fairly easy if you are using modern encryption. The problem comes when you are selling this encrypted intangible thing that you must also decrypt to provide the experience the customer was looking for. You must provide both the lock and the key, but try to hide the key from the user behind obfuscation.
Saying that removal "would not work" implies that we have something that does work now, and yet it quite clearly does not work. The "tweaking" of IP laws will be adding more restrictions for individuals and restricting their freedom and violating their privacy further, and it still will not work. |
||||||||
tuxedocat
Posts: 2183 |
|
|||||||
I'm having trouble understanding why all this anger is being directed at Lance. What do you expect him to do, given his circumstances? Let's say you had a business that depended on maintaining good relationships with committees, some members of which act on other committees, therefore pretty much represent ALL committees in one way or another. You have to maintain the appearance of being on their side, even when a few executives in these groups make really dumbass decisions you might not personally agree with. Your business, however, requires that you take their side. You want to nurture your business. That means smiling and keeping your personal feelings to yourself since what you say will definitely effect your negotiations going forward. Now let's say there are a very vocal group of self-proclaimed "customers", demanding that you pretty much sever ties with a certain committee. You know if you act like a jerk to this committee, you may deep-six your business, since this one committee may be tied in with a lot of other committees. In fact, the people in these committees have a different business culture. If you act like you are not on their side, that will get around. You would be screwing yourself, your business, and eventually all the employees at your business. These committees are your bread and butter, while the vocal "customers" - well, you don't really have any proof that they actually are "customers", do you? In fact, it seems that these "customers" are actually committed to seeing your little business fail. So whose side would you take, if you were in that position? |
||||||||
Xanas
Posts: 2058 |
|
|||||||
tuxedocat, I think your logic is pretty sound on the business aspects.
And I don't blame Lance at all, I blame IP without which FPC would not have these unrealistic expectations. |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group