×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: 2 Aki Sora Manga Books to No Longer Be Printed After July


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Melanchthon



Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 550
Location: Northwest from Here
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:03 am Reply with quote
Wow, y'all raise a lot of interesting and salient points here. Ahem. Anyway, look at the facts. This work is borderline hentai. Don't take my word on it, look it up:
http://anidb.net/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=6782
http://anidb.net/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=7484
http://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=33685
In fact, bakaupdates lists it as both Mature and Adult. So is this a serious literary take on the theme of incest? No! This is softcore porn that is escaping an over 18 rating since it is not 'officially' an ero-manga. It is for reasons like this that Ishihara's Banhammer was passed in the first place. People were sick and tired of smut like this being sold without age restrictions. And to throw a hissy fit because people call your porn for what it is, is petulant and shameful.
Also, if the wanted to draw this manga for literary reasons, the man could always publish online or in another city. The fact that he is refusing this shows that it is not literary concerns, but financial, that is driving this.
So in the end, the problem is that people like Masahiro Itosugi ruined it for everyone, because they could not treat these themes in a mature way. I have no sympathy for these fools.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
egoist



Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 7762
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:22 am Reply with quote
Quote:
So is this a serious literary take on the theme of incest? No!

Remember who proposed the bill? I do.
Quote:
This is softcore porn

Ever heard of Page 3?
Quote:
And to throw a hissy fit because people call your porn for what it is, is petulant and shameful.

Someone clearly haven't seen lolicon or tentacle rape hentai. That thing is banned over here, yet it exists, and is in fact created over there. Why the heck would you even apply your sense of righteousness to those people?
Quote:
The fact that he is refusing this shows that it is not literary concerns, but financial, that is driving this.

Or maybe you know, he doesn't want to move. It's not like he's been banned from being a mangaka in Tokyo, otherwise I'd understand that moving to another city is a reasonable decision.
Quote:
I have no sympathy for these fools.

Yeah, I bet they'll burn in hell for bringing happiness to a bunch of pubescent teenagers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
MrTerrorist



Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 1348
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:10 am Reply with quote
Dear ANN Editors
I think i should tell you that Masahiro Itosugi, the manga artist who created Aki-Sora is actually a woman, not a man.


Shocked What? You think only men do ero manga? Woman can Ero manga as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jarm



Joined: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 87
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:30 am Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:

Jarm wrote:
Interesting, how people who say "II don't like the idea of young people reading raunchy manga" are arguing from the position of their own personal values rather than the values of the country's people in question.. .

Japan is an odd country. They hunt whales and dolphins in the name of science, allow their nationals to take take full custody and refuge when they escape from marriages involving foreign nationals, allow only naturalized citizens to vote-no duel citizenship- and have pretty tight laws on immigration.


And it's a very sexist country. And as they'd probably say: "... And Proud of It!"


Jarm wrote:

Does any of this make me angry? No, I honestly could care less...
Because I don't live there. So, it's not my business how the the Japanese people want to govern themselves. Nor is my or your business to decide what Japanese children should be reading.

We're only throwing our support behind this, because the industry and a large majority of mangaka, otaku and non-otaku are against this- no real influence from us.

So the question here isn't if the law is justified, it's if you standby the industry and the mangaka or not.

You people can argue about morals and beliefs, but as for me I'm going to get behind the mangaka!


I'm going behind the whole Japanese people, not just the mangaka, what ever they vote on. That's how democracy works, after all! Laughing




I don't want to argue about Japan being a sexist country... but tell me what country isn't?

And if you think, Bill 156 is democracy. Then it's every bit as democratic as Stop-light cameras. Because the local people sure love stoplight cameras, and want them at almost every intersection- Surely, not a political ploy to rob people. :V

I'm an advocate of personal responsibility. If you are a parent and you don't want a child to read something, you can:

A. Train the child to avoid reading that material


B. You can refuse to purchase any of that material for them and won't allow it in your household.


C. If you're that paranoid about it, cut off the internet, unsubscribe from from Starz HBO, and Cinemax, send them over to a convent until they are the ripe old age of 18 and then let them run wild!

Mr. Green

My point is that you shouldn't ban something, just because you don't like it. Just because the Ozawa's don't like young Keitaro reading to-love-aru, while the Tanaka's are fine with young Takumi reading it, doesn't mean we should impose the values of the Ozawa's on the Tanaka's. It is only the job of the Ozawa's to protect Keitaro, not TMP.

That is why going the way of government regulation on personal choice is overkill because it an imposition on everyone.

Note: The "Ozawa's" are only a substitute for the religious groups like the New Komeito Party that backed Ishihara,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:47 am Reply with quote
Unholy_Nny wrote:
Wait.

Wait wait wait wait.

Aki-Sora isn't sold with an "adults only" label? Really? I know they don't show any genitals but it's still really, really, really graphic. I'm one of those people who believe there's a fine line between what's erotic and what's flat out porn, and Aki-Sora is 100% porn. There's no debate. It's porn. I'm honestly shocked it's not already sold as "adults only"

As had been mentioned already it's got a long way to go from being actual porn. Please stop calling it porn.

How is it different from many movies? It's been like this in the US for a good long while now, decades really: graphic sex scene in Excalibur, what about Basic Instinct? Naked, hips locked together, thrusting intercourse, sucking breasts (again though like Aki-Sora -- NO penis or vagina shown) -- mainstream US movies, STILL NOT porn, nor restricted as adults only. What about the more explicit Uncut and Unrated versions of Basic Instict or Sliver or American Pie 2 and American Pie 3 or any other sexually themed movie? Still NOT adults-only. What about all the western erotica art books or graphic novels on amazon? Still not restricted nor sold or even marketed as strictly 18+ only. Heck not even Lost Girls is restricted as such.

And Aki-Sora is hardly alone anyways. One such title I'm reading now is Toshiue no Hito. Look it up. And this applies to yaoi as well. It crosses into strictly-over-18-only on a national level once you start having to show explicit (censored) genitalia. But Aki-Sora gets the attention here in terms of publishers worrying about bill 156 not really because of its sexual nature (again, why this and not the many other titles?), but because of its incest theme as the mangaka mentions.

MrTerrorist wrote:
Dear ANN Editors
I think i should tell you that Masahiro Itosugi, the manga artist who created Aki-Sora is actually a woman, not a man.


Shocked What? You think only men do ero manga? Woman can Ero manga as well.

Yeah, I need to face palm myself too Embarassed I'm sure a lot of people are Shocked

.. and the list of "unexpected female mangaka" is long (Seikirei, Kodomo no Jikan, etc, etc) Mr. Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 9902
Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:33 am Reply with quote
MrTerrorist wrote:
Dear ANN Editors
I think i should tell you that Masahiro Itosugi, the manga artist who created Aki-Sora is actually a woman, not a man.

"Masahiro" is a quite masculine name; much more so than, say, Hiromu (Hiromi) Arakawa, which is similar to Alexander/Alexandra in English. I wonder why she chose it.

MrTerrorist wrote:
Shocked What? You think only men do ero manga? Woman can Ero manga as well.

Some of my favorite ero-mangaka are female: Towa Oshima, Yumi Nakata, Mitsuki Nikaido, plus several I suspect but have no proof.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
leoval



Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 11
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:00 pm Reply with quote
configspace wrote:
leoval wrote:
Beyond the debate if Porn should be labeled as such and marketed only to adults (which I think has been settled de facto in the western world for quite some time), there is no denying that Aki-Sora is smut pure and simple. Unadulterated sexual content, full frontal nudity, explicit sex scenes and dialog along the lines: "Have sex with me next" "no I'm next" "don't cheat I am next" (literally 4 different naked girls asking the hero for sex). If that doesn't qualify for an Adults Only rating I don't know what does.

No, it is not. People need to get there heads out of there prudish asses. As he and all the other publishers have said, it does NOT qualify for porn since there are NO depictions of genitals whatsoever. In fact it is the same in the US. How is this any different from a raunchy R-rated movie? Or in fact, what about those movies with even more sexually explicit versions sold as uncut and therefore unrated versions on home video in the US -- again not porn, not restricted.

As he mentioned it would've been VERY different if he had decided to make it an actual R-18 work (again, you would've been staring at genitals in your face, where there are NONE here) If you've ever seen any hentai or ero-manga, then you'd know how this does not approach that level at all.

Besides he mentions it isn't the erotic nature of the work that's the problem, it is the subject matter.
Quote:
materials that the Tokyo Metropolitan Government considers "to be excessively disrupting of social order."

Note that bill 156 itself says nothing about how graphic or explicit it needs to be but rather that if the work depicts the subject matter in a way that is “unjustifiably glorified or exaggerated manner.” basically meaning if it gives out the message, "hey, there's nothing wrong with this" and indeed, it is ironic because in real life incest is not illegal.

Quote:

He also said that he "probably" cannot release volumes 1 and 3 on Ken Akamatsu's J-Comi service or other forms of electronic publishing.

This is where he's wrong though. He certainly can as one the acknowledged loopholes around bill 156 is that it does not cover online or digital goods, nor does it apply to retail outside of Tokyo for that matter. However it is likely that his publisher does not want to take the chance to draw more attention from the Tokyo board.


Well perhaps we live in different countries, but last time I checked minors were not allowed to watch R rated movies by themselves in the US.

Also restricting the definition of porn to the display of genitalia does not align itself with the definitions provided by the US Supreme Court in countless cases about free speech and child pornography (a whole different subject worth of debate).

Finally, softcore porn (sexual acts without the display of genitalia) are commonly given a TV-MA rating in the US (Just check Cinemax lat at night).

So no matter how you want to spin it Aki-Sora would deserve a MA rating in the US under the rating system we have in place here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14758
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:54 pm Reply with quote
Jarm wrote:

I don't want to argue about Japan being a sexist country... but tell me what country isn't?


I said "very." Laughing


Jarm wrote:

And if you think, Bill 156 is democracy.


I'm just saying I support them as a whole, instead of picking and choosing just certain parts. Laughing


Jarm wrote:

I'm an advocate of personal responsibility. If you are a parent and you don't want a child to read something, you can:


Still, the ESRB MA ratings system for games or the MPAA R ratings for movies are just there to help.


Jarm wrote:

My point is that you shouldn't ban something,


It's not banned. It could easily be released with the sticker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsunayakuin



Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 91
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:25 pm Reply with quote
This may not be a ban but it feels like one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14758
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:05 pm Reply with quote
Here's something else that ya guys could be worried about:

Internet providers begin blocking access to child porn sites
Quote:
Friday 22nd April, 06:08 AM JST

TOKYO — Major Japanese Internet service providers on Thursday began blocking access to more than 100 websites that offer child pornography.

The Internet Content Safety Association, which was established by 21 major Internet service providers in March, said users will be denied access to such websites, possibly including sites containing a single still or moving child pornography picture.

Police and the Internet Hotline Center Japan, both of which monitor illegal information on the Internet, will deliver their data on child porn websites to the Internet Content Safety Association, association officials said.

The association will listen to lawyers and experts and determine whether those images are child pornography. Member providers will in turn block access to those websites, they said.

In Japan, nine leading Internet service providers account for about 70% of all the country’s Internet service market. Among them are NTT Communications Corp, NEC Biglobe Ltd, Nifty Corp and Yahoo Japan Corp.


And just for fun, here's another controversy going on in Japan, courtesy of an International Herald Tribune editorial cartoon: Laughing

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nemo_N



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 272
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:48 pm Reply with quote
dormcat wrote:
MrTerrorist wrote:
Dear ANN Editors
I think i should tell you that Masahiro Itosugi, the manga artist who created Aki-Sora is actually a woman, not a man.

"Masahiro" is a quite masculine name; much more so than, say, Hiromu (Hiromi) Arakawa, which is similar to Alexander/Alexandra in English. I wonder why she chose it.

Could it be gender expectations? That is, maybe guys wouldn't buy an erotic manga from a female author? I don't know about the buying habits of the japanese, so I'm talking out of my ass here.

dormcat wrote:
MrTerrorist wrote:
Shocked What? You think only men do ero manga? Woman can Ero manga as well.

Some of my favorite ero-mangaka are female: Towa Oshima, Yumi Nakata, Mitsuki Nikaido, plus several I suspect but have no proof.

Anyone know if Ozaki Mirai is a woman?

Anyways, long ago I learned not a assign genders to manga-ka I haven't seen a picture of; there really are lots of female managa-ka (ero or not) out there.

And with that said, it really is annoying seeing any mangaka who draws anything sexual being automatically assumed to be male.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DangerMouse



Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 3982
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:49 pm Reply with quote
zaeris wrote:
DangerMouse wrote:
Koi Kaze's another serious work with the theme, and that one's gotten tons of great reviews on numerous sites with the critics.


I believe Koi Kaze and Aki Sora are vastly differently not to mention the former is superior in every way. The similar theme are however dealt with differently. I don't think believe it is wise to use Aki Sora to compare it to Koi Kaze... somewhere saying this bill could affect Koi Kaze as evidence.


Agreed, I was not nor did I intend to be comparing them, I was just mentioning it in response to the previous post pointing out how even serious stories with controversial themes like this could be effected in the future. For example Koi Kaze could be classified completely differently than it was back then thanks to the bill, despite being often considered a great work.


Last edited by DangerMouse on Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jrittmayer



Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 304
Location: New Jersey
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:57 pm Reply with quote
Tis a shame, I really liked Akisora.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrHatandClogs



Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 283
Location: Between two ferns!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:21 pm Reply with quote
I by no means support Aki-Sora, it's disgusting. Glorifying incest on any level is wrong imo, but I'm a believer in free speech.

I agree it should be labled R-18, not for the ero, but for the incest.

If they are gonna do this, then they need to take out any morally wrong situations, not just sexual ones.

I just hope it doesn't effect the industry as a whole too much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 9902
Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:45 pm Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
It's not banned. It could easily be released with the sticker.

Back in the days of bubble economy, Japanese companies (almost all with lifetime employment) didn't fire unwanted people. Instead, they'd relocate you to the basement, assign you no real job to do, cut off your communication (within the company), etc., in order to force you to resign. On the record, the company didn't fire anyone; that's the Japanese business culture.

MrHatandClogs wrote:
Glorifying incest on any level is wrong imo

Well, it's a Japanese tradition, which has been adapted into manga and anime at least four times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 5 of 7

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group