×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: 2 Aki Sora Manga Books to No Longer Be Printed After July


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Starsplash Taiwan



Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 134
Location: Taipei Taiwan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:01 am Reply with quote
I can't argue with ur response to 1 and 3 because ur right.

I still hate the fact that everyone else has to be punished because parents can't control their kid and rely on the governement on such issues like this. Thats still how I see why this ban was created.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14758
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:50 am Reply with quote
Starsplash Taiwan wrote:
I can't argue with ur response to 1 and 3 because ur right.

I still hate the fact that everyone else has to be punished because parents can't control their kid and rely on the governement on such issues like this. Thats still how I see why this ban was created.


Technically, it's the minors who will be inconvenienced. If you're an adult, you should be OK.

BTW, how's it going in Taiwan? Haven't been there in years! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moomintroll



Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 1600
Location: Nottingham (UK)
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:28 am Reply with quote
Daemonblue wrote:
Except it is censorship when it's being restricted only because of one small part of the plot and not the rest of the content, and it's only applied to a very limited amount of media instead of all media.


That's not what censorship means. According to that definition beer is "censored" because it has an age limit whereas orange juice does not and roller coasters are "censored" because you have to be a certain height to ride them.
As to the content, how does one impose ratings without reference to content? One would hope that context is taken into account but that's a different discussion.

Quote:
A lot of works that have been in novel form for as long as people can remember would not be able to get animated or a manga because this would effectively ban them.


This has always been the case - not all media are judged the same way and visual media tends to get a harder time than prose media. If you're making a slippery slope argument though, it seems worth pointing out that various forms of visual media are age-rated in most countries and have been for a long time but I can't think of any that age-rate literature.

Quote:
Something doesn't have to be completely banned for it to not be worth producing, all you have to do is limit the audiences that have access to it.


True. But limiting gratuitously sexual material to adults hasn't exactly ended the production of such materials in any other country and, given that the author is refusing to re-release the work with an adults only label, we'll never know one way or the other whether or not this title would have done okay without sales to teens.

Quote:
All this bill does is force the morals of the few onto the many, whether they realize it or not.


All laws impose the framer's idea of right and wrong on to everybody else. But since the bill was introduced by a popularly elected administration (and seems to have fairly broad support outside the otaku set), it's not clear why you think it's the few imposing their morality on the many? Surely it's the other way around?

Quote:
There's a reason why the Comic Book Code ended up failing in America, and this looks like it would do nothing better than kill the manga industry in the long term.


There are a number of reasons why the Comic Book Code failed. It's worth noting, though, that the CBC was self-imposed by the comic book industry and had no weight of law behind it so it's not really analogous with this bill.

---

egoist wrote:
You most likely didn't understand my point because you haven't read my previous posts.


Quite possibly.

Quote:
Yet they watch it, which makes me wonder just how hypocrit[ical] they can get.


Well they'd need to have encountered it initially in order to come to the conclusion that they didn't like it, no?
If one can hold one's nose long enough, one can find diamonds buried in the toxic sludge and, with experience, it becomes easier to detect the gems without getting too soiled in the process. Well, at least as far as manga's concerned - I've given up on anime aside from the occasional theatrical release.

Quote:
And as others have said, sex without genitals is present in plenty of under 18 movies.


Depends on the context of the material and the audience it's marketed to. From what I can tell from the ill-tempered discussion you've all been having, this would certainly not get a pass on the basis of context were it being rated by the BBFC.

Quote:
In other words, this is being censored for the simple fact of having fictional siblings.


All ratings of fictional media are based on fictional situations. Violent horror movies aren't rated 18 because a real hooker really got ripped to pieces by a horde of real zombies.

And, again, it's not being "censored", it's being age-restricted. Not the same thing. If you overuse - and misuse - a word too much it tends to lose its power. You're crying wolf.

Quote:
Although that doesn't change the fact that this is the beginning of this.


Oh, please. Martin Niemöller was an ultra-conservative monarchist, a retired naval officer who pined for the social values of the Kaiser's time and a devout Lutheran pastor. He was neither a libertarian nor a socially progressive liberal and he was most certainly not in favour of the legal dissemination of pornography (and, regardless of whether or not you think this particular title is pornography, he most certainly would have considered it such). Niemöller would have been horrified to have his name associated with your argument.

Moreover, to invoke the name of a man who spent years in a concentration camp standing up to the most monstrous regime in history - with reference to a quote in which he talks about groups of people who were imprisoned, brutalised and murdered in their millions - in order to make a point about placing age restrictions on comic books would be laughable if it weren't so stupid, so inappropriate, so grotesque and so sadly misinformed.

Anyway, if you're going for the horribly misjudged cliché of the thread award, aren't you supposed to start by misquoting Voltaire before gradually working your way up through ever less appropriate references before finally peaking with Niemöller?

Quote:
See, while I definitely agree that democracy is probably the best system humanity has to offer, that doesn't mean every political system, including democracy itself, isn't absolutely shit.


Quite. But since both we and they (the Japanese) are living in democracies, it's the only political context we have to work with in terms of this discussion. Top marks on the angsty cynicism though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Kyaa the Catlord



Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 300
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:33 am Reply with quote
And so begins the inevitable slide to nazi zombies eating our women. Film at 11.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
egoist



Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 7762
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:50 am Reply with quote
egoist wonders how much of that crap is relevant to his post or topic at hand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Moomintroll



Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 1600
Location: Nottingham (UK)
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:04 am Reply with quote
Crap. I just remembered why I generally avoid this kind of nonsense debate on ANN these days: otaku are seemingly incapable of civilised discourse when they think somebody might be about to take their imaginary girlfriends away.

egoist wrote:
egoist wonders how much of that crap is relevant to his post or topic at hand.


Well, the half of it that was addressed to you with regard to the former and all of it with regard to the latter.

Fear not though - I'll leave you in peace now to get on with launching your entertainingly (if unaccountably) furious mixture of endearingly juvenile playground insults, ill-thought through one-liners and amusingly adolescent angst at anybody who has the temerity to disagree with you. You go get 'em champ!

Quick word of advice though: the whole speaking in the third person thing only really works for schizophrenics, mad dictators and inbred royalty. Might want to re-think that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Monad



Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Posts: 10
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:13 pm Reply with quote
Japanese doing what they do best. Basically being p****s. This people can't even imagine actually standing up for something.Rolling Eyes They are so used to bow they can't stop. If publishers ignored the law then Tokyo wouldn't be able to enforce it and they will have been just fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group