Forum - View topicNEWS: New Anti-Piracy Act from U.S. Congress Leaked
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palefire
Posts: 3 |
|
|||||||||
And someone stealing from another person isn't damage? You realize anime/manga/movies are still businesses. financial damage is still damage. These people have to make money in order to continue doing what they do. I'll take his analogy and make it more fitting. So if I went up and stole the project you just spent a year creating (and from which you receive your income) from your house and didn't pay you a cent for it, no damage was done? And then what if everyone else came by and stole copies of it from him too. Still no damage? And it's okay because we possess the right to view anything created before buying it anyway? |
||||||||||
tsunayakuin
Posts: 91 |
|
|||||||||
fudge you america, the only reason I've been able to finish a lot of shows I've wanted to see is because of these illegal sites.
|
||||||||||
Ermat_46
Posts: 725 Location: Philippines |
|
|||||||||
don't know if troll or a ret**d |
||||||||||
Shale
Posts: 337 Location: The Middle of Nowhere, DE |
|
|||||||||
Reading: It's fundamental! |
||||||||||
Ermat_46
Posts: 725 Location: Philippines |
|
|||||||||
Stealing --> depriving someone of his property Pirating --> producing a copy of the property. It doesn't deprive someone of his property. EDIT: The damage is not clear. We're talking about unlicensed anime here. Even if I didn't watched it, noting will be lose since that product isn't offered in my area in the first place. Last edited by Ermat_46 on Thu May 12, 2011 10:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||
Jozoiscute
Posts: 252 |
|
|||||||||
Good gravy....THIS argument again?
To the people who said not to worry because certain illegal torrent sites located in other countries can't be harmed: YES. That is true, but certainly the government can block Americans from using such sites? It's been done before on certain youtube channels, and various streaming sites. I have mixed feelings about this bill as well. I applaud the US for attempting to stop people from downloading illegal content. It's gotten WAY out of hand at this point- movies, shows, music, even books can be downloaded illegally! I'm personally one of those people that views piracy on par with stealing, and there's a good reason for it. I currently know a LOT of people in both the writing and film industry whom have been affected by so many people downloading their work illegally. In all seriousness, I have no clue how we got to this stage where personal moral and national taboo are basically chucked out the window in order to save a few bucks. People think that stealing is ok, as long as it's done online which (in this author's opinion) is as strange as it is absurd. There is always the choice of learning Japanese and importing your favorite shows and manga from overseas. That being said, I'm more curious how this bill would affect things like fanart and AMV's. Will these things be taken down as well? Because they are given to the public for free, and don't really hurt the industry in any manner I'm aware of (unless people were to use torrents to make them, or sell such things online), I wonder how the government would deal with such things? |
||||||||||
Cutiebunny
Posts: 1746 |
|
|||||||||
Boo-hoo.
First of all, I'm not worried about this because it isn't a law yet. It's just a suggestion for a possible bill. But I doubt it will go anywhere, especially not with a strong democrat presence still in Washington. Liberals don't like things that will restrict their voters' 'rights'. People will always find a way of getting the same product for less, whether that means watching stuff on non-US sites or (heaven forbid!) going back to the era where you went to Chinatown for pirated movies/anime. I say...go for it. Because as soon as you shut down one site, another site with the same content will appear. It's like the whole Wikileaks thing - knock out the main site and there are 800+ other websites waiting in the wings with exactly the same materials. This is just for show, to make the US actually seem like it is doing something "proactive". |
||||||||||
nekedo
Posts: 94 |
|
|||||||||
This is going to create jobs, right?
|
||||||||||
PetrifiedJello
Posts: 3782 |
|
|||||||||
Five pages of commentary and the most important aspect of this bill is overlooked: The contents were leaked.
This means a democratic congress introduced a bill in secrecy. This means a democratic congress motioned the bill in secrecy. None of which is covered under an act of war. Yet piracy is the issue? Perhaps it is just me who hasn't seen a single news article written indicating businesses have shut down because of piracy. Probably because they're buried between all those record-breaking sales news articles I keep seeing pop up everywhere. |
||||||||||
Shale
Posts: 337 Location: The Middle of Nowhere, DE |
|
|||||||||
Seriously. Reading. It's good. |
||||||||||
Jarmel
Posts: 280 Location: NYC |
|
|||||||||
Wrong model. You're comparing anime to movies when anime should be compared to a television series. For television a person is allowed to see the entire series before they pay for the DVDs. However since we can't watch Japanese television over here we use rips. |
||||||||||
Kazemon15
Posts: 400 |
|
|||||||||
Oh but they're still being paid for by commercial advertisement and TV ratings. By watching online, a TV show loses TV ratings, which, if good or not, affect if the show gets a DVD release or not. |
||||||||||
RyanSaotome
Posts: 4210 Location: Towson, Maryland |
|
|||||||||
At: Palefire
I don't want to quite whole thing since its so long, but basically you're saying people shouldn't be able to watch anime before they buy it. So, what about Japan? They are able to watch all of these shows before they buy it just by turning on a TV. How is this a bit different from what we do? Nobody in Japan would blindly buy an anime they never saw, so its absurd to expect us to do that too. Or are you going to claim that having anime on TV in Japan is ruining that industry? Last edited by RyanSaotome on Thu May 12, 2011 1:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||
JDuks
Posts: 75 |
|
|||||||||
I think 90% might be pushing it. It's probably more like 50% of what's out every season that is being simulcast. Of course that number will hopefully increase if this law makes piracy less widespread and companies get more incentive to license titles for simulcast.
This isn't 100% true. What if the law is written to allow the US government to blacklist websites the way they do in England? Not seize the domain, as it's in another country, but just force ISP's to block the site (which they can if it's declared illegal). I read about a similar law they wrote last year that wanted to do just this. I didn't really follow up on it, but I assume it didn't go through because... well.. it doesn't seem to be happening.
It's easy to say if you don't watch anything unlicensed, or if you're the type of person who doesn't think about other people.
Drafted. The bill was drafted. I don't think your drafts that NO ONE is voting on yet have to be made public. |
||||||||||
Paploo
Posts: 1875 |
|
|||||||||
Oh noes! Somebody linked the news an hour or so early! Or found the press releases on assorted US Gov. and IP Rights websites! http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2011/05/join-the-chorus-voices-against-digital-theft/ http://www.uschamber.com/press/releases/2011/may/us-chamber’s-donohue-commends-senate-introduction-legislation-protect-jobs-a http://www.copyrightalliance.org/news.php?id=109 They even had a website dedicated to it- http://www.fightonlinetheft.com/ Seriously, it was being announced by all appearances, it just seems some anti-copyright sites lodged onto the news quickly that's all. Take off the tinfoil hate. |
||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group