×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Arkansas law threatens manga retailers


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jmays
ANN Associate Editor


Joined: 29 Jul 2002
Posts: 1390
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:50 am Reply with quote
Anlushac11 wrote:
Line C seems to be the blanket coverage that covers the stuff they don't understand or like.

A court case over what constitutes "serious artistic value" would be ugly and embarrassing to the legal system. But with the new law, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see that path followed eventually.

-Sigh-

-Jonathan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Coral Skipper



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 223
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 10:27 am Reply with quote
Miagi wrote:
Anlushac11 wrote:
Line C seems to be the blanket coverage that covers the stuff they don't understand or like.

A court case over what constitutes "serious artistic value" would be ugly and embarrassing to the legal system. But with the new law, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see that path followed eventually.

-Sigh-

-Jonathan


I agree with you, but if I was going to try to get the law overturned that would be the point to focus on. I would argue that everyone has their own definitian of what has artistic value. Manga has artistic value for its wonderful artwork, and sometimes writing, in my opinion. You may disagree, but again my point is that artistic value is a subjective term.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Animetallica
Guest




PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 3:11 pm Reply with quote
At least you guys don't live in Arkansas like me.
Back to top
Dan42
Chief Encyclopedist


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 3782
Location: Montreal
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 4:02 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
(2) "Harmful to minors" means that quality of any description, exhibition, presentation, or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse, when the material or performance, taken as a whole, has the following characteristics:

(A) The average person eighteen (18) years of age or older applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance has a predominant tendency to appeal to a prurient interest in sex to minors;

(B) The average person eighteen (18) years of age or older applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance depicts or describes nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse in a manner that is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable for minors; and

(C) The material or performance lacks serious literary, scientific, medical, artistic, or political value for minors


It seems to me the definition of "harmful to minors" is an AND combination of the 3 points, nor OR. In other words, in order to be considered harmful to minors, something has to exhibit A and B and C. At least, the wording makes it seems that way to me. If you see it that way, then item C is a way to exclude from the law stuff that is controversial but artistic. I still think that law is an affront to free expression, but it may not be as bad as it first appears.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
sunlord
Guest




PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 7:19 pm Reply with quote
Say does this apply to the bible to cuase im pretty sure it violates this law... I'd have to read the law in more detail to if they made religous things legal
Back to top
Case



Joined: 09 Apr 2002
Posts: 1016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:45 pm Reply with quote
Dan42 wrote:
The average person eighteen (18) years of age or older


What, exactly, constitutes an average person 18 years of age or older? How is a person even supposed to know if they fall into that group or not?

Subjective control of censorship by government is facism. I think that really goes without saying. I say, if they can't answer that second question, the law is too vague and has no place in our justice system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rogue_Darkholme
Guest




PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:59 am Reply with quote
Most adults in America has got to be the biggest hypocrites in the world. Bastards. -.-
Back to top
Delthayre



Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 414
Location: One of the good United States
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:27 am Reply with quote
Hyberbole and bloviating aside, so far as I can tell this law is simply to vague and broad, thus it would seem to be a bad law.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Minky
Guest




PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 6:10 pm Reply with quote
I for one do not read manga because of the cursing violence and nudity... I read it for the overall story and the beautifully drawn artwork. I mean even SAILOR MOON one of the most innocent and cute mangas! Seriousley so there are lesbians in it, there is way worse on the tv! Bastards of Arkansas... better not get to Michigan
Back to top
Lucca



Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 67
Location: Amoung the Fern-Growers
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 6:30 pm Reply with quote
Not to bring a new topic into the light of this, but truly, this is another form of the government trying to do a parent's job. Yes, I am a minor, yes, under the definition of the law I am my parents property. In other words, anything I do, my parents can be punished for it, because I am their property.
Then you have the abounding number of bad parents. I think it's safe to say that out of every ten families in America, seven are dysfunctional.
This law, in my opinion, is just another way of the Government trying to play "Parent: Mommy and Daddy". It is vauge, and with the contraversy, will be gone before the month ends. But, someone has to set boundries for children. The problem is: Everyone's boundries are different, and this is what the gov't. fails to realise. So they took the best route they could: The vauge one.

As said by everyone else: This law is going to be voided. There's no way such a thing as this could work. Too risky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Amused Observer



Joined: 24 Feb 2003
Posts: 164
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 9:23 pm Reply with quote
Coral Skipper wrote:
Don't worry, the law will be overturned, if only because it is too vague. Aside from porn whenever the government tries to keep things from kids. Aside from that I think a court overturned a recent ruling about M rated video games being kept in a diffrent area of a store, and not allowing minors to buy them on the basis that it would put them in the same context as porn. Something like that will happen to this law.


You are right about this. The law is too vague to be enforced.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yang
Guest




PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 9:41 pm Reply with quote
Well, there's still the internet!

BWHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ah, nothing can stop the might of ebay.
Back to top
Coral Skipper



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 223
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 11:37 pm Reply with quote
One other thing about the law is that it only applies to comics and books, which is B.S. We all know that the stuff on T.V is worse then "harmful" books, and yet the law doesn't cover that. If you are going to be a facist censor don't allow some things to avoid getting censor. It doesn't work.

I hate the law, more then any other so called dumb laws because aside from keeping porn from minors no form of censorship is practical.

I hope this law will get appealed to the federal Supreme Court so that no other laws like it will be passed, based on a ruling against that law.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Case



Joined: 09 Apr 2002
Posts: 1016
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 1:26 am Reply with quote
Coral Skipper wrote:
One other thing about the law is that it only applies to comics and books, which is B.S. We all know that the stuff on T.V is worse then "harmful" books, and yet the law doesn't cover that. If you are going to be a facist censor don't allow some things to avoid getting censor. It doesn't work.


With all due respect to the lawmakers of Arkansas state (however thoughtless they may be), this law is an attempt to use a specific course of action to apply a specific type of censorship - materials in bookstores must be moved or covered up. Television and movie censorship laws would have to follow a completely different course of action than books and magazines, so... short of creating some kind of massive "censorship guide" law that lumps together all "decency" legislation in a given jurisdiction (...which will probably never exist, because public opinion of such a thing would almost definitely be much worse than public opinion of assorted laws mixed in and among all other passed laws...), it wouldn't make sense to lump things together like that. It would probably be considered a "rider", and come up against stiff resistance for that reason alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ribby
Guest




PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 10:17 am Reply with quote
Mr. Tierney has a valid point, but the following statement:

Quote:
In Sweden, Disney comics are illegal because it's considered obscene that Donald Duck and his nephews don't wear trousers. Sure... I know that it's hard to conceive of by American standards - but it's true.


is total crap, according to Snopes.com (see article: http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/finland.htm) The reason why it's "hard to conceive of by American standards" is because it's not true. Mr. Tierney, as the owner of a comic book store (which has most likely sold thousands of copies of Donald Duck books) should have done his research a little better and not have made his point with a completely bogus explanation.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group