Forum - View topicNEWS: Russian Man Sentenced in "Child Pornography Anime" Case
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deacon Blues
Posts: 398 Location: Albuquerque, NM |
|
|||||
Child porn is still child porn whether it is real or animated. There is no getting around that.
|
||||||
enurtsol
Posts: 14878 |
|
|||||
And they're probably gay too! |
||||||
Rederoin
Posts: 1427 Location: Europa |
|
|||||
Your point?
So he was uploading Sakura Trick or Sasameki koto? |
||||||
OdessaJones
Posts: 12 Location: Maryland, USA |
|
|||||
I wonder if the children being exploited in photographs would agree. Porn may be in the eye of the beholder, but there's a big difference from posing a kid in a photo and drawing a tasteless but imaginary fantasy on paper. |
||||||
mdo7
Posts: 6362 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||
I think Enurtsol was poking fun at Russia's anti-gay law. |
||||||
Rederoin
Posts: 1427 Location: Europa |
|
|||||
I was just going along with it. |
||||||
ATastySub
Past ANN Contributor
Posts: 681 |
|
|||||
Sorry, but even comparing this case to Russia invading another country is insane. If you honestly feel that on some level this case will cause someone to take action against the Russian government then your sense of reality is extremely messed up. There are many serious issues with Russia right now. Being anti-loli is not one of them. |
||||||
revolutionotaku
Posts: 895 |
|
|||||
If he lived in Japan, he would've been arrested only for copyright. |
||||||
Alunimus
Posts: 117 |
|
|||||
|
||||||
mdo7
Posts: 6362 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||
Invading another country is not the answer to help the Russian people in Ukraine, that would be like UK invading the US because couple of British expats faced discrimination by American people. |
||||||
#809957
Posts: 6 |
|
|||||
Right... Since when has "child porn" been the problem, instead of the actual molestation of children? This is just another case of idiocy where the original reason for condeming something has been almost entirely forgotten and been replaced with ridiculous overgrown taboo that has no base in reality. Creating the photographed kind of child pornography almost always involves molestation of actual living children, whereas drawing pictures of deformed characters that someone with severely limited sense of reality could equate to children, do not. Therefore, even if it technically could be called "child porn", original reasons for condemning it do not apply. Why is this so damn difficult to understand? |
||||||
DTJB
Posts: 671 Location: Dubuque, IA |
|
|||||
Knock it off Putin.
Does that mean a homicide is still a homicide if comes in the form of a book, a TV series, or a movie? |
||||||
VanGosroth
Posts: 299 |
|
|||||
It's quite easy to get around something that's 100% false. If you're having a hard time differentiating reality from fiction I would suggest finding a competent mental health care professional to help work those issues out. |
||||||
BGMaxie
Posts: 63 |
|
|||||
Not sure what to think of this. Specially given that Russia has several WORSE issues to address than this one in particular.
Also which manga were involved in this shit? |
||||||
Chagen46
Posts: 4377 |
|
|||||
I know everyone has already mentioned this, but there's QUITE the gulf between: >pictures drawn that harm no one and detail a fantasy >exploitation of young children that scars them for lives and is used to make a profit that fuels more horrific exploitation Truly, the fact that you even think the two are equitable is honestly somewhat disturbing. |
||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group