Forum - View topic

RIGHT TURN ONLY!! - Tiger by the Tail

@Ihernan02

I haven't read the manga, so you may be completely justified. But it is not entirely unrealistic in a doomsday situation or knowing that there is a good chance of dying, for some to seek solace or the celebration of life, in sex. After all, if you are going to die, you need to make the time to cram as much of life into the time you have left.

Mistakes happen but you too can use google.

This is a trans issue. Grammar is secondary.

To be honest this would be clear as well if you too used google before typing that.

It sounds harsh what I wrote but honestly if you don't know what trans people are then you don't write about them. It would be silly to write about a day in life of a Jew if I don't know what Judaism is. I'm happy if they want to edit it now, but my original comment still stands. I wrote I understood the confusion between the two but the difference is huge for people who are affected by it.

Basically by talking as if the persons sex defines their limitations can hurt. Is 101 on "What is a trans person". I would hope that someone who was talking about how this is serious, would know.

Mistakes happen but you too can use google. Here. This might be helpful http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender.aspx

Also it is easy to see attacks when they aren't there. I did not say they hate trans, I just said they need to understand what trans people are.[/url]

Ms Silverman says:

"Really, the major issue here is still with the artwork, which is still oversexualized to a point where it is sometimes difficult to take the story as seriously as it deserves. There's one last fairly explicit lesbian sex scene (which is kind of explained, or at least the attitude towards underage sexuality is), but then most of the fanservice is the girls' clothes. "

I'm old, and comments like this give me the CREEPS. When I grew up in the USA in the '50s and '60s all media were self-censored to the max. Nothing sexual or even sexy--or even just seriously suggestive was allowed to appear. Are we going back to that?

You definitely do have a good point and a valid reason for making it. But I think that you were a bit harsh.
I will admit though that I might feel differently if I had a personal interest in the topic.

Holy crap, you don't have to be so angry about something that is really just a semantics issue.

....You can go point out that in certain circles and situations that equivalency is removed, but you don't have to be so self-righteous about it.