×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Hey, Santaman! [2006-12-08]


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PaladinBlue



Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Billings, MT
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:15 pm Reply with quote
Richard J. wrote:
I'm not sure how being homeschooled with a "Christian" curriculum could possibly make any of the titles mentioned in previous posts any worse than they already were. Personally, if you're being homeschooled, I'd say that any problems are going to come from your parents rather than necessarily their religion, considering that not every Christian thinks and acts the same way.


I was generalizing mainly because most of the curriculums I've seen that claim to be Christian love Shakespeare way too much. I mean to an almost obsessive level, second usually to Pilgrim's Progress (my most hated of all "classics"). Of course, my own mother chose A Beka when she started my sister and me. I had to read Hamlet, Julius Caesar, and Romeo and Juliet, at least, normally all three in one year.

Quote:
I wish I had been homeschooled. My mother is a retired school teacher and my father is a lawyer. My education would have been considerably better if I'd been taught by them.


Neither of my parents are teachers. They just got me the DVDs available for the curriculum. I'm glad they did, really, because I do have a better education. Just the material tended to annoy me.

Quote:
PaladinBlue wrote:
if there's one thing I know, you can NOT read Shakespeare as a piece of literature and enjoy it.
One-hundred percent true! One of my high school literature classes had a lesson on Shakespeare. The students had to read the parts out-loud, which would have been perfect, except that my class was full of morons.

First, we didn't finish Romeo and Juliet. Second, have you ever heard a group of people who can barely read on a fourth grade level trying to read Shakespeare? Ever seen a movie called Renaissance Man with Danny DeVito?

My high school class made those guys look like truly gifted Shakespearean actors. I was the only person in the class aside from the teacher who even knew how to pronounce the names correctly. (You don't even want to know how they pronounced some of them.)


I shudder at the thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Neverwhere



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 351
Location: socal
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:21 pm Reply with quote
PaladinBlue wrote:
If there's one thing I know, you can NOT read Shakespeare as a piece of literature and enjoy it.


That's not true. I am an actor and have read many Shakespearan plays as both performer and literary critic and enjoyed them very much. I preferred acting, but that doesn't mean I didn't like analysing and writing about them either.

However, I very much agree with your anticipation regarding Gonzo's new production of Romeo and Juliet. Personally I wish they had chosen another play to adapt, but I'm also excited to see how they make such a well known property feel unpredicable and unique.

I loveloveLOVE Flowers for Algernon, even if it was one of the most tragically depressing things I've ever read. Gah. I'm getting sniffly just thinking about it. Smile


I still don't understand why the ranter wasted so much time describing the deplorable violence in anime (especially against children), when apparently all he really wanted to discuss was the inequality between outrage over sexual imagery/fanservice and acceptance of violent imagery. Now THAT would have been a totally different, and in my opinion infinitely better rant, and one I can agree with one hundred percent, although as I said earlier in the thread I believe that frustration should be more directed towards the FCC and MPAA rather than anime studios, who (for the most part) have some socio-political commentary underlying the extreme violence, instead of simply doing it because it's 'cool'. And I still can't believe it's perfectly acceptable to kill people and do terribly upsetting things to them on network tv, but show the merest hint of nipple and everyone freaks out like the world's about to end. It's beyond absurd.
I do agree that people get far more upset over fanservice than horrible violence, and it's a shame. But really, that didn't seem to be what the rant was about at all, the observation was just thrown in at the end to make the previous diatribe acceptable, or perhaps even make sense, which it did neither.

For the record, I like everything, regardless of body count and/or panchira, as long as it has a good story to tell. Well, sometimes it doesn't have to. *quickly hides Urotosukidouji under the bed* Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheezisgoooood



Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 253
Location: Orlando, FL
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:38 pm Reply with quote
I wonder how many more people will respond to the rant without reading the last paragraph thinking that he actually meant everything he said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger My Anime
Anath_19



Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 87
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:55 pm Reply with quote
v1cious wrote:

HitokiriShadow wrote:
I love the Gifts for People You Hate section. I'd like to see what you recommend for the Radical Fundamentalist Christian. Very Happy You know, the ones that were claiming Pokemon was from the devil and burned Pikachu effigies? And I'm completely serious in my desire to see the recomendation for them.


Evangelion Very Happy

...am I the only one who immediately thinks of Bible Black when I hear about giving gifts to Radical Fundamentalist Christians you hate? It has both the elements of porn (seemingly one of the things radical fundamentalist Christians hate the most) AND Satanic imagery (at least...that's the impression I get whenever I hear about it, never actually tried watching the darn thing). I can't see that going over very well with a fundamentalist Christian at all.

Abarenbo Shogun wrote:
Kamon wrote:
Anime_Freak wrote:
How about Trinity Blood for the atheist relative/friend for a future Gfts for people you Hate column/section?


How about Trinity Blood, period? Rolling Eyes


Add Chrono Crusade to the list. Y'know, if they like blondes with guns.

If anything, I think atheists would be annoyed by that anime based off the Bible more than anything else. Too bad there aren't any R1 DVDs of it, though.

Edit: Changed some phrasing around, added a couple things
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger My Anime
Richard J.



Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 3367
Location: Sic Semper Tyrannis.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 2:37 am Reply with quote
PaladinBlue wrote:
I was generalizing mainly because most of the curriculums I've seen that claim to be Christian love Shakespeare way too much. I mean to an almost obsessive level, second usually to Pilgrim's Progress (my most hated of all "classics"). Of course, my own mother chose A Beka when she started my sister and me. I had to read Hamlet, Julius Caesar, and Romeo and Juliet, at least, normally all three in one year.
Okay, I wasn't sure exactly what you were getting at before. Sorry about that.

It's odd that Shakespeare would be so prominent in a "Christian" curriculum. I'm not particularly aware of anything particularly relgious about the Bard's works, but I suppose anything is better than some of the horrors that are taught in the public school system.

Never heard of Pilgrim's Progress but it doesn't exactly sound like something that would go on my list of favorites, no matter how religious I may be in real life.

Neverwhere wrote:
I loveloveLOVE Flowers for Algernon, even if it was one of the most tragically depressing things I've ever read. Gah. I'm getting sniffly just thinking about it. Smile
It was well-written and moving, thought provoking as well, but I could never call it a favorite. I can only take tragedy when it's of the heroic variety. Or like in Romeo and Juliet, with the "we can only be together in death" type situation.

My family's been dealing with a real tragedy since I was three, so I read books and manga, and watch anime and other such visual media, to escape from pointless sadness.

I'm glad you enjoyed it my friend but when it comes to the classics, I think I'll stick with To Kill a Mockingbird. Certainly there are tragic elements, but the ending is very positive. (It's the only book I was ever assigned to read that I actually read again on my own afterward.)

Neverwhere wrote:
For the record, I like everything, regardless of body count and/or panchira, as long as it has a good story to tell. Well, sometimes it doesn't have to. *quickly hides Urotosukidouji under the bed* Wink
Same here, although I prefer the violence not be just for it's own sake and that the fanservice serve some purpose. (Let it be funny at least, like Negima!'s fanservice.)

By the by, you taught me a new word. I'd never heard "panchira" before, if you can believe that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 2:44 am Reply with quote
Richard J. wrote:
PaladinBlue wrote:
I was generalizing mainly because most of the curriculums I've seen that claim to be Christian love Shakespeare way too much. I mean to an almost obsessive level, second usually to Pilgrim's Progress (my most hated of all "classics"). Of course, my own mother chose A Beka when she started my sister and me. I had to read Hamlet, Julius Caesar, and Romeo and Juliet, at least, normally all three in one year.
Okay, I wasn't sure exactly what you were getting at before. Sorry about that.

It's odd that Shakespeare would be so prominent in a "Christian" curriculum. I'm not particularly aware of anything particularly relgious about the Bard's works, but I suppose anything is better than some of the horrors that are taught in the public school system.


I didn't even realize Christian schools were relatively obsessed with it. I figured that all high schools made sure to have English classes read at least two or three of his plays. I read more than that in high school (R&J, Julius Ceasar, Twelfth Night, Macbeth, and Hamlet.... that makes 5) but I was in honors, so I figured that was part of it. I assumed that we read a lot of it because it was just good (and famous) literature and, well, that's what literature courses are for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FuuH



Joined: 20 Aug 2002
Posts: 23
Location: middle-earth!:D
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:26 am Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
And I LOLed that Utena has senseless violence. First of all Utena is a shoujo title, which means it's not going to have excessive violence in the first place (there are exceptions, though). The point of the duels (which are remisicent of honor duels back in the day) is to fight for the Rose Bride, plus Episode 13 shows the results of those Rose Duels to Utena. Ikki Tousen and Tenjou Tenge are fighting series. The main focus is fighting and they usually have reasons for why they fight.


I was going to get around to mentioning this. Compared to some gore I've seen, Utena is very stylized and it's main focus is anything but the violence. The guy admits he didn't even like Utena, anyway :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:08 am Reply with quote
FuuH wrote:
Mohawk52 wrote:
And I LOLed that Utena has senseless violence. First of all Utena is a shoujo title, which means it's not going to have excessive violence in the first place (there are exceptions, though). The point of the duels (which are remisicent of honor duels back in the day) is to fight for the Rose Bride, plus Episode 13 shows the results of those Rose Duels to Utena. Ikki Tousen and Tenjou Tenge are fighting series. The main focus is fighting and they usually have reasons for why they fight.


I was going to get around to mentioning this. Compared to some gore I've seen, Utena is very stylized and it's main focus is anything but the violence. The guy admits he didn't even like Utena, anyway Sad
I know I'm ol git an all, but I know I never posted this quote as I've yet to see Utena, or any of the other titles to know anything about them. You'll be hearing from my solicitor about this mate. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FuuH



Joined: 20 Aug 2002
Posts: 23
Location: middle-earth!:D
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:11 am Reply with quote
oh gosh I'm so sorry!! I think I may have been trying to quote someone, who quoted you. :O

You should definitely check out Utena some time though...It is probably one of the most fascinating and classic animes I have ever seen ^__^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Kouji



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 978
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:03 pm Reply with quote
This was an interesting rant this week, but there's one tiny problem I have with it. That's people do complain about violence in entertainment just as much as they do about sex, if not more so. When parents complained about teens playing M rated video games, was it the sex that they complained about the most? No, it was their fear of the graphic violence influencing their kids. When parents accused Marilyn Manson's music for causing school shootings, was it because of the sexual content in his lyrics? No, it was because of the violence. When parents complained about Power Rangers back in the '90s was it because they thought Kimberly and Trini wore skimpy outfits? No, it was because of the "violence." When parents complained about Pokemon, was it because of Jessie and James crossdressing or Brock flirting with girls? No, in addition to the evolutionary controversy, the thing they complained about most in Pokemon was the fighting influencing kids. So, why this ranter seems to think that people don't complain about violence in entertainment as much as they do sex is a mystery beyond me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger My Anime My Manga
Strephon



Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 177
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm Reply with quote
Iron Chef wrote:

Sideways tangent to the recent ban on trans-fats at all restaurants in NYC (and a similar ban on foie gras in Chicago) based on health reasons.


The Chicago foie gras ban wasn't about human health concerns; it was in response to the treatment of the animals used to produce it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zetsuie



Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:13 pm Reply with quote
hey since thier not going to release onepice anymore im assuming this makes fansubs fair game also are they still goanna release the manga
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldfusion5050



Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 93
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:20 am Reply with quote
zetsuie wrote:
hey since thier not going to release onepice anymore im assuming this makes fansubs fair game also are they still goanna release the manga


Ano, no. Fansubs are, by copyright law, illegal at any stage of licencing.

Anath_19 wrote:
If anything, I think atheists would be annoyed by that anime based off the Bible more than anything else. Too bad there aren't any R1 DVDs of it, though.


Being such a person, I would be less annoyed and more ammused at the irony. Trinity Blood DVDs would make me annoyed just because I never liked the show, and Chrono Crusade . . . depends which DVD though I would love any manga volume.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
abunai
Old Regular


Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Posts: 5463
Location: 露命
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:02 am Reply with quote
animalia555 wrote:
Also the most compelling reason I have heard for explaining Christanity's aversion to sexuality dates back to it early days when it was persecuted by the Roman Empire. In the curroupt Roman Empire that mercilessly persecuted the Early Christans wanton sexuality was practiced. There are too many examples to even describe a small sample of them. As a result early Christans associated sexuality with moral corruptness, and unnessecary sexuala acts outside of marriage (i.e. sex not intended for procreation) was condemned, and celibacy was considered the ideal. The idea still stubbornally persists to this day. In contrast eastern sociteties, including Japan generally had more balanced outlook on sexuality, combining pleasure and spirtuallity.

I'm sorry, but where on Earth did you get this theory from? I mean, about the "corruption of Rome" being the driving force in Christian sexual restrictiveness?

Was this some nonsense your Sunday school teacher stuffed into your defenseless head while you were a child? Or did you actually read it somewhere? If so, how about quoting a source?

All of which is to say that your theory is claptrap. It's completely ahistorical. No matter what you may have seen in "I, Claudius", wanton sexuality was far from the norm in Rome.

If you want a reason for Christianity (not the Judeo-Christian whole, but the early Christian Church in particular) being pervaded by feelings of abhorrence for natural sexuality, look no further than the twisted man who made this theme so important in both the New Testament and in the Church: St. Paul. Don't blame the Romans for his excesses.

If only the early Church had taken another path than the Pauline, a lot of wickedness might have been avoided.

- abunai
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
animalia555



Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 467
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:00 pm Reply with quote
abunai wrote:
animalia555 wrote:
Also the most compelling reason I have heard for explaining Christanity's aversion to sexuality dates back to it early days when it was persecuted by the Roman Empire. In the curroupt Roman Empire that mercilessly persecuted the Early Christans wanton sexuality was practiced. There are too many examples to even describe a small sample of them. As a result early Christans associated sexuality with moral corruptness, and unnessecary sexuala acts outside of marriage (i.e. sex not intended for procreation) was condemned, and celibacy was considered the ideal. The idea still stubbornally persists to this day. In contrast eastern sociteties, including Japan generally had more balanced outlook on sexuality, combining pleasure and spirtuallity.

I'm sorry, but where on Earth did you get this theory from? I mean, about the "corruption of Rome" being the driving force in Christian sexual restrictiveness?

Was this some nonsense your Sunday school teacher stuffed into your defenseless head while you were a child? Or did you actually read it somewhere? If so, how about quoting a source?

All of which is to say that your theory is claptrap. It's completely ahistorical. No matter what you may have seen in "I, Claudius", wanton sexuality was far from the norm in Rome.

If you want a reason for Christianity (not the Judeo-Christian whole, but the early Christian Church in particular) being pervaded by feelings of abhorrence for natural sexuality, look no further than the twisted man who made this theme so important in both the New Testament and in the Church: St. Paul. Don't blame the Romans for his excesses.

If only the early Church had taken another path than the Pauline, a lot of wickedness might have been avoided.

- abunai
Actually, I did not hear of any of this in sunday school which I haven't really taken since I was about 10. If memory serves I learned about the whole Roman-Christan connection, in a HUMAN SEXUALITY class I took in COLLEGE, and let me just say this it was NOT taught by a conservative teacher. I mean MIss Pisacreta (who teaches the psychology, versus the Biology aspect of the course) even said that porn is okay as long as you don't dwell on it.

Quote:
Same here, although I prefer the violence not be just for it's own sake and that the fanservice serve some purpose. (Let it be funny at least, like Negima!'s fanservice.)
The fanserivce itself being pointless (I don't reall mind, so long as it has a great plot to back it up. I mean look at Tenjho Tenge. MOST of the fanserivce is pointless, BUT, it DOESN'T really matter as it has a great plot, and multi-dimensiional charcters,. I especially love the whole MAya-Shin backstory, and the way that Pgaining power, unlike other fighting series, can morally, mentally, and PHYSICALLY corrupt you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group