×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
EP. REVIEW: Attack on Titan


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
danpmss



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 766
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 1:00 am Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:
danpmss wrote:
No, you are misinterpreting the post I linked and my own words regarding it.

As I already told you, there may be references for both elements, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are DIRECT paralels to our reality, and that's precisely the point of the linked post.


Again, to quote the post you linked to "Now, it is undeniable that the parallels are there, and most likely intentional."

But like I said, that post was terrible and argued against strawmen anyways, but even it at least acknowledged parallels were there.


I mean, that post isn't arguing against strawmen, since this very same accusations did take place back when the manga was released, are still in part taking place in some discussions, and even took place in this very discussion, and your review does the same comparison "Eldians = Persecuted Jews" in a way.

You are cherrypicking the text from that post to make your point in here.
When the text speak about paralels, they are not speaking about DIRECT paralels. What does that mean? It means that they are in no way a direct representation of our actual history figures in any way.

To quote a line some paragraphs bellow the one you just quoted
Quote:
So are Eldians Nazis or Jews? None of those two, not everything is black and white, which is the point Isayama tries to make.


In that context, they are a mix of elements constructed to represent a very especific kind of conflict in this story. The chosen aspects that can be drawn as allusions or elements taken from the Nazi German persecution arein there, but they only a part of what it will soon become a theme of cycle of oppression inside the story, and they are represented accordingly because it is the actual bad element both sides are fighting against, even though their both societies are ironically using of it to repay the other in the same coin for their opression towards them (be it Marley on Paradis the same way Eldia did to them, be it Paradis and the Eldian Restorationists on Marley, the same way they are doing it now, but much more justifiably, the brainwashed population inside the walls, since as explained in Part 1 of season 3, Fritz and the Reiss family made all of the population oblivious about any information that ever happened outside the Walls).

The post is meant to create food for thought for anime-onlies not for them to misjudge the story like people did back when the manga chapters for this part were released, without however, straight spoiling why is that so and give the actual point-of-view of a manga reader that already know what is to come.

It isn't there to give you answers, but to give you reasons on why to consider it otherwise given previously and already established mentioned information thus far into the anime, despite the seemingly possible comparisons one could make on it. Which is again, why I posted, because that's indeed the case.

Mad_Scientist wrote:
danpmss wrote:

And please explain how the heck that would make it anyhow offensive if you may.


If I have to explain to you why a work of fiction saying "here's a group of people who clearly intended to be an analogue for Jews, also actually they're the original Nazis too!" is offensive then I'm not sure where to even begin.

I personally think the post is completely wrong about any Nazi parallels though, and agree more with what johan.eriksson.9003 said regarding Imperial Japan. Which uh, isn't all that great, but is better than the alternative.


Again, they were NOT "clearly intended to be analogue for Jews" in any way, and instead, from the very start of this reveal, they can be at best slightly paraleled of what would become of a not still defeated Nazi German population that remained in victoriously retaken territory by Jews (assuming all of the surrounding countries from German territory were Jewish in that scenario) if they were to manage to back them off during the war, if you REALLY want to make a similar comparison like that (because there's a lot to it still to come and some stuff in this episode alone that already allude to many other mixed elements).

They were equally treated and oppressed in the same way the Eldian did to them (or if you really want to call it, "Yet to be actually defeated in this story Nazi Germany" in Marley's perspective). Or do you think that, in Jewish retriven territory, nazi POW would have been treated ever so lightly and without any hard feelings after causing the holocaust but yet still not being properly defeated and a potential threat to be feared at a distance by that same population?

Because that's the situation we have here, and if you think that's the case and that they would have been "the better person", you may want to read throughtout human history and be proven wrong by the several populations that, when faced with similar circumstances, would definitely have made them pay in the same coin in some way if the war was still not over.

In that case, Eldians were strictly treated poorly albeit not outright thrown in concentration camps and having the Nazi golden time treatment towards their prisoners, for example, instead the Marley government opting to re-educated them into learning about their past crimes and their historical debt towards the Marleyan population, albeit clearly leaning into some fake history issues with the Marleyan government itself (History is made by the winners is quite the big truth to this day), who is definitely painting in a darker light their oppressors in the eyes of the captured Eldian population by ommiting any kind of positive view they may have possibly had in the past, which in turn motivated Eldian Restorationists such as Grisha to rebel for thinking that maybe EVERYTHING they said about their population's war crimes are a lie instead.

Those who dare to rebel against Marley in any way would be turned into Mindless Titans and directed towards Paradis in an effort to halt any kind of oppressive behavior they may still be planning by using their own power against them (beforehand being tortured to know the whereabouts of their leaders, accordingly). Obviously, some of the soldiers are not as righteous and would prefer all of the Eldians died for good suffering, and even having fun making them fight to death after turned into mindless titans, like properly named Gross would do.

Any further than that would spoil events that, as I told before, will be properly covered in the next episode, so I'll refrain myself from commenting on them now. And I really don't think I can be ANY clearer than that without spoiling stuff at this point, so hopefully that's enough to showcase the point in hand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vonPeterhof



Joined: 10 Nov 2014
Posts: 729
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 1:38 am Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Side note, a lot of people seem shocked by the very idea that people would draw any comparisons between Jews and Eldians. Well...

The Eldians are an oppressed people living in a society comparable in many ways to 20th century Europe, where they are forced to live in ghettos, wear distinctive armbands identifying themselves, and are mocked for apparently believing they're "God's chosen people." The Eldian royal family has the last name of Fritz, for crying out loud.

Not disagreeing with your overall point, and admittedly this is a bit of a tangent, but is Fritz even common as an Ashkenazic name? Here in Russia it’s firmly associated with (non-Jewish) Germans, to the point that during World War II “Fritz” was a derogatory word for the German soldiers. Judging by British wartime propaganda, it was used similarly in the UK as well (I guess the US equivalent would be “Kraut”). But then, Hoffman isn’t really considered a “Jewish” name around here either, apparently unlike the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
danpmss



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 766
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 2:05 am Reply with quote
vonPeterhof wrote:
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Side note, a lot of people seem shocked by the very idea that people would draw any comparisons between Jews and Eldians. Well...

The Eldians are an oppressed people living in a society comparable in many ways to 20th century Europe, where they are forced to live in ghettos, wear distinctive armbands identifying themselves, and are mocked for apparently believing they're "God's chosen people." The Eldian royal family has the last name of Fritz, for crying out loud.

Not disagreeing with your overall point, and admittedly this is a bit of a tangent, but is Fritz even common as an Ashkenazic name? Here in Russia it’s firmly associated with (non-Jewish) Germans, to the point that during World War II “Fritz” was a derogatory word for the German soldiers. Judging by British wartime propaganda, it was used similarly in the UK as well (I guess the US equivalent would be “Kraut”). But then, Hoffman isn’t really considered a “Jewish” name around here either, apparently unlike the US.


That's because the story has purposefully mixed elements all around, not to pick sides nor directly represent anyone from our real history in any sort of fictional projection.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad_Scientist
Subscriber
Moderator


Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 3011
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 2:11 am Reply with quote
jdnation wrote:
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Whoa, whoa, hold on a second, back up. Okay.

Jews are not some monolithic hivemind where every one agrees with each other, and you are not the Jew whisperer speaking to the forums to proclaim what "the Jews" do or do not feel.

Let's avoid any sweeping generalizations about what "the Jews" feel in the future. That goes for anybody in this thread, regardless of side.


Obviously. Certainly not any more than those feeling concerned on their behalf. But what I brought up in that example is an undeniable fact. Every concerned criticism one could level at Attack on Titan over this, is so much more applicable to the film 'Life is Beautiful' - that it can be accused of only using everything about the actual historic holocaust in the real world to make people laugh and make a big joke out of it. But obviously the greater context and intent matters, and Jewish audiences are not stupid. So while it goes without saying that Jewish people are not some hivemind where everyone thinks or feels the same, certainly only one of these two sides in this debate entertains the fact that Jewish audiences are perfectly and reasonably accommodating of using an event like the holocaust in a liberal fashion to make a point. If 'Life is Beautiful' can do that, and Life is Beautiful was threading on far thinner ice than anything Isayama is 'guilty' of, then there is really no need for any over-concern about how Jews will feel about a work of fiction that unlike Life is Beautiful is not actually set in real world history.


Rather bold of you to directly quote my post where I warn you to stop posting as though Jews are a monolith and you their chosen speaker, and then go on and post like Jews are a monolith and you their chosen speaker. The fact that you say Jewish audiences instead of "the Jews" does not change the fact that not all Jewish people agree that Life is Beautiful is some amazing masterpiece, and in fact it's been criticized by some for being offensive. And it may surprise you that some Jews in fact do NOT like the holocaust being used in a liberal fashion to make a point, and instead view that as gross and exploitative.

Maybe I wasn't clear enough that I was speaking as a moderator, so let me be crystal clear now: STOP posting as though you speak for all Jews.

On another note, you're bringing up Life is Beautiful is rather off topic. Even if it WAS universally loved and there wasn't a single person who thought it gross, that still wouldn't prove a thing about Attack on Titan and whether it is or isn't antisemitic, as AoT is a completely different work that doesn't even resemble Life is Beautiful. I could bring up the movie "The Day The Clown Cried", another film involving the holocaust that was apparently so offensive it never even got released, but it would be silly to act like the existence of The Day The Clown Cried somehow proved Attack on Titan is antisemitic. I could even bring up how famous and beloved movies like Schindler's List have been criticized by some for being antisemitic and gross, but that still would be irrelevant because Schindler's List is not Attack on Titan.

"Schindler's List is not Attack on Titan" is not something I ever expected I would type, but here we are. Moving on to more pleasant things.



vonPeterhof wrote:
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Side note, a lot of people seem shocked by the very idea that people would draw any comparisons between Jews and Eldians. Well...

The Eldians are an oppressed people living in a society comparable in many ways to 20th century Europe, where they are forced to live in ghettos, wear distinctive armbands identifying themselves, and are mocked for apparently believing they're "God's chosen people." The Eldian royal family has the last name of Fritz, for crying out loud.

Not disagreeing with your overall point, and admittedly this is a bit of a tangent, but is Fritz even common as an Ashkenazic name? Here in Russia it’s firmly associated with (non-Jewish) Germans, to the point that during World War II “Fritz” was a derogatory word for the German soldiers. Judging by British wartime propaganda, it was used similarly in the UK as well (I guess the US equivalent would be “Kraut”). But then, Hoffman isn’t really considered a “Jewish” name around here either, apparently unlike the US.


Mea culpa here, I should have considered how potentially different name associations can be throughout the world. I guess if I'm honest I can't even be sure the name Fritz is associated with Jews throughout the US, it may be more local or related to my own personal sphere and experiences. So I'll concede that point.


danpmss wrote:
Mad_Scientist wrote:
danpmss wrote:
No, you are misinterpreting the post I linked and my own words regarding it.

As I already told you, there may be references for both elements, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are DIRECT paralels to our reality, and that's precisely the point of the linked post.


Again, to quote the post you linked to "Now, it is undeniable that the parallels are there, and most likely intentional."

But like I said, that post was terrible and argued against strawmen anyways, but even it at least acknowledged parallels were there.


I mean, that post isn't arguing against strawmen, since this very same accusations did take place back when the manga was released, are still in part taking place in some discussions, and even took place in this very discussion, and your review does the same comparison "Eldians = Persecuted Jews" in a way.


A couple points.

-I'm not the reviewer.

-The post you link to argues against the argument, among other things, that "Isayama uses Holocaust parallels, and is therefore a Nazi apologist", which brings up my comment about strawmen. That is an absurd argument, but it's also not an argument that either myself or James is making.

I'd respond to more of your wall of text, but I'm honestly not sure there's a point, as it seems clear we're not gonna really come to any understanding here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Agent355



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Posts: 5113
Location: Crackberry in hand, thumbs at the ready...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:53 am Reply with quote
Tuor_of_Gondolin wrote:
You know what my country did during WW II? We rounded up a certain segment of our population and put them into camps, which they were not allowed to leave. These people had committed no crimes, but there they were. Only they weren't Jews, they were Americans of Japanese ancestry.
*****
In many countries, those of certain race or ethnicity were prohibited from going into certain areas or establishments. Throughout history, "the Other" has been used as a way to manipulate the populous.

It's a great point and should be emphasized more---I don't think there are any countries on Earth that are completely free of racism or "othering," but the United States, from slavery to the Trail of Tears to segregation and Jim Crow to Japanese internment to having forced sterilization still technically legal on a Federal level today (a law that supposedly "inspired" Hitler)--- has a REALLY long, awful history that many American kids only learn the basics of.


Doodleboy wrote:
Well I'll try to keep things short since I think everyone's discoursed out.

Do I think Attack on Titan is purposefully anti-semetic? No. You don't write a story demonizing a minority while having every single viewpoint character be said minority. Do I understand people who'll take offense to it, yep.

The further the series goes on the more out of the way Isayama will go to state that oppression is bad, that persecution of minorities is evil. But the unfortunate implications of the Titan is still there, and there's more unfortunate implications to come. The story is a mess, and that mess can be interpreted badly by the worst people.

Back when I was reading the chapters I had a different reaction, knowing Isayama's controversy. I read Marley as Koreans angry at Japan for denying the existence of War Crimes. Both Eldia supressing it's own history paralleling Japan's controversy with it's own history education/denialism, and Isayama's own conflicts with Korean fans. Admittedly this reading annoyed the hell out of me. As comparing people wanting you to stop glorifying Imperial Japan to jewish persecution is a tad odious.

Same, and i'm still not completely convinced it isn't, thus my post. However...
Doodleboy wrote:

What kind of saves it though is that the story is very clear that Grisha isn't a great person, and his POV isn't one you should trust
.
I think we got a hint in this episode where Grisha is pretending to have translated ancient language to better rally the Restorationists (uh, not to mention the whole "raised first son from toddler-hood to become a double agent to fight for his cause, knowing that it could get his whole family killed, failed, gave superpowers to younger son without telling him, because that's a *much* better way to get your kid to fight for your cause!")
Grisha Yaegar is up there with Genji ikari from Evangelion and Daigo from Dororo in the list of "anime dads risking their sons' lives for their own selfish reasons" in my mind.

Doodleboy wrote:

But there are things I like about the backstory. I mean there has been discourse around Attack on Titan before this. A country trying to gain more territory, killing enemies that are literally inhuman monsters. Eren our protagonist is on a genocidal vendetta of revenge, vowing to exterminate the Titans from the world. People have been comparing this universe to the worldview of fascism and imperialism before this.

The revelations basically turn this narrative on it's head.

It turns out that the entire world agrees with Eren Jaeger. And that worldview Eren holds may be the death of Eren and everyone he cares about.

If I were to end this season it'd be on a scene of the Marley military, doing their own version of the Survey corps salute. A Marley recruit does a passionate speech vowing revenge, a promise to exterminate every single Titan inside the walls.

A bitter ironic echo of Eren's vow in the beginning of the series.

There is a lot of really interesting parallelisms. I love the way you phrase it:
It turns out that the entire world agrees with Eren Jaeger. And that worldview Eren holds may be the death of Eren and everyone he cares about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kirki



Joined: 11 Jun 2019
Posts: 296
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:58 am Reply with quote
For the love of God, this is a story about WAR.

Everybody is making parallels as they see fit because almost every nation in this planet has a history of war. War is illogical by definition; it only makes sense when you look at it from a completely utilitarian perspective: "I'm hungry. The person next to me has food. I will go kill the person next to me and grab their food and this is how I will survive." This is how it is basically dumbed down. The problem comes when you need to persuade other people do the killing for you. That's when you use: "The person next to us is a bad person and deserves to be killed. Go kill him." And you can use absolutely anything to portray them as a bad person, usually them being different. Because they believe in a different God, because they have different laws or customs, because they simply have different anatomic characteristics. Different defies tradition, it defies order, change seems difficult and threatening.

History is also written by the winners. If the Nazis had won back in WWII, society would probably look very different than what it is right now. Yet life would still go on, even so, one way or another. Genocides have been committed multiple times during the course of history, with the worse one being... oh right, AMERICA GOD BLESS. (Apparently God didn't bless the natives enough, how sad, offer some prayers) Atrocious war crimes have been committed, and are still being committed right now as we are talking about fictional stuff and worry how much they might offend whomever. Sometimes I think we live inside a pretty pink cloud, protected from all the horrors other people have to face. People are dying in Syria, Iraq, and other places so that you and I can sit behind a computer and hypocritically ponder about how much an armband should offend a previously oppressed group of people. Does it make you feel uncomfortable? It should be.

The reason we do talk about fictional stuff is because there are things to be learnt through them without us having to experience them directly. Attack on Titan tells you that it is important to remember your history, (The name of the Queen is Historia! Come on!) albeit difficult, because history can be conveniently altered in order to fit political agendas. BUT, remembering your history is really an entirely different animal than blaming currently living people for crimes that have happened in the past. Some history has unfortunately been lost forever. Do you imagine where humanity would have been right now if the Library of Alexandria hadn't been burnt to the ground?

The message is that every person born into this world deserves to be happy in it, no matter the circumstances surrounding their birth. Nitpicking armbands doesn't contribute - it's like focusing on a tree and missing the forest behind it. Instead of keeping a calm head and seeing the armbands for what they are - imagery famous and effective enough to make the audience do an immediate connection to political oppression without having to explain much, under the "show don't tell" principle - we keep talking against one another like we have to prove the other wrong as a matter of honor. Yes, controversy is trendy and catchy and all, but dragging this too far cheapens the essence of the series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killjoy_the



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 2459
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:34 am Reply with quote
I think how the next episode is literally a name drop but also it's not the actual translation of the title (Attack Titan instead of Attack on Titan) perfectly encapsulates how everything we thought we knew about this series was pretty much wrong from the get-go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
danpmss



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 766
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:45 am Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:


A couple points.

-I'm not the reviewer.


Oh, that's one thing I would like to apologize in that case. I assumed you were the reviewer since your were arguably defending the very same points made. Sorry about that.

The reviewers don't really have the same name in the forums after all, so I really never know, my mistake.

Quote:

-The post you link to argues against the argument, among other things, that "Isayama uses Holocaust parallels, and is therefore a Nazi apologist", which brings up my comment about strawmen. That is an absurd argument, but it's also not an argument that either myself or James is making.


However, this is not the case. This is according to the post one of the claims some people were making about the content and spreading over the internet ever since these chapters came by in the manga, not necessarily you guys. I never accused you people of saying that, nor the poster. He is referring about a group of people who did and argued accordingly, and I am taking it as a reference to point out my own argument regarding why is it wrong to assume things the way it's been done be it both in here and in the review.

Again, no strawman argument, and it doesn't at all argue against my argument. It was solely mentioning people who claimed this and why that post was an answer to those in case they were to come back with that mindset after the episode's release (which hopefully, wasn't the case, as mentioned by that same poster).

Quote:

I'd respond to more of your wall of text, but I'm honestly not sure there's a point, as it seems clear we're not gonna really come to any understanding here.


I mean, I'm here to discuss the anime, if people say something I really disagree with, I will of course respond to that criticism and engage in a debate. This isn't exactly the kind of assumption I would like to go by inconclusive about this particular work and subject, but I can't actually oblige you to continue. If you do wish to cease responding, it's fine. But I still will quote your future comments regarding this depending of what you say about it as the discussion progresses with my own counterarguments, so I hope you don't mind that.


Last edited by danpmss on Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:59 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SheRrIs





PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:45 am Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:
Sherris wrote:
Has virtue signalling gone too far? It's a fictional story, with fictional characters and settings. Even if some resemblance to real-life events could be drawn in some cases - WHY should it be considered offensive? On a purely intellectual level. Are certain types of imaginary too politically incorrect? Why? Who decides this? Why is that person's judgement considered more acceptable than another's? Discuss.


On a "purely intellectual level" it's because fiction still has meaning, and much of the discussion around fiction (especially visual media) is about using different tools of communication to both impart and decipher that meaning. If a creator is using a particular piece of imagery, be it as a reference or allusion or direct comparison, then the various ideas attached to that imagery are going to be brought up in the minds of the audience.

Titan isn't stepping into this by accident, either. It's very deliberately referencing one of the most memorable symbols from the Holocaust. You can have whatever reaction to that you want, and if it's to just ignore it that's your call. But saying it's "virtue signalling" to acknowledge and dissect that decision isn't just bad faith arguing, it's willfully lying about what the series is doing.


Why would referencing Holocaust cause controversy? Not rewriting the history, simply referencing some characteristics in a fictional setting? Is it because it happened in anime&manga - media that are considered 'pop culture'? I have a feeling few would protest if AoT was a book.
Back to top
Angel of Blood



Joined: 18 Jun 2019
Posts: 2
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:09 am Reply with quote
Regarding names and ethnic backgrounds. Fritz is a very German name coming from old German which means 'ruler of peace'. So there is nothing Jewish about that. The name Armin is a German/Persian name which means Protector of the Aryans. He has blond hair, blue eyes, is intelligent and on top of that he is also a titan. Does that mean the Eldias represent the superior Aryan race who are being oppressed by the inferior Marley civilization? German names, the overall white population. Everything makes sense now! See what I did there?

I find it sad that after such a reveal in the story some people would focus on one single aspect that might be controversial for some, rather than seeing the bigger picture. To be honest I came here to ask if anybody else thought the titans in the walls might be a reference to the Golden Army from Hellboy, but instead I got caught in a political debate. Awareness of history is one thing, but there is a fine line between awareness and being oversensitive about political symbolism put into a vague context. Really, I wonder why no one here has accused the author of glorifying white supremacy yet because there is no black character in AoT.


Last edited by Angel of Blood on Wed Jun 19, 2019 7:10 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SheRrIs





PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:24 am Reply with quote
Agent355 wrote:


My absolute biggest concern would be if Attack on Titan sends the message that rememberance of one’s ancestors/forefathers/nation’s misdeeds is not necessary or worse, actively oppressive against innocent descendants.


I, on the other hand, find it refreshing. There are plenty of works that present the narrative of 'those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it', but we hardly see the downsides of 'remembering history too well' in fiction. What if guilt on one hand and a sense of entitlement arising from victimhood on the other get passed down the generations? Will it backfire at some point? Can history prevent us from engaging with those we consider as 'others' or 'aggressors'? History can be used as a propaganda tool, even without it being altered in any way. This could have much more pronounced outcomes in societies that have subscribed to the collectivist, not the individualistic mindset. (Just thinking of that Chinese table tennis player who flooded his hotel room in Japan 'to take revenge on the Japanese for WWII' - I know it's random.)
Back to top
ShatteredWorld



Joined: 05 May 2013
Posts: 265
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:30 am Reply with quote
Kirki wrote:
For the love of God, this is a story about WAR.

Everybody is making parallels as they see fit because almost every nation in this planet has a history of war. War is illogical by definition; it only makes sense when you look at it from a completely utilitarian perspective: "I'm hungry. The person next to me has food. I will go kill the person next to me and grab their food and this is how I will survive." This is how it is basically dumbed down. The problem comes when you need to persuade other people do the killing for you. That's when you use: "The person next to us is a bad person and deserves to be killed. Go kill him." And you can use absolutely anything to portray them as a bad person, usually them being different. Because they believe in a different God, because they have different laws or customs, because they simply have different anatomic characteristics. Different defies tradition, it defies order, change seems difficult and threatening.

History is also written by the winners. If the Nazis had won back in WWII, society would probably look very different than what it is right now. Yet life would still go on, even so, one way or another. Genocides have been committed multiple times during the course of history, with the worse one being... oh right, AMERICA GOD BLESS. (Apparently God didn't bless the natives enough, how sad, offer some prayers) Atrocious war crimes have been committed, and are still being committed right now as we are talking about fictional stuff and worry how much they might offend whomever. Sometimes I think we live inside a pretty pink cloud, protected from all the horrors other people have to face. People are dying in Syria, Iraq, and other places so that you and I can sit behind a computer and hypocritically ponder about how much an armband should offend a previously oppressed group of people. Does it make you feel uncomfortable? It should be.

The reason we do talk about fictional stuff is because there are things to be learnt through them without us having to experience them directly. Attack on Titan tells you that it is important to remember your history, (The name of the Queen is Historia! Come on!) albeit difficult, because history can be conveniently altered in order to fit political agendas. BUT, remembering your history is really an entirely different animal than blaming currently living people for crimes that have happened in the past. Some history has unfortunately been lost forever. Do you imagine where humanity would have been right now if the Library of Alexandria hadn't been burnt to the ground?

The message is that every person born into this world deserves to be happy in it, no matter the circumstances surrounding their birth. Nitpicking armbands doesn't contribute - it's like focusing on a tree and missing the forest behind it. Instead of keeping a calm head and seeing the armbands for what they are - imagery famous and effective enough to make the audience do an immediate connection to political oppression without having to explain much, under the "show don't tell" principle - we keep talking against one another like we have to prove the other wrong as a matter of honor. Yes, controversy is trendy and catchy and all, but dragging this too far cheapens the essence of the series.


Exactly this. I just don't see how someone could look at the story of Attack on Titan and get from it (in full context) that the series is anti-semitic or fascist in nature. Hell, in the latest chapter of the manga alone, spoiler[we have Gabi realize that the people she's been calling Devil-blood or Devils have actually been real people, with real families and real siblings, one of which she killed in cold blood, continuing that cycle of hatred. She realizes this, finally, cries over the loss of a potential friendship and possibly being able to reconnect and apologize to Kaya. Then we have Gabi literally snatch off Falco's armband, a symbol of oppression in the series.]

Context is always important, but unfortunately we exist in a world where hot takes and clout-chasing clickbait exists. So the nuance of the thing is ultimately lost.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiskeyii



Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:04 am Reply with quote
Kirki wrote:
Instead of keeping a calm head and seeing the armbands for what they are - imagery famous and effective enough to make the audience do an immediate connection to political oppression without having to explain much, under the "show don't tell" principle - we keep talking against one another like we have to prove the other wrong as a matter of honor. Yes, controversy is trendy and catchy and all, but dragging this too far cheapens the essence of the series.


Bolded for emphasis. But that right there is my biggest problem with Isayama's employment of the armbands: he's using it to highlight oppression, rather than the thing the Holocaust is most known for, which is genocide. To me that smacks of Isayama not really grasping what those armbands mean in a wider context--it'd be like someone arguing that the swastika can be used in its original Buddhist context. You absolutely *can* try that, but the rest of the world is gonna give you some serious side-eye because it's widely accepted as a Nazi symbol now, and no amount of declarations otherwise is going to help you reclaim such a deeply entrenched symbol.

EDIT: To clarify, if this were in service of making some kind of commentary about the plight of the Jewish people or the Holocaust, I wouldn't mind so much. But the series seems to be deliberately sidestepping the whole genocide issue, so to me it comes off as cheap and/or misguided. Not malicious, per se, or at least not intentionally so, but definitely something Isayama should've spent more time Googling.


Last edited by whiskeyii on Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FackuIkari



Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 411
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:09 am Reply with quote
"Attack on titan is pro nazi" or whatever, yeah yeah, we went through this shit 3 years ago, what else is new
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maximilianjenus



Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 2862
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:19 am Reply with quote
Angel of Blood wrote:

I find it sad that after such a reveal in the story some people would focus on one single aspect that might be controversial for some, rather than seeing the bigger picture. To be honest I came here to ask if anybody else thought the titans in the walls might be a reference to the Golden Army from Hellboy, but instead I got caught in a political debate. Awareness of history is one thing, but there is a fine line between awareness and being oversensitive about political symbolism put into a vague context. Really, I wonder why no one here has accused the author of glorifying white supremacy yet because there is no black character in AoT.


I feel you man; I came here wanted to see people's reaciton of the plot being turned on it's head and instead I read about [expletive] armbands; funny thing because as a westerner (or are latin americans considered westerners?) I ahd not even heard of them until this topic.

Another observation is that in other comunities people were not comparing the eldians to jews at all, but rather, calling them right wingers. I finalyl understood why ; while the westerners were being all self important about this being about jews, the asians got the message of the eldians being japanese instead. trapped in an island (paradise), pacifist government (king fritz) , after inading thier neighboors (japan vs korea/china wars); now I understand why the author made AoT so european, the landines he woudl have to avoid if it made the context asian would have blow off his legs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 35 of 39

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group