Forum - View topicAnswerman - Why Are Big Hollywood Studios Buying Anime Distributors?
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Kadmos1
Posts: 13555 Location: In Phoenix but has an 85308 ZIP |
|
|||
Technically, Disney has not finalized this pending I don't think they have gotten "yes" or "no" from all 15 foreign regulators I mentioned earlier.
|
||||
honey power
Posts: 5 |
|
|||
Hang on. My brain can't keep up.
|
||||
I_Drive_DSM
Posts: 217 |
|
|||
I haven't had cable television for going on SEVEN years now. Seven. It was difficult at first but then all the major stations in the US on air went digital. My city gets nearly 80 air channels just using an antenna (Mohu Leaf, which was well worth the purchase). There's really no reason to have 700 channels and me not even watch 695 of them. Plus like you state most all smart TVs nowadays have apps or can cast from your phone. All of my TVs can cast or have apps. When you have free streaming services like YouTube at your disposal for free that you can watch on a 4K TV it's kind of hard to justify cable. Networks like CBS and the like push free channels on TV apps and Roku as well. I do pay for Crunchyroll (it's a pretty good service despite any of the 'normie' memes people want to post) and I pay for a free other services. However combined they're drastically less than even most basic cable packages, and that's with near unlimited content that's not held down by cable TV slots. |
||||
KabaKabaFruit
Posts: 1871 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba |
|
|||
Well, can't say I should expect FUNimation's future to be rosy in any way if Sony wants more of a say in affairs...
But that's none of my business... *casually sips Lipton tea* |
||||
lumclaw
Posts: 47 |
|
|||
After the way Disney handled Power Rangers (among other things like the terrible theatrical performance of the Pokemon movies they'd distributed through Miramax), I'm not very convinced they understand such Japanese properties enough to want them owning anime . It's kind of funny how for a short time in early 2010, they owned PR and Marvel (Marvel was involved in creating Super Sentai). Great crossover potential that didn't bear fruit. Not to mention Disney got PR through acquiring parts of Fox. Go figure.
What do I think of streaming video? Fairly little. For the most part I'd rather skip movies or TV shows without an accessible physical media release in my region/language. |
||||
TheAnimeRevolutionizer
Posts: 329 |
|
|||
Do they not know that their originating medium gave way to their beloved cash cows? And that their medium helped make sequential art an actual thing? Do they not have an ounce of creativity and fighting drive to make a statement in this world? I know they have a deal in China and they are big in Japan, but what they are doing is suicide, and as you've stated, it appears they want to do it. Pitiful and pathetic. |
||||
leafy sea dragon
Posts: 7163 Location: Another Kingdom |
|
|||
Well, they handled Ghibli localization and distribution quite well for quite a while. |
||||
Ushio
Posts: 630 |
|
|||
The Alien IP should have ended with Aliens anyway. But there is nothing monopoly about this. More companies are producing films/TV shows today than ever before because distribution is so much easier and cheaper thanks to the internet. When you hear about films that lost money in the 50's to 70's even though they made 5-6 times there production budget back in the domestic boxoffice alone it's because the distribution of several thousand copies of the film each across multiple film reels costs a lot of money at the time. You are right the Fox studio will probably be shut down. Disney doesn't need to make films under the Fox brand they already have 40%+ of the US boxoffice locked down. Disney wants Fox's film and television library for streaming services since Disney will either buy out AT&T and Comcast for full control of HULU or sell their 60% stake and start an ABC streaming service to go along with the Disney and ESPN streaming services. |
||||
Ushio
Posts: 630 |
|
|||
0% This isn't about films, it isn't about getting X-men and FF back. It's about getting Fox's huge library or films and TV shows for streaming services, getting a majority controlling share of Hulu and getting Star India (the next growth region) and maybe Europe's SKY expanding Disney's international reach in television and streaming. Disney has made huge amounts of money in the last 3 years out of theatrical films and yet ESPN, ABC broadcast the other cable channels as a group and the theme parks placed Disney's film division in 5th place in where Disney makes it's money. |
||||
Ushio
Posts: 630 |
|
|||
The thing is most US cable channels cost you 0 dollars a month. It's the big ones that rack up the bill ESPN 1 alone charges Comcast and other big cable/satellite companies $8.50 a month per subscriber, the retransmission fees for ABC, NBC and CBS are $5 a month each and local sports channels start at $3 a month each. All shopping, religion and most foreign language channels are funded by advertising alone so get carried by cable companies at no charge. While smaller cable channels like A&E, Syfy and Cartoon network charge $0.30 each or less in most cases. |
||||
matt78
Posts: 249 |
|
|||
Here is a quote from Edge of Spider-Geddon #1. "What that means Spider-Punk is that I own you. Or rather your image. Heroes of your time all turn me a tidy profit. The dolls, the T-shirts, the comics...Well the comics don't make me much, But the films! Ah the films." I think that pretty much tells you what their thinking is. Last edited by matt78 on Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||
Ushio
Posts: 630 |
|
|||
Well the layoffs would have happened even if the sale didn't happen. Murdoch wants to focus on live news and sports in the US everything else was either going to be sold or shut down. |
||||
Kadmos1
Posts: 13555 Location: In Phoenix but has an 85308 ZIP |
|
|||
I agree with this. I also think that Disney is the only of the Big 6 Amer. movie companies* that has an established rapport *the other 5 are 20th Century Fox, WB, Universal, Paramount, and Columbia/Sony) |
||||
macattack
Posts: 256 |
|
|||
Disney is farming out limited Marvel rights to indie publisher IDW in the coming months. If that isn't a sign of what is coming, I don't know what is. |
||||
dragonrider_cody
Posts: 2541 |
|
|||
He wouldn’t have shut it down. It would have shut off HUGE positive cash flow, and wasted millions in expenses. Murdoch isn’t stupid. If he couldn’t have found a buyer, he would have spun off, or more likely spun-out the assets. Both would have brought in billions, and a spin out would have shifted most of the tax liabilities and debt to the new company rather than Fox Broadcasting. No one is going to shut down a profitable multi billion dollar business just because they want to focus on other things. There are more options that selling to another company. |
||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group