×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
REVIEW: Detective Pikachu


Goto page Previous  1, 2

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sekaro



Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 348
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 3:11 am Reply with quote
I've seen the movie so I would to point out a few things that bothered me without spoiling much of anything of course.

1. For a movie that seems to be praised for making a live-action pokemon film work, I didn't really see a whole lot of different pokemon. They reused the same type of pokemons and just multiplied them to fill up the background. In one scene, I saw nothing but a group of sneazels and charmanders littering the screen. This might seem like a small issue but it bothered me quite a bit.

2. The side-characters are really not that engrossing to watch. I agree with pretty much all of the points the reviewer made regarding the side-characters. By the end of the movie, I just couldn't care less about their arcs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
King Pickle the Wise



Joined: 21 Apr 2019
Posts: 37
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 8:47 pm Reply with quote
ninjamitsuki wrote:
So... First ever good video game movie?


There's been a lot of great anime movies, but I guess you're talking about Hollywood live action films? I'd say no. It suffers from the usual problems they face. Not having much to do with the games its based on, controversal racial casting choices, and bad CGI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danpmss



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 764
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 9:58 pm Reply with quote
Sekaro wrote:

1. For a movie that seems to be praised for making a live-action pokemon film work, I didn't really see a whole lot of different pokemon. They reused the same type of pokemons and just multiplied them to fill up the background. In one scene, I saw nothing but a group of sneazels and charmanders littering the screen. This might seem like a small issue but it bothered me quite a bit.


There's quite a reasonable amount of Pokemon appearing all around, for a 100 minutes movie.
https://www.polygon.com/2018/11/12/18087432/detective-pikachu-trailer-live-action-every-pokemon-list-cameos
And these aren't even all of them, even if they also count a few posters.
You will find less variety in 100 minutes of the anime (and obviously, the games, which consume 50+ hours even when you are playing just the story casually). Sometimes that can get overdone (like the Pokemon 2000 movie, in which most of them just appeared to appear and had not really much significance even to enrich the settings of the very plot, like this one tries and succeeds in establishing with the new city). Which isn't really a problem tbh, but I would rather treat it as a bonus at that point.

And iirc, even in this movie, by the third act, there's quite A LOT of different Pokemon (some different, and some repeated) in the streets just for cameo spoiler[during the whole parade incident]. The only problem I've found with variety was probably the fact that spoiler[I could find at least one of each type except for Steel (correct me if I'm wrong)].

Otherwise, this was a pretty good amount for a first movie, especially when a lot of the Pokemon shown played a nice roll in certain parts of the movie instead of just being background fodder (some of them actually had more of a role than some of the secondary cast lel).

Which brings to the point I actually agree...
Quote:
2. The side-characters are really not that engrossing to watch. I agree with pretty much all of the points the reviewer made regarding the side-characters. By the end of the movie, I just couldn't care less about their arcs.


Considering that anyone other than Pikachu and Tim were mostly extra at best, with very few minutes of screentime if not seconds (yes, that "important" person), with the exception of that girl, kinda, I don't really think the secondary cast was really too much of the focus at all and was never intended to be fair.

Everyone wanted to see Deadtective Poolkachu goodness and his chemistry with the main character which is his partner for the rest of the movie, and we kinda got exactly that. It kinda went with a Conan Doyle-like approach and treated the other characters in the "Mystery" more like plot devices with defining characteristics and some character development by the end, than an actually impactful presence to the other characters outside the main storyline in which they are inserted for very specific reasons.

But for that exact reason, it works in here since they were indeed giving more attention towards other elements and mostly the major core to the plot instead of giving more depth they didn't really need for this kind of script.


Last edited by danpmss on Fri May 10, 2019 12:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jose Cruz



Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 1773
Location: South America
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 11:02 pm Reply with quote
I think the reviewers here give out A's too easily for blockbuster Hollywood movies. It might be a good piece of entertainment but I strongly suspect it is not something artistically accomplished to deserve an A score.

Dardre wrote:
BadNewsBlues wrote:
ninjamitsuki wrote:
So... First ever good video game movie?


No given the existence of Mortal Kombat


So, first ever good video game movie then. Sorry, but Mortal Kombat was a terrible movie. It was just terrible in a way that was entertaining.


There are movies based on videogames made in other countries besides the US. In Japan there are many movies based on videogames that are good, for instance, the Clannad movie from 2007 was good (although weaker than the TV show), and Clannad is a videogame.

I actually liked the Warcraft movie a lot. Although I enjoyed it for its super over the top quality it is a movie that was effectively entertaining, much better than those Avengers movies for instance in that regard.

By the way I think that Clannad: Afterstory is the best piece of film media (TV show/movie/short) based on a videogame ever made. Visual novels are perhaps the best kind of videogame to adapt into a narrative medium such as film.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Dessa



Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 4438
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 11:23 pm Reply with quote
danpmss wrote:
The only problem I've found with variety was probably the fact that spoiler[I could find at least one of each type except for Steel (correct me if I'm wrong)].


I'm pretty sure spoiler[I saw at least a Magnemite somewhere, plus there's the Dialga statue in Howard's office]. Speaking of part of that... spoiler[why were the statues Dialga, Palkia, and Arceus, instead of D, P, and Giratina]?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
steelmirror



Joined: 22 Oct 2015
Posts: 342
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 11:44 pm Reply with quote
Finally saw it. Freaking loved it. I'll admit I'd probably give this like a B-/C+ if it were not a pokemon movie, but....well it's a pokemon movie! Pikachu is incredibly adorable, the world feels and looks great, and the main duo and Ken Watanabe are good enough to carry an otherwise weak cast.

You basically know whether you'll like this already if you liked the trailer. My friends and I dressed up in pokemon onesies after work to see it and had a blast. Solid A from me, heartily recommend it to anyone who likes pokemon and isn't too grown up for a little wholesome fluffy fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AiddonValentine



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 2204
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 3:29 am Reply with quote
ninjamitsuki wrote:
So... First ever good video game movie?


Pretty much. I know some will argue Mortal Kombat was good, but....no, that movie merely competent, not good. That runs completely on the rose-tinted glasses industry.

But anyway, good to hear we've got ourselves a winner. Though I dread the upcoming Sonic movie once again making the average plunge at least we got this before then.

Now to see if Legendary starts bugging Nintendo so they can make stuff based on other properties. You just know some chucklehead would see Fire Emblem and try to pitch it as Game of Thrones
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14761
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 8:39 am Reply with quote
It only took a couple days - and the full Detective Pikachu movie has already been leaked! It's even uploaded on Youtube! Razz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAA_yWX8ycQ

(Hint: don't watch it if ya want to get spoiled!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oggers



Joined: 29 Nov 2017
Posts: 362
Location: Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:11 am Reply with quote
gridsleep wrote:
It would have been more natural as Detective Meowth. At least he does talk all the time. And seems more like a natural reservoir for Deadpool-as-a-Pocket-Monster. I was never a Pokémon fan, but I do like Meowth.


That Meowth is pretty much exclusive to the anime series. No other Meowth in the franchise can speak like he can, and he only learned to speak through sheer force of will.

That said, I'm glad to hear a mostly positive review on this movie. As a long-time Pokemon fan, I've been looking forward to it and I'm going to see it tonight!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tygerchickchibi



Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 1448
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:12 am Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
It only took a couple days - and the full Detective Pikachu movie has already been leaked! It's even uploaded on Youtube! Razz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAA_yWX8ycQ

(Hint: don't watch it if ya want to get spoiled!)


I watched this at least twice. Then I saw the movie yesterday.

I'll be watching it again today. I encourage all of you to watch it.

I'm going to agree with @danpmss here. I saw a lot of different pokemon, even some I didn't recognize because I actually stopped watching it after the Jotoh arc. I watched a few epsodes of the other seasons last year but I never was consistent. I don't remember a lot of Pokemon in the show, tbh. I think it's pretty accurate in terms of representation.

I ain't gonna lie, though. I think Psyduck is the real star of the movie. Yeah Pikachu is there, but I genuinely liked the interaction between him and Lucy.

Lucy wasn't 100% likeable but she did remind me of a less annoying Misty. Loved Charizard. Annndd....

spoiler[the fight scene with Ditto was hilariously amazing. You can't stop staring at its face when it transforms into other people/pokemon. ]

Adding it to my list of blu-rays when it comes on home release.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danpmss



Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 764
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 12:15 pm Reply with quote
Jose Cruz wrote:

Visual novels are perhaps the best kind of videogame to adapt into a narrative medium such as film.


Sorry, but Visual Novels are SO MUCH MORE of a full blown virtual book with (sometimes) "choose your own adventure" elements of a sort than a videogame that I can't really agree with that statement, maybe with the exception of heavily hybrid examples with loads and loads of gameplay such Danganronpa and Phoenix Wright (and those are exceptions pretty much, there are much more purely text heavy VNs than gameplay focused ones).

Calling them a game is more by definition for their minor interactive (or not, some don't even have choices at all and are straight books through and through) elements (in fact, vndb doesn't even classify as a VN if it isn't more of a book than a game).

Also the Clannad movie was quite the bad and lackluster adaptation, especially compared to what this movie did to its barebones source material game.


Last edited by danpmss on Sat May 11, 2019 1:48 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 5920
PostPosted: Sat May 11, 2019 1:38 am Reply with quote
Dardre wrote:

So, first ever good video game movie then. Sorry, but Mortal Kombat was a terrible movie. It was just terrible in a way that was entertaining.


That was the street fighter movie, the original MK movie was good certainly better than Annihilation.

AiddonValentine wrote:


Pretty much. I know some will argue Mortal Kombat was good, but....no, that movie merely competent, not good. That runs completely on the rose-tinted glasses industry.


Just like the Detective Pikachu movie thrives on nostalgia to appeal to people who grew up with the games/anime?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EricJ2



Joined: 01 Feb 2014
Posts: 4016
PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2019 12:18 am Reply with quote
StarfighterPegasus wrote:
I view the sequels as a bad thing. The movie hasn't been released the audience yet and Legendary wants to make two sequels haven't they learned from The defunct DCEU and the struck down Dark Universe not to mention the Amazing spiderman all of whom just made movies to set up for sequels instead of actually movies people wanted to see? I think Legendary should slow down and wait until they see the final numbers before they go off trying to build a cnimatic universe. They should look at what the MCU has been doing for a decade use that as blueprint on how to make a successful franchise


Old saying that Warner, and especially Legendary, has never...ever...EVER learned:
"Never greenlight that sequel on Thursday afternoon or Monday morning--You'll live to regret it." Laughing

ninjamitsuki wrote:
So... First ever good video game movie?


Nope, sorry, we already have __________

(Pick response as needed, depending on individual taste:
- Van Damme "Street Fighter"
- Doom
- Prince of Persia
- the first "Mortal Kombat", with the Highlander guy)


Warner's US-pandering dependence on Ryan Reynolds keeps it just a hair from being __Street Fighter__, but gotta admit, the CGI on the other Pokemon brings it pretty darn close.

Jose Cruz wrote:
There are movies based on videogames made in other countries besides the US. In Japan there are many movies based on videogames that are good


And I'll just have to keep looking for a good copy of Miike Takahashi's live-action "Ace Attorney":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIi44sSQCDs


Last edited by EricJ2 on Mon May 13, 2019 10:05 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AmpersandsUnited



Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 633
PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2019 1:02 am Reply with quote
BadNewsBlues wrote:
Just like the Detective Pikachu movie thrives on nostalgia to appeal to people who grew up with the games/anime?


I agree, it's pretty clear given all the main Pokemon in the movie are all Gen I Pokemon. It was clearly made for a more casual Pokemon Go audience. Giving the main girl a Koduck like Kasumi had, and Mewtwo being a main figure almost felt like they were trying to make it their own version of the anime in a way, specifically Mewtwo Strikes Back.

While the movie is not as bad as I thought, I think it's a pretty poor representation of the games, especially the one it's supposed to be based on which is has very little resemblance to. The movie looked nothing like how the world of Pokemon actually looks like, and is more of a "What if Pokemon were in OUR world" type of scenario, hense why the Pokemon CG is all terrifying and don't look like how they do in the game.

Not one of the worst video game movies Hollywood has made, but it definitely doesn't hold a candle to the anime films, but those can't be released theatrically in America anymore so they have to go with a live-action attempt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group