Forum - View topic

This Week in Games - Honey, I Shrunk the Switch

Huh???? If anything higher fps is indicative of better optimization coding. Whether or not you're a techie has nothing to do with it. Stuttering and frame lag on machines that are standardized are indicative of poor developer skill/QA.

https://www.testufo.com/ is a really quick and easy way to understand why at the very least aiming for a specific framerate and maintaining it is good for everyone. You don't need some microscope or be obsessed with technology to have frame skips impact your experience.

Setting a new lowest common denominator (weaker standardized hardware) for devs might get some to think outside the box and produce roundabout ways to code better performance with shortcuts but it also means those with better hardware (in this case, current users) are now expected to deal with with future software needing looking worse to account. Granted this is only speculation based on how the normal switch runs while not docked, but I'm personally hoping that that's all it is and not an actual part swap.

Except that's NOT what they use the frame rates for. A recurring problem with a lot of devs for the past ten years is that they've used nothing but brute force methods, letting the hardware do all the work. When it comes time to actually code efficiently they basically suffer panic attacks because, oops, turns out they're not actually that good of designers.

AiddonValentine wrote:

TsubomiKoneko wrote: I didn't read the full article, does it state there that it's been confirmed that the lite will be weaker graphics wise? It kind of makes no sense, since as my boyfriend likes to point out to me the Switch is essentially a glorified tablet (when compared to other consoles being more like actual computers these days). From what I've heard, it's the exact same as the regular Switch power-wise. Plus considering they can stuff The Witcher III on there it's clear power is kind of a moot point

Hardware wise it is, but the switch would always go weaker when in portable mode (to save battery life), so the switch lite is stuck in the underpowered mode.

As fro TW3, it's severely downgraded graphic wise, so the switch can play it the same way a 10 year old laptop can
https://www.newsweek.com/witcher-3-switch-graphics-resolution-wild-hunt-nintendo-1443664

I really wish they had announced what imo seems like the obvious second part of this: a $200 console only Switch. I've been waiting to pick up a Switch once the price dropped and $200 is totally my sweet spot but I was planning on never traveling with my Switch and letting it live docked to a TV as if it was a normal console.

If this had video out or casting (even if it was locked to 720p or whatever the Lite's resolution is) I'd buy it day one.

I don't think your math adds up there, buddy. Making a permanently-docked switch doesn't remove anything that would justify a $200 retail sticker. You may as well just buy an ordinary Switch for that.

FinalVentCard wrote:

I don't think your math adds up there, buddy. Making a permanently-docked switch doesn't remove anything that would justify a $200 retail sticker. You may as well just buy an ordinary Switch for that.

You remove a whole screen. It would basically be the same as the PSTV was to the Vita (except the HDMI output capability is already in the Switch), which was quite a bit cheaper.