Forum - View topicINTEREST: Online Petition Demands Content Warnings for Sexual Violence in Weekly Shonen Jump
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrowLia
Posts: 5504 Location: Mexico |
|
|||||||||
It's not "unfashionable" it's an incorrect and dangerous misconception. The idea that rapists and sexual abusers are "evil" or "monsters" not only inadvertently excuses them and the society that raised them of responsibility and criminalizes neurodivergent people, it creates the false sense of "evil men lurking in dark allies" overlooking the fact that most sexual assault is committed by someone in the victim's family. This idea mythologizes rapists as cartoonish Disney villains cackling in their dark basement, deranged social outcasts constantly planning their next attack, when in fact a lot of rapists don't even believe that what they're doing is wrong. And why would they, when the society around them keeps telling them that groping women is funny, that getting a flash of a teenage girl's panties is "lucky", that "no means yes", that a woman being upset and uncomfortable when her body gets violated is "sexy", when rapists and pedophiles routinely go unpunished? You are right, manga, anime, videogames, books or movies don't make rapists become rapists, but they are part of the structural problem, the system that continues to make women and girls into sexual objects with no agency or power. |
||||||||||
DRosencraft
Posts: 665 |
|
|||||||||
This is hugely important. I see the argument a lot, "nobody reads a manga/watches an anime and decides to do X" and that is true. 100%. But behavior doesn't just spontaneously manifest either. It is learned. It develops. There a numerous studies that show that immersion in a certain environment for long enough can change the way a person thinks, even if they begin with completely opposing views. This is similar to how group-think becomes a problem in the workplace. It's never something as simple as "they're just evil" or "they just don't know any better". Believing the problem to be so simple is the same as denying the problem even exists. And if a problem isn't even able to be recognized as a problem, there is no way it can be addressed, let alone solved. |
||||||||||
NiPah
Subscriber
Posts: 205 |
|
|||||||||
I’m honestly curious, can you link a few of those studies? |
||||||||||
nargun
Posts: 925 |
|
|||||||||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error [which seems to be a large part of the plotting problems with your revenge-flavoured extruded isekai product, too.] |
||||||||||
TarsTarkas
Posts: 5824 Location: Virginia, United States |
|
|||||||||
Being evil does not excuse them from their actions, nor does it not make them Disney cartoons. Nor even Tom Hanks from 'Ladykillers'.
The are evil because they chose to be. They are evil because they do evil things to hurt and kill people. They are evil because they enjoy making others suffer for their own enjoyment. They are monsters cause they do monstrous things. They being evil doesn't mean you can't ask why they are like that It is not an excuse, it is simply what they are, and is what society should view them as. And they should be punished accordingly. |
||||||||||
CrowLia
Posts: 5504 Location: Mexico |
|
|||||||||
Your maniquean fairytale is part of the reason why deep structural changes are so hard to achieve. It's easier to attribute horrid acts to individual, unsalvageable defects instead of acknowledging the systemic issues that run at the very core of the problem. We can all sleep better at night if we believe it is just an isolated issue, if we don't believe there are deep structural flaws in our society that enable so many men to behave like this. If the problem is just individual, vague Evil, we don't have to do anything about it other than shake our heads in disgust and pat ourselves on the back because we are not Evil.
Believing this is just an issue of "good individuals vs evil individuals" prevent us from working at the deeper societal problems, of which the horrid act is but a symptom. If this were just an issue of "some men are evil monsters", rapists and pedophiles wouldn't systematically get away with their crimes, sheltered by institutions that would not dare jeopardize the promising future of a young rapist. If this were a problem of "evil individuals", women wouldn't be sexually assaulted every single day. |
||||||||||
El Hermano
Posts: 450 Location: Texas |
|
|||||||||
At the end of the day we're talking about kids here. There's a huge difference between a kid doing something and an adult doing something. People trying to compare this to the act-age mangaka are being very disingenuous. If a young boy slapped a girl on the butt while riding his bike past her like that mangaka did, they'd get detention or some other form of disciplinary action from their parents or school. At most, they'd be suspended for a bit. When an adult does that, that's a crime because they're older and know better. That's why they go to jail and put on a sex offender registry for doing the same thing. Kids are going to do stupid and immature things as a part of their growing and learning experience. Some people never learn or grow, but that's more of a failure in their personal life than anything that has to do with the media they consume and they'll quickly find themselves as a member of the prison system. |
||||||||||
Agent355
Posts: 5113 Location: Crackberry in hand, thumbs at the ready... |
|
|||||||||
Let’s focus on 2 things—
1-Most Shonen Jump readers are under 15 2-The petition focuses on *non-consensual* sexual content I will be very happy if there is a trend towards reducing non-consensual sex gags and fanservice in manga aimed at kids (and yes, under-15 year olds are kids. Can’t drink, can’t smoke, can’t buy porn). And it is very possible to create fanservice scenarios with consent. It’s different and unusual, because it hasn’t been considered. But it’s not impossible, and it could be a more creative scenario than the tired “fell on her and grabbed her boobs” or “caught peeping” gags. FTR, there are manga and comics (and porn!) which are sexy, sex positive, and emphasize consent. I get where everyone is coming from wrt censorship, but aiming for more age appropriate content isn’t censorship. Did you ever notice that minors are almost never shown drinking alcohol in anime and manga? Because (IIRC) the drinking age in Japan is 20, and it’s considered inappropriate to show kids drinking alcohol, especially in media aimed at them. I’ve never seen anyone get upset at that taboo. |
||||||||||
Blanchimont
Posts: 3447 Location: Finland |
|
|||||||||
I think you take a too wide of a shot here, if they don't make people behave badly, then how exactly are they a structural problem, or even a part of a structural problem? The appropriate age rating of the target audience or whether SJ should be barred from those too young can definitely be debated, but anything fiction aimed toward rational adults(that includes anything seinen) should really not be restrained in law in any healthy society, I for example often read manga with non-consensual actions, but that doesn't suddenly in the real world make me go out there to rape and mutilate girls and children, or worse. Any sane adult mind can understand the difference between fiction and reality. I can't deny there's a structural problem in how society tends to treat women, much in the same way as the ingrained racism in US society, but taking a pot shot on fiction across the board ain't the answer you're looking for. |
||||||||||
Sakagami Tomoyo
Posts: 940 Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
|
|||||||||
I think you're thinking a bit too black-and-white, too all-or-nothing here. Think of it like tobacco and cancer. Not everyone who smokes develops cancer. Not everyone who develops cancer smokes. But smoking tobacco does increase the chances of developing cancer; it is a factor in many people developing cancer. And not just cancer; there a whole lot of lesser diseases that are if not caused by smoking exactly, have their chances increased by smoking. (And yes, the severity and the chances in this comparison are way off, but the basic point is still there.) |
||||||||||
Blanchimont
Posts: 3447 Location: Finland |
|
|||||||||
Am I? Unlike fiction, there's tangible physical consequences/effects of smoking, for smokers and non-smokers alike, and consequently on society too in the form of raised healthcare costs, and no way to mitigate them without proper regulation. |
||||||||||
ATastySub
Past ANN Contributor
Posts: 647 |
|
|||||||||
And that’s what everyone is saying. There are tangible effects on society through fiction, but it takes caring about them to realize what they are. If you want to keep using the smoking metaphor consider this the period in time where we’re seeing a large increase in cancer in the population, but no one has fully admitted that it’s because everyone started heavily smoking for the last 20 years. Fiction is not a magical thing that exists outside of our reality. Every work of fiction is drawn from real life, and they carry varying amounts of cultural weight for good or ill. On the smaller side things like someone playing video game shooters doesn’t make someone a school shooter, but does impact their decision making to more violence focused answers. That’s the same idea here, where no one is saying it makes someone a rapist, but that repeated and constant normalizing of nonconsensual situations impacts what someone sees as appropriate or not. If you want to see more extreme examples of how fiction impacts the world then look into works like Siege or the The Turner Dairies and how they help radicalize and breed a slew of white supremacist terrorists. It would help a lot if asking people to realize that anything that can produce positive feelings can also produce negative would stop being painted as outlandish or censorship. We know the dangers of smoking and that’s still legal and heavily encouraged. At the very least we can all learn to admit things can cause harm so we can start to better understand exactly what that harm is. |
||||||||||
Kisuke525
Posts: 191 |
|
|||||||||
Uh.. no they aren't. animenewsnetwork.com/news/2020-06-05/shueisha-reveals-2019-circulation-numbers-for-manga-magazines/.160319 You can see the ages there. Less than 30% is not MOST. This took me less than 5 minutes to find. I don't know why you and others are acting like what you said is true. If you don't know what you're talking about research it! Don't go spreading misinformation! |
||||||||||
Blanchimont
Posts: 3447 Location: Finland |
|
|||||||||
No, at least no harmfuls effects on a mature audience. To introduce censorship across the board would be a lot more harmful in the long run. And no, not everyone is saying, do not go generalize if you have nothing to back it up on.
Sakagami Tomoyo used the metaphor, I just responded to show how it was wrong. And as I said in response to him/her, tobacco is harmful whether you want or not, whereas there's no risk of fiction to healthy mature rational minds.
Fiction is escape from reality, that's why you can do things in it which you could not do in real life. How much it draws from real life is neither here nor there.
Or those people were drawn to such literature because they were already radicalized in the first place. If a few writings can cause people to turn terrorists, they already have deeper laying issues.
We can all also learn some things are harmless no matter how prejudiced puritanical view one holds. Are you up to the challenge? |
||||||||||
Color2413
Posts: 49 |
|
|||||||||
Some of the most non-con material I have ever seen occurs in BL manga written by women. As a male, I have always wondered why it's so common and evidently accepted by BL's primarily female audience. It certainly makes me uncomfortable. I have sometimes wondered if its prevalence represents a sort of proxy revenge against patriarchal treatment of women, given that in the BL world, the victims of the non-con are male. |
||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group