Forum - View topicANNtv - 2008-01-26
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Vicserr
 Posts: 480 Location: Carolina, Puerto Rico USA |
|
|||
Well, you both should relax, this is just an anime review, maybe for fun both should wach Mike Toole´s review of something both of you would hate...like Odin  Hey, that`s an idea (the one he did with the AWO was a riot) 
|
||||
|
||||
Viga_of_stars
 Posts: 1240 Location: Washington D.C. in the Anime Atelier |
|
|||
Yes! Mike Toole do Odin the next episode. Oh and Vicserr you don't say Odin. You say OOOhhhhdddeeeeeeeeeennnnnn!!!!! |
||||
|
||||
|
Vicserr
Posts: 480 Location: Carolina, Puerto Rico USA |
|
|||
Oh Yeah!!!!, with Loudness as background music and stills of the ship as visual background 
Last edited by Vicserr on Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||
|
||||
Alexander Morou
 Posts: 7 |
|
|||
|
It would be quite interesting were Mike to give general insight towards market trends in anime. Such as the decision to utterly destroy a franchise such as Naruto and Bleach by adding horrendous filler arcs when they should preempt the show with reruns. I agree that during the time of the reruns the ratings may drop; however, it's better than producing substantially retardified variants that change the course of the anime from then on (the stupid three [3] dolls in Bleach, for example.)
Though it might actually be what he did with the Kanon example he used in the first show. Though his focus was more the flooding of the market with crap shows that follow stereotypical and predictable story lines. On a side note, Furudanuki, please review your logical fallacies. Ad hominem is when someone attacks your character or something about you personally. What he attacked was your view and your basis for your viewpoint, and was generally telling you to lighten up. He didn't call you names, or belittle you in any way by insulting your intelligence; though I'll admit he did later say you were being embarrassing through your debating skills. To break down what he was trying to say in more direct terms: your argument is non sequitur, that is to say, "it does not follow". You're contradicting yourself by saying you disagree with their inclusion of his segment and referring it as a 'review' and then you defend the offending show mentioned. Which means, it's not so much that you disagree with what they define as a review, as it was you didn't like what he said. That could also classify this as a double fallacy, in that you used a 'red herring' technique to 'look at your definition of what is called a "review"' when your hidden intent is your obvious dislike for, again, what was said about Kanon. One thing you cannot argue here is that you appear to have had no dislike for his review of Alakazam the Great. It appears you even mentioned it only once in rephrasing the quote:
(Whereas Furudanuki's version is: "in which he reviews Kanon and Alakazam the Great") *Edit: Though I'll admit, I don't really understand the whole persecution complex thing (for those confused, read page 6 of thread.) |
||||
|
||||
|
Sprocket
Posts: 43 |
|
|||
|
A lot of you really need to toughen up, but then, I'm talking to the internet-anime generation, so deaf ears, etc. etc. There is something to be criticized in EVERYTHING. And did you ever think your incredible bias might just be creeping up in your rather transparent fanboy/fangirl rage?
There's more important things in life to worry about, like 'financial security', or 'professional satisfaction', or the fact that the anime industry it spiralling down the toilet with the rest of the late '90s/early 00's 'specialized market' boom. Well, keep it up. There's as much comedy in this thread as there was in Mike's show. |
||||
|
||||
|
shaman0897
Posts: 1 |
|
|||
|
honestly, i am new in this site...and at first i was amaze because it has most of the anime stuff i need.the latest news and updates,..but after i saw the video "Anime Jump Show:kanon" I was dismayed...
I really like Kanon...and it was one of my favorite anime so far, i just don't like the way he gave his opinion about it.... He act as if he know what are good animes...but honestly i don't even think he likes Japanese anime...and i don't think he is expert either... I've been watching anime since i was a child ,so i already know which are good and bad.i even know which has good quality and which has low quality...and i've been giving my opinion to it also...but not in that rude manner.. Yah!!...the drawing might not that excellent but the story behind it, it was awesome and great....  
|
||||
|
||||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group