×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Chicks On Anime - Fan Fiction (Part 2)


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yblees



Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 165
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:31 pm Reply with quote
konkonsn wrote:
Anime World Order wrote:
Then again, I must re-ask: why does the supermajority of fan fiction writers want to write about every character being gay or otherwise engaged in some sort of romantic and/or sexual pursuit? Is it really as simple as "because the supermajority of fanfic authors are interested in this sort of thing because they're teenage girls...only it's also true when they're in their 20s-30s...and especially in their 30s-40s and up"? Because I must say that if I was a card-carrying misogynist--AND I AM, WOOP WOOP WOOP--that sounds like exactly the answer I would provide.


I think it's a culture thing. This is all pure speculation with nothing to back it up, but hey, where would we be without thinking outloud, eh?


I always thought it was because the english language fanfic communities started as slash-fic communities back before there was a legitimate outlet for yaoi style stories (which I'm starting to think holds a deep seated instinctive attraction for significant numbers of women Wink ) - and just carried on from there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yblees



Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 165
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:46 pm Reply with quote
Cait wrote:
fuuma_monou wrote:
Cait wrote:
Should people in some third world nation on the other side of the planet really be expected to know who Abraham Lincoln was?


Given that I used to know how to transliterate "Lincoln" into Chinese, I'd say YES. Honest Abe isn't exactly a famous in America only type. Not as famous Mickey Mouse, but who is?


Are you suggesting that China is some backwater third-world nation? You know they are a world power, right? And that they have a vested interest in America, considering we are a major trade partner with a considerable debt to them? It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they knew about one of our presidents. My reference was specific to countries whose awareness of America might not be such that they would have heard of Abraham Lincoln. My argument is that no one outside of our culture should be expected to know who he was.


Abraham Lincoln is probably not the best example, I knew about Abe as a child of 7 in Malaysia.
Try something more obscure like ... Hershey's kisses.. I think everyone in the US would know what they are, but I first encountered them on a flight to the US when they were served up with coffee. Dark chocolate kisses - yummmm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cait



Joined: 29 May 2008
Posts: 503
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:52 pm Reply with quote
yblees wrote:

Abraham Lincoln is probably not the best example, I knew about Abe as a child of 7 in Malaysia.
Try something more obscure like ... Hershey's kisses.. I think everyone in the US would know what they are, but I first encountered them on a flight to the US when they were served up with coffee. Dark chocolate kisses - yummmm.


I stand by my choice. I still contend that knowing who Abraham Lincoln was is not something that anyone outside of the US should be expected to know and I would never hold it against anyone outside of this country for not knowing who he was. I wouldn't have used a chocolate snack food as an example, mostly considering it is not a person (and therefore not exactly comparable to the discussion).

Also, anyone here who is saying, "well I know who Abraham Lincoln is and I live in a 'third world' nation," I have to point out to you that you are on the internet right now, reading this forum. You are therefore perfectly capable of reading and understanding the English language fluently enough to participate in this discussion and probably therefore have a decent enough working knowledge of the basic histories of English-speaking countries, or, at the very least, exposure to American culture (Lincoln being very commonly used in imagery) through other online venues. Furthermore, any country outside of the US that has had exposure, outside of the internet, to American culture (through TV, films, etc.) would also probably have been exposed to enough of it to have learned who Abraham Lincoln was.

The implication of my argument was that anyone who does not have any exposure to American culture would probably not know, and would certainly not be expected to know, who one of our presidents was, despite the fact that he had such wide renown within our culture. I find it particularly interesting that although it seems no one is objecting to my argument they seem all too interested in harping on the specific example I used. I think this discussion could better be served outside of such unnecessary nitpicking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 3904
Location: CO
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:49 pm Reply with quote
Anime World Order wrote:

Natalie wrote:
I was a Gundam Wing [fan fiction] fan long before I watched the DVDs and got all the pencil boards and such. Then, of course, I watched the series and thought, "Wow, there is so much politics in it. Where was that? That was cool."


The implication of this statement is that of all the Gundam Wing fan fiction out there that Natalie Baan--a self-professed huge fan fiction enthusiast--read, none of them placed any significant focus on the political aspect of the series, which happens to be its fundamental narrative element! That entire fan fiction communities will handily and gladly jettison wholesale entire aspects of a series en masse, no matter how essential they may be, begs the question: "do they even actually WANT the show itself?" If so many are THAT willing to collectively change/ignore the actual storyline and characterizations present within a given series in order to write "they're all gay!" wouldn't they be equally (if not BETTER) served by simply being handed some drawings of a bunch of characters in various outfits and poses plus some short biographies/vital stats?


At the same time, you have to realize that the Japanese licensors know this, which is why you have all those Gundam Wing photobooks, and the clear files, and pencil boards, and all that stuff. For every series about war and destruction or politics, there are a billion licensed prints of the characters stretched on a bed, or foddling each other's hair.

Now, I'm not saying that I don't agree with you, because I do, but I just wanted to point out that bit of pandering.

As for fanfiction topics... I don't really understand the need to slash characters together either, but maybe it's because I've never really been a big yaoi fan. I'd rather read a GW fanfic about a military strategy meeting, but I imagine I'm in the vast minority.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 3904
Location: CO
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:54 pm Reply with quote
Cait wrote:

I stand by my choice. I still contend that knowing who Abraham Lincoln was is not something that anyone outside of the US should be expected to know and I would never hold it against anyone outside of this country for not knowing who he was. I wouldn't have used a chocolate snack food as an example, mostly considering it is not a person (and therefore not exactly comparable to the discussion).


I disagree, but because of a different reason. The United States is really one of the few educated countries in the world whose citizens don't really know about foreign matters and history. Hell, a big chunk of American-born citizens probably don't even know who the current Secretary of State is. Just because we're not expected to know every historical figure from France in our schooling system doesn't mean that French children don't know historical figures from our past.

That's the nature of our citizens, though. I bet almost every French citizen knows who's running for US president, but you couldn't find even 50% of this country who knows who's running their country.

That's a departure from the "what is fame?" discussion, so I apologize, but I wanted to throw my thoughts in there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
konkonsn



Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 172
Location: Illinois
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:44 pm Reply with quote
yblees wrote:
I always thought it was because the english language fanfic communities started as slash-fic communities back before there was a legitimate outlet for yaoi style stories (which I'm starting to think holds a deep seated instinctive attraction for significant numbers of women Wink ) - and just carried on from there.


Jah, I make things too complicated sometimes. When I slept on it, I had the thought that it was probably more like: yaoi fiction is written, attracts yaoi fans, other fans leave because too much yaoi, more fans come in, etc, etc. Much simpler...

I still like my longer answer, tho, for a good mental chewing. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Goodpenguin



Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 457
Location: Hunt Valley, MD
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:05 pm Reply with quote
SakechanBD wrote:

The United States is really one of the few educated countries in the world whose citizens don't really know about foreign matters and history. Hell, a big chunk of American-born citizens probably don't even know who the current Secretary of State is. Just because we're not expected to know every historical figure from France in our schooling system doesn't mean that French children don't know historical figures from our past.

That's the nature of our citizens, though. I bet almost every French citizen knows who's running for US president, but you couldn't find even 50% of this country who knows who's running their country.


The US is, for now and over the past few decades, the worlds only true 'Superpower'. The President of the US can be said to make decisions that guide the free world, that's generally not something attributed to Nicholas Sarkozy. The sheer scope and reach of our (the US's) international economy means that many countries are deeply intertwined with our own fiscal fortunes. Having a knowledge of US history and current political landscape is considered smart/functional educational preparedness in many parts of the world. In this sense, you're correct that many countries learn more about cultural/political specifics of the US than we do about them on a 'pound for pound' basis, through general education.

The line I bolded, however, seems to imply that the US stands out as some low-lying outlier in terms of general historical education, and I don't believe that case to be accurate. Can the average Japanese kid speak at length about the current administration of Peru? Can the typical Belgium kid lecture about the specifics of post-60's Kenyan politics? Can the average Australian in the street give an accurate run-down on Argentinian politics? Or can people in those places speak to more familiarity with the American scene than an American could vice-versa? As above, isn't that due to the prominence of America on the cultural, economic and political stage rather than a culturally superior love of history?

I've also seen (in public education) a relatively deeper knowledge of basic 'regional history' in places like Europe and Asia, but in fairness these are tightly connected geographical areas which share centuries of history and mixed cultural ancestry that don't have parallels in the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CCSYueh



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 2707
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:17 pm Reply with quote
Anime World Order wrote:
CCSYueh wrote:
There's also the fact some of these are hinted at so blatantly, it's not even funny. What was that 3 pages of a naked Matsumoto in Orihime's face in a recent Viz release of Bleach (was it 23?) A last page shot of Kenpachi & Mayuri. Aren't these just planting the seeds?


While I've never read or seen any of Bleach, the scenario you've described sounds like a fine example of neo-shonen pandering at its most obvious.


Viz Edition Bleach 23 pg 37
Orihime's been sitting on the floor whining about her feelings for Ichigo while Matsumoto showers. Matsumoto steps out of course naked & dripping wet putting Orihime just a touche below naked crotch level. Naked Matsumoto hugs Orihime. On page 38, Matsumoto tickles Orihime. Last frame on the page naked Orihime is on all fours straddling Orihime. Pg 39 closeup of both females, then another hug

Nooooooo.
No one could strip the dialog & put in their own wild imaginings.
My late husband would have. Lots of guys would.

The Kenpachi/Mayuri shot is something like Vol 34.

Quote:
Ed Chavez is absolutely right about Shonen Jump after about 1987. What's been running in that magazine for the past 20+ years is by and large not "shonen." It's "neo-shonen" since they're specifically engineered to appeal to female readers too. The Shonen Jump tables at Comiket you mentioned being constantly swarmed almost entirely by girls is proof. But where Ed and I potentially differ is that I'm not saying neo-shonen is intrinsically inferior to shonen. I am just saying that the spirit embodied by Hitman Reborn is not the same spirit embodied by Violence Jack or Fist of the North Star.


You ARE a misogynist believing that.
Boo hoo! Stupid pandering to FEMALES has ruined our MANLY stories! Hollywood sure has caught onto the idea appealing to a wider audience sells better=more moolah but god forbid Japan try to make a profit on stories.
So Dragonball & Saint Seiya are neo-shonen since they're from that era? Such horrible stories, aren't they? Apocalypse Zero. Bastard.

You do know shonen & shojo are only TARGET groups. Guys can read/watch shojo & enjoy it. Gals can read/watch shonen & enjoy it.



Anime World Order wrote:

CCSYueh wrote:
lord_darkseid wrote:
I just have one question: why does every character HAVE to be gay?


Because that's what the person writing the fanfic wants to write?


Then again, I must re-ask: why does the supermajority of fan fiction writers want to write about every character being gay or otherwise engaged in some sort of romantic and/or sexual pursuit? Is it really as simple as "because the supermajority of fanfic authors are interested in this sort of thing because they're teenage girls...only it's also true when they're in their 20s-30s...and especially in their 30s-40s and up"? Because I must say that if I was a card-carrying misogynist--AND I AM, WOOP WOOP WOOP--that sounds like exactly the answer I would provide.


I still fail to see your issue over FAN ART, FAN FICTION, etc.
So you hate yaoi.
Don't read it.
God knows I've found my share of hetero stuff out there. You are just lucky wnough to find all the homosexual stuff that obviously drives you wild.
I'm 48 & have a large yaoi collection. I DETEST whiney shojo heroines. We get romance without the whiney shojo heroines in yaoi.
YEAH!

Anime World Order wrote:

The most telling excerpt from this column was probably this:

Natalie wrote:
I was a Gundam Wing [fan fiction] fan long before I watched the DVDs and got all the pencil boards and such. Then, of course, I watched the series and thought, "Wow, there is so much politics in it. Where was that? That was cool."


The implication of this statement is that of all the Gundam Wing fan fiction out there that Natalie Baan--a self-professed huge fan fiction enthusiast--read, none of them placed any significant focus on the political aspect of the series, which happens to be its fundamental narrative element! That entire fan fiction communities will handily and gladly jettison wholesale entire aspects of a series en masse, no matter how essential they may be, begs the question: "do they even actually WANT the show itself?" If so many are THAT willing to collectively change/ignore the actual storyline and characterizations present within a given series in order to write "they're all gay!" wouldn't they be equally (if not BETTER) served by simply being handed some drawings of a bunch of characters in various outfits and poses plus some short biographies/vital stats? Perhaps include a drama CD if voice acting is important to the equation? Would this not accomplish the same task for fan fiction authors as the multiple anime for say, Weiss Kreuz?


Maybe because those writers also see that Gundam is just a lame excuse to create a story about racial tension for a country that's largely homogenous (new type vs naturals) & have a bunch of battle scenes using tanks/ships that are shaped roughly humanoid. Gundam politics rarely rises above the drug-addled hippie concepts of the 60's (What if we gave a war & nobody came? Ooooo).
There is no substance to Gundam Politics. It's 3rd grade primer version at best.

Anime World Order wrote:

musouka wrote:
I will never, ever understand the way people froth over the fact that someone, somewhere is [GASP] writing something about someone else's characters. Someone rewriting the ending of Romeo and Juliet so that they have a million babies and live happily ever after should have exactly zero impact on your enjoyment of the text.


As I mentioned in my response to last week's column, the problem at hand is that there's a disconnect between what should happen (it is exactly as you say; nothing should happen at all and there should be exactly zero impact) and what actually does happen.


Can't one say filler is the same? Scriptwriters very possibly destroying the original creator's plotting so that in the worst cases the show can't return to the original plot?

fuuma_monou wrote:

There's a lot of feminist spin about how it's good to have masturbatory aids for women. Sex toys for men, however, have never seemed particularly socially acceptable, because real men get it on with real women.


Only to one another's face in casual relationships. There are lots of dudes buying stuff from the various Adult Bookstores in this fair city. That's really a pretty old-fashioned attitude to have. I've heard lots of guys talk about their sex toys.

fuuma_monou wrote:

Gay men don't seem to have any problem finding "gay for pay" male porn stars, so why aren't they being tapped to do gay porn for women?


Yaoi isn't about real guys having sex. Yes, there are gay movies pitched in some of the zines, but overall BL is about fantasy. Impossibly beautiful men having idealized relationships-love conquers all, even "forbidden" relationships. Frankly I have no desire to see real guys bumping flesh.

A lot of yaoi isn't all that explicit. Lots of kissing & confessions of love. Love Recipe Vol 2 is a pretty good read on the subject. "Facts" as related in that story (about a BL publisher) is hetero hentai is designed for 2 shots--one in the first 8 pages & another by the end of the installment. BL is about flutter--th-thump or some such sound effect. The story follows a male editor of the zine as he works with their star author in Vol 1 & with a newb in Vol 2-also male & gay so he's writing for himself which IS NOT what the BL audience wants.

So maybe the reason one sees so much yaoi fanfics is BL is designed to appeal to an audience seeking fantasy & impossible relationships. Since the subject itself leans that way, the audience is quicker to read a certain subtext into any given story

I seem to recall the catch-phrase in Robo Cop for the fake show was "I'll buy that for a dollar!" & my late husband used that phrase far & wide & vulgarly. I also hear guys turn innocent phrases vulgar just by inflection all the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
musouka



Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 707
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:56 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
Ed Chavez is absolutely right about Shonen Jump after about 1987. What's been running in that magazine for the past 20+ years is by and large not "shonen." It's "neo-shonen" since they're specifically engineered to appeal to female readers too. The Shonen Jump tables at Comiket you mentioned being constantly swarmed almost entirely by girls is proof. But where Ed and I potentially differ is that I'm not saying neo-shonen is intrinsically inferior to shonen. I am just saying that the spirit embodied by Hitman Reborn is not the same spirit embodied by Violence Jack or Fist of the North Star.


So, let's see, the magazine, as we know it, as been running since 1969. "Neo-shounen"--which you can probably blame on Saint Seiya and its legion of badass pretty boys--started its filthy, manly-man polluting ways back in 1986. So, uh, let's see. I'm going to pretend it's 2009, for clarity's sake.

"PURE" shounen: Had a run of seventeen years.
"NEO" shounen: Has a run of twenty-three years, still going strong.

Yeah, it's about time to stop crying the manly tears into your beers and accept that "neo" shounen has been a Shounen Jump staple for longer than those good ole days you remember, pure fans. Don't worry, you'll still have seinen manga, until the people growing up on neo-shounen get older. :p
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poonk



Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 1490
Location: In the Library with Philip
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:44 pm Reply with quote
fuuma_monou wrote:
Gay men don't seem to have any problem finding "gay for pay" male porn stars, so why aren't they being tapped to do gay porn for women?
Actually, they are (for example, I'm pretty sure Japan's COAT WEST studio's target audience is women), but the live stuff isn't and will probably never be as popular as yaoi, simply because it lacks romance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
yblees



Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 165
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:23 am Reply with quote
poonk wrote:
fuuma_monou wrote:
Gay men don't seem to have any problem finding "gay for pay" male porn stars, so why aren't they being tapped to do gay porn for women?
Actually, they are (for example, I'm pretty sure Japan's COAT WEST studio's target audience is women), but the live stuff isn't and will probably never be as popular as yaoi, simply because it lacks romance.


I'm amazed someone is actually trying that!
Good for them and all, but speaking as a woman, some of the gay porn "live stuff" is seriously SCARY!!! (IMHO)
Give me 2D bishies any day.


@CCSYueh.
Er, I definitely see where you're coming from and I agree with you in general, but I feel you're being too harsh in your responses here.

I think most guys, young and old do find the attraction of yaoi unusual and confusing - if only because this genre has only very recently become popular enough to be noticed (i.e. it's a New Thing, even if it's not really).
I feel the fact that discussing yaoi is becoming more ..."normalised", can only be a good thing, and writing that one thinks something's f*kng pointless bull-crp should be allowed if done sensitively Wink
Hopefully, we will eventually all agree to disagree ...
What I'm saying is - don't be so rough on those guys, you'll scare them away. And I for one prefer to keep these lines of conversation wide open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 3904
Location: CO
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:48 am Reply with quote
Goodpenguin wrote:

The line I bolded, however, seems to imply that the US stands out as some low-lying outlier in terms of general historical education, and I don't believe that case to be accurate. Can the average Japanese kid speak at length about the current administration of Peru? Can the typical Belgium kid lecture about the specifics of post-60's Kenyan politics? Can the average Australian in the street give an accurate run-down on Argentinian politics? Or can people in those places speak to more familiarity with the American scene than an American could vice-versa? As above, isn't that due to the prominence of America on the cultural, economic and political stage rather than a culturally superior love of history?

I've also seen (in public education) a relatively deeper knowledge of basic 'regional history' in places like Europe and Asia, but in fairness these are tightly connected geographical areas which share centuries of history and mixed cultural ancestry that don't have parallels in the US.


You raise a valid point, though I'm sometimes dismayed by the lack of awareness that some of my countrymen have about current foreign affairs. Maybe not everyone should need to commit post-60s Kenyan politics to memory, but we ought to know the leaders of our closest allies. However, I wouldn't be surprised to find that a large number of Americans still think that Tony Blair is the PM of Britain. I don't think a large percentage of Americans know there is anything going on in Venezuela.

To give an extreme example that I personally find humorous, the other day, I was telling the other grad student in my lab that Putin recently received a tiger for his birthday. She looked at me quizzically and asked, "Vladimir Putin? Is he a guy in our building?"

However, you're right, and it's possible that this scenario is mirrored in other countries as well, which is disheartening.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
fuuma_monou



Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 1817
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:49 am Reply with quote
CCSYueh wrote:


Anime World Order wrote:

Ed Chavez is absolutely right about Shonen Jump after about 1987. What's been running in that magazine for the past 20+ years is by and large not "shonen." It's "neo-shonen" since they're specifically engineered to appeal to female readers too. The Shonen Jump tables at Comiket you mentioned being constantly swarmed almost entirely by girls is proof. But where Ed and I potentially differ is that I'm not saying neo-shonen is intrinsically inferior to shonen. I am just saying that the spirit embodied by Hitman Reborn is not the same spirit embodied by Violence Jack or Fist of the North Star.


You ARE a misogynist believing that.


Funny, I thought misogyny involved stuff like female infanticide. You know, outright hatred of the female sex, rather than just sexism against women. And I'm not sure the passage you quoted even qualifies as sexist. Mind my litmus test is "Would Dave Sim say this?"

Quote:

I'm 48 & have a large yaoi collection. I DETEST whiney shojo heroines. We get romance without the whiney shojo heroines in yaoi.
YEAH!


"Bah! Who needs independent heroines!"

All kidding aside, this reminds me of the hypothesis that male yuri fans and female yaoi fans are possibly transgendered to some degree. Lesbian in a man's body, gay man in a woman's body, so to speak. So they're not really appropriating the opposite sex's homosexuality or otherwise perverted. Seems too niche to survey properly, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Anime World Order



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 389
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:56 am Reply with quote
It fascinates me that two people can properly quote me as saying this:

Quote:
But where Ed and I potentially differ is that I'm not saying neo-shonen is intrinsically inferior to shonen.


And then respond to me with this, suggesting I said the polar opposite:

CCSYueh wrote:
Boo hoo! Stupid pandering to FEMALES has ruined our MANLY stories! Hollywood sure has caught onto the idea appealing to a wider audience sells better=more moolah but god forbid Japan try to make a profit on stories.
So Dragonball & Saint Seiya are neo-shonen since they're from that era? Such horrible stories, aren't they?


musouka wrote:
Yeah, it's about time to stop crying the manly tears into your beers and accept that "neo" shounen has been a Shounen Jump staple for longer than those good ole days you remember, pure fans. Don't worry, you'll still have seinen manga, until the people growing up on neo-shounen get older. :p


I therefore feel no obligation to defend myself for positions I don't actually hold and never actually stated. I said it rather clearly the first time: my distinction between "shonen" and "neo-shonen" is not a quality judgment or a pejorative. I simply use it to denote what I perceive as a movemental difference. The Hong Kong action films produced by Run Run Shaw and the films of Tsui Hark would both be categorized as "kung fu" movies for the times in which they were made, but one would be "Hong Kong new wave" and the other would not be. Merely acknowledging that there are tangible differences between "wuxia," "new wave," and the like is not passing sentence upon anything. It's an observation, just as it's an observation to note that the dramatic rise of yaoi fandom, as manifest in fan art, fan fiction, and such, corresponds directly to the time in which editors of shonen publications started to cater to said demographic. Unless anyone denies the fact that this change did indeed happen, I feel no need to argue the point. Note that since "neo-shonen" is not an official term, you're more than welcome to call it by a different name: someone in Japan recently told me that they attended a lecture in which the shonen distinction I speak of was made by referring to works pre-City Hunter/Saint Seiya as being part of a "kuro" ("black") era, and works after that as part of the current "shiro" ("white") era.

In discussions relating to fan fiction and the prevalence of yaoi content as it pertains to the anime realm of things, a frequently asked question is "why is the fan base for yuri barely a fraction of that for yaoi?" Many reasons could potentially exist for this--a lot have already been mentioned--but I think a significant reason is that shojo editors never made any concerted efforts to also draw in male readers the way the shonen editors did for female readers. That is why the male readership of Shojo Beat is something like 4 or 5 percent compared to the 40 or so percent female readership for Shonen Jump. Should such a change be made at some point in the future, I don't think it would be fair to insist that The Rose of Versailles be retroactively classified as josei rather than acknowledge the change being made.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
musouka



Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 707
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:12 pm Reply with quote
Anime World Order wrote:
I therefore feel no obligation to defend myself for positions I don't actually hold and never actually stated.


"Fans" are in plural, so I wasn't just referring to you. I don't think you need to defend the entirety of old shounen fans either; I was just using your post as a springboard for my own thoughts on the matter.

As far as you go, personally, I do detect a distinct sense of "fangirls are shallow, with their focus on relationships and sex at the expense of other aspects of the series in their fanfiction". I would tell you that it's probably because, in those series, fangirls have grown to love the characters and want to explore emotional relationships between them in more depth than the series itself allots. If a need for action/adventure/talking heads is being met perfectly fine in the series in question, I'm usually content to let canon play out as it will.

For example, my eyes tend to glaze over when political talk comes up in Gundam 00. It's not because I'm stupid, or I dislike politics, or I'm "shallow" and just in it for the Kouga Yun character designs. It's because the show does a piss poor job for nearly the entire first season of making you care about a single person embroiled in the conflict. My interest was only majorly piqued by the inclusion of Tieria's homosexual crush on Lockon. Not because it was homosexual--though the unique, for a Gundam series, aspect helped--but because it was one of the first times a character had forged a genuinely strong connection to another character outside of "we're both shooting at the same thing".

I'm not interested enough in Gundam to write fanfiction for it, but another person who is more emotionally invested might want to take that relationship and run with it. Or they might want to give the rest of the team plausible bonds of affection, with an added bonus of watching two attractive people have sex while doing so.

This is also why you so rarely see fanfiction about "canon" yaoi. The emotional needs are being met by the series itself, so why write about it? Basically, people like a little (or a lot) romance in their series, and if it's not there, they don't feel much compunction about writing it in. So I'm not sure why it's such a big mystery to people why so much fanfiction focuses on sex/romance.

Anime World Order wrote:
In discussions relating to fan fiction and the prevalence of yaoi content as it pertains to the anime realm of things, a frequently asked question is "why is the fan base for yuri barely a fraction of that for yaoi?" Many reasons could potentially exist for this--a lot have already been mentioned--but I think a significant reason is that shojo editors never made any concerted efforts to also draw in male readers the way the shonen editors did for female readers. That is why the male readership of Shojo Beat is something like 4 or 5 percent compared to the 40 or so percent female readership for Shonen Jump.


You also need to keep in mind the stereotype that "it's okay for women to do things that are masculine (because it "elevates them") but it's bad for guys to do things that are feminine (because it "lowers them")". You would have to change that mindset before seeing a mass exodus towards shoujo magazines.

On the other hand, you are ignoring the fact that "moe", in both visual novels and in general, tends to have artwork more strongly associated with "shoujo" than "shounen". The initial artwork in Key's Kanon is a lot closer to a series running in Ribbon magazine than any shounen magazine you could pull off the shelf. The magazines themselves might not have any appreciable male readership, but as a subculture, traditional shoujo art and style is very much alive for male otaku.

Anime World Order wrote:
Should such a change be made at some point in the future, I don't think it would be fair to insist that The Rose of Versailles be retroactively classified as josei rather than acknowledge the change being made.


No, what I am referring to is that the "pure" shounen culture is still alive and well in the pages of seinen magazines. The creator of "Fist of the Northstar" is still writing his spin offs. "Souten Kouro" (which is one of my all time favorite series, btw) was insanely popular and fit very much in line with "pure" shounen's excesses. Even "Bastard" just relocated to the pages of a seinen mag. Kurumada's "Ring ni Kakero 2", despite being on a similar reading level and probably even less violent than the original series, was serialized in a seinen magazine, while the original was in Jump.

Rose of Versailles shouldn't be classified as ladies, but if Ikeda made a spin off, what sort of magazine do you think it'd be more likely to show up in?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group