×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Funimation Sues A.D. Vision, Sentai, Others for US$8 Million


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GATSU



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15306
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:06 am Reply with quote
Teriyaki:
Quote:
I don't think Funimation would just start random fights with Senti, A.D. Vision and so and so fourth. They probably do owe Funimation 8 million dollars.


Well, that's what people were sure about in 4Kids' case, till they owned TV Tokyo in court. There's an irony of FUNi being a third party in that dispute, too.

Quote:
I have a feeling this court ordeal is going to last most of 2012, maybe even longer than that.


Technically, it'll have to, if the pre-trial begins in October...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14761
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:54 am Reply with quote
Hahaha, let the jury decide!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anglicanotaku



Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 9
Location: Metro Atlanta
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:00 am Reply with quote
cyberbeing wrote:


Can somebody explain why the defendants are claiming a two years stature of limitations, when it's actually fours years in Texas?


Quote:
Sec. 16.070. CONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person may not enter a stipulation, contract, or agreement that purports to limit the time in which to bring suit on the stipulation, contract, or agreement to a period shorter than two years. A stipulation, contract, or agreement that establishes a limitations period that is shorter than two years is void in this state.

(b) This section does not apply to a stipulation, contract, or agreement relating to the sale or purchase of a business entity if a party to the stipulation, contract, or agreement pays or receives or is obligated to pay or entitled to receive consideration under the stipulation, contract, or agreement having an aggregate value of not less than $500,000.


The only thing I could find mentioning two years is the above, which states 2 years is the minimum valid period for contractual limitations.


The way I read it, (b) says, stipulations or agreements that impose a less than 2 year limitation on suits as opposed to the 4 year limitation in the rest of the section are not valid unless the monetary value involved was equal to or more than $500,000 (which $8million sure is). ADV may be claiming that within the initial contract, there was a stipulation that established a 2 year (or less) limitation, and since the sum involved is at or around $8million. This is merely conjecture though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
metroid24



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 69
Location: grand junction colorado
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:02 am Reply with quote
dang i hope they come with a settlemnt like a few gs cause last thing i want is another company to get shut down 1st it was geneon thanks to universel for that then bandai and now all there is is us manga mediablasters sentai films viz films and the most stable funimation i call them most stable since finacially between this and encore they distrbute they are the top dogs now i just hope they work peacefully sette for a few grand or drop the suit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
anglicanotaku



Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 9
Location: Metro Atlanta
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:13 am Reply with quote
A coupe of thoughts:

From the main article
Quote:
The companies [including AEsir Holdings, LLC ("Aesir") ] claim, among other things, that they do not have a contract with Funimation and are not liable to the company. They claim that the companies did not exist when Funimation acquired the rights from ARM to enforce ADV's contract with ARM
.

which is interesting, since the news release on www.advfilms.com and dated September 1, 2009: "A.D.VISION, INC. CONCLUDES SERIES OF ASSET TRANSACTIONS" includes the following statement,

Quote:
The transaction requires Aesir to assume specific obligations and scheduled liabilities of the Company under legacy license agreements associated with the acquired programming.
-which, to my mind is a recognition of the assumption of debt, i.e. the stipulated $ 8million.

Now, www.yourdictionary.com gives the business definition of "subordinated interest" as
Quote:
A loan secured by another claim and subordinate to a senior interest
http://business.yourdictionary.com/subordinate-interest.

Meanwhile, the Sirius Cybernetic Marketing Division defines "subordinated interest" -as they define all their products- as "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with" Razz



As to why Funi included Sentai et. al. in the lawsuit, its possible that Funi is covering all its bases by casting as wide a net as possible in the lawsuit. It is also possible that the Judge may pare down the number of defendant based on standing, if the lawsuit is not dismissed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14761
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:17 am Reply with quote
metroid24 wrote:
dang i hope they come with a settlemnt like a few gs cause last thing i want is another company to get shut down 1st it was geneon thanks to universel for that


Why do you blame Universal for that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yoda117



Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 406
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:36 am Reply with quote
jsieczkar wrote:
With how ADV was "fixed" this was bound to happen, I'm sure many creditors were screwed over with what they did.


Pretty much.

When news of ADV's bankrupcy first hit ANN, there was a lot of stuff flying, but a few of the posters were very good at pointing out the key elements based on the information ANN had linked to their article at the time. One of the biggies was that the way ADV was doing this would harm a lot of their creditors and provide them with a means of selling their more popular titles to the spin-offs for pennies on the dollar.

At the time the question was raised whether or not that would result in future lawsuits. I think we now know the answer.

It should be interesting to see how this plays out, and to get more information on the finances if this matter should actually make it to trial.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mike.motaku



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 160
Location: Indiana
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:18 pm Reply with quote
Personally I think Funimation acquired the debt just for the purpose of tying any entity that arose out of ADV into an expensive legal battle because competition is competition and if you can't beat them in the market place, you can beat them in court. If Funimation filed the lawsuit outside of the statute of limitations, well, too bad for them. Either way, Sentai, a much smaller company, now has to spend a lot of money & effort for much of 2012 fighting what may turn out to be just a nuisance lawsuit that Funimation knows it stands no chance of winning but wants to see what it would take to force Sentai out of business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragonrider_cody



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2541
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:22 pm Reply with quote
Yoda117 wrote:
jsieczkar wrote:
With how ADV was "fixed" this was bound to happen, I'm sure many creditors were screwed over with what they did.


Pretty much.

When news of ADV's bankrupcy first hit ANN, there was a lot of stuff flying, but a few of the posters were very good at pointing out the key elements based on the information ANN had linked to their article at the time. One of the biggies was that the way ADV was doing this would harm a lot of their creditors and provide them with a means of selling their more popular titles to the spin-offs for pennies on the dollar.

At the time the question was raised whether or not that would result in future lawsuits. I think we now know the answer.

It should be interesting to see how this plays out, and to get more information on the finances if this matter should actually make it to trial.


First of all, ADV never filed for bankruptcy. If they had, this debt would have already been resolved one way or the other and several of the creditors would have been screwed anyway.

Secondly, the licenses ADV still held were older, had little value, and many were on the verge of expiration, hence why many have been rescued by Funi and others.

Honestly, I doubt we will get much information from this lawsuit one way or the other. Certain documents will be made available to public but many will be kept confidential, particularly financial documents. The chances of us learning much are even lower as this is a relatively small lawsuit between two relatively tiny companies and it's not likely to receive any press coverage, other than ANN who will probably not attend the proceedings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samuelp
Industry Insider


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: San Antonio, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:27 pm Reply with quote
dragonrider_cody wrote:

Honestly, I doubt we will get much information from this lawsuit one way or the other. Certain documents will be made available to public but many will be kept confidential, particularly financial documents. The chances of us learning much are even lower as this is a relatively small lawsuit between two relatively tiny companies and it's not likely to receive any press coverage, other than ANN who will probably not attend the proceedings.

Ooh, we should take up a collection to send bayoab to the trial/hearings and live-blog it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TheTheory



Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Posts: 1029
Location: Central PA
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:29 pm Reply with quote
If I remember correctly, it was pretty well agreed upon in the threads attached to the Sentai/Section23 phoenix-act that ADV was pulling some pretty tricky legal strings to dodge some debt.

That these ghosts are coming back in a lawsuit are not surprising. The surprising part (for me) is that FUNi has their fingers in this mess.

As an anime fan the best-case scenario is that FUNi doesn't require this money to stay afloat and this case gets dismissed before the lawyers can start their bloodletting.

To me I care less about who is right and who is wrong--all I care about is keeping as many viable anime companies afloat as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:00 pm Reply with quote
Teriyaki Terrier wrote:
... Honestly, I am going to have side with the underdog here, despite the fact this will ultimately be seen as caustic to others. I don't think Funimation would just start random fights with Senti, A.D. Vision and so and so fourth. They probably do owe Funimation 8 million dollars. ...

Or they do owe Funimation some amount bigger than $0 and smaller than $8m, and Funimation sued for $8m to force them to pay that smaller amount. The forum lawyering ~ and IANDL, which is to say, I Aint No Damn Lawyer ~ suggests that there are distinct legal theories and claims of fact tied to distinct aspects of the suit, so $8m could well be an "ambit claim" ~ the most that they could plausibly win, as a wrapper around an expectation of probably winning some lesser amount.

But on the financial side, its seems extremely unlikely that Funimation would have received this standing to sue in lieu of $8m in cash ~ if they received this standing to sue in return for a consideration, it would seem likely to be worth pennies on the dollar.

The range for a settlement would be what Funimation expects that its very likely to win, minus lawyering up costs, at the bottom end, and what neo-ADV expects its likely to lose, plus lawyering up costs, at the top end. If the two ends do not line up right, that's where its most likely to go to court. But the game theory suggests that if either side has substantial uncertainty regarding the view of the value of the case of the other side, a settlement might not occur until some early stages of the trial itself narrows down the field of play.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:08 pm Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
Hahaha, let the jury decide!

Having served on a jury, knowing the selection process--they will most definitely NOT get a jury of their peers, i.e. contract lawyers and business or legal professionals, either due to pruning by Funi or not having the selection-- and knowing how the results go for many past cases concerning technical matters (technological or legal) I am always very suspicious, especially in Texas (where it's infamous for this) when one party requests a jury trial. It almost always means that they aren't purely confident about merits of the case. As in, if they let judges decide, they think there's a not insignificant chance they can loose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunday Silence



Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 2047
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:28 pm Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
Hahaha, let the jury decide!


Some hope that on that jury is a disgruntled Otaku with a hard-on hate for FUNi and manages to at least make it a mistrial.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
silentjay



Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 304
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:01 pm Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
metroid24 wrote:
dang i hope they come with a settlemnt like a few gs cause last thing i want is another company to get shut down 1st it was geneon thanks to universel for that


Why do you blame Universal for that?


It's because the parent company in Japan is now known as Geneon Universal, but that merger didn't happen until long after Pioneer shut down Geneon USA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 14 of 16

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group