×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
ANNCast - The Long Con


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AmpersandsUnited



Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 633
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:31 pm Reply with quote
Sewingrose wrote:
But when they are fully developed characters who can still kick ass and don't actually flash the camera, like the women of One Piece, I have no real problem with it.




We're watching different One Pieces apparently.

spoiler[unless you mean "flash the camera LIKE the girls in One Piece Razz]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sewingrose



Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Posts: 579
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:58 pm Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:

I am not trying to sound ultra conservative (I am not), but I am getting the feeling that an argument is being made that anime can be enjoyed by children. I know that shounen stuff is more about action and adventure, and does not have "heavy" themes, but, as an example, if you show a child Naruto, he or she is going to wonder why ninjas are trying to kill each other.


...because there are evil ninja and there are good ninja who want to fight the bad ones. It really can be broken down that easily. I was reading Harry Potter at age 7 and that's all about bad guys trying to kill good guys. You're really underestimating a kid's ability to understand a series.

Violent deaths are one thing, and I can understand not wanting to show a kid a gore feast, but having the concept of death thrown around is not going to hurt a kid. Kids are a lot more resilient then you give them credit for, they don't get subtleties to character's motivations sometimes, but they can freely get the idea of "bad guys trying to kill good guys". I watched Princess Mononoke with my parents at age of 8 and I loved it, and looking back at it now, it was not the violence that I didn't comprehend, but most of the implied internal politics.

And to AmpersandsUnited, I was thinking more about actual nudity, but point taken. In fact I will modify my statement:
Quote:
But when they are fully developed characters who can still kick ass and even if they flash the camera, like the women of One Piece, I have no real problem with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TitanXL



Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 4036
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:32 pm Reply with quote
Surrender Artist wrote:
I don't think that this is a fully tenable assertion. If boobs weren't a big deal, then they wouldn't be on mousepads and nobody would have even bothered to come up with Qwaser of the Stigmata. What you're saying might have been true historically, but it's fairly clear that the Japanese have to a significant extent internalized western sexualization of breasts and taboo pretty reliably follows sexualization.


I think you took my point a bit too far. I'm just saying you can show a woman's jiggling breasts overflowing in a tiny bikini, or a loli's crotch and butt in string bikini in a kid's show and no one is going to freak out or sue someone over it, because the human body isn't as demonized and that's perfectly fine for a kid to see. Especially since you can see stuff like that everytime you go to the beach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Angel M Cazares



Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 5431
Location: Iscandar
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:41 pm Reply with quote
Sewingrose wrote:
...because there are evil ninja and there are good ninja who want to fight the bad ones. It really can be broken down that easily. I was reading Harry Potter at age 7 and that's all about bad guys trying to kill good guys. You're really underestimating a kid's ability to understand a series.


I am not trying to underestimate children's intelligence. I know they are very smart. I am saying that I would not let children watch anime at such a young age. Not only because they would not understand all of it (sure, they might understand some concepts), but I do not feel it is mandatory to show children anime just because I enjoy this form of entertainment.

Sewingrose wrote:
But when they are fully developed characters who can still kick ass and even if they flash the camera, like the women of One Piece, I have no real problem with it.


So, objectifying women's sexuality is fine as long as they "kick ass"?


TitanXL wrote:
I'm just saying you can show a woman's jiggling breasts overflowing in a tiny bikini, or a loli's crotch and butt in string bikini in a kid's show and no one is going to freak out or sue someone over it, because the human body isn't as demonized and that's perfectly fine for a kid to see. Especially since you can see stuff like that everytime you go to the beach.


To me this sounds very close to sexual objectification. Just because Otaku get off on loli, it does not make it morally acceptable to everyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Sewingrose



Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Posts: 579
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:57 pm Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:


So, objectifying women's sexuality is fine as long as they "kick ass"?


No, and trust me I could be going for hours over the oversexualization of women in media especially anime.
But at least in terms of One Piece, there is a difference to having a character who has never had a love interest, who is an invaluable member in a team of impossibly overpowered pirates, and has a complete and whole character story. The animation of her breast jiggling is not going to negate that. Do I find it unnecessary? Yes, but not enough to make me want to age up what I think the appropriate audience is.


And I'm not arguing with you about what you can show your kids, honestly all power to you, and it should be the parents finale say in it. I am saying I disagree with you though on what we say is appropriate, not all anime is equal and I think it entirely depends on the title in question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ojamajo LimePie



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 766
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:47 pm Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:
I am not trying to underestimate children's intelligence. I know they are very smart. I am saying that I would not let children watch anime at such a young age. Not only because they would not understand all of it (sure, they might understand some concepts), but I do not feel it is mandatory to show children anime just because I enjoy this form of entertainment.


You wouldn't let a kid watch Angelic Layer? A show with no fanservice, violence limited to battling toys, and maybe one or two mild four-letter words? Because that was the series I was talking about. I never said anything about letting kids watch FMA, which was targeted at teens in Japan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chagen46



Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:00 am Reply with quote
Quote:
No, and trust me I could be going for hours over the oversexualization of women in media especially anime.
But at least in terms of One Piece, there is a difference to having a character who has never had a love interest, who is an invaluable member in a team of impossibly overpowered pirates, and has a complete and whole character story. The animation of her breast jiggling is not going to negate that. Do I find it unnecessary? Yes, but not enough to make me want to age up what I think the appropriate audience is.


I'm not sure how having a love interest automatically negated a female character from being well-rounded and believable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TitanXL



Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 4036
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:13 am Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:
To me this sounds very close to sexual objectification. Just because Otaku get off on loli, it does not make it morally acceptable to everyone.


Thing is, objectification is pretty subjective. Some people may think showing a woman in a bikini or porn is objectifying women, but others think it's freedom and a woman's own choice. For example, if showing a woman in a bikini is objectifying, what does that make the millions of women who wear them at the beach... self objectifying? People still can't agree on a definition, so why worry about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anymouse



Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 685
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:34 am Reply with quote
To me that is kind of an important issue: if you are depicting daily life it is hard for it to be anything other than morally neutral, until you start giving positive or negative moral judgement. And in daily life parents have to fight against the flow to get their daughter into a swimsuit that doesn't look like it comes from Beach Blanket Bingo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sewingrose



Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Posts: 579
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:35 am Reply with quote
Chagen46 wrote:
Quote:
No, and trust me I could be going for hours over the oversexualization of women in media especially anime.
But at least in terms of One Piece, there is a difference to having a character who has never had a love interest, who is an invaluable member in a team of impossibly overpowered pirates, and has a complete and whole character story. The animation of her breast jiggling is not going to negate that. Do I find it unnecessary? Yes, but not enough to make me want to age up what I think the appropriate audience is.


I'm not sure how having a love interest automatically negated a female character from being well-rounded and believable.


It doesn't, but I was trying to make a point that in One Piece while many female characters have large breasts the overall series is every chaste to the point of Nami not having a love intrest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wintersnowgust



Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Posts: 9
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:07 am Reply with quote
Keichitsu0305 wrote:

wintersnowgust wrote:
I should make an avatar... I don't know though.
Should I choose a favorite anime character or something snow related. Because, I couldn't live in a place that didn't have snow every and all winter.


Well, there's like a massive amount of anime/manga characters named Yuki (which means snow), or who have "Yuki" in their names, and then you have characters who have ice-powers. Also, you could just choose a snowflake. I think there are some people who use non-anime/manga related images as their avatar. ^__^




Well... I know Yuki means snow. But when I think Yuki, I always think of Yuki Sohma from Fruits Basket. Yuki doesn't seem tough enough to me. I was always liked Kyo better. Though...Now that I thought about it a bit more, Yukiatsu Ryuudou is pretty cool from Ghost Slayers Ayashi aka Ayakashi Ayashi. He's like the old man of the show since he was in his late 30s or somewhere in his 40s compared to all the younger people that were part or his group so to speak... Yeah, if you or anyone reading this hasn't seen the show it's definitely worth a viewing. I pretty sure it's only $30 for the whole series at rightstuf.com right now.
I'll have to ponder over my avatar more though...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Angel M Cazares



Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 5431
Location: Iscandar
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:34 am Reply with quote
Ojamajo LimePie wrote:
angelmcazares wrote:
I am not trying to underestimate children's intelligence. I know they are very smart. I am saying that I would not let children watch anime at such a young age. Not only because they would not understand all of it (sure, they might understand some concepts), but I do not feel it is mandatory to show children anime just because I enjoy this form of entertainment.


You wouldn't let a kid watch Angelic Layer? A show with no fanservice, violence limited to battling toys, and maybe one or two mild four-letter words? Because that was the series I was talking about. I never said anything about letting kids watch FMA, which was targeted at teens in Japan.


I get that there might be some anime shows that children could comprehend. What I don't get is the need to justify that anime can be enjoyed by children. You can keep arguing this, but ANIME IS NOT FOR CHILDREN in my opinion.

[I mentioned FMA because someone else did]

*When I talk about anime (I refer to late night anime). I am aware that there is also daytime anime in Japanese television aimed at younger audiences, but I have not watch them to really have an opinion about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
dandelion_rose



Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 657
Location: Kuala Lumpur
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:09 am Reply with quote
This is the kind of conversation that makes me realize that American puritanism is a real thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
walw6pK4Alo



Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:17 am Reply with quote
Anime is for children, some of it. Give them Dragon Ball and Pre Cure, they'll do alright. Just because some are aimed at older audiences doesn't mean kids won't want to watch it too. Having violent cartoons with the prospect of nudity is what drew me into anime initially as a kid, the art design and overall look was simply fascinating compared to the simple things I'd see on Nick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Angel M Cazares



Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 5431
Location: Iscandar
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:24 am Reply with quote
dandelion_rose wrote:
This is the kind of conversation that makes me realize that American puritanism is a real thing.


Sorry if this comment really pisses me off, BUT AM I SUPPOSED TO LET CHILDREN WATCH THE GARDEN OF SINNERS!? Who knows, they might learn that spoiler[humans die if you rip their limbs off one by one or take their intestines out]. That will be a healthy education, right?

I will stop talking about this topic after saying this: some of you might feel comfortable letting children watch anime, I DON'T. I think I am a fairly liberal person against thing like racism and sexism. Those are values I would want my children to have. But they do not need to learn that they can punch each other like shounen heroes do. Violence (even if is animated) can breed real life violence.

Call me John Calvin if you still think I am a close minded Puritan. I AM JUST TRYING TO BE RESPONSIBLE.


Last edited by Angel M Cazares on Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:37 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group