| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
shiranehito
Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 793
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:21 pm
|
 |
|
|
The problem here is because she's one of the official animators. If she's just some random unknown fanartist, I don't think she'd be bashed (or glorified by fujoshi) like this. If Jump was really being protective, I'm sure they won't approve any kind of doujinshi (especially the erotic ones) to appear in comic convention or the like. I'm pretty sure some doujinshi can be found in place like Torano and Animate, and JUMP series like Kurobas, KHReborn and Haikyuu are some which have large fujoshi fanbase with thousands of yaoi doujin around there.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
daichi383
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 313
Location: England
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:29 pm
|
|
|
|
Well thats unfortunate. Some of that other stuff though like losing Kuroko design sheets is a bit iffy though. As a professional she partly represents the studio she works for so i can see the rationale behind the decision but its still a tad weird.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
shi666san
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:33 pm
|
|
|
| championferret wrote: | |
Isn't Haikyuu a late-night show though? I'm sure there aren't many kid fans that know enough about the production process to know the names and twitter accounts of the people who animate it.
|
IIRC, Haikyuu aired pretty early on. Like late evening.
On another note, what probably riled people up even more so was the fact the she mentioned not wanting to work on Kuroko. Also, I think she made some crude comments about Midorima and Takao? I'm not completely sure, but I did see their names mentioned in some of the tweets.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
mistress_kisara
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 210
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:45 pm
|
|
|
| shi666san wrote: |
| championferret wrote: | |
Isn't Haikyuu a late-night show though? I'm sure there aren't many kid fans that know enough about the production process to know the names and twitter accounts of the people who animate it.
|
IIRC, Haikyuu aired pretty early on. Like late evening.
On another note, what probably riled people up even more so was the fact the she mentioned not wanting to work on Kuroko. Also, I think she made some crude comments about Midorima and Takao? I'm not completely sure, but I did see their names mentioned in some of the tweets. |
Haikyuu aired on MBS at 5pm so its pretty early 
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
championferret
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 765
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:45 pm
|
|
|
| shi666san wrote: |
| championferret wrote: | |
Isn't Haikyuu a late-night show though? I'm sure there aren't many kid fans that know enough about the production process to know the names and twitter accounts of the people who animate it.
|
IIRC, Haikyuu aired pretty early on. Like late evening.
|
Ah you're right, it's 5pm. My mistake, I was thinking of other sports anime that are usually on at stupid o clock in the morning.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
reanimator
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:46 pm
|
|
|
It has nothing to do with female animator being Fujoshi. It's her unprofessional behaviors made got her into hot water.
| Quote: | | The images Kuroiwa posted were of Haikyu!! characters depicted in a sexual manner. She also posted that she does not want to work on Kuroko's Basketball and that she rather work just on Haikyu!! She added that she lost her copy of the Kuroko designs, but said that she will just rely on memory to draw the anime. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Zahirus
Joined: 26 Nov 2014
Posts: 4
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:46 pm
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Hilarious. Do you not realize how sexualised males have made the Madoka series? |
Very much so. Not saying it's better. Although the madoka creators are aware of the yuri fanbase and go with it to improve merch, similar as kurobasu with fujoshis.
If she had gotten fired over the images she posted it'd have been really silly. I'd be more inclined to think it was due to her comments, as dissing your work is frowned upon with japan's work ethics.
I'm not defending the people who oversexualize series, in fact that's why I'm saying fujoshis aren't any better than moe-fanservice otakus.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
meepsheeps
Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Posts: 399
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
|
|
|
| Zahirus wrote: | | I'm not defending the people who oversexualize series, in fact that's why I'm saying fujoshis aren't any better than moe-fanservice otakus. |
And I wasn't saying one was better than the other either. lol
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Zahirus
Joined: 26 Nov 2014
Posts: 4
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:52 pm
|
|
|
| meepsheeps wrote: |
| Zahirus wrote: | | I'm not defending the people who oversexualize series, in fact that's why I'm saying fujoshis aren't any better than moe-fanservice otakus. |
And I wasn't saying one was better than the other either. lol |
Then I guess we're on the same page.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Zahirus
Joined: 26 Nov 2014
Posts: 4
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:18 pm
|
|
|
| BrainBlow wrote: | |
we get plenty good stuff from "fap bait" that fujoshi fund with their money. Kuroko, Haikyuu!!, Blue Exorcist, Free! |
except that if we go that way we could also say that moetakus also bring good stuff like Sora no Woto, K-On and Oreimo among other well recieved shows. Truth is the opinions on those shows are subjective. Not everyone considers K-On or Oreimo good (myself included) same way there's plenty people who don't think Blue Ex, Free!, etc. are any good.
Reality is the anime industry is deviating from original ideas for series and sticking with what sells: cute girls doing cute things for the moetakus and cute boys doing sports for the fujoshis.
Fujoshis and moetakus are two sides of the same coin.
Either way that's enough derailing.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Araki
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 383
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:33 pm
|
|
|
|
She had it coming. Well deserved.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
RestLessone
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 1426
Location: New York
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:53 pm
|
|
|
| meepsheeps wrote: | Wait, we're talking about these "sexualized" tweets, right? |
Assuming these more explicit ones are the tweets.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Eisenmann V
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Posts: 212
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:14 pm
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the animator got drunk and went on the internet. I can't imagine someone outright twittering about their lack of professionalism otherwise.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
meepsheeps
Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Posts: 399
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:37 pm
|
|
|
| RestLessone wrote: |
| meepsheeps wrote: | Wait, we're talking about these "sexualized" tweets, right? |
Assuming these more explicit ones are the tweets. |
Ohhhh okay. Yeah, moral is she should have just put them on a pixiv account or something that doesn't reveal who she actually is.
| Zahirus wrote: | | Reality is the anime industry is deviating from original ideas for series and sticking with what sells: cute girls doing cute things for the moetakus and cute boys doing sports for the fujoshis. |
uh newsflash, moe/fanservice shows are intended to pander while sports series only gives out merchandise while the original source doesn't pander at all.
...and there's still less sports than the former but that's for another discussion
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Fedora-san
Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 464
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 12:20 am
|
|
|
|
Part of me wants to say it might be her complaining about working on Kuroko and her general unprofessionalism that got her canned rather than the smut, if only because of all the other smut and merchandise I see for other properties from official channels wouldn't make sense, unless I.G is just anal like that.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
