Forum - View topicNEWS: San Diego Police Arrest 29-Year-Old Male in Alleged Assault on Comic-Con Cosplayer
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rensie
Posts: 251 |
|
|||||||
But uncle sam have thought crimes too, lol. And newspapers/ tv news like these things otherwise nobody read/watch them, and don't matter if they ruin the life of people even if they are innocent, what's matter is the business. |
||||||||
overlordrae
Posts: 90 |
|
|||||||
Why is everyone acting like they were dating at the time? They broke up. Some of the most dangerous moments for a girl in a relationship is when they try to leave.
Also, it was her birthday during the con so she JUST turned 17. It would be more appropriate to say he was dating a 16 year old, because they already broke up before she was 17. |
||||||||
KPhilipsen
Posts: 15 |
|
|||||||
By all means but different societies and cultures define "Adulthood" as occurring at different ages. For instance in Canada, where I live, the age of consent is 16. This relationship wouldn't be a crime in my country and honestly the age gap doesn't bother me. 17yr old girls have sex. Sometimes with older men. It's not a moral problem unless your culture has issues with purity and sex.
Drugs are a developmental issue. Marijuana can harm a still developing brain. Sex? Not so much. If consensual and safe, sex at 17 isn't harmful.
Last edited by KPhilipsen on Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:43 am; edited 2 times in total |
||||||||
KPhilipsen
Posts: 15 |
|
|||||||
Update:
"While Harbor Police was speaking with that witness, Kalior returned without prompting. Harbor Police spoke to Kalior and he denied any dating relationship with [the girl] but admitted to bringing her to a party at the hotel that night where there were a lot of alcohol beverages. A consensual search of Kalior's cellphone revealed a break-up text dated 7/15/14 in which he used her nick-name ... and he referenced their dating relationship. A short time later, [the girl] woke up in the hospital and confirmed she and Kalior have been in a sexual/dating relationship." http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/31/5957517/police-san-diego-comic-con-cosplayer-assault-investigation |
||||||||
EyeOfPain
Posts: 312 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
DireKit
Posts: 2 |
|
|||||||
Large gatherings of primarily misogynistic men in a sexist culture where women try to dress up as characters they often lust after aren't safe for young women. Gee. Who would'a thunk it?
Ironically, in most of the rest of the World outside of the United States, the age of legal consent is 16. |
||||||||
Hawkwing
Posts: 317 Location: Sweden |
|
|||||||
I'm fully aware that it's a marketing strategy by the media, but doing so kinda makes me furious.
True, the age of consent in my country happens to be 15 and I think that's a reasonable age. |
||||||||
gloverrandal
Posts: 406 Location: Oita |
|
|||||||
Please speak only for yourself, thank you.
Incorrect. Women actually have far less clothing restrictions than men do. Women can wear any traditional man's clothing from pants to a suit and it would be socially accepted, unlike a man deciding to go out in public in a dress or stockings or heels. |
||||||||
DireKit
Posts: 2 |
|
|||||||
Well, We're not male. Soo, yeah. Additionally, We said 'primarily', not all. Assuming you're not guilty of the same behaviour and you're male, you really have nothing to take offense from that statement. However any woman who has been to a convention and dressed up will know that the majority of men there are kinda creepers typically.
You're missing the point. |
||||||||
Keiichi-chan
Posts: 143 |
|
|||||||
really disappointed in ANN for not obscuring the photo of someone who's merely a suspect at this point...i guess in the court of public opinion you're guilty until proven innocent.
|
||||||||
Hawkwing
Posts: 317 Location: Sweden |
|
|||||||
Glad I'm not the only one who lost respect for this pathetic act. |
||||||||
leesahlynn
Posts: 81 |
|
|||||||
It seems like some people are confused about "sexual assault" vs. "sexual contact with a minor".
"Contact with a minor" means a 17 (or less) year old person consented to sex with a legal adult but their consent means nothing because they're a legal minor. It's a misdemeanor in CA (though it can/has been escalated in cases where some genuine creep is taking advantage of a young person who is consenting but clearly being abused) and that's why they don't like calling it "statutory rape" because that makes it sound like rape is a misdemeanor, trivial crime. If they're going to charge him with it, it's not because of anything that happened that night, which would be a much more serious assault charge regardless of the ages and relationship status of those involved. It's because of their admitted sexual relationship, and it's pretty much up to her/her parents whether they charge, the police generally don't enforce borderline age of consent cases (obviously consensual 17 yr old dating a 23 yr old kind of things) unless directed to. As far as the conversation that seems to currently be taking place: age of consent laws are great in theory, pretty horrible in practice, specifically because of things like this. It's better to go by a case by case basis. There's a really obvious difference between an 18 year old who wants to date his 14 year old neighbor/friend/whatever and the 30 year old who loves 7 year old neighborhood kids in general, but the future employer of either will only see a pedophile with a rape record. If it really needs to exist then it needs to be set at like 13. |
||||||||
Polycell
Posts: 4623 |
|
|||||||
@leesahlynn:
At least in my state, sex with a minor under the age of consent is covered by the sexual assault statute. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case in the vast majority of states. |
||||||||
Tomibiki
Posts: 834 |
|
|||||||
What is this TMZ Headline shit? Who gives a damn? Everybody's lying anyway, this story is about to get buried in sensationalism.
|
||||||||
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher Posts: 10427 Location: Do not message me for support. |
|
|||||||
I see you're from Sweden. In many parts of Europe, a suspects right to privacy outweighs the media's "freedom of speech" and the public's "right to know." In North America, particularly the USA, but also Canada, it is the other way around. Not only do journalists here have a right to disclose identifiable information about suspects, it's generally believed that they have a responsibility to do so. It's standard practice in the United States and other countries for news outlets to post suspects' pictures. In fact, it's considered an important part of journalism because it makes it possible for the public to be aware of a potential threat from a suspect, and it also informs people with knowledge of the suspect that their knowledge may be useful to the police. CBS - http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/08/03/suspect-in-dallas-triple-murder-arrested/ News9 - http://www.news9.com/story/26184884/kansas-rape-suspect-arrested-in-tulsa CTV (Canada) - http://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/sixth-suspect-arrested-after-victims-robbed-and-held-under-bridge-1.1921958 SFGate - http://blog.sfgate.com/crime/2014/08/01/suspect-arrested-in-stanford-palo-alto-gropings/ bbc: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-27874867 more: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=nws&q="suspect+arrested" and more: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22suspect+arrested%22&hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=isch That last one is very interesting. For UK news, the BBC rarely or never posts a picture of a suspect because it is not standard practice (possibly it's illegal, I don't know), but for US news they do. The BBC is arguably the most respected news source in the world. If they can post photos of US suspects, so can we. That said, I don't personally agree with the practice, but I haven't over-ruled our editors in regards to it. I might one day over-rule our editors on this, but I've already forced a new policy on them in regards to photos once this week, I prefer not to meddle on a regular basis. I'd rather do it after a long discussion with them, and possibly other professional journalists whom I respect. -t |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group