×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Answerman - Why Is Incest Such A Common Topic In Anime?


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kgw



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 1080
Location: Spain, EU
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:06 pm Reply with quote
Cam0 wrote:
Quote:
But incest is not illegal there, ...


Wow. I didn't know this. So sex between family members is allowed, but marriage isn't? Is that right?

In Europe (at least in Spain), incest is not illegal*, too. Marriage between brothers is not allowed.

* as it's not any relation between consenting adults. It can be a problem with the siblings' age, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BethanyP



Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Posts: 26
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:12 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
Indeed. To keep the bloodline "pure", incest in the royal bloodline for Britain centuries ago was expected and totally normal.(as was other royal bloodline like the article mentioned.)


Ehh ... depends what you call incest. Historically in the British Isles marriage between cousins wasn't considered to be a big deal. I would dispute the assertion that marriage closer than that was expected and normal - I'm struggling to remember any instances of it in the royal lines of England, at least. I'd have to check my books for details, but I'm certain that at least once a rumoured relationship between uncle and niece caused a scandal in the medieval period.

Actually, now I think about it, in Shakespeare's Hamlet a big deal is made over the idea of Claudius marrying his brother's widow. Now, obviously there's more going on there than just that, what with the politics of Denmark set out in the play, but it's telling that the marriage is called "incestuous" at least once, and not in a casual way. Now, there's more than one way to interpret that, but given the theme of the rotten state of Denmark, I think there's strong evidence to argue that the audience is supposed to find that wrong, in some way

Perceived purity of the bloodline had nothing to do with it - it was all about status. And status, so often, was backed as much by temporal power (Money, political influence, military force, etc) as by abstract notions of nobility.

EDIT - Did a quick bit of digging - Henry II was third cousins with his wife Eleanor of Aquitaine, and wasn't supposed to be able to marry Eleanor's daughter Marie for the same reason. John I was married to his second cousin Isabella, Countess of Gloucester, but the marriage was later annulled on the grounds that he couldn't legally have married his cousin


Last edited by BethanyP on Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
H. Guderian



Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 1255
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:18 pm Reply with quote
As was pointed out it was not a Japanese exclusive idea. But in a society where people long for the stability and connections we see constantly a celebration of youth and school. Likewise you can easily extend that some are reaching out for the same with their relationships. What relationships are the most stable and reliable that remind us all of better, simpler times? Family.

This trend will likely continue so long as people have a desire to enhance their ideas of youth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AnimeLordLuis



Joined: 27 Jan 2015
Posts: 1626
Location: The Borderlands of Pandora
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:24 pm Reply with quote
I knew that Incest played a big role in Japanese history but that whole mother x son thing is new to me I mean talk about a mother f##ker. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hoppy800



Joined: 09 Aug 2013
Posts: 3331
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:26 pm Reply with quote
Japan should seriously legalize incest between adults. Same with the US, the only real issue with incest now is if it's not between two consenting adults.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blanchimont



Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3459
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:30 pm Reply with quote
Hoppy800 wrote:
Japan should seriously legalize incest between adults. Same with the US, the only real issue with incest now is if it's not between two consenting adults.

It IS. Legal. In Japan. It was even mentioned in the article.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fenrin



Joined: 19 Dec 2015
Posts: 697
Location: SoCal
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:38 pm Reply with quote
Blood- wrote:
Oddly enough, I started a thread about this topic in the General Anime Discussion forum recently:

animenewsnetwork.com/bbs/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3057873


First - and please anybody who knows different, feel free to jump in - but my assumption is that the incest trope is not nearly as prevalent in other forms of Japanese entertainment as they are in ones specifically aimed at otaku or porn viewers: anime, manga, eroge, light novels, etc. I don't think the trope crops up nearly as often in J-dramas, live action films, regular novels, etc. Again, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Therefore I don't believe the incest trope is so much a Japanese phenomenon as it is an otaku one. My completely unscientific theory as to why it has such a hold on the otaku world is that there are a lot of otaku guys out there who are terrified of the thought of dealing with a regular female. The exchange is just too fraught with social anxiety and discomfort. By the same token, watching an anime character have to deal with a regular female might aggravate these anxieties. However, if that anime character is dealing with a female that already knows him, looks up to him, respects him, then the otaku doesn't have to vicariously experience the awkwardness of watching a self-insert character go through the trauma of courting a regular female. I don't think it's any coincidence that most incest tropes in anime revolve around younger sister-older brother relationships. For an otaku, the built-in love and respect a younger sister would have (in the anime world, not real life) for an older brother is probably a more soothing scenario than watching a dude try to win over a regular female.

Good theory. But it doesn't exactly explain why incest is also a popular theme (but to a lesser degree) in female-oriented works like shoujo manga and even BL, with the mc's older brother often being the overprotective one after the younger sibling's affections.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
relentlessflame



Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 188
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:39 pm Reply with quote
Blood- wrote:
Just to be clear, I am not hypothezing that otaku are lusting after their imoutos in RL (if they have any). I'm sure the taboo/fetish aspect may be an attraction for some, but my theory is that the attraction to the incest trope actually has very little to do with incest itself, but rather it's attraction as a scenario where the viewer does not have to "worry" about watching a character try to woo a regular female. I don't know if I'm making myself clear, but my thought is that an otaku thinks, "hey, it's nice to see a couple in a relationship but, oh my god, the thought of watching a character approach a female who might scorn him is really anxiety-making ... oh wait, here is a scenario where a younger sister, naturally enough, loves and respects her older brother ... yes, I can watch this relationship unfold without feeling anxious."


I don't really think the theory holds up if you consider the way most of these relationships are actually portrayed in anime (and other related works like visual novels, etc.). Typically, these sorts of relationships are portrayed as difficult and counter-intuitive (given the social stigma). Consider something like OreImo, for example, where the protagonist has to overcome mountains of abuse to finally "get through" to his sister. Other major works with this theme tend to have major drama revolving around the social stigma that may or may not get an entirely positive resolution (see Koi Kaze, Yosuga no Sora, etc.).

If the "otaku" wants to take the "low-anxiety" path, these stories almost always present a truly low-anxiety alternative, typically in the form of the childhood friend. This also has the same sort of benefit you describe of already being in a close relationship without the anxiety of being scorned, and also the benefit of having no social stigma. This is done on purpose so that it's clearer that the protagonist in the story is purposefully choosing the harder road (and not due to anxiety or lacking other available options). Typically these stories are structured more as "true love overcoming the odds" than some sort of easy road.

In general, I don't really see any evidence to support that "otaku" are trying to avoid fiction portraying "high-anxiety" relationships or the risk of being scorned in the story. Further evidence could be the on-going popularity of "tsundere" (which does have some overlap with a lot of the portrayals here). If you want to believe that the choice of fiction is somehow related to real-life anxiety, then I would say propose instead that "otaku" seek out these various kinds of relationships portrayed in fiction perhaps instead of confronting them in real life -- i.e. because they know it's fiction. The perceived challenge or anxiety of forming the relationship in the story probably wouldn't be something the reader would ever do in real life (for a lot of reasons), but it can be part of what makes the story enjoyable. Anxiety in fiction is always guided by the hand of the author.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FenixFiesta



Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 2581
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:52 pm Reply with quote
AnimeLordLuis wrote:
I knew that Incest played a big role in Japanese history but that whole mother x son thing is new to me I mean talk about a mother f##ker. Shocked


Incest between siblings or first cousins is significantly different from a parental incest, assumedly between cousins/siblings it is still between young naïve individuals that are both are not completely seeing the long term consequences of there actions, where in the case of say a mother and a son it is clearly an adult taking advantage of child that is not ready to comprehend the ramifications of the situation.

This is of course assuming the situation is under assumed "consent" and not just outright a situation of rape, which is crossing more lines of "why?, dear god, why?" that would be found in some circles of fetish doujin that run under the logic that "the more taboo the material is, the more kink marks it is checking off".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DerekL1963
Subscriber



Joined: 14 Jan 2015
Posts: 1116
Location: Puget Sound
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:54 pm Reply with quote
BethanyP wrote:
Ehh ... depends what you call incest. Historically in the British Isles marriage between cousins wasn't considered to be a big deal. I would dispute the assertion that marriage closer than that was expected and normal - I'm struggling to remember any instances of it in the royal lines of England, at least. I'd have to check my books for details, but I'm certain that at least once a rumoured relationship between uncle and niece caused a scandal in the medieval period.

EDIT - Did a quick bit of digging - Henry II was third cousins with his wife Eleanor of Aquitaine, and wasn't supposed to be able to marry Eleanor's daughter Marie for the same reason. John I was married to his second cousin Isabella, Countess of Gloucester, but the marriage was later annulled on the grounds that he couldn't legally have married his cousin


Joh I's case is much more complicated than that... He was betrothed to Isabella of Gloucester on the condition that a dispensation could be obtained. Once married (in 1189), the Archbishop of Canterbury declared the marriage null - which was later overridden by the Pope who granted dispensation to marry but forbade sexual relationships. In 1199 John himself sought and was granted an annulment (on the grounds of their close relationship) so he could marry Isabella of Angoulême. (Some say it was love, others that it was the allure of a younger woman, yet others point to the land and income Isabella of Angoulême brought to the marriage.)

I.E. Dispensation, annulment, and scandal often had a political dimension.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Utsuro no Hako



Joined: 18 May 2012
Posts: 1039
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:00 pm Reply with quote
BethanyP wrote:
Ehh ... depends what you call incest. Historically in the British Isles marriage between cousins wasn't considered to be a big deal. I would dispute the assertion that marriage closer than that was expected and normal - I'm struggling to remember any instances of it in the royal lines of England, at least. I'd have to check my books for details, but I'm certain that at least once a rumoured relationship between uncle and niece caused a scandal in the medieval period.


The Catholic Church, which decided who could get married throughout the Middle Ages, changed definitions several times. At the broadest, sixth cousins were forbidden from marrying. At the narrowest, the prohibition extended only as far as first cousins.

Of course the sixth cousin rule was ridiculously broad (do you even know who your sixth cousins are?), but such things could be dealt with by getting papal approval.

Quote:
Actually, now I think about it, in Shakespeare's Hamlet a big deal is made over the idea of Claudius marrying his brother's widow. Now, obviously there's more going on there than just that, what with the politics of Denmark set out in the play, but it's telling that the marriage is called "incestuous" at least once, and not in a casual way. Now, there's more than one way to interpret that, but given the theme of the rotten state of Denmark, I think there's strong evidence to argue that the audience is supposed to find that wrong, in some way


The issue there was that the Bible expressly forbids a man from marrying his brother's widow. It's classed as incest, but a different kind from consanguineous relationships. This is the same issue that caused Henry VIII to break from the Catholic Church -- his wife Catherine of Aragon had originally married Henry's brother, Arthur, but Arthur died during the honeymoon. In order for Catherine to marry Henry, she had to swear her first marriage had never been consummated. When Henry decided to dump her, he accused her of lying about the consummation, which would've voided the marriage, but the Pope was in the pocket of Catherine's brother and wouldn't approve the annulment. So Henry declared the Pope wasn't the boss of him and set up the Church of England, which allowed the annulment to go through.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cptn_Taylor



Joined: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 925
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:11 pm Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:
Wow. I had no idea that incest has been that prevalent in Japanese history.

CrescentWolf wrote:
That was actually fairly interesting, I didn't know about Japan's history with Incest. But I guess it makes sense with the whole Clan Dynasties and bloodlines thing.

Not trying to defend/justify Japan, but if I am not misremembering incest also occurred among members of European royalty.


There is a slight difference between incest in royal families and as something that is accepted in society at large. European societies never ever legitimised incest, this can't be said about Japanese society. So yeah things are very different between Japan and western societies on this issue (among other issues such as pedophilia).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cptn_Taylor



Joined: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 925
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:27 pm Reply with quote
Blood- wrote:


Just to be clear, I am not hypothezing that otaku are lusting after their imoutos in RL (if they have any). I'm sure the taboo/fetish aspect may be an attraction for some, but my theory is that the attraction to the incest trope actually has very little to do with incest itself, but rather it's attraction as a scenario where the viewer does not have to "worry" about watching a character try to woo a regular female. I don't know if I'm making myself clear, but my thought is that an otaku thinks, "hey, it's nice to see a couple in a relationship but, oh my god, the thought of watching a character approach a female who might scorn him is really anxiety-making ... oh wait, here is a scenario where a younger sister, naturally enough, loves and respects her older brother ... yes, I can watch this relationship unfold without feeling anxious."


Your reasoning doesn't make sense. If the otaku male viewer is so afraid of a real life woman (a sister is still a girl isn't she ?) why would he obsess over a virtual little sister ? Obsess to such a point that he'd want to bang her ? You say it's because a little sister is more loving, caring, inferior to the male otaku. So he has absolute control over her and incest is rape by another name. Somehow I don't see virtual little sisters saying ok big virtual brother, I love you so much you can bang me.

There is absolutely no reason why anime can't depicted couple relationships between a man (or a teenager) and a girl (not his first cousin, not his baby sister). The woman could be drooling all over the man but it doesn't make it incest. What I mean if incest is depicted in anime and is so prevalent it is not by accident. It's a conscious choice. Just like it's a conscious choice when you rape someone.

Incest between mother/father and sons/daughters or brother/sister are pervesions. Criminal acts in fact. That it gets a free pass in anime is 100% disgusting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jojothepunisher



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 799
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:28 pm Reply with quote
Well, we got incestuous relationships between parents and kids here in the West too. The only difference between Japan and the rest of the world is that they don't have law to restrict it, which makes it not so hurtful for individuals or products to fetishize it.

But man, that report of the mothers having relationships with their sons takes the cake in ridiculousness......and the rationalization for the behavior too...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
relyat08



Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Posts: 4125
Location: Northern Virginia
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:47 pm Reply with quote
Fenrin wrote:

Good theory. But it doesn't exactly explain why incest is also a popular theme (but to a lesser degree) in female-oriented works like shoujo manga and even BL, with the mc's older brother often being the overprotective one after the younger sibling's affections.


I think that does actually sort of explain it. It's more or less some of the same reasons. A super anxiety ridden girl might find the idea of seeing a relationship where the girl is protected and loved by her older brother, romantically, appealing. The fantasy of witnessing a romantic relationship, without the fear of actually going out and having to socialize with strange unknown people. I've heard people suggest that yaoi is popular among fujoshi for some of the same reasons as well. These women can experience a hot romance between two men without the fear of actually having to be involved in one themselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 3 of 9

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group