×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
INTEREST: This Summer's New Swimming Anime Will Get Female Fans Thirsty


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fenrin



Joined: 19 Dec 2015
Posts: 697
Location: SoCal
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:39 am Reply with quote
Ochinchinsama69 wrote:
As a Shotacon,the character designs got me excited as fudge

I was also thinking how that young one looks like a shota Laughing, for me on the other hand it's disturbing to see one get sexualized outside of doujin in an ordinary anime. That doesn't really happen often with young male characters huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
H. Guderian



Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 1255
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 5:45 am Reply with quote
SHD wrote:
Stuart Smith wrote:
Anime and manga have never been a "boys club". Series for females have existed since the 1960, one of which still airs to this day and is Japan's #1 anime. That also says nothing abouts sports series that have attracted females viewers which have been around since at least Captain Tsubasa back in 1981, which is also nothing new. It sounds like you are judging an entire medium based on one show you saw.

Nope. Go back and read what I actually wrote. Yes, there were "series for females" (women - they're called women) and some of them are good, a few actually great. But they were specific kinds of stories designed specifically for young girls/younger teenagers, with the occasional exception proving the rule. Most of the stories I found actually interesting, the ones I wanted to watch - the action shows, sci-fi shows, etc? Boys club, shows made with the assumption that they will be watched by a male audience. You clearly don't know what it is like to watch Cowboy Bebop (to use an example most everyone is familiar with) and be all "yes, I understand what you're doing with Faye but how about you tone it down a little bit? and does Julia have to wear a sexy catsuit?" Or even shows like GITS:SAC, one of my favorite anime ever - and yet I spent a considerable amount of the first season thinking "the Major is awesome but how about you give her some pants for chrissakes, it's difficult to take her seriously like this." And so on and so forth. All women must be beautiful/sexy, but the male characters? let them be vaguely decent looking (so it doesn't intimidate viewers), but otherwise meh, who cares.

Today's shows (at least the ones not squarely targeting specific otaku demographics) make sure to think of the potential female audience, including service targeted at them as well as male viewers. Now you have hot guys in the cast, not just hot chicks, care is taken to get popular male seiyuu for the important roles to croon into viewers' ears, to add Passionate Male Friendships(TM) for the segment that appreciates this, etc. It's a far cry from sweating blood to draw prettier versions of the characters from Captain Tsubasa, and digging deep to find subtext for your BL doujinshi.


So Princess Knight and Rose of Versailles and Touch, and Mahou Tsukai Sally (this isn't even in color) and Megu-chan and Aim for the Ace...

I dunno both of your examples were from the 90s.

Did you know the original Comiket was originally a fujoshi doujin event? It evolved into what it is today, but certainly didn't start out that way. When the term Otaku was coined, Nakamori went to live meetups and made fun of how undateable the men and women there were. While the anime fandom overseas certainly started out leaning heavily male (any fanclub picture meeting from the 80's can confirm this) it just wasn't as much the case.

What you're confusing is that "Sexy Fanservice" was thrown at the guys first because most of the animators were guys and drew what they wanted to see. Its not like things weren't being given to the female audiences, but even among them 'sexy fanservice for women' wasn't a big idea in anime until decades later. Now that the production arm of anime has more women in them they're producing more 'fanservice.'

It is still mistaken to assume anime was a snickering boys club with a big 'no girls allowed' sign on the door.

Also what's with that snide comment about 'women, yes they're called women.'? Fanservice shows can also cater to girls in their teens. Heck, many Super Robot shows had absurd fanservice elements and their target demo was clearly young boys, not men.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHD



Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 1752
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:48 am Reply with quote
H. Guderian wrote:
So Princess Knight and Rose of Versailles and Touch, and Mahou Tsukai Sally (this isn't even in color) and Megu-chan and Aim for the Ace...

....yes, I know about these. I never once said there were no shows made for a female audience. What I wrote was that there were not only a lot fewer of them, but they were also not as varied in themes/topics as anime aimed squarely at male viewers. (And again this only covers anime, not manga.)

H. Guderian wrote:
Did you know the original Comiket was originally a fujoshi doujin event?

Yes. I'm perfectly aware. Again I'm not sure what you're trying to get at - I never said that there were no women who watched shows and made BL fanworks. (Seriously, is what I wrote so difficult to understand?)

H. Guderian wrote:
What you're confusing is that "Sexy Fanservice" was thrown at the guys first because most of the animators were guys and drew what they wanted to see.

Yes, and I'm not confusing anything - that was exactly my problem. They were making stuff they wanted to see, and as they were mostly guys, well. And no, sexy fanservice for women didn't start rising with the number of women in the animation industry, it came with recognizing women as a buying force and deciding to pander to them as well as male audiences that was regarded as the "default" until then.

H. Guderian wrote:
Also what's with that snide comment about 'women, yes they're called women.'?

Women, not "females".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HazyDawns



Joined: 27 Apr 2017
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:59 am Reply with quote
Cam0 wrote:
Same as Free, these dudes don't have nipples. What's up with that?

Censorship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Samiamiam



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Posts: 227
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:23 am Reply with quote
HazyDawns wrote:
Cam0 wrote:
Same as Free, these dudes don't have nipples. What's up with that?

Censorship.


If only shows could follow in Yuri on Ices footsteps and free the nip.

Jokes aside, I think the character designs in this one are garbage. The faces and the bodies don't mesh at all. And anyone who talks about shows aimed at women being only based on how hot the guys are, are massive hypocrites. Character designs (along with things like studio/plot/directors) are part of what gets people interested in watching a show- any show with any demographic- but they stay watching it for a reason. This one is obviously weaker in that department though yikes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
championferret



Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 765
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:09 am Reply with quote
Uh, I hope I dont offend anyone with this comment.
But the weird plasticy, roidy way the boys are drawn reminds me less of art aimed at fujos and more like this very particular style of art I see of gay porn parodies drawn by men/for men of popular shonen series (as opposed to BL/doujin art of the same series). Not that I swim around in that end of Pixiv all that much, it's just that I have safe search on there off cos I'm fearless, and I sure scroll past a lot of stuff regularly. That's literally all I can think when I look at this. If it's supposed to be attractive to female fans I...really can't say, but I'll be curious to know what demographic its more popular with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sheriru



Joined: 27 May 2016
Posts: 126
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 12:18 pm Reply with quote
Too muscular and not pretty/boring looking.
Im out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arale Kurashiki



Joined: 24 Aug 2015
Posts: 755
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:20 pm Reply with quote
Incorrect headline, I hate boys. Can we get more psychological girls' shows instead. I miss Utena and Princess Tutu and stuff. :9
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrysostomus



Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:31 pm Reply with quote
SHD wrote:
Most of the stories I found actually interesting, the ones I wanted to watch - the action shows, sci-fi shows, etc? Boys club, shows made with the assumption that they will be watched by a male audience.
The action and sci-fi genres have been dominated by male audiences since their inception. This is like a 65 year old grandpa complaining that YA novels aren't written for him.

SHD wrote:
You clearly don't know what it is like to watch Cowboy Bebop (to use an example most everyone is familiar with) and be all "yes, I understand what you're doing with Faye but how about you tone it down a little bit? and does Julia have to wear a sexy catsuit?" Or even shows like GITS:SAC, one of my favorite anime ever - and yet I spent a considerable amount of the first season thinking "the Major is awesome but how about you give her some pants for chrissakes, it's difficult to take her seriously like this." And so on and so forth. All women must be beautiful/sexy, but the male characters? let them be vaguely decent looking (so it doesn't intimidate viewers), but otherwise meh, who cares.
At this point it just sounds like you're punishing male sexuality. Men are visual creatures and they enjoy seeing sexy things. It's hard for women to understand because our blatant predisposition for the visual simply has no female analogue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Izu0



Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 195
Location: California
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:52 pm Reply with quote
Hyped to see how the plot turns out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Izu0



Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 195
Location: California
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:05 pm Reply with quote
[/quote] 'Men' are visual creatures and they enjoy seeing sexy things. [/quote]

That sounds like a myth.
It's 2017, if you don't like it then leave it. GAY 'MEN' will watch it or transgenderMEN will watch it.
Your definition of 'MEN' is narrow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Rivailloli



Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 562
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:28 pm Reply with quote
While the designs are not my cup of tea, I'm glad to see that anime is explicitly targeting female otaku more so than ever before. Sports anime are some of my favorite works and I'm happy to see the trend continue, but I'm picky with aesthetics so I'll be passing on this one.

Chrysostomus wrote:
The action and sci-fi genres have been dominated by male audiences since their inception. This is like a 65 year old grandpa complaining that YA novels aren't written for him.


Science fiction was created by a woman. Women have liked science fiction and been a part of it since its inception, so please. Don't forget that Star Trek was immensely popular with women and that show gave way to the "fathers of slash" (AKA Spock/Kirk).

Chrysostomus wrote:

At this point it just sounds like you're punishing male sexuality. Men are visual creatures and they enjoy seeing sexy things. It's hard for women to understand because our blatant predisposition for the visual simply has no female analogue.


Men and women are both visual creatures cause they have eyes. Men are not more visual than women. Honestly, this view is so archaic and research doesn't even back it up. Both men and women like to look at attractive people and find them sexually appealing, but only ONE gender has had their sexuality repressed to the point where it's regarded as non-existent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peno



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 349
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:23 pm Reply with quote
@Rivailloli
I can't even call that view archaic, IMO it's purely and wholeheartedly sexist. Sorry if I insulted someone with this harsh comment, but that's how I see Chrysostomus' view.

Anyway, to the topic on hand, I can see some hot boys, so I am in, unless it will be boring, like Yowamushi Pedal was for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrysostomus



Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:35 pm Reply with quote
Rivailloli wrote:
Science fiction was created by a woman. Women have liked science fiction and been a part of it since its inception, so please. Don't forget that Star Trek was immensely popular with women and that show gave way to the "fathers of slash" (AKA Spock/Kirk).
The shoujo genre was pioneered by men and they outnumbered female artists up until the 60's but this is irrelevant, because I said audiences, not content creators, and it is a fact of life that sci-fi and action genres have historically appealed more to men than women.

Rivailloli wrote:
Men and women are both visual creatures cause they have eyes. Men are not more visual than women.
Wrong on all accounts. Men respond very differently to visual stimuli, especially sexual stimuli. For the vast majority of men, visual imagery is all they need to get turned on. For example, men are incredibly aroused by the sight a woman's legs, and this is also something that has no analogue in women. It must be shocking news for you but, get this, men and women's brains and hormones are not identically wired. Who would have thought?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
manapear



Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 1526
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:59 pm Reply with quote
Thank you, Rivailloli and peno. Wow, some of the statements are getting interesting. :/

Chrysostomus wrote:
(. . .)


There have been studies disproving these kind of things for a long time now. Science and our understanding of things is always advancing; to say nothing of the sexist, intentionally inaccurate things that some people (professionals and scholars even, yes) would say.

SHD made a number of points, and there was nothing punishing male sexuality about it. Just that male sexuality tends to be pushed above and given priority of female sexuality. Which, is not surprising looking at history. There's nothing based on "biology" or anything about it. It's just the way societal conditioning and climates go. (Sadly.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group