×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Hey, Answerman! All Scanlations, All The Time


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:01 am Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
Who makes a profit from free?


The chinese sites, OneManga, MangaFox (don't know how many others are based in china) sure as heck make a profit from free. Its called advertising.

Of course, their economics are different because they just rip off all their content without paying the creators of the work. Making a profit from free and legal is harder, but not impossible.

The real problem is making a profit from free and legal on top of existing markets, or making a profit from free and legal in addition to new paid markets, since the cash flow from ad-supported free viewing alone is nowhere near enough to keep the industry in business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:11 am Reply with quote
Shay Guy wrote:
If you're jumping for joy at the thought of somebody else going bankrupt or landing behind bars, independent of how well the "Good Guys" might do...something's wrong.


I don't get this. It seems to be trying to make a broad point that does not hold up in the extreme. After all, taken to the extreme, is says if someone is murdered, we should be sad to see the killer end up in jail, because putting the killer in jail won't bring the victim back to life.

I am not sure where the "happy to see justice done" is supposed to stop being the response. Maybe if those who were deluding themselves into thinking they were actually helping build the industry get caught while the people pulling in the thousands or even millions from the big profit machines get away, we might have mixed feelings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:54 am Reply with quote
agila61 wrote:
Mohawk52 wrote:
Who makes a profit from free?


The chinese sites, OneManga, MangaFox (don't know how many others are based in china) sure as heck make a profit from free. Its called advertising.

Of course, their economics are different because they just rip off all their content without paying the creators of the work. Making a profit from free and legal is harder, but not impossible.

The real problem is making a profit from free and legal on top of existing markets, or making a profit from free and legal in addition to new paid markets, since the cash flow from ad-supported free viewing alone is nowhere near enough to keep the industry in business.
Is the correct answer. Well done you get an A*. Only the pirates win because it's their game. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:57 am Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
Only the pirates win because it's their game. Wink


Pirates on that scale always attract the attention of the authorities and get shut down. Bootlegging and file sharing won't stop - but despite the fantasies of the RIAA, stopping all bootlegging is not the goal, The goal is to carve out a market space that allows revenues to be funneled back to the creators of the work. The flip side of the low cost of distributing online that makes the piracy possible is that in a legal distribution system, as much as 70% of revenues can go back to the creators.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Youkai Warrior



Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 505
Location: Sarayashiki
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:55 pm Reply with quote
It's so funny how people will justify scantilations. Look people, I don't care what you say, scantilations is stills stealing. Especially if the manga in question has been licensed and is available everywhere. Of course, while scantilations are hurting the industry, it's not the only thing that is.

On "old school anime", there might be some issue with what I've got to say, but I'm gonna say it anyway. Some anime that came out in the 90s were really great, (like Escaflowne) and then, there were some series that should have never left Japan. (Not that I've seen it, but I've heard horrible stuff about Galaxy Fraulein Yuna). Then there were others that just didn't satnd the test of time (in other words, some might've moved on from them) like Sailor Moon. However, despite some less than good anime that came out in the 90s, there is no doubt about it, there are several anime that came out in the 90s that are way better than todays, at least to me. I'm sorry, but in the last 7-10 years, there's been nothing but crap. I think one of the reasons newer fans don't give a damn about old stuff is either because they are too concerned with what's going on now, and don't want to bother with something older, or they have really bad taste, or simply put, they want to keep up with what's new, flashy, and "in" in their little niche. By the way, anime should not be a clique, but newer fans are treating it that way. I don't really care that newer fans have never heard of Escaflowne, or Trigun, or even some of CLAMPs older works like X or Magic Knight Rayearth, even though some might be into xxxHolic and Tsubasa. In fact, I'm glad. While the newer fans are fangasming over Naruto, Bleach and Vampire Knight, I'm enjoying Escaflowne, or some other really great series that younger fans have never heard of, and will stand the test of time. I have a feeling that some of the anime that are mainstream now, will run its course and that'll be it for some of those series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
glitteringloke



Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 160
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:14 pm Reply with quote
I find it amusing that youkai warrior lists 'old school' anime as stuff from the 90s.

some of us want stuff from the 60s and 70s... *cough*cyborg009*cough*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loka



Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:08 pm Reply with quote
eyeresist wrote:

loka wrote:
So, you are claiming that the audience for Maharaba and LotGH are narutards?

No. That's actually sort of the opposite of what he was saying.


Perhaps you missed this statement:
Brian wrote:
It's nice that those titles are finding an audience, sure, but that audience was there because they wanted to read the absolute latest, fresh-off-the-Japanese-press chapters of One Piece, Naruto, Bleach, and [...]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:28 pm Reply with quote
loka wrote:
eyeresist wrote:

loka wrote:
So, you are claiming that the audience for Maharaba and LotGH are narutards?

No. That's actually sort of the opposite of what he was saying.


Perhaps you missed this statement:
Brian wrote:
It's nice that those titles are finding an audience, sure, but that audience was there because they wanted to read the absolute latest, fresh-off-the-Japanese-press chapters of One Piece, Naruto, Bleach, and [...]


"that audience was there because" is true of the large majority of the audience.

If your point is that it would be more precise to say, "by far the large majority of that audience was there because ..." ... well, true, but its quibbling.

If the manga viewing sites left the licensed titles alone, they would not be attracting the attention of the authorities, because they would be attracting a small fraction of the views that they in fact do attract, and no publisher would see any of their titles lose sales when the title hit a viewing site, because published series would never hit such a site.

The big viewing sites benefit from having the smaller niche unlicensed titles to broaden their variety, but there has always been the option to adopt a policy of not uploading any scanlation or rip of a licensed work. If all unlicensed titles would be enough to compete for online viewers, there would be more sites doing just that.

Indeed, one of the things we may see is one or more of the B-list and C-list sites adopting that policy - taking down all their licensed titles to see if it puts them back underneath the radar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:41 pm Reply with quote
agila61 wrote:
Mohawk52 wrote:
Only the pirates win because it's their game. Wink


Pirates on that scale always attract the attention of the authorities and get shut down.
Well Maybe, if we're lucky.
Quote:
Bootlegging and file sharing won't stop - but despite the fantasies of the RIAA, stopping all bootlegging is not the goal, The goal is to carve out a market space that allows revenues to be funneled back to the creators of the work. The flip side of the low cost of distributing online that makes the piracy possible is that in a legal distribution system, as much as 70% of revenues can go back to the creators.
Now who's living the fantasy? No one is making a profit from this yet. It's just not happening, because the people making the rules are moving the goal posts and until they are shut down that will always be the case. Like I said, it's their game. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dewlwieldthedarpachief



Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 751
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:55 pm Reply with quote
Brian wrote:
For a recent reference, their recent Akira Blu-Ray costs 50 dollars. 50! No special features or doo-dads to speak of. Luckily the disc is gorgeous, and it's Akira, so they can get away with it.


Gorgeous doesn't even begin to get into what they had to do remastering Akira; the sound alone was so beyond anything the studio could handle the guy who originally composed the soundtrack lent out his personal equipment to properly process it for the disc. Akira's dual layer BD was barely enough to fit the finished product on their; sure they could have tossed in another extras disc but that would have jacked the price up even more.

I think my expectations may differ from some; when I buy a movie I mainly want the movie; I find extras occasionally interesting but rarely watch them more than once and more often than not am irritated at how space on the disc was wasted on some gimmicky shite. In my perfect world, all releases would be like Akira and extras would be relegated to supplementary books and documentaries, maybe with the exception of commentaries and such.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:11 pm Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
agila61 wrote:
The flip side of the low cost of distributing online that makes the piracy possible is that in a legal distribution system, as much as 70% of revenues can go back to the creators.
Now who's living the fantasy? No one is making a profit from this yet.


What does profit and loss have to do with the share going to the creators? Hulu has been paying 70% of ad revenues to the rights owners since founding, though they only made their first profit this last fiscal year. While CR is private and does not have to say, it seems unlikely they have registered their first profit, but over half their revenues go to the rights holders.

The creators are getting one or another form of revenue share ... whether their share is determined by royalty per view or as a percent of the gross. They are not getting profit shares, so they don't have to wait until the legit distributors make profits to see any money from the venture.

Quote:
It's just not happening, because the people making the rules are moving the goal posts and until they are shut down that will always be the case. Like I said, it's their game. Wink


Its not clear who you are arguing are "making the rules", nor precisely which rules about what you are referring to, so the statement of this part of the argument leaves it a bit obscure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:16 am Reply with quote
agila61 wrote:
What does profit and loss have to do with the share going to the creators? Hulu has been paying 70% of ad revenues to the rights owners since founding, though they only made their first profit this last fiscal year. While CR is private and does not have to say, it seems unlikely they have registered their first profit, but over half their revenues go to the rights holders.

The creators are getting one or another form of revenue share ... whether their share is determined by royalty per view or as a percent of the gross. They are not getting profit shares, so they don't have to wait until the legit distributors make profits to see any money from the venture.
Perhaps income would be a better word for it then. But as has been reported by some creators it's not enough to put meat on table. How much longer can sites like Crunchyroll rely on subsidies from backers in these times when money is tight? I'm frankly surprised they have made it this long, and what about the advertisers? How much increase in business are they seeing from a site that is mostly used by kids with no income, or means of paying for goods and services? But I suppose if it does lose its drip feed I'm sure it will just revert back to what it was before easily enough, but there goes that 70% to the creators again. Not a very reliable income, is it? Wink

Quote:
Its not clear who you are arguing are "making the rules", nor precisely which rules about what you are referring to, so the statement of this part of the argument leaves it a bit obscure.
The rule makers are the aggregators that seem to have the manga companies by the short and curlies and are holding them to ransom enough where companies like DMP appear to be forced to join them, rather than fight. Maybe DMP want to pimp themselves to scanlators in the vain hope of maybe making a buck, or two who knows? But it isn't a very dignified business being someones whore in search of profit. Like J.R. Ewing quoted " once you lose integrity, the rest is a piece of cake." Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ikillchicken



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 7272
Location: Vancouver
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:25 am Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
Maybe DMP want to pimp themselves to scanlators in the vain hope of maybe making a buck, or two who knows? But it isn't a very dignified business being someones whore in search of profit. Like J.R. Ewing quoted " once you lose integrity, the rest is a piece of cake." Wink


Yes. Companies embracing a new business model = whores. That's totally a reasonable assessment.

This is where I can only roll my eyes at people like you. It's like you're so committed to this absurd little crusade you've created against piracy that you're only fighting it for it's own sake. It's not even about the issue. This is pretty evident when you place this crazy idea of 'business dignity' (aka. not siding with the pirates) ahead of actually making money and finding ways to solve the problem and call any company who doesn't do the same whores without integrity. The only real conclusion I can draw is that for all your bluster and complaining about piracy, you don't really care about it at all. You just like being outraged and acting morally superior.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Charred Knight



Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 3085
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:02 am Reply with quote
I just don't think streaming and going to a digital release is really going to do anything. I mean your either going to have to shrink liscensing cost down to nothing meaning that only certain anime companies like Kyoto Animation and Sunrise can survive, or your going to lose massive amounts of money. I mean you can not make millions of dollars streaming anime, it doesn't get the views.

Also with digital you run the risk of killing off the print side, which would force you to sell 7 to 11 times the sales you get now to cover it, and frankly your not going to get it, you can't beat the ease of aggregator sites. Frankly, China has nothing to gain from helping american and Japanese companies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agila61



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 3213
Location: NE Ohio
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:49 am Reply with quote
Mohawk52 wrote:
Perhaps income would be a better word for it then. But as has been reported by some creators it's not enough to put meat on table. How much longer can sites like Crunchyroll rely on subsidies from backers in these times when money is tight?


If it took Hulu, with a much earlier start and much broader content base, until this year to earn its first profits, it would be very surprising if Crunchy was making a profit at this point.

On how long they can attract continued investment to allow them to grow their audience ... likely as long as their audience continues to grow. Its well known to be no get rich quick channel, but they are in the top 500 sites in the Phillipines and Singapore - and that is basically on the back of Naruto alone - top 1,000 in Malaysia, Qatar, Canada and Norway, and top 1,500 in UAE, Finland, Mexico, Chile, Australia, Indonesia and the US.

Quote:
I'm frankly surprised they have made it this long, and what about the advertisers? How much increase in business are they seeing from a site that is mostly used by kids with no income, or means of paying for goods and services?


Their demo trends 18-24, fairly balanced on gender trending slightly female, and no kids. There are lots of advertisers looking for that demo - there is an established conventional wisdom on getting to young adults to establish a long term position in a cohort.

Quote:
But I suppose if it does lose its drip feed I'm sure it will just revert back to what it was before easily enough, but there goes that 70% to the creators again. Not a very reliable income, is it? Wink


Its highly unlikely that it can revert to what it was before - being a streaming site dedicated to hosting bootleg material is a lot of extra DMCA work in return for much lower quality of advertising clients ... the heaving bosom free multiplayer games rather than the car companies advertising special deals to recent college graduates. There's a strong financial reason why the remaining bootleg streaming sites are leech streamers, relying on MySpace, Veoh and Megavideo to do the heavy lifting.

Quote:
Quote:
Its not clear who you are arguing are "making the rules", nor precisely which rules about what you are referring to, so the statement of this part of the argument leaves it a bit obscure.
The rule makers are the aggregators that seem to have the manga companies by the short and curlies and are holding them to ransom enough where companies like DMP appear to be forced to join them, rather than fight.


There is no indication that DMP is joining the aggregators. It seems far more like DMP is looking to poach the aggregators unpaid volunteer labor force, aka "scanlaters" and "suckers". They could well have been looking to primarily rely on poaching the unpaid scanlators that the bootleg manga viewing sites rely upon for free content, but of course if there is a sweep of the big manga viewing sites, they'll want to position themselves to take advantage of that as well.

Quote:
Maybe DMP want to pimp themselves to scanlators in the vain hope of maybe making a buck, or two who knows? But it isn't a very dignified business being someones whore in search of profit. Like J.R. Ewing quoted " once you lose integrity, the rest is a piece of cake." Wink


DMP seems set to cherry pick the cream of the crop among the established scanlator groups, and with them their support networks in social media. The former scanlators will, of course, have to drop all of their scanlating activity in order to start working for DMP for beer money, and will of course be spreading the story about how they wanted to do something like this all along, but until DMP came alone, nobody in the industry was willing to give them a chance.

I am not sure where you are finding your sex industry definitions, but the one paying the money and receiving the service without having to make a long term commitment would not normally be referred to as "pimping themselves out".


Last edited by agila61 on Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:10 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group