| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Didarina
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:27 am
|
 |
|
| LUNI_TUNZ wrote: | | And, there's a difference "finding hubby's porn stash", and "finding hubby's 'child porn' stash". |
Obviously the court that tried this case agrees with you. A more important question, I think, is whether putting this guy away for three years to share living accommodations with rapists and predators is a just, or even a meaningful verdict for getting caught with "incest comics".
And to your previous point, for the life of me, I just can't picture any realistic circumstances under which a spouse brings charges against her husband with a presumptive 10 year prison sentence, which would effectively end the marriage anyway, without some form of conscientious malice on her part.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chagen46
Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:12 am
|
|
|
| LUNI_TUNZ wrote: |
| Didarina wrote: |
| LUNI_TUNZ wrote: | | Or... maybe they were in a loving relationship, until she found his hidden stash of "child pornography".
And therefore wasn't ding it out of spite, but doing what she thought seemed like the right thing to do.
Let's not assume. |
I'm pretty sure there's definitely a point in a relationship between "finding hubby's porn stash" and "three year prison sentence" where spite becomes a distinct and significant factor. |
And, there's a difference "finding hubby's porn stash", and "finding hubby's 'child porn' stash". |
And there's a difference between "finding hubby's child porn stash" and "finding hubby's loli/shota stash".
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
LUNI_TUNZ
Joined: 28 Apr 2010
Posts: 809
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:18 pm
|
|
|
| Didarina wrote: | | And to your previous point, for the life of me, I just can't picture any realistic circumstances under which a spouse brings charges against her husband with a presumptive 10 year prison sentence, which would effectively end the marriage anyway, without some form of conscientious malice on her part. |
Simple. She thought her husband was in possession of child porn and thus a potential danger to actual children.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
revolutionotaku
Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 889
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:27 pm
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, the people of Japan continue to read, buy, sell, trade & illustrate Lolicon & Shotacon mangas/anime every single day, 24/7, all year around & without living in fear of being arrested or turned in.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Blanchimont
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3457
Location: Finland
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:15 pm
|
|
|
| Didarina wrote: | | ...
And to your previous point, for the life of me, I just can't picture any realistic circumstances under which a spouse brings charges against her husband with a presumptive 10 year prison sentence, which would effectively end the marriage anyway, without some form of conscientious malice on her part. |
Why, custody cases. Unfortunately happened already. Though the charges got overturned at the highest appeal. However in this particular case I see no mention of the couple having children.
But yes, custody cases can get ugly...
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Cecilthedarkknight_234
Joined: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 3820
Location: Louisville, KY
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:15 pm
|
|
|
| LUNI_TUNZ wrote: |
| Didarina wrote: | | And to your previous point, for the life of me, I just can't picture any realistic circumstances under which a spouse brings charges against her husband with a presumptive 10 year prison sentence, which would effectively end the marriage anyway, without some form of conscientious malice on her part. |
Simple. She thought her husband was in possession of child porn and thus a potential danger to actual children. |
or she could have been upset that he was wanking to this stuff rather than having sex with her.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
partysmores
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 284
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Seriously though, dude, are you an idiot? Labeling your loli stash as "incest comics"? GEE, I WONDER WHAT'S IN THERE.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Draneor
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 355
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Hey, we could totally discuss our current legal system (including the nature of plea bargaining), what types of speech are protected and what are considered obscene, etc. Or we can make half-assed comments about a couple's relationship and sex lives based on jack shit knowledge and impute "impure" motives to one gender.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Didarina
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 10
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:40 pm
|
|
|
| Draneor wrote: | | Hey, we could totally discuss our current legal system (including the nature of plea bargaining), what types of speech are protected and what are considered obscene, etc. Or we can make half-assed comments about a couple's relationship and sex lives based on jack shit knowledge and impute "impure" motives to one gender. |
Since your post is the first one to bring "gender" into the conversation, does that make you the aforementioned half-assed poster? The background info about the wife contacting the police department is verbatim from the indictment, the public record of the case and source of all the legit facts on the subject. You're the only one bringing up "gender", everyone else is talking about the accused and his spouse, as described in the official documents.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
RAmmsoldat
Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 1261
Location: North wales coast
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:45 pm
|
|
|
| partysmores wrote: | | Seriously though, dude, are you an idiot? Labeling your loli stash as "incest comics"? GEE, I WONDER WHAT'S IN THERE. |
maybe he should have labeled it "Definitely not incest comics" lol
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chagen46
Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:47 pm
|
|
|
| RAmmsoldat wrote: |
| partysmores wrote: | | Seriously though, dude, are you an idiot? Labeling your loli stash as "incest comics"? GEE, I WONDER WHAT'S IN THERE. |
maybe he should have labeled it "Definitely not incest comics" lol |
I once told me friend that if I ever needed to have a porn folder, I'd name it "This is definitely not my porn folder" just to screw with people who peek around my comp.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Digimontamerfreak
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:06 am
|
|
|
|
If I were him I would have gone through every security measure in the book to make sure no one but me could get into the system. bios password, account password, tpm, biometric scanner, a token, hide the folders and password protect said folder incase anyone ever did manage to get into the system. Although odds are if they were determined and skillfull they would likley get through all that eventually. He should of put that stuff somewhere more secure like on an encrypted usb.swapping out the hard drive is simple as well.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Draneor
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 355
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:16 am
|
|
|
| Didarina wrote: | | You're the only one bringing up "gender", everyone else is talking about the accused and his spouse, as described in the official documents. |
Did you miss these lines?
"And keep your women far away from your computer! "
" or she could have been upset that he was wanking to this stuff rather than having sex with her."
If you don't find these lines anti-woman, I don't know what to say. Half the posters are, in fact, attacking his wife (who, I'll note, did nothing wrong) rather than the legal system.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polycell
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:35 am
|
|
|
|
So attacking a person for calling the cops on their spouse for something harmless is an automatic attack on their sex? Not a single post besmirching the wife here has been misogynistic.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Draneor
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 355
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:10 am
|
|
|
| Polycell wrote: | | So attacking a person for calling the cops on their spouse for something harmless is an automatic attack on their sex? Not a single post besmirching the wife here has been misogynistic. |
If your response to a wife reporting their spouse for committing what they perceived to be a crime is "they were jealous because they didn't get enough sex," yes, you're being misogynistic.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
