×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Japan Animation Creators Assoc. Adds Opposition to New Child Porn Revision Bill


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yell0



Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 24
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:11 am Reply with quote
VORTIA wrote:
@yello
You seem to have misunderstood me. I feel I am unqualified to make any sort of argument or decision as to whether or not the legality of possession impacts the ability to arrest abusers. It is something best left up to those who know more than I. I simply claimed that whether or not it is legal to possess, I believe it is morally reprehensible to do so.


Okay, well I would agree it makes them of questionable morality for sure.

I just don't believe that you can automatically assume so much about an individual based merely on the fact they were in possession of a recording of an illegal act. This does not necessarily mean that they were involved in supporting the act recorded. It could, but to assume that is always the case is just going to land people innocent of actually injuring another individual in prison.

Not to mention scaring people into not reporting stuff they may have otherwise.

There's also the fact that it's far better for people to release their possibly harmful desires in a safe and harmless way through masturbation than to actually go out and do someone harm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
antvasima



Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 21
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:56 am Reply with quote
But what about the financing of the real perpetrators then? I mean, I read about these transgressions even being ordered in direct live view over the Internet. Don't you think that placing orders for others to rape children as a masturbation show should be illegal?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yell0



Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 24
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:59 am Reply with quote
antvasima wrote:
But what about the financing of the real perpetrators then? I mean, I read about these transgressions even being ordered in direct live view over the Internet. Don't you think that placing orders for others to rape children as a masturbation show should be illegal?


Well that's quite a bit different, because then you're directly soliciting a sexual performance from a minor. That is not the same at all as merely possessing child pornography.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tcsavato



Joined: 20 May 2013
Posts: 27
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:36 pm Reply with quote
antvasima wrote:
1. I respectfully disagree with your opinion, and at the end that is all that it is. One opinion or another.

There is a massive difference between an offpage reference to child rape as a vile crime to be punished and for deeply gratuitious purposes.

2. Given the massive problems with paedophile networks in Japan I think that the child rape hentai is grooming the users into the real alternative, and I couldn't be less concerned that the doujin industry would have to adapt through consentual sex depictions, which would probably sell just as well.

Mind you, the real deal should obviously hold far harsher punishments, but I wouldn't mind if the actual spreading and production of any form of gratuitious child rape would be imposed with a fine, but mere possession is much iffier.

3. This viewpoint is not likely to change, no matter whether you are more tolerant towards the practice, just as I'm sure that the reverse holds equally true. My problem is the assumption that your viewpoint should somehow automatically hold greater validity. Also, should you really waste your time fighting for the rights of people who think like Nambla members?


1. There were no opinions in my post barring the part about rape. There is no victim and there is no child. Without those, you don't have CP.

2. Lolicons are not pedophiles and Vice versa. Most lolicons do not hold an attraction to real children (or real people at all in extreme cases, though, that's because of other factors not lolicon consumption). And there are plenty of consensual loli (potential AoC issues aside) doujins.

3. NAMBLA peeps can think what they want. As long as they don't sex up kids against their will, then I will not persecute based on thought crime.

antvasima wrote:
1. I am however somewhat concerned that people digesting lolicon tentacle rape hentai will need greater and greater stimulation and move on to paying for real child pornography networks, and whether the two industries intersect. On the other hand, I concede that it is better that the paedos get their jollies from drawings instead, if that is the case.

2. Still, the thing that I don't get is that, if this bill would strictly go after the ltrh, why would this somehow adversely affect the economy? Wouldn't the doujin creators simply adapt their production to consenting adults instead, and sell just as much?


1. It's not grooming anybody if there is no attraction to a real child in the first place. Even then, only those with mental health issues would jump the gap between fiction and reality.

2. Doujin creators should seek that change themselves, not because the law tells them too.

antvasima wrote:
As for illegality of possession, it should obviously not be illegal for police investigators to find out where the REAL child porn networks are, nor for informers, but if anybody could get off scott free from charges by claiming "I was gathering evidence while paying for watching that 8 year old get violated by a dog", we wouldn't get anywhere. Also, I never stated that possession of simulated porn should be fined.


This assumes there's transactions happening for (most) CP. There likely isn't. Considering the situation, there's very little to be made (especially on charging people) on internet porn, CP or otherwise.

antvasima wrote:
1. I would say that it is because of the massive human trafficking making rape unnecessary, and considering that I didn't develop them of course I don't know how exactly they were derived, but the reverse goes as well, if you cannot point to that the evaluators did use flawed methods, then they are the best we have to go by.

2. As for possession of REAL child pornography, which is what you seem to be defending, as I never said that I wanted mere possession of virtual fined, it directly finances and directly or indirectly orders severe abuse of children, so much like the law in the US sets heavy punishments for this, I agree with it, as do thankfully most of the western world.


1. Human trafficking is still rape. Though, they are typically unreported (Most rapes are). Honestly, unless stated otherwise by trying to incorporate unreported rapes, the rape statistics are always a lot more then what is published and is impossible to do a true statistic of it.

2. Rapists have a very different mindset than a normal person. They are not driven by money, they are driven by the thrill, power and humiliation/dehumanization of the victim. That is why it's posted online. The only thing driving them to do it, is their own sick mind. Very very few (if any) make any sort of money off the content.

antvasima wrote:
But what about the financing of the real perpetrators then? I mean, I read about these transgressions even being ordered in direct live view over the Internet. Don't you think that placing orders for others to rape children as a masturbation show should be illegal?


Of course, material like this is something that would be paid for, atleast if they were specific requests for such and not a community type dealie. And things like these are more in tune to human trafficking, your run of the mill CP maker won't exactly risk themselves that openly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 888
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:24 am Reply with quote
Child protection laws sometimes do not work as governments had originally planned.
Example, when the PROTECT Act of 2003 was put into law in the United States, it was the exact same year as the kidnapping of Amanda Berry in Ohio.
She was impregnated & held as a prisoner in a torture/sex chamber by Ariel Castro.
Meanwhile, the feds were busy arresting law-abiding otakus like Christopher Handley.
10 years later, she managed to escape & finally got the police to help save the other teenage girls who were also held prisoner by Castro.
Castro has since been arrested & is now facing the death penalty.
The PROTECT Act did not save Amanda Berry, she saved herself.
So the PROTECT Act of 2003 was a absolute failure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
partysmores



Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 284
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:41 pm Reply with quote
https://twitter.com/hiro_mashima/status/341080365601009665

Actual proof that manga will be affected right here.

Rough translation:

-Natsu's vest will be closed

-All Grey shirtless scenes will be removed

-Any scenes of "sex appeal" on female characters will be removed

-Wendy will have to drop out

-No more bathing suits or bath scenes.

-Any old manuscripts/tankobons with this material in them will have to be "disposed of".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
mdo7



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 6259
Location: Katy, Texas, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:46 pm Reply with quote
partysmores wrote:
https://twitter.com/hiro_mashima/status/341080365601009665

Actual proof that manga will be affected right here.

Rough translation:

-Natsu's vest will be closed

-All Grey shirtless scenes will be removed

-Any scenes of "sex appeal" on female characters will be removed

-Wendy will have to drop out

-No more bathing suits or bath scenes.

-Any old manuscripts/tankobons with this material in them will have to be "disposed of".


Yeah that's what I'm afraid of and this could be the end of the industry as we know it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Chagen46



Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:05 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
1. I am however somewhat concerned that people digesting lolicon tentacle rape hentai will need greater and greater stimulation and move on to paying for real child pornography networks, and whether the two industries intersect. On the other hand, I concede that it is better that the paedos get their jollies from drawings instead, if that is the case.


I am a loli/shotacon (though I am attracted to adult characters too) and I have never wanted to ever do anything sexual with a child. The thought sickens me. Actually, I HATE children. You couldn't pay me a million bucks to spend time with some other person't ugly and whiny spawn.

People do not get "bored" with a fetish. Sexuality doesn't work that way. Going by your logic someone who looks at porn with consensual sex would soon get bored with it and watch rape porn. But not everyone watches rape porn. You're just comitting a Slippery Slope Fallacy.

The difference between an actual child and a bunch of lines on a page representing a precoscious pseudo-child (that frequently acts in a way utterly divorced from real children) is gigantic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Oshawott



Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 6773
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:23 pm Reply with quote
partysmores wrote:
-Natsu's vest will be closed

-All Grey shirtless scenes will be removed

-Any scenes of "sex appeal" on female characters will be removed

-Wendy will have to drop out

-No more bathing suits or bath scenes.

-Any old manuscripts/tankobons with this material in them will have to be "disposed of".

Ohh, boy. Then it seems that Fairy Tail and most other anime shows like it are going to get severely crippled. Even worse, this could mean that lesser-known manga and anime shows may end up being shut down before they even have a chance to start. Yes, this child porn bill really does reek of censorship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mdo7



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 6259
Location: Katy, Texas, USA
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:41 pm Reply with quote
Mr. Oshawott wrote:
partysmores wrote:
-Natsu's vest will be closed

-All Grey shirtless scenes will be removed

-Any scenes of "sex appeal" on female characters will be removed

-Wendy will have to drop out

-No more bathing suits or bath scenes.

-Any old manuscripts/tankobons with this material in them will have to be "disposed of".

Ohh, boy. Then it seems that Fairy Tail and most other anime shows like it are going to get severely crippled. Even worse, this could mean that lesser-known manga and anime shows may end up being shut down before they even have a chance to start. Yes, this child porn bill really does reek of censorship.


Yes, this could killed the anime and manga industry for sure. Japan has already did it. Good bye anime and manga, it's been nice knowing you. Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 888
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:31 am Reply with quote
If this bill includes anime/manga (which is total harmless fiction) alongside with actual kiddie porn (which should be banned completely) & get passed into law, it will be considered a tragic act of suicide for Japan's anime culture.
I'm so glad that the JACA & other animation groups are noticing the red flags early before this bill causes serious damage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Shiroi Hane
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 25 Oct 2003
Posts: 7580
Location: Wales
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:29 pm Reply with quote
FuriFuu wrote:
The United States passed a bill in 2003 called Protect Act under George Bush which is basically the same thing as this bill revision here. Once this was passed other countries began to copy-cat, including UK <2009> and Spain <this>.

There was a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in the run up to the
Coroners and Justice Act, but since then only a single second has been cut from a mainstream anime. Strike Witches passed uncut with a 12 rating.
While it might be interesting to see what the BBFC would make of To Love-ru Darkness, I'm not convinced that the sky is falling over Japan as far as mainstream anime is concerned.

Quote:
It's also the main reason why many manga and anime do not make it to U.S. shores without severely being censored(non hentai), or not translated at all(hentai). Japanese cartoonist have a better chance in Denmark or even Sweden than they do in the U.S.

Can you name me a few of these severely censored non-hentai titles?
Last I heard, while it downsized a lot after the anime bubble burst, there is still a hentai anime business up and running in the US, with less censorship than in Japan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
Grinpatch



Joined: 02 Mar 2013
Posts: 5
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:06 pm Reply with quote
Yes, very good!
Ban drawings but leave clips with half naked REAL girls on the TV.
Also, I'm sure that drawings are definitly the cause of all the child-rape that happens in this world, if they ban this made-with-a-pencil then all the child-rape will dissapear!

They should also ban drawings with violence in them, it's that that causes so many violence in this world, the reason there are wars are simply because of drawings, there's even this rumour going on that the cause of the 2 World-Wars are because of Anime.

Oh and those atomic bombs that fell on Japan weren't really atomic bombs, they were drawings from an Anime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 888
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 10:26 pm Reply with quote
Shiroi Hane wrote:

Can you name me a few of these severely censored non-hentai titles? .

The first manga volume of "Kamikaze" had some chick giving a guy a BJ in a subway station.
The English version had to remove & redraw the scenes that were too explicit for the bible-reading public.
That's good-old fashioned American censorship for you!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group