×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Japan's Child Pornography Bill Would Not Restrict Anime, Manga


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
KatamariSkill



Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Posts: 13
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:47 pm Reply with quote
I'm glad this content wasn't outlawed in japan. I don't know about other people but I enjoy my loli games and manga. But that doesn't mean I have any desire to go out and find some kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Polycell



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:29 pm Reply with quote
jl07045 wrote:
Maybe drawn children are just a substitute for real children
I wanted to call attention to this - to the degree this is true is the degree real child pornography is displaced(not that this changes any inclination to live out fantasy). If they're hanged anyway, nothing but personal conscious is left to deter them from seeking out the real deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Touma



Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2651
Location: Colorado, USA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:49 pm Reply with quote
Shadowrun20XX wrote:
IMO hope the bill does some damage.

Damage to what?
Anime and manga are not covered by this bill.

EDIT: It looks like this is no longer a bill. It has been passed by the Diet and is now a law, according to the Japan Times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Kaioshin_Sama



Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 1215
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:10 pm Reply with quote
I wish they'd go one step further and impose harsher laws on animated and printed content of fictional characters. For one the obvious reason that it's creepy as hell, for another I'm tired of lazy writers and animators using it as a crutch for actual content and better storytelling. It'd force producers to find more alternative and less...creepy ideas for marketing, it'd cut down on the ever encroaching element of the anime fanbase that I frankly want nothing to do with and I'd have the peace of mind in being able to feel a little less ashamed of one of my hobbies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
walw6pK4Alo



Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:21 pm Reply with quote
So it's creepy and therefore should be illegal? "I don't like a thing, therefore no one else can." And it's clear you're not even talking about just loli/shota content, but literally anything you disapprove of. So glad you have zero power and your opinions amount to naught.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:01 pm Reply with quote
>The country's upper house of parliament passed a bill Wednesday, which will see people found with explicit images of children jailed for up to year or fined up to $10,000.
>jailed for up to year
>fined up to $10,000




National government just turned this whole thing as a way for them to get more money! Japan's government balance sheet is not a cause for concern for the international markets, but it really is in deep red ink.

Basically, those who got caught will only pay $10,000 and spend a year in detention. If one re-offends it's another $10,000 and a year long detention. This looks like a good business case! Laughing Laughing Laughing


Last edited by NGK on Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lebrel



Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 374
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:13 pm Reply with quote
People, this is not about loli and shota. It's not about porn. If the current Japanese CP law is applied to manga, any manga with a sexy shot of a topless high school girl will be CP:

Text of law (translated):

3 (iii) "Any pose of a child wholly or partially naked, which arouses or stimulates the viewer's sexual desire."

Remember that "child" means a person under 18. So everything from Love Hina to Sensual Phrase would be grounds for prosecution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:17 pm Reply with quote
I'm calling arms for further fortification of The Japan Ink. 2D Industry Complex (I just made these term up) should fight back, NRA style!

We should advice manga/LN/anime publishers in Japan that they should take a page or the whole book from National Rifle Association on how to deal with outside forces who are trying to destroy its freedom (in this case for 2D publishers... artists' expression), commerce & culture.

By now I'm sure everyone here knows who/what NRA and its arm NRA-ILA is, and why it's one of few NGOs that racked up a lot of victories besides the American Gaming Association (AGA).

heck, NRA even fought the UN and won!



As for the publishers, they rightfully won in a purely defensive front, but this is NOT ENOUGH! Going forward they should regroup and rebuild (using the "templates" mentioned above) in such a way that an attempt to damage the "2D Complex" industry by outside forces should not even be put for into motion or consideration in DIET in the first place!


Last edited by NGK on Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:29 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rederoin



Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 1427
Location: Europa
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:20 pm Reply with quote
walw6pK4Alo wrote:
So it's creepy and therefore should be illegal? "I don't like a thing, therefore no one else can." And it's clear you're not even talking about just loli/shota content, but literally anything you disapprove of. So glad you have zero power and your opinions amount to naught.

Honestly, I'm not even that surprised to see this coming from him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
animefan1238



Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 299
Location: Ma
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:39 pm Reply with quote
Maybe if they didn't blur regular real porn then this won't be as big a problem. I'm not saying it would be a cure all, but that kind of restriction makes the more of the unusual folk look for a different material that isn't as censored or is a bigger, ummm, libido switch. I have to say they are a repressed people with the decently laws in terms of adult entertainment. Meanwhile they love the incest, some of the more nasty H and lolicon H stuff. In my opinion the government needs to get in touch with the 21st century and let these restrictions go and focus on the serious issues with regards to child pornography. Granted this problem won't disappear in a flash but it would be a start.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:45 pm Reply with quote
mehh wrote:
I'm honestly shocked that they're just deciding to make this illegal now... Why the hell has this taken so long?


Could it be that those who were trying to craft the law years ago, was so broad in restriction, that it will negatively affect the multibillion dollar "Japan Ink. 2D Complex" enterprise?

It is no wonder then that DIET was stuck over what to do with CP.

It's very easy to pinpoint those who are behind such broad measures - Western backed NGOs and their arm in the int&national mainstream media basically advocating for inclusion of fiction 2D. ... and we all saw it put to practice blatantly this week by CNN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad_Scientist
Subscriber
Moderator


Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 3011
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:51 pm Reply with quote
Very glad to see they're finally going after possession of real life child pornography. About time.

Also, I do agree with the decision not to include drawings in this. I'll quote what Touma said earlier.

Touma wrote:
If somebody already said this I apologize for being redundant. I just noticed that this thread became active again and I might have missed something when I read through it.

Rahxephon91 wrote:
My point was that I don't understand how being fiction makes some difference.

For me the difference is not in the picture that you see, the difference is in what had to happen for that picture to be produced.

For the real child pornography to be made a real child must be hurt.
When you look at that picture you are seeing that child being assaulted. You are looking at evidence of a crime. You are actually viewing that crime in progress.
This is not true of fictional pornography.

Whenever somebody buys, or just downloads, one of those pictures he is encouraging the original criminal to abuse more children and make more pictures.
This does not apply to fictional child pornography.

The market for real child pornography will probably never be completely eliminated, and even if it was that would not stop all sexual abuse of children. But making the possession of real child pornography a crime might reduce the market and remove some of the incentive for people to produce the material.
Making fictional child pornography illegal would not do that.

No children are hurt in the creation of fictional child pornography, and no children will be saved by the prohibition of fictional child pornography.

That, in my opinion, is the difference.


Is loli/shota stuff gross/creepy/weird? Sure. But there is a difference between something that is gross or even something that is outright immoral, and something that should be illegal. There are plenty of things I consider wrong that I don't think the government should be throwing people in jail for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
eragon2890



Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 159
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:58 pm Reply with quote
lebrel wrote:
People, this is not about loli and shota. It's not about porn. If the current Japanese CP law is applied to manga, any manga with a sexy shot of a topless high school girl will be CP:

Text of law (translated):

3 (iii) "Any pose of a child wholly or partially naked, which arouses or stimulates the viewer's sexual desire."

Remember that "child" means a person under 18. So everything from Love Hina to Sensual Phrase would be grounds for prosecution.


I am against the law, but given that the previously-inlucded part about anime and manga asked for ´an investigation into *sexual child abuse* in anime and manga´ (end quote) I am almost 100% that wouldn´t fall under it. That was probably the reason they wanted it investigated, because they already saw that problem and thus tought different lines had to be drawn for those media (which is also what the congressperson was talking about. If he/she ´loves manga´ as she said, she sure as hell isn´t gonna be against love hina. he/she was talking about literall child rape hentai.

Still happy it didn´t happen tough! JAY!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 5:01 pm Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Very glad to see they're finally going after possession of real life child pornography. About time.


More like DIET finally put a smackdown on those who are also pushing fictional works for inclusion! For years the motion for outlawing cp possession couldn't move forward because it's either too broad of a paintbrush or you have outside forces pushing to include fictional works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14763
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:11 am Reply with quote
Don't worry; these gravure are still fine. Laughing

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group