Forum - View topicINTEREST: Ken Akamatsu Bemoans Britain's Child Pornography Sentencing
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mdo7
Posts: 6255 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||||
You sick bastard, you should rot in hell. spoiler[Disclaimer: I was being sarcastic and joking around and playing along with relyat08, so please don't ban or moderate me.] |
||||||||
taster of pork
Posts: 594 Location: My House |
|
|||||||
Someone should take that picture to the British police and see what they do.
|
||||||||
Zalis116
Moderator
Posts: 6867 Location: Kazune City |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Ali07
Posts: 3333 Location: Victoria, Australia |
|
|||||||
There's nothing that sets any freedom of speech in stone in Australia in any constitutional or statutory declaration of rights. For some reason, people seem to believe that we have freedom of speech here. There is limited (political speech) protection, but it's a complicated matter. Also, I had no idea that polls were in favour of internet filtering in Australia. Guess that news just passed me by.
We're getting closer and closer. One step at a time. |
||||||||
Juno016
Posts: 2386 |
|
|||||||
Quoting what I said in the last thread for its relevance to this thread:
I just don't get why people think of other people like this as "sickos". The word carries no weight and is just a blind insult. So what if someone else is interested in something seemingly unsanitary? As long as they're either taking the extra steps to stay healthy OR they're not taking the extra steps to harm someone else, their unsanitary actions are their rights to perform. If we don't strictly talk about the rights under existing laws, it is widely accepted that the rightful freedoms of humans extend until they either restrict someone else's ability to perform those freedoms or they harm someone else entirely. Beyond that, a person's actions are free for them to perform at any given time. |
||||||||
yu3lora
Posts: 288 |
|
|||||||
I agree with yah. |
||||||||
mdo7
Posts: 6255 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||||
Could you explain that to me maybe over the PM, I like to learn more about the land down under's freedom of speech? Also I don't think Australians don't seem to understand the real meaning of freedom of speech.
So should the Animation Creators Assoc that oppose Japan's New Child Porn Revision Bill be arrested for supporting what you don't like? Should we sent the whole Japanese government to the ICC (International Criminal Court) for not putting anime and manga on Japan's child porn law? |
||||||||
jdotaku
Posts: 32 |
|
|||||||
I am a long time fan of Akamatsu and his work and appreciate his outspokenness on these issues. He himself could likely be censored or who knows what else for some of his work over the years which is absurd. Do I like some of the stuff thats out there? No. Do most americans (or apparently british?) no. Hell just recently I offered to take a friend a grown man mind you older than myself to an anime club meeting only to have his mother whom he lives with for health reasons concerned that it might be offensive material we were viewing (granted some of it is PG13 type stuff but hentai is for special showings lol) anyway hope this gets overturned
|
||||||||
SquadmemberRitsu
Posts: 1391 |
|
|||||||
However I did wrongly assume that most anime was either grimdark degenerate pandering horse shit or Dragonball Z rip offs. The western anime community likes to scream about how ecchi or 'moe' shows like K-ON or, in this case, loli is what's setting a bad example completely oblivious to the fact that shows like Hellsing and Naruto aren't going to be everyone's cup of tea either. Admittedly I actually quite liked Death Note when my friend managed to convince me to watch it and I also really enjoyed watching Attack on Titan as it aired. However, I really don't like the sort of people those shows attract and the image it gives to anime. It's exactly the sort of thing that drove me away from watching anime in the first place until I found out about K-ON and the Slice of Life genre. So by that logic all those shows should be banned right? Violence is illegal in real life so gratuitous depictions of violence should be outlawed too right? Because by your logic that makes perfect sense. |
||||||||
the-antihero
Posts: 726 |
|
|||||||
And everyone who owns Rambo 4 on DVD or Blu-ray will be on trial since there are scenes depicting children being murdered, one being stabbed while being stepped on and another being thrown into a burning house by a Burmese soldier. Besides, hasn't Allan Moore made a pornographic work involving underage girls? And he actually uses the word 'pornographic' on BBC's Hard Talk and differentiating it from erotica. And the guy gets tons of praise. I just hate how inconsistent sex laws are in many countries. |
||||||||
revolutionotaku
Posts: 886 |
|
|||||||
Rambo 4 is banned in Burma for "negative betrayals of Burmese soldiers". |
||||||||
revolutionotaku
Posts: 886 |
|
|||||||
"Puni Puni Poemy", "Ikki Tousen: Dragon Destiny" & "High School DxD" are all banned in New Zealand according to Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_films |
||||||||
animalia555
Posts: 467 |
|
|||||||
Anyone ever hear of Turner's Syndrome? I bring it up because one of the side effects is that girls with will stop aging physically right before they hit puberty. Law & Order SVU even did an episode about the implications of this, and had a 17 year old (legally an adult in New York) girl with Turner's Syndrome LEGALLY dating an adult, who she new was into her because she looked like a little kid but didn't care because it was probably her only chance for a relationship. While it REALLY creeps the detective out there is nothing they can do because the girl is PHYSICAL girl is LEGALLY an adult despite LOOKING like a kid. While a fictional story it obviously thought about the real world applications of something like that.
|
||||||||
Adamb15
Posts: 115 |
|
|||||||
I find it hard to believe a human being in this day and age is this close minded and judgmental to something that probably has never affected them, and probably never will. But hey, let's go ahead and believe it's serious: You should be locked in a cage and isolated from normal human society. You are poisonous. You and people like you will lead humanity down through a dark age of fear, paranoia, and slavery to the lowest common denominator of pretentious over-worried control freaks. |
||||||||
Shippoyasha
Posts: 459 |
|
|||||||
Ken Akamatsu has always been my hero for speaking up for support of artistic freedoms and the right for people to consume them safely. I think loli art is largely cute and I can understand those who have stronger feelings for it. As long as people can consume it safely as people had for decades, I am for artistic freedom and for consumers to be able to enjoy without being thrown into jail. Let there be some recourse and benefit of the doubt instead of kneejerk arresting and convicting. Best of luck to that man.
|
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group