×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Shelf Life - Chocolate Bund Cake


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rizuchan



Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 975
Location: Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:48 am Reply with quote
Quote:
Ui is an enabler. Yui will never be able to survive on her own, thanks to her sister's doting. She'll never learn to cook unless you stop feeding her, Ui!

This made me actually lol. I feel the same way about Ui. The weird "mature little sister imature big sister" trope in Anime is starting to get really stale to me.

The panties thing with Mio never really bothered me because I thought it was rather tastefully done in the anime. (The manga, not as much...) It also helps that it's really about the only obviously fanservice scene in the show, aside from the obligatory beach episodes and such.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14761
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:06 am Reply with quote
DmonHiro wrote:
ArsenicSteel wrote:

Sigh. This is going nowhere this is the same bunch of people that called Nanoha pedo-training material because of some silhouette'd transformation sequences. Oh no a body line.

Well, the one thing I can take solace in is the fact Japan makes more and more of this stuff. Not only because I enjoy it, but the fact that it pisses so many prudes off is like a delicious icing on a very moist cake. And yes, that was inuendo.


The Japanese make more of it because they don't have any pretense about it: it is for sexual purposes - and proud of it!** And that's why anime fans love 'em for it, and that's why there's no need to defend it when they're not even defending it themselves. Surprised

[** Told to us from their animators. The animators know it; they know we know it, hint hint wink wink Laughing ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blood-
Bargain Hunter



Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 23771
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:15 am Reply with quote
DmonHiro wrote:
ArsenicSteel wrote:

Sigh. This is going nowhere this is the same bunch of people that called Nanoha pedo-training material because of some silhouette'd transformation sequences. Oh no a body line.

Well, the one thing I can take solace in is the fact Japan makes more and more of this stuff. Not only because I enjoy it, but the fact that it pisses so many prudes off is like a delicious icing on a very moist cake. And yes, that was inuendo.


Being skevved out by the sexualization of child characters in anime isn't prudish - it's a sign of mental health.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
neocloud9



Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 1178
Location: Atlanta, GA
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:07 am Reply with quote
Quote:
It is a bit ludicrous that there are only four episodes on this Blu-ray


Amen, sister! No idea why Bandai didn't release this in a box set to begin with...

I may have to check out GE999 now! I just recently watched Interstella 5555 and loved it~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PetrifiedJello



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 3782
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:36 am Reply with quote
There are two three guarantees in life:
-Taxes
-Erin Finnegan will rate a "loli" series as "Perishable"
-Death

I doubt I'm the only one who knew of the rating before opening the article in regard to DitVB.

It's good to know the comments didn't disappoint, either.

Not that I'm complaining, so move the mouse away from the submit button, please.

As for the K-ON BD, it's pathetic such visual anomalies are easily seen on a product which should be perfect. Considering this is Bandai, the same company who hires subtitling companies with 2 months of English experience [citation needed], it's not surprising to see the business model of Money over Customer Satisfaction in play again (not against profit making, but there is such a thing called Fair Exchange Value).

To do this to a market that's shrinking is insulting to me. No matter. It's $30 I'm saving.

As for GE999.... I decided to leave this one at the station. Nostalgia and I are bitter enemies.

Now, about those pictures. Someone works in a clean room or hospital. They look so sterile, I feel I've been vaccinated just looking at them.

Jesting aside, I have to admit I love how the collection stands out against the white.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ArsenicSteel



Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 2370
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:35 pm Reply with quote
Blood- wrote:
Being skevved out by the sexualization of child characters in anime isn't prudish - it's a sign of mental health.


Looks prudish to me but then again that's considering there are works both in and outside of anime that do just that and the fans' mental abilities don't get called into question. Telling this to a guy with a Blood+ avatar seems a bit ironic.

Quote:
If I remember correctly in the new movie she is actually simply naked and you see everything. That was indeed shocking to see imho (didn't remember the tv series going that far).


I haven't seen the movie but my comment about the general feelings toward the series predate the movie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lelliel



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:51 pm Reply with quote
ArsenicSteel wrote:
Blood- wrote:
Being skevved out by the sexualization of child characters in anime isn't prudish - it's a sign of mental health.


Looks prudish to me but then again that's considering there are works both in and outside of anime that do just that and the fans' mental abilities don't get called into question. Telling this to a guy with a Blood+ avatar seems a bit ironic.


Depends on exactly what you mean by child. Do you mean someone who's strictly under 18 or do you mean someone who's prepubescent?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blood-
Bargain Hunter



Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 23771
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:04 pm Reply with quote
ArsenicSteel wrote:
Blood- wrote:
Being skevved out by the sexualization of child characters in anime isn't prudish - it's a sign of mental health.


Looks prudish to me ...


No, being skeeved out by the sexualization of child characters isn't prudish. Just as believing stealing is wrong doesn't make you a materialistic money-grubber or believing murder is wrong doesn't make you a moralistic goody-two shoes. These are simply the common sense positions of a normally functioning mind.

Where the argument can come is deciding what is sexualization of child characters. For example, I find Moonphase pretty innocent, but I suppose somebody else might consider it rife with loli-pandering.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
ArsenicSteel



Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 2370
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:39 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
No, being skeeved out by the sexualization of child characters isn't prudish. Just as believing stealing is wrong doesn't make you a materialistic money-grubber or believing murder is wrong doesn't make you a moralistic goody-two shoes. These are simply the common sense positions of a normally functioning mind.


Please stop with the logical fail.

I am not going to argue what sexualization is. I will say virtual child nudity is pretty common in modern art and that sexual innuendo, intended or accident, around those cases are not obscene, pornographic, or skevvy.

I say it's prudish because it is typical prudish reaction to argue imaginary without context or to make the context seem irrelevant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blood-
Bargain Hunter



Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 23771
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:48 pm Reply with quote
ArsenicSteel wrote:
I am not going to argue what sexualization is. I will say virtual child nudity is pretty common in modern art and that sexual innuendo, intended or accident, around those cases are not obscene, pornographic, or skevvy.


So according to you, any intended sexual innuendo that accompanies virtual child nudity is not skeevy, eh? Laughing Glad you settled that thorny question for us. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Maigraith



Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 80
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:54 pm Reply with quote
ArsenicSteel wrote:

I say it's prudish because it is typical prudish reaction to argue imaginary without context or to make the context seem irrelevant.


Then please explain the context to me since I don't get it. I understand she has to be prepubescent because of the child birthing thing, but why does she have to be scantily clad as well?

And using the fact that she's "really an adult" doesn't fly, adult women only hang out in their undies in porn videos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ArsenicSteel



Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 2370
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:00 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
So according to you, any intended sexual innuendo that accompanies virtual child nudity is not skeevy, eh? Laughing Glad you settled that thorny question for us. Laughing

It's not according to me. That was just my very short and loose interpretation of US Code Title 18 Section 2256 if we applied it to the drawings in DiTVB.

@Maigraith, If you exclude the most important factor of context and answer own question with such factual reasoning that only pornstars openly appear in their underwear. I have no way of answering you seriously.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blood-
Bargain Hunter



Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 23771
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:17 pm Reply with quote
ArsenicSteel wrote:
Quote:
So according to you, any intended sexual innuendo that accompanies virtual child nudity is not skeevy, eh? Laughing Glad you settled that thorny question for us. Laughing

It's not according to me. That was just my very short and loose interpretation of US Code Title 18 Section 2256 if we applied it to the drawings in DiTVB.


Ah, so US Code Title 18 Section 2256 determines what is skeevy or not, eh? Laughing I'll give you a hint: "skeevy" is not actually an official legal term. And according to you, any "intended" sexual innuendo surrounding virtual child nudity is not "skeevy." Yeah, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on that one because, as far as I'm concerned, any "intended" sexual innuendo on the part of the creators of virtual child nudity is skeevy as hell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
ArsenicSteel



Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 2370
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:22 pm Reply with quote
As far as I'm concerned, saying something is skeevy comes across as being a prude, imo(In my opinion). If I were to say so myself, IMHO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darkchibi07



Joined: 15 Oct 2003
Posts: 5469
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:35 pm Reply with quote
neocloud9 wrote:
Quote:
It is a bit ludicrous that there are only four episodes on this Blu-ray


Amen, sister! No idea why Bandai didn't release this in a box set to begin with...



Considering the surprise immense popularity of the series in Japan, I'd imagine the Japanese licensors in one way or another forced this on Bandai.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group