×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Hey, Answerman! [2006-07-28]


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wolverine Princess



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1100
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 12:55 am Reply with quote
Quote:
I haven't found time to read through the entire thread yet, but I would like to ask 1 thing: How many of you guys have actually watched Today in Class 5-2?

I have, just because I'll watch anything once. I regret it immensely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Buster Blader 126



Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:21 am Reply with quote
CrazyCanuck wrote:


Oh, Thank God! A topic change. I DID go through all 200 some posts. It got two pages longer while I read them...


Same here. I don't know how I got through it. =\

Anyways, My opinion on lolicon is this.

If you watch lolicon, then ok. If you enjoy lolicon (in whatever way you want), then fine. I can't stop you. But while I haven't witnessed this yet anywhere, the thought of lolicon fans blatently professing their love for lolicon like nothing's wrong does concern me as an anime fan.

As long as the fans keep quiet about it, then I'm fine with it, as I certainly don't want some 3rd-party to make a news report saying that "Anime is a haven for pedophiles" due to lack of proper research, & then be labeled as a pedo myself. There are still some people at my school that think anime is "animated porn," no matter how much I explain it to them. Heck, even a couple of my friends still have that bit of mentality in them. Adding pedophilia into the foray wouldn't make it better for me (or for the fandom, for that matter).

& on an added note, after reading the column, I will never look at "cute" shows the same way again, as I never knew/thought that shows like Strawberry Marshmallow or Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha would cater to such an audience. Although that doesn't mean that I'll hate/won't find a series entertaining/amusing just because it's loli (since I can watch virtually any anime without much complaint). For example, I started watching Chocotto Sister recently (which seems loli to me), but I find it rather amusing to watch.

Long story short, I agree with Zac's response on his column. That is all.

Now to change the subject:

ShadowrazoR wrote:
I haven't found time to read through the entire thread yet, but I would like to ask 1 thing: How many of you guys have actually watched Today in Class 5-2?


I have. I think it's pretty funny. While I know that there's some fanservice in it, most of it isn't too blatant.

Pleroma wrote:


ROFL Anime hyper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
hikaru004



Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 2306
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:34 am Reply with quote
Pleroma wrote:



But, the execution of the anime version is more graphic than what those panels show. It definitely had lolicon material in it including nude shots and implied masturbation. This is not a series for those that are easily offended.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zero89



Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 147
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:48 am Reply with quote
OK... With all this talk about "lolicon", I just have to ask you this one question: Why is it wrong to think that short, flat chested women are hot? Yes, I said WOMEN... I can assure you, that there are PLENTY of women like that where I live (Hawaii). Am I supposed to assume that they are all unattractive to every "sane" person?

I understand the whole issue people have with thinking "that way" about a child, but a lot of the people condemning the "Hot" comments about certain characters... (i.e. Shana, who btw, although it is never mentioned in the series... Is probably WAY older than 14), quite frankly, should educate themselves....

*note.... Not that I find them overly attractive. People just shouldn't condemn someone for thinking they're hot...*

P.S. @Pantsgoblin: They actually make pedo hentai?! Anime dazed Damn, that's just wrong!


Last edited by Zero89 on Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:29 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sweet Lou



Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 14
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:50 am Reply with quote
Just chiming in, no time to read the whole thread, but I pretty much agree with Zac's comments. Lolicon just sickens the hell out of me, and I'm stunned every time I see people talking about it on forums, especially when they're speaking in terms of getting some kind of sick pleasure from lolicon. I want to puke whenever I read that crap. I fear the day a little girl gets raped because a raving anime fan wanted to mimic his hobby.

What gets me even more is that Japan is producing more lolicon material than ever, and it seems every single one of them makes it into the fansub/scanlating scene without fail. Please, I would rather there be 84 different teams fansubbing the next Bleach/Naruto-type huge series than ONE subbing a blatantly lolicon series. Read a Playboy if you want to get off that bad. At least people won't think you're a crazy pedophile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Pleroma



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 443
Location: Eromanga island
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:59 am Reply with quote
Quote:
But, the execution of the anime version is more graphic than what those panels show. It definitely had lolicon material in it including nude shots and implied masturbation. This is not a series for those that are easily offended.


Heh, thats because I used the "worksafe" panels. Anime seems tamer actually, wonder how they will do the awsome "HYPER SELF-PLEASURE!" incident. Either way, Satou mostly gets over his lolicon after this and the whole thing with filling up his hard-drive with 30 gigs of loli and CP. They also haven't mentioned his drug use in the anime so far.

Quote:

What gets me even more is that Japan is producing more lolicon material than ever, and it seems every single one of them makes it into the fansub/scanlating scene without fail. Please, I would rather there be 84 different teams fansubbing the next Bleach/Naruto-type huge series than ONE subbing a blatantly lolicon series.


Eww, no thanks, I'll take my Nanohas and Ichigo Mashimaros any day over more of that shonen drivel. Who cares about intent, its often good quality stuff since its aimed at an older audience as a side effect of, well the other reason why it is aimed at said audience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hikaru004



Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 2306
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:09 am Reply with quote
Yeah, that part apparently got skipped. spoiler[That's how the fridge was talking to him apparently. It's 120 GB in ep. 3 There were alot of nude pics, including a couple shot in that episode. No Pedo Bears.] However, the only drug he's abusing is alcohol in the series so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ranma824



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 456
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:28 am Reply with quote
I left at page 6, now 12 pages later I've caught up...

Personally, all debate about security vs. freedom aside; this is what upsets me the most:

Buster Blader 126 wrote:

& on an added note, after reading the column, I will never look at "cute" shows the same way again, as I never knew/thought that shows like Strawberry Marshmallow or Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha would cater to such an audience. Although that doesn't mean that I'll hate/won't find a series entertaining/amusing just because it's loli (since I can watch virtually any anime without much complaint). For example, I started watching Chocotto Sister recently (which seems loli to me), but I find it rather amusing to watch.


"Cute" shows ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY made for those of the lolicon persuasion. Although admittly Buster said that this won't deter them, I'm sure there are plenty of other people who read the editorial, who will go to their local B&M shop, pick up a copy of Kamichu! and say "Wow, this is a lolicon and a perverted show! Every person who likes this show must be castrated!". There will Always be a small minority who will see what they want out of a show, even if nothing is there to begin with (as per every show that's been called out). Trying to label every other fan of the show the same way is just absurd.

At the end of the day, I err on the side of people doing what they want to themselves. And I also can't side with someone who agrees that Azumanga Daioh has the "spirit" of a Loli-show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PantsGoblin
Subscriber
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 2969
Location: L.A.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:47 am Reply with quote
Wow, this thread has already doubled in size since I was last here...

Steroid wrote:
So here's my take, put bluntly: I think it's worth it to have children raped to have the free communication of sexual material.


Okay, ya... frankly, I find that idea to be absurd and actually pretty crazy. I don't know what to say to this...

Zero89 wrote:
P.S. @Pantsgoblin: They actually make pedo hentai?! Anime dazed Damn, that's just wrong!


... um, if by "pedo hentai" you mean animated child pornography... that's basically what loli is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
cyrax777



Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 1825
Location: the desert
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:03 am Reply with quote
PantsGoblin wrote:
.
... um, if by "pedo hentai" you mean animated child pornography... that's basically what loli is.

to be honest other then the story of little monica I cant think of a liscened lolish hentai.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger My Anime My Manga
PantsGoblin
Subscriber
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 2969
Location: L.A.
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:09 am Reply with quote
cyrax777 wrote:
PantsGoblin wrote:
.
... um, if by "pedo hentai" you mean animated child pornography... that's basically what loli is.

to be honest other then the story of little monica I can't think of a liscened lolish hentai.


By "animated child pornography" I guess I mainly mean just doujinshi and images. Ya, I can't recall any actual animated loli. I just kind of see "animated" as encompassing all of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
YUGI



Joined: 18 Apr 2004
Posts: 173
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:35 am Reply with quote
Animenation seems to be a haven of lolicon.
John O. has admitted in many forums of his unusual hobby. The sickest minds visit this site, and some people could get the wrong impression of anime fans.

1st sick thread
The big question.

2nd sick thread
Some of the sickest explanations in the world]


Animefandom should disassociate itself with lolicon. The reasonings of watching lolicon is actually more ill than the work itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Key
Moderator


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 18192
Location: Indianapolis, IN (formerly Mimiho Valley)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:42 am Reply with quote
Geez, I go away for a few hours and look at what happens to this thread!

Guys and gals, arguing with Steroid is pointless. His track record in other threads has shown that he has a very hard-set world view which is not open to compromise or any consideration that viewpoints other than his own could be right. (Reminds me of Danae in the comic strip Non Sequitor.) He's an extremist, pure and simple, and history and politics have shown that extremists can't be reasoned with. I strongly disagree with several of his views - especially the comment he made about "punishing speech for inciting action is wrong," which to me shows a lack of appreciation for exactly how damaging "speech which incites action" can be in some situations - but I don't see any value in debating him about it.

And that was not intended as a compliment, BTW.

Anyway, this whole lolicon debate reminds me of perhaps its most savage parody: the OVA series Bokusatsu Tenshi Dokuro-chan, where God sends an angel back in time to kill a young man before he can grow up to create a formula which does grant immortality but halts the physical aging of all women at age 12. (He grows up to also have a lolicon fetish, you see.)


Last edited by Key on Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Lyrai



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 173
Location: Potatoes (Idaho)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:28 am Reply with quote
This may be completly useless, but would it accomplish anything if fans wrote to anime companies (TokyoPop is the main offender I've seen) and asked them to not liscense series that was heavy on the loli content? Like the Strawberry Marshmellow manga.

NOT ENTIRELY SURE ABOUT THIS, MAY BE JUST ME MISHEARING SOMETHING:
I had heard on a certain imageboard that TP has also liscensed a manga that's completly beyond Strawberry in terms of pedo in it. Kodomo no Jikan is the name. All I remember was an elementary schooler writing something obscene on a paper relating to sexual body functions.

I hope that's, er, appropriate for the thread. If not, remove it.


But yeah, would anything be accomplished if one or a few people told companies that we don't like it? Or would that be like telling them "Don't make money"?

EDIT: Clarified, found the name.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
jgreen



Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 1325
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:15 am Reply with quote
Ranma824 wrote:
And I also can't side with someone who agrees that Azumanga Daioh has the "spirit" of a Loli-show.


Someone actually said that somewhere in this monster thread? WOW. Talk about stupidity reaching staggering levels....

Lyrai wrote:
This may be completly useless, but would it accomplish anything if fans wrote to anime companies (TokyoPop is the main offender I've seen) and asked them to not liscense series that was heavy on the loli content? Like the Strawberry Marshmellow manga.


As Erik Larsen, publisher of Image Comics, said in hismost recent column, readers' thoughts and opinions do have some influence, but nothing speaks louder than your wallet. If you don't like a certain series, don't buy it, and feel free to tell TokyoPop your reasons for not buying it. Unfortunately, as long as there's still a market for it and people keep buying it, companies are going to keep making it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 18 of 36

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group