View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Zalis116
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 6867
Location: Kazune City
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:28 pm
|
|
|
TheMorry wrote: | Australia should rather focus on important matters: their underwhelming economic position. |
I'd say that isn't as concerning as the fact that the country was on freaking fire earlier this year, and another climate-crisis-enhanced summer is just a few months away.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leviathonlx
Joined: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 84
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:41 pm
|
|
|
Kisuke525 wrote: |
Leviathonlx wrote: | I dislike the idea of censorship but on the other hand I can fully see why someone not into anime/LN/manga would be offput by illustrations showing a 11 year old girl spreading her legs in a shower. I won't link to it but just go look up volume one in the No Game/No Life wiki and scroll down to the illustrations. |
If people are offput by it shouldn't they just avoid reading/watching stuff like that then? Personally I think they should just put a warning label on stuff like this so that the people that it bothers can just avoid it and the people who don't care can still read/watch whatever has the "offensive" content.
I personally believe that as long as something is fictional it should be allowed. Nobody is going to be harmed by something that isn't real. |
Well I guess they could label it as adult and put it in an adult only section. I can see the main concern would be a kid walking in and opening up the book with the pretty cover and seeing softcore porn involving a child character. Sure kids see worse stuff all the time but that tends to be the go to argument.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trendo
Joined: 07 Jun 2018
Posts: 53
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:56 pm
|
|
|
Volume 1, 2 and 9 are banned, meanwhile Volume 3-8 and 10 are okay and it doesnt make any sense, because the content they mentioned as a reason for the ban is also in Volume 3,4,6,7,8, only 5 and 10 dont have this kind of content as a Illustration.
Some pictures in 4 and 6 showing even more nudity than 1,2 or 9.
Volume 2 was banned because it has a Illustration from a flatchested girl in a bikini, the same girl appears in Volume 6 again in a colored illustration in full nudity.
So, why is Vol 2 banned but not 6?
Its the same with the other volumes too, same content and not banned
I dont know if links to twitter are okay, but someone made a interesting tweet about it with all this pictures (censored), as evidence that the ban doesnt make sense
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blanchimont
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3448
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:59 pm
|
|
|
Leviathonlx wrote: | Well I guess they could label it as adult and put it in an adult only section. I can see the main concern would be a kid walking in and opening up the book with the pretty cover and seeing softcore porn involving a child character. Sure kids see worse stuff all the time but that tends to be the go to argument. |
That could happen with any adult material. There's no difference.
The point is storing the adult material, whatever it is, so kids can't access it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kisuke525
Joined: 05 Nov 2019
Posts: 191
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:27 pm
|
|
|
Leviathonlx wrote: |
Well I guess they could label it as adult and put it in an adult only section. I can see the main concern would be a kid walking in and opening up the book with the pretty cover and seeing softcore porn involving a child character. Sure kids see worse stuff all the time but that tends to be the go to argument. |
As Blanchimont said before me it could happen with any adult material. They can just put it in an adult's only section and have a plastic wrap or something covering it so it can't be opened. Hell, if you wanna go even further have it stored in a case or behind a glass door that needs an employee key to be opened. Never seen it done with books before but I have for other things.
|
Back to top |
|
|
nargun
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 925
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:49 pm
|
|
|
Blanchimont wrote: |
Leviathonlx wrote: | Well I guess they could label it as adult and put it in an adult only section. I can see the main concern would be a kid walking in and opening up the book with the pretty cover and seeing softcore porn involving a child character. Sure kids see worse stuff all the time but that tends to be the go to argument. |
That could happen with any adult material. There's no difference.
The point is storing the adult material, whatever it is, so kids can't access it. |
Sure, but the print classification scheme has been disused for so long that nobody has a workflow to support it.
(Don't vote for self-described centrists, kids: everybody has some sort of extreme opinion, calling yourself a "centrist" just means you don't know how to spot the things that make you unusual. Which means you'll double down on your mistakes and fun stuff like that. Unless -- even worse -- you're calling yourself a centrist because you'd rather do something you're convinced is wrong rather than attempt to persuade people or find someone who likes the idea to manage it: a person who won't stand for anything shouldn't stand for parliament.)
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cecilthedarkknight_234
Joined: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 3820
Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:46 pm
|
|
|
So the only few options for those who are fans of NGNL in Australia is to either have someone smuggle in the volumes in "not sure what legal ramifications that would cause", or use a VPN and buy them digitally from a place where they aren't banned.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Calsolum
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 898
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:00 pm
|
|
|
Netero wrote: |
harminia wrote: | I don’t know if the English version was censored but in volume one of the novels, there’s a double page coloured spread (that would’ve been at the start of the book) where you can see Shiro’s vagina. There’s another coloured image in volume two where you can see her bare bottom and what looks to be the folds of her vagina between her legs. |
I had to go and check these out because I thought I must have missed something when I read it. Actually the picture you refer to in volume 1 shows Shiro with her crotch obscured by water dripping from her foot. I guess you can imagine you can see her vulva if you want, but it's not there - if it had been, the book would have been banned in Japan, let alone Australia. The volume 2 picture shows Shiro's crotch "Barbie-doll" style because that's to underline the point that Sora removed all female genitalia in their shiritori game with Jibril in order to make their nudity "wholesome". |
Lol I did the exact same thing, glad to know I'm not the only person who tried to verify this.
The first illustration is vague though it is a very revealing shot of a fictional minor. the first thing i thought while staring at that section trying to figure out of it was water or the real thing is that this reminds me of that woman/old hag optical illusion. You stare at it long enough that details are obsure enough that you can fill in the gaps with what you want to see. I didn't think of it like that the first time around but I can see why other's could see it like that.
The Vol 2 picture is as explained by Netero, Shiro at that specific moment has a Barbie-doll physiology so you could replicate this exact pose with a barbie doll... theoretically. Actually the more that I think about it you'd need a custom made doll to mimic this.
BUT the point is that without knowing the specifc context of the scene it's quite easy to think that it's worse than it is. Which was definitely the angle the creators were going for.
I understand the concern over child pornography but let's leave fictional characters out of this yeah? Put a higher rating for it if you absolutely must or seal the books in shrinkwrap but policing works of fiction always seemed like a poor use of resources that could be allocated elsewhere.
|
Back to top |
|
|
harminia
Joined: 24 Aug 2015
Posts: 2002
Location: australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:09 pm
|
|
|
Netero wrote: | I had to go and check these out because I thought I must have missed something when I read it. Actually the picture you refer to in volume 1 shows Shiro with her crotch obscured by water dripping from her foot. I guess you can imagine you can see her vulva if you want, but it's not there - if it had been, the book would have been banned in Japan, let alone Australia. The volume 2 picture shows Shiro's crotch "Barbie-doll" style because that's to underline the point that Sora removed all female genitalia in their shiritori game with Jibril in order to make their nudity "wholesome". |
Yeah, I guess it's not like, the literal vagina, but it's very heavily implying it. I believe in that picture there's also a nipple implied (though in most pictures they have barbie doll boobs)
Have to say, hearing about a storyline where someone removes all female genitalia (including that of underage girls) via a shiritori game... If that's a plot point in vol 2 I can understand why the board is a bit concerned...
__
I think the pictures are a large part of it, but the pictures reflect scenes from the book, which means they're expanded on. So I feel like maybe the content in these three books were worse than in the non-banned books, even if the other books had a bunch of barbie doll nudity and stuff.
But I don't read the books so beyond the summary of vol 9 I read, i don't know of the specific content, though I do seem to remember from ep 1 of the anime (I only watched one episode) there was some sort of sexual stuff happening with the princess chick? So maybe that made the board uncomfortable.
As I said before, they take sexual abuse and underage related sexualisation or abuse very very seriously.
|
Back to top |
|
|
LegitPancake
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 1294
Location: Texas, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:05 pm
|
|
|
Cecilthedarkknight_234 wrote: | So the only few options for those who are fans of NGNL in Australia is to either have someone smuggle in the volumes in "not sure what legal ramifications that would cause", or use a VPN and buy them digitally from a place where they aren't banned. |
Only Amazon Kindle has removed the ebooks. As far as I can see, the ebooks are still being sold in Australia on Kobo, Bookwalker, iTunes, Nook, Google Play Books, etc.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cecilthedarkknight_234
Joined: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 3820
Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 8:08 pm
|
|
|
@legitpancake That's good but I'm starting to wonder how long those options will be available. If companies are pressured hard enough, they will remove said content that's deemed offensive from their stores. Honestly this starting to become very tiresome to see on a weekly basis.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kotomikun
Joined: 06 May 2013
Posts: 1205
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:55 pm
|
|
|
Errinundra wrote: | At the risk of heading off-topic, democracy =/= freedom of speech. Well, not necessarily. One is a system of government; the other is a principle, albeit associated with democracies more often than with communist governments. If the majority of voters in a democracy want to censor the depiction of sexualised anime characters, then it is right and proper for the government to introduce laws to implement their wishes. |
You're making a couple implicit assumptions here, though. One is that the majority of voters actually do want this (somewhat arbitrary) series censored. They might, but an infamous study in the US showed that, statistically, our representatives do what the rich and powerful want, and ignore the rest of us. They only follow the will of the people by coincidence, or because they told us what we wanted. Given that Australia is also a capitalist/globalist country, the same likely applies there.
The other assumption is that "democracy" necessarily means that we always must use majority rule for everything, and everyone who disagrees is out of luck--no compromises. Which... people do like to believe when convenient, but has troubling implications.
Truth be told, NGNL is possibly my least favorite anime of all time, so I'm not inclined to defend it, but this sort of thing is still concerning. I mean, technically you could use that law to ban something that depicts a 17-year-old stealing a bag of potato chips. Broad wording in legislation is rarely a good idea, and total censorship should be a last resort, if it's ever used at all.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sakagami Tomoyo
Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 940
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 12:04 am
|
|
|
Scion Drake wrote: | Wait their banning only 3 specific volumes? That’s just really stupid. I mean your gonna ban something, ban it entirely then. Like why the Hell would I read volume 2 if I can’t read volume one, it’s pointless. |
Because whether or not it seems pointless to you to read any part of a series without reading the whole lot of it, each book in the series is still purchasable individually, and each therefore has to be treated as its own entity. Consumers tend to get used to thinking of a series as an indivisible whole, but in every step of the process of publishing and selling them, it's just a bunch of individual books that happen to be related to each other.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rederoin
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 1427
Location: Europa
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:28 am
|
|
|
Lann wrote: | Its about time time stuff like this was regulated. It might be okay in Japans culture, but hardly for the western markets. In the 90s, Viz (and maybe others) simply got around this issue by editing the images to cover up the girls. Its time to go back to this model of practice. |
I too wish we would go back to puritan times.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brent Allison
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 2444
Location: Athens-Clarke County, GA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:04 am
|
|
|
If someone's response on an anime and manga fan forum is de facto "I want you to get fined and/or imprisoned for reading/watching this manga/anime in the privacy of your domicle," they're a troll. Every time. Ignore them and move on.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|