View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
hopefully lost
Joined: 23 May 2018
Posts: 27
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:11 am
|
|
|
marshmallowpie wrote: | What's next, is Yuzumori-san going to be animated or something? |
I would actually love to see it animated
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheAncientOne
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Posts: 1873
Location: USA (mid-south)
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:24 am
|
|
|
The most disturbing thing for me about this series is that the maid's eye patch still looks like a bloody eye socket, especially at a distance.
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hayabusa
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:41 am
|
|
|
Punch Drunk Marc wrote: |
John Hayabusa wrote: |
Be grateful that yuri is growing slowly but steadily for the past several years. Otherwise, you would be clamoring for a tiny puny fragment of yuri from female-dominated series that are yuribait and hetero, or where the yuri-shippable girls belong to the, you know, male-self insert character. |
Sure. |
FTFY. At least you tried....
hopefully lost wrote: |
marshmallowpie wrote: | What's next, is Yuzumori-san going to be animated or something? |
I would actually love to see it animated |
We need more OneeLoli anime. Yuzumori-san anime would be great.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Engineering Nerd
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 898
Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:59 am
|
|
|
@John Hayabusa
For the record, although I can’t say I am a die-hard Yuri-fan, many shows I considered enjoyable have Yuri elements and I appreciate them for having that.
But this is entirely different (and your baseless assumption is really rude, no, I despise bland male insert guys as much as the next guy, please do not categorize me into that camp)
What I am worried is from a genuine fan perspective, if this show is indeed cute and not creepy, they really should make the teaser image to a heartwarming or funny one instead, not something predatory like this. This might give the show a bad name even before it starts, and the way they word the premise, also fail to capture the supposed cute elements of the show, so I would blame the anime staff for now as they should maximize the source material ‘s strength (assuming the source is good or decent)
That is my stance, definitely not on your opposing side or some derogatory “soccer mom” analogy that try to paint people who are uncomfortable as too sensitive.
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hayabusa
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:26 am
|
|
|
@Engineering Nerd
Why are you so upset over a teaser image? If this anime is creepy because of the age difference between the two female leads, then so be it. Better to be straight-forward if it is not going to hide it. Not every anime is for everyone. If you are upset about this cute anime being creepy, then it is probably not for you. And since you said that assuming the source is good or decent, maybe you should check out its source material first before judging the anime by its one teaser image. We also have Sunohara-san this summer which is the same as this except it is between a young boy and his female caretaker. Another cute but creepy anime.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crext
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 211
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:57 am
|
|
|
John Hayabusa wrote: | @Engineering Nerd
Why are you so upset over a teaser image? |
Location: California.
It's probably something in the water... >: D
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ashen Phoenix
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2914
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:02 am
|
|
|
Engineering Nerd wrote: | Wow, The premise is more cringeworthy than I thought, did someone honestly think just because the lolicon is a grown woman, it gets a free pass and the story instantly becomes cute? |
I know, right? To me, this is Pedophile: The Anime. Full stop. (No really, stahp).
I'm not disparaging anyone who enjoys this type of show for a lark, but it just gives me the creeps.
|
Back to top |
|
|
NGK
Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:03 am
|
|
|
will this be as creepy as kodomo no jikan ?
Yeah it’s been a decade since an anime release really pandered to lolicons
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunny milk
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 695
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:15 am
|
|
|
Lolicon targeted fanservice in anime is dead anyways. I don't know what the point of making any, when the adaptation will have no fanservice of note, or the point of complaining about it is, since, once again, no actual fanservice of note will come out of anything that gets animated. So no, this isn't a pedophile, or even a lolicon show, anime does not do that anymore, and will play it down to a point only the most irritable people will even raise an eyebrow, and of course not even lolicons will care about it, and will be an inevitable flop like the low profile, filler project it was always meant to be, since obviously industry people know that lolicons gave up on anime as well for said reasons.
Not to mention complaining about lolicon content in a title that's originally lolicon is like complaining that Free has guys in tiny swimming trucks, or that a borderline hentai show has heavy fanservice, and so on.
|
Back to top |
|
|
fantaselion
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 351
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:29 pm
|
|
|
John Hayabusa wrote: | @Engineering Nerd
Why are you so upset over a teaser image? If this anime is creepy because of the age difference between the two female leads, then so be it. Better to be straight-forward if it is not going to hide it. Not every anime is for everyone. If you are upset about this cute anime being creepy, then it is probably not for you. And since you said that assuming the source is good or decent, maybe you should check out its source material first before judging the anime by its one teaser image. We also have Sunohara-san this summer which is the same as this except it is between a young boy and his female caretaker. Another cute but creepy anime. |
wow, like someone was trying to be nice to you and your still triggered. its ok to be infactuated with yuri but when someone brings up a good point that this series may indeed be "ILLEGAL" then I think you should listen.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Angel Investor
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:21 pm
|
|
|
fantaselion wrote: |
John Hayabusa wrote: | @Engineering Nerd
Why are you so upset over a teaser image? If this anime is creepy because of the age difference between the two female leads, then so be it. Better to be straight-forward if it is not going to hide it. Not every anime is for everyone. If you are upset about this cute anime being creepy, then it is probably not for you. And since you said that assuming the source is good or decent, maybe you should check out its source material first before judging the anime by its one teaser image. We also have Sunohara-san this summer which is the same as this except it is between a young boy and his female caretaker. Another cute but creepy anime. |
wow, like someone was trying to be nice to you and your still triggered. its ok to be infactuated with yuri but when someone brings up a good point that this series may indeed be "ILLEGAL" then I think you should listen. |
Illegal? I don't know where you're from, but here in the US we have this nice little thing called Freedom of Expression. Regardless of how much it might offend people, there is nothing illegal about this, Kodomo No Jikan, or any other controversial manga/anime.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shay Guy
Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 2153
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:42 pm
|
|
|
1. Generic male self-insert harem fantasies are usually bad.
2. Pedophilia is also bad.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunny milk
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 695
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:57 pm
|
|
|
Shay Guy wrote: | 1. Generic male self-insert harem fantasies are usually bad.
2. Pedophilia is also bad. |
Fighting series are also bad. Violent series are also bad. Cute series are also bad. Feminine guys are bad. Mecha series are bad. Dark series are also bad!
And the list goes on. You know what? Opinions are not facts.
|
Back to top |
|
|
fantaselion
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 351
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:50 pm
|
|
|
Sunny milk wrote: |
Shay Guy wrote: | 1. Generic male self-insert harem fantasies are usually bad.
2. Pedophilia is also bad. |
Fighting series are also bad. Violent series are also bad. Cute series are also bad. Feminine guys are bad. Mecha series are bad. Dark series are also bad!
And the list goes on. You know what? Opinions are not facts. |
exactly, and neither is your opinion.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunny milk
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 695
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:02 pm
|
|
|
fantaselion wrote: |
exactly, and neither is your opinion. |
Did you have a point you wanted to make? Because you certainly didn't manage to do so.
Complaining about a certain kind of series focuses on the exact kind of thing it promises is still pointless.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|