Forum - View topic

Hey, Answerman! [2006-07-28]

Mint Mania IIDX wrote:

^__^ Silly Zac. You've done nothing of the sort, especially since lolicon isn't kiddie porn.

Right, because it's just drawings of children being raped and abused and tortured.

You're totally in the clear, man. You're an upright citizen who goes to work, does a great job, gives a thumbs up to his boss on the way home, grabs a latte on his way back to the apartment...

And then boots up animated Japanese porn involving 8-year olds being raped, beats off, and then goes to bed.

Clearly this is a totally normal situation and does not involve you fantasizing about children being raped and abused, at all.

Mint Mania IIDX wrote:

Zac wrote: Sorry I hurt your feelings or made you think twice before beating off to kiddie porn. ^__^ Silly Zac. You've done nothing of the sort, especially since lolicon isn't kiddie porn.

if your jerking to drawing of little kids its kiddie porn. yeah legaly it isnt but moraly it probly isnt but hey its still kiddie porn.
just drawn kiddie porn.

Wow. There's no debating going on. It's just all the people who think that lolicon = child porn yelling at and attacking all the people who don't. GJ, guys.

Says the guy who clearly registered just to defend lolicon porn in this thread and also filled in the "location" field with "raping your lolis because it pisses you off".

PROTIP: you're supposed to put where you live there, not your oh-so-valuable opinion on whether or not it's cool to jerk off to kiddie porn.

Someone is getting hurt. You. You're slowly conditioning yourselves into thinking that it's OKAY that it's depicting a kid being treated like an object and not a person.

Perhaps I'm just in utter shock that there are people willing to defend child-pornography. Regardless of what anyone personally thinks on the subject, the fact is that when someone creates an anime or manga that sexualizes children, that's what they were trying to do. And I'm sorry, but that's wrong.

People have changed my mind on things and I am very quick to admit when I'm wrong, as people who know me will tell you. But the arguments in this thread are not compelling; they are simply transparent.

Nice to meet you, Dr. Bohr.

Is this a problem? The United States government doesn't seem to think so, otherwise they would've made it illegal too.

Guro makes me want to kill people.

A number of the European countries have, or are likely moving that way. Perhaps the reason the US government hasn't specifically outlawed this yet is only because it hasn't come up.

Kilgamayan wrote:

Is this a problem? The United States government doesn't seem to think so, otherwise they would've made it illegal too.

A number of the European countries have, or are likely moving that way. Perhaps the reason the US government hasn't specifically outlawed this yet is only because it hasn't come up.

(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including anyphotograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generatedimage or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical,or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, orcomputer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that ofa minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified toappear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicitconduct.

Beautiful way to, you know, sidestep the whole point of the post. A pity too, it might be one of the most germane posts in the entire thread.

Pop-Art Samurai wrote:

Beautiful way to, you know, sidestep the whole point of the post. A pity too, it might be one of the most germane posts in the entire thread.

I got it, but I don't see how it applies to everyone. The generalizations in this thread are ruining the creditability of most of its posters.

Mint Mania IIDX wrote:

Pop-Art Samurai wrote: Beautiful way to, you know, sidestep the whole point of the post. A pity too, it might be one of the most germane posts in the entire thread. I got it, but I don't see how it applies to everyone. The generalizations in this thread are ruining the creditability of most of its posters.

I actually didn't say 'lolicon makes you rape children'...just that it desensitises you to the idea. Maybe guro doesn't make you want to KILL people, but maybe it makes it less of a big deal--which is dangerous, none the less. Same for lolicon.

It does not matter if they are real children or Anime children, IT IS STILL [expletive] CHILD PORN! :x Jeasus Christ, Can't you people see that! Are you Insane! What the hell's wrong with you?


Flame me all you want, I AM RIGHT-YOU ARE WRONG!

If you are, then I'd like to point out to you that my government disagrees with you, and no offense, but I'm prepared to take their stance over yours.

To The [expletive] defender's of Lolicon,

It does not matter if they are real children or Anime children, IT IS STILL [expletive] CHILD PORN! Jeasus Christ, Can't you people see that! Are you Insane! What the hell's wrong with you?


Flame me all you want, I AM [expletive] RIGHT AND YOU ARE [expletive] WRONG AND SICK!

Curtis

END!


[size=9](Apologies, I hate this topic)[/size]