×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
INTEREST: Japanese Journalist Proposes International Edit for Ghibli's Latest Film


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cyberphobe



Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 194
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:36 am Reply with quote
As far as naked breasts are concerned that's nothing new here in the states so that will be fine, but about the child nudity as long as the kids are not in a sexually obscene situation (i.e. pornography) it's fine. DON'T CENSOR ART!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Maidenoftheredhand



Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 2633
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:51 am Reply with quote
The fact that people don't understand the difference between fanservice and nudity is just really sad.

I object to fanservice because it objectifies women. I am not against nudity in public bath scenes, breastfeeding, or heck even sex scenes. You can have nudity without being objectifying.

And once again "fanservice"is not part of the Japanese culture.

Anyways I was in Japan last week but chose not to see Kaguya Hime because I wanted to wait for subtitles so I can better appreciate it. I hope that wasn't the wrong decision and this won't be another Only Yesterday situation with it not being released here. At least I am sure it will be at some upcoming film festival in NY or Philadelphia. I don't know how the film is doing in Japan, but the merchandise displays always seemed to have a lot of people by them, at least from what I observed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leebo



Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 660
Location: Somerville, MA
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:07 am Reply with quote
RyanSaotome wrote:
Lets be frank: Western audiences, especially Americans, are really prudes when it comes to anything sexual in media. Just look at this forum itself... people constantly cry about fanservice in anime, while in Japan its so natural that even kids shows have lots of fanservice. People over there don't even think twice about it since its just normal. Sad as it is, sometimes you gotta change or edit things to appeal to foreign audiences due to their culture just viewing things vastly different.


It doesn't sound like any of the nudity in this will be fanservice or sexual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14766
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:08 pm Reply with quote
America loves sex 'n violence. Heck, they kept it in Oldboy and that guy who just died for the Fast and Furious franchise! It's just when it skews young that they get creeped out about it. Some of you may just not notice because you don't look for older women in US media.

So as long as this movie's art style doesn't emphasize young fanservice, it should be fine. Besides, it's not like the Japanese moviegoers are appreciating the art style all that much neither, so it must be inconsequential.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keonyn
Subscriber



Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:19 pm Reply with quote
Adamb15 wrote:
"It isn't true, at least among anime fans"

Acceptance of sexuality is a cultural attitude, and anime-watchers are automatically being influenced by Japan's cultural attitudes which, you know, just happen to be different from American attitudes. I don't know these 'talking points' that you seem to have memorized, But I'm feeling pretty sure that no one was even considering anime-watchers when talking about 'American prudes.'

Now, "How can you be a fan of this medium and have a serious issue with sex?"

Easily. I'm not sure why you would even ask this. It almost sounds like you're trying to qualify what makes a person an anime fan. If that wasn't your aim, and your point was instead that there is so much sex in the medium that it is unavoidable, then you're wrong. You should know as well as I do that there are plenty of shows not built around sex, sexy women, or sexy men, or that have very insignificant or no instances of fanservice or even attractive characters.


Oh please, I know plenty of Americans who have no issue with nudity or sex. It's sad that you're railing against and making blanket statements in regards to an entire national populace as being prejudiced when the very act of what you're doing is prejudiced in itself. Pot meet kettle. I'm sorry, I have no problem with nudity or sex scenes and what not and it isn't "the all enlightening influence of anime and Japanese culture" that is respsonsbile; geez, the elitism of some anime fans is just ridiculous. Get over yourself.

Don't sit here and act all enlightened when your entire argument is based on prejudicial nationalistic blanket statements. It doesn't make you seem as enlightened as you think it does, as it's just thinly veiled bigotry. How you can possibly look at American media and think they're prudes about sex is beyond me, just because a few vocal conservative groups constantly like to raise a stink about things. Sorry, but that doesn't represent the national voice. In fact, no one represents the national voice because it's made up of individuals and not some great American hivemind. Seriously, do people even think about the prejudices they choose to adopt anymore? It's just sad.

Adamb15 wrote:
I don't know what your beef is with that guy, but attacking him like that was pretty low and I'm embarrassed for you. Even if he was a hypocrite on the issue, it doesn't make his opinion less valid.

I'm going to leave the discussion about American attitudes towards sex alone because we obviously disagree on them, and I don't want to get banned from this site just because I piss you off.


And you're attacking and judging an entire nation of over 300 million because it happens to have some vocal groups that oppose sex and nudity, in spite of media that is fully of the stuff. So really, who should be embarrassed again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
EricJ



Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 876
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:33 pm Reply with quote
Leebo wrote:
It doesn't sound like any of the nudity in this will be fanservice or sexual.


Ghibli no-cuts aside, the journalist thought the Strange Inscrutable West would never allow "artistic swimming nudity, waist-up half-nudity or nursing babies" in their films:
Guess what, Akihiko: You CAN show those in the West, under tasteful conditions. Somebody doesn't get out much. Rolling Eyes

(Now, as to whether in North America we ever saw Lil' Gokuu, Nobita or Tetsuro's 9-yo. peas-and-carrots when they came out of the bathtub, that's quite another cultural matter...But if they don't HAVE anything above the waist yet, you can show it.)

And speaking of international misunderstanding:
Quote:
Specifically, he is concerned that viewing restrictions will be placed on the film in Islamic countries, and that obtaining a G-rating in the US would be "impossible."


A) Islamic countries don't go to see movies anyway, as movies are "decadent",
and
B) Spirited Away and Howl's Moving Castle did just fine in the US with a PG. (Had to look up IMDB to see whether Arietty had one.) Chill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Adamb15



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Posts: 115
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:35 pm Reply with quote
Edited with more data.


Keonyn wrote:
All of it


Congrats so do I. But I also know plenty of people who do take issue with sex and nudity. Somehow you think I'm railing on America. I'm not. America is a country with ups and downs. American attitudes are not bad or good, they just ARE. But hey, if you're going to accuse me of being elitist then I'll fill the role for you.

I'm not acting, I really am enlightened. I'm Jesus Christ's second coming.

Just kidding.

The national voice is not made up of some great American hivemind. It's also not made up of individuals. It's a hybrid of the two; individuals who agree on a point and vote, and speak, and think similarly on that point while those who disagree do it in quiet voices or when they are in a position to not receive any real-world social punishments for their ideals, such as right here. Democracy.

You talked about vocal minorites.
When those vocal groups influence the entertainment, as well as the political powers-that-be who happen to be connected to the owners of the corporations that broadcast the entertainment, market the entertainment, and hire the creative staff to make the entertainment,
they effectively SHAPE the entertainment.

1. They effectively shape the entertainment.
2. There is nowhere near as much effort going into the counteraction.
3. Media and entertainment are given to kids in their developing years, when they absorb the most knowledge.



Quote:
Children spend more time watching television than in any other activity except sleep. - Huston and Wright, University of Kansas. "Television and Socialization of Young Children."
54% of kids have a TV in their bedroom. - Ibid
66% of children (ages 10 to 16) surveyed say that their peers are influenced by TV shows
62% say that sex on TV shows and movies influences kids to have sex when they are too young
77% say there is too much sex before marriage on television

Compiled by the Parents Television Council, hosted by the FCC: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=cJSgRn4QlWyG1JgZ2h71W9zCnCNvsZvvmp32MmWfPBvBrpZLQlyR!-817071755!638063854?id=7022283827



So if these people are shaping the entertainment, and the entertainment shapes the kids, and the kids grow up to fund the production of the entertainment which continues in a cycle over and over and over that reinforces itself with (I don't want to quantify this) maybe 15-30% of the energy going against it, then yeah, our 'Voice' is basically represented by them.

Quote:
Only two forms of sex education are taught in American schools: "abstinence plus" and "abstinence-only".[citation needed] "Abstinence plus" (also known as comprehensive sex ed) covers abstinence as a positive choice, but also teaches about contraception and the avoidance of STIs when sexually active. A 2002 study conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 58% of secondary school principals describe their sex education curriculum as "abstinence plus".
Abstinence-only sex education tells teenagers that they should be sexually abstinent until marriage and does not provide information about contraception. In the Kaiser study, 34% of high-school principals said their school's main message was abstinence-only.

By the Kaiser Family Foundation.
"Sex Education in the U.S.: Policy and Politics" (PDF). Issue Update. Kaiser Family Foundation. October 2002. Retrieved 2007-05-23.

Quote:

On the other hand, proponents of abstinence-only sex education object to curricula that fail to teach their standard of moral behavior; they maintain that a morality which is based on sex only within the bounds of marriage is "healthy and constructive" and that value-free knowledge of the body may lead to immoral, unhealthy, and harmful practices. Within the last decade, the federal government has encouraged abstinence-only education by steering over a billion dollars to such programs. Some 25 states now decline the funding so that they can continue to teach comprehensive sex education.
Compiled by Wiki




Now, you seem to think I'm exactly like Shiratori, or a hater of American culture, or a hypocrite who views sex in the media as in a repressed state but am not comfortable with all artistic forms of sexual expression, or maybe even a dumbass who wants to run the streets naked without consequence, but you're wrong.

I read actual data from actual surveys from the Pew foundation, Gallup, etc. and base my views off of the numbers. So they are NOT blind ignorant blanket-statements. What you say, with your references to people you know and attitudes that just you have observed are! You're taking what you've observed, and applying it to everyone. And as we both have now said, that's not ok.
Quote:
Between 2002 and 2013, at least 62% and at most 80% of respondents think that America has bad morals. In that same time period, at least 67% and at most 82% of respondents think America's morals are getting worse.
In 2011, 76% of Conservatives, 62% of Moderates, and 50% of Liberals believed America to have negative moral values.
In 2012, They asked what the most important problem was facing American morals 'today'. Both choices 'Media' and 'Sexuality' had 2 times the number of votes of Crimes/Violence and Racism/Discrimination, and 4 times as many votes as Drugs/Alcohol!
-Gallup yearly poll
From http://www.gallup.com/poll/1681/Moral-Issues.aspx


So there's that.

Here's more on how Americans are prudes:
Quote:
Proving that these ancient stigmas against masturbation are still alive and felt by women and men, researchers in 1994 found that half of the adult women and men who masturbate feel guilty about it (Laumann, et al., 1994 , 85). Another study in 2000 found that adolescent young men are still frequently afraid to admit that they masturbate (Halpern, et al., 2000, 327).
From wiki


Quote:
America: Only 38 percent of women said they'd masturbated at all during the past year. The figure for men was 61 percent.
From http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/200903/how-common-is-masturbation-really

Britain: (Germany is even more liberal on this) 73 percent of men and 36.8% of women reported masturbating in the last 4 weeks
From: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-006-9123-6


Quote:
Finally, we all know about what's taught in U.S. sex-ed lessons, and I included data on it above. Here's something Britain did!

"In a new National Health Service leaflet entitled Pleasure, teenagers are encouraged to exercise their right to 'an orgasm a day.'"

From: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/story?id=8072314&page=1


And I didn't even make any moral judgements about what I've seen. In this post and my last all I've done is acknowledge what's right there! And yet you jump on me and and the executive editor jumps on Shiratori with personal insults and snide remarks.

AdamB15 wrote:
I'm going to leave the discussion about American attitudes towards sex alone because we obviously disagree on them, and I don't want to get banned from this site just because I piss you off.

See? I didn't even want to dig all of this up because like I said, we disagree, and it's time-consuming to actually put all of it together. But now it's there and I've got the mod and maybe even the executive editor pissed off, so let's just run the full nine yards, yeah?!

Keonyn wrote:
Don't sit here and act all enlightened when your entire argument is based on prejudicial nationalistic blanket statements

I've got objective data, what have you got?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maidenoftheredhand



Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 2633
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:23 pm Reply with quote
Adamb15 wrote:
Edited with more data.


So where are ALL your articles that Japan is more enlightened about sex? Please show me your articles and results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adamb15



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Posts: 115
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:59 pm Reply with quote
Maidenoftheredhand wrote:
Adamb15 wrote:
Edited with more data.


So where are ALL your articles that Japan is more enlightened about sex? Please show me your articles and results.



Please stop saying 'enlightened' because I'm not arguing morality, I'm arguing what the reality of the attitudes are. I don't care if the attitudes are right or wrong, just that they are accurately expressed.


I thought the point we were talking about was that Americans were prudish.

But hey, I'll go for this too. Here ya go.

Quote:
The national age of consent in Japan is 13 as specified by the Japanese Penal Code Articles 176 and 177.

‘Rape’, Art. 177 Penal Code 'A person who, through violence or intimidation, has sexual intercourse with a female person of not less than thirteen (13) years of age commits the crime of rape and shall be punished with imprisonment at forced labour for a limited term of not less than two years. The same shall apply to a person who has sexual intercourse with a female person under thirteen (13) years of age.'[37]

'Indecency through compulsion', Art. 176 Penal Code 'A person who, through violence or intimidation, commits an indecent act upon a male or female person of not less than thirteen (13) years of age shall be punished with imprisonment at forced labour for not less than six months nor more than seven years. The same shall apply to a person who commits an indecent act upon a male or female person under thirteen (13) years of age.'
From wiki, from Interpol.

Prostitution, or as close as you can possibly get:

Quote:
Prostitution has existed in some form throughout Japan's history. Despite the Anti-Prostitution Law of 1956, various legal loopholes, liberal interpretations of the law, and loose enforcement have allowed the sex industry to prosper and earn an estimated 2.3 trillion yen a year. Notably, the Anti-Prostitution Law makes prostituting oneself a crime whereas those who use the services of a prostitute are immune from prosecution.
From Wiki, from Pink Box

That's pseudo legal and weakly prosecuted prostitution. It's very rare in the West, with Amsterdam having a street dedicated to it, and Nevada having a county or something where it's legal. Otherwise, nope, nada, zip.
Fun facts:
Quote:
Not only are they aware of the differences between male and female masturbation, they're not shy to point them out either. Male masturbation is called sendzuri, which translates as "1,000 strokes." Female masturbation, however, is mandzuri, which translates as "10,000 strokes." The current world record holder for prolonged masturbation is Japanese.
From rationalwiki, from http://www.japanator.com/post.phtml?pk=9887
and
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/05/masturbate-a-thon_champion_spe.php


"Love Joule," a bar.
"Once they take a seat, customers are able to experience a pleasant place in which they can openly discuss masturbation...
Behind the counter, where rows of liquor bottles would normally stand, are colorful display cases filled with dozens and dozens of different types of vibrators... And of course what woman can’t resist testing out a new vibrator or at least finding out about the one she may have recently overlooked during her last visit to the adult store?"
From http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2012/10/love-joule-japanese-bar-devoted-to-female-masturbation/


Aaand of course there's Japanese pornography, which came about in the Edo period. Then there was an entire movement motivated by "Eroticism, decadence, and corruption." Japanese pornography has fetishes and weird and varied genres to hell and back. And of course they gave us lolicon, which is once in awhile reported on here when someone gets arrested for photographic CP and they tack on extra charges for the drawn stuff. Futa, lotion play, the famous tentacle rape, rope BDSM, and bukkake, etc all came from Japan.

So there ya go.
They aren't more 'enlightened,' just more indulgent or accepting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GATSU



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15311
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:23 pm Reply with quote
Now that I think about it, that child stripper scene in Bad Grandpa which they emphasized in the trailer creeps me out more than what I hear about Kaguya Hime.

Ericj:
Quote:
Islamic countries don't go to see movies anyway, as movies are "decadent",


They apparently see anime, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ikillchicken



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 7272
Location: Vancouver
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:29 pm Reply with quote
Adamb15 wrote:
When those vocal groups influence the entertainment, as well as the political powers-that-be...


Because there's no crazy, right wing politicians in Japan right?

Quote:
Here's more on how Americans are prudes:


Just so you know, when you use the term "prudes" it becomes very difficult to take you seriously or believe you're just making some reasonable factual point as you claim. And it blatantly contradicts your claim that you're not talking about morality or what is right and wrong. That's like me saying "Japanese are smut peddling perverts but I'm not arguing morality or what's right and wrong, just what the reality of the attitudes are." It's a joke.

Quote:
And yet you jump on me and and the executive editor jumps on Shiratori with personal insults and snide remarks.


Shiratori is an [insult removed] who brings nothing to the table but a sneering air of self assured superiority. If you want to claim to have a real point I wouldn't hitch your wagon to him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Zac
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 7912
Location: Anime News Network Technodrome
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:57 pm Reply with quote
Adamb15 wrote:


Easily. I'm not sure why you would even ask this. It almost sounds like you're trying to qualify what makes a person an anime fan. If that wasn't your aim, and your point was instead that there is so much sex in the medium that it is unavoidable, then you're wrong. You should know as well as I do that there are plenty of shows not built around sex, sexy women, or sexy men, or that have very insignificant or no instances of fanservice or even attractive characters.


How could you possibly misinterpret what I said this badly? Anime is drenched in sex most of the time. I didn't say that was a bad thing, and there are certainly plenty of shows produced every year that aren't, but if you go down the list, there are more shows being sold on sex appeal that aren't. I don't really think this is 1. controversial or 2. insulting to anyone at all. Just an observation based on watching this stuff for 15 years.

Quote:

I don't know what your beef is with that guy, but attacking him like that was pretty low and I'm embarrassed for you. Even if he was a hypocrite on the issue, it doesn't make his opinion less valid.


Is this the new thing, high-horsin' it every time you see someone get in a mild disagreement with someone while attempting to guilt or shame the side you don't agree with? Seems like it's going around a lot. Shiratori1 has a very, very, very long history of attacking people on these forums that disagree with his views on all matters related to fanservice shows and virtually anything that has to do with material aimed at the hardcore Japanese otaku market and I responded to him knowing that history. Be "embarrassed" for me all you like without knowing any of the context though broheim.

Quote:

I'm going to leave the discussion about American attitudes towards sex alone because we obviously disagree on them, and I don't want to get banned from this site just because I piss you off.


I have zero history of banning people for disagreeing with me. None whatsoever. It's a made-up thing people want to believe about me that isn't at all true, as has been proven over and over again, but who am I to stop you from presuming?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
Marco Sensei



Joined: 07 Sep 2013
Posts: 7
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:14 am Reply with quote
Wow... Shocked

Can everybody calm down a little bit ?

Let's be pragmatic here, and go point by point.

- Is the journalist idea a good idea ?
Seriously ? No.

- Why ?
1) because you should never censor that kind of art just for the reason your culture is different. Better be open minded about other culture point of view, and event like that you can say you don't agree... but at least you have to see the whole thing to tell that in the first place. That idea of censoring nudity for cultural reason BEFORE any complain also means that you think people can't be open minded and you fear exposing them to you point of view. And that is not a good thing.

2) If Disney could do that (and they don't), I'm pretty sure they'll go with the "soft" version of the movie for EVERYBODY. Why ? Because it's easier to deal with angry animation fans that angry families... They still really do fear some associations, and being sued by them. So giving the international market a "safe" version would be bad, because we won't get any other version that this one until it's up on DVD or BR...

3) Last and not least, it's bad for Animation business... REALLY bad. It's sefl-censorship, censoring anything that could offense anyone, or even a few bunch of nuts who can say it out loud... But before that really happen, before the film is done, right at the source. Once there was said that in the US, any film with smoking character would be PG13... Disney said at that time that they will stop including smoking character in their films altogether. When the Tokyo Ban on manga (mostly based on fan serv issue with young characters) tried to go national in Japan, some manga editor started to ask their mangaka to avoid depiction of school-life completely... So each time someone put a though limit, for good or bad reasons, there is also people who see getting rid of the "problem" at the source as the easiest and most economic solution. And that's not good for creativity or art.

So theoretically (because it's not gonna happen anyway), when you get the big picture, I really think that censoring that kind of film for international release is a terrible idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Agent355



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Posts: 5113
Location: Crackberry in hand, thumbs at the ready...
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:47 am Reply with quote
Adamb15, you provided a lot of good data for your argument about American attitudes towards sex, but the articles regarding Japan are not equivalent. I'd be curious about how sex ed is handled in Japan, and if public opinions towards sex outside of marriage, say, are really statistically different now than they are elsewhere.

Putting that aside, when was the last time breastfeeding was depicted in American media?
Breastfeeding in public, and heck, breastfeeding in general is a very contentious issue in the United States. Even though it is legal, many women feel uncomfortable breastfeeding in public, and there have been instances of women being kicked out of stores, restaurants and airplanes because of breastfeeding. It is simply not accepted or normalized, and I really can't recall an instance where it has been depicted on TV or in movies. Childbirth has been depicted more than breastfeeding. So it's more than likely that some people might be put off by breastfeeding in a movie (animated or otherwise) because they are simply not used to it and it makes them uncomfortable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReverseTitan



Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 109
Location: Hong Kong
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:33 pm Reply with quote
@Adamb Never, use Britain as an example to prove anything against the US. Ever. Britain itself is a rather conservative country, run by conservatives. At least the States is run by a liberal in the form of Barack Obama. Censorship/sensitivity levels there can exceed the US in many ways. As I said before, a show for kids, Regular Show is censored. The US censored Regular Show, too, but Britain pretty much purges the show of its purpose, even though the show has virtually no objectionable content. Britain, at least England lacks sexual education as well. Britain as a whole is basically a wannabe America anyway. It's best not to use it as an example, since anything the US does stupidly/wrong, you can bet the UK will do it, just in lesser bursts. Same goes for Canada, since Canada is just America, with liberal fold and less intrusive.

Also, it's not like Japanese themselves don't have some conservative issues. CoughInfamousCEROZCough. A game for teens, which isn't THAT violent is rated CERO Z. Think about it. That's not to talk about their own games which they gut, while Europeans and Americans get a version that they don't even see. Final Fantasy XII, Metal Gear Rising, No More Heroes, Ninja Gaiden(Xbox). If Americans and by extension westerners are scared of sexual content, then Japanese are dead afraid of even the slightest bit of violence, which is odd, since the PG-12 movie has more gore than COD, yet COD gets slapped with CERO Zs, not to mention censored and the like, Uncharted actually gets part of the gameplay altered, which is really, really bad. See, it's not just the States. Japanese can be prudes TOO.

Finally, it's not wise to use Japanese porn to prove your point, since that will bite you in the ass. Japanese porn, unlike US porn is CENSORED. It's not really porn in that regard.

@Marco Sensei That should apply to Japan, too. Call of Duty, is SUPPOSED TO BE VIOLENT! What is the point of censoring a game BUILT ON VIOLENCE? If Persona 4 shouldn't be hit with Ms and shit for having sexual themes, COD should be rated CERO D, with all the blood intact.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group