Forum - View topic

INTEREST: Police Report: Dub Voice Actress' Door Damaged, Classified Criminal Mischief

There's an alarming number of people claiming that either Rial or Samantha where the ones conducting the investigation. This misinformation is so prevalent and said with such authority that one of the youtube ambulance chasers must be primary sources of it's spread.

There's an alarming number of people claiming that either Rial or Samantha where the ones conducting the investigation. This misinformation is so prevalent and said with such authority that one of the youtube ambulance chasers must be primary sources of it's spread.

Seif wrote:

There's an alarming number of people claiming that either Rial or Samantha where the ones conducting the investigation. This misinformation is so prevalent and said with such authority that one of the youtube ambulance chasers must be primary sources of it's spread.

I've been watching a lot of YouTubers takes on the drama and haven't heard any of them say those two were conducting the investigation. Like Phraze alluded to, I've seen them say those two were involved with the investigation, that is to say they were being questioned and their testimonies were taken down and being used as evidence, which is accurate. But I can't say I've seen anyone say they were conducting it.

Steve Minecraft wrote:

Seif wrote: There's an alarming number of people claiming that either Rial or Samantha where the ones conducting the investigation. This misinformation is so prevalent and said with such authority that one of the youtube ambulance chasers must be primary sources of it's spread. I've been watching a lot of YouTubers takes on the drama and haven't heard any of them say those two were conducting the investigation. Like Phraze alluded to, I've seen them say those two were involved with the investigation, that is to say they were being questioned and their testimonies were taken down and being used as evidence, which is accurate. But I can't say I've seen anyone say they were conducting it.

People have poor comprehension skills is what it all boils down to. They hear and read "involved" and automatically take it to mean that they were "conducting" the investigation.
Theres a disconnect with thinking that the only way to be involved with the investigation is to be the one sorting through all the evidence. That you can't be "involved" if all they did was ask you questions.
That's what Seif is getting at. That it's so widespread amongst the people who support Vic that it can't simply be a comprehension problem and someone, likely a person from YouTube, had to be the cause of it.

lol she posted old pictures to make the incident seem worse

Exactly this. Any little thing that can support their narrative and be twisted to damaged the opposition they will jump on and clutch tight, even if they are clearly wrong. That's how they work.

Ryasha wrote:

That's what Seif is getting at. That it's so widespread amongst the people who support Vic that it can't simply be a comprehension problem and someone, likely a person from YouTube, had to be the cause of it.

It's only 'likely" a person from YouTube because you guys have an irrational fear of YouTubers for some reason. There's zero evidence to make that assumption.

Lynx Raven Raide wrote:

Exactly this. Any little thing that can support their narrative and be twisted to damaged the opposition they will jump on and clutch tight, even if they are clearly wrong. That's how they work.

Yesterday people were insisting the GoFundMe set up was a scam and in no way connected to Vic, despite that fact these people were "clearly wrong" since anyone who had been following this story would know it was real since Nick had been doing livestreams about the issue since he got in contact with Vic.

It seems like the issue is people are irrationally ignoring sources of information because it come from people they don't want to listen to, even if it's verified information.

It's only 'likely" a person from YouTube because you guys have an irrational fear of YouTubers for some reason. There's zero evidence to make that assumption.
...
It seems like the issue is people are irrationally ignoring sources of information because it come from people they don't want to listen to, even if it's verified information.

I don't think it's irrational to be honest. YouTube is a mixed bag, full of as many click baiters wanting their 15mb of fame or further their echo chamber as there are legitimate pages posting stuff. Same goes for GoFundMe too, as there has been many instances of scams such as the recent border wall one.

[quote="Steve Minecraft"]

Ryasha wrote:

That's what Seif is getting at. That it's so widespread amongst the people who support Vic that it can't simply be a comprehension problem and someone, likely a person from YouTube, had to be the cause of it.

It's only 'likely" a person from YouTube because you guys have an irrational fear of YouTubers for some reason. There's zero evidence to make that assumption.

Yesterday people were insisting the GoFundMe set up was a scam and in no way connected to Vic, despite that fact these people were "clearly wrong" since anyone who had been following this story would know it was real since Nick had been doing livestreams about the issue since he got in contact with Vic.

It seems like the issue is people are irrationally ignoring sources of information because it come from people they don't want to listen to, even if it's verified information.

Yesterday people were insisting the GoFundMe set up was a scam and in no way connected to Vic, despite that fact these people were "clearly wrong" since anyone who had been following this story would know it was real since Nick had been doing livestreams about the issue since he got in contact with Vic.

It seems like the issue is people are irrationally ignoring sources of information because it come from people they don't want to listen to, even if it's verified information.

I took the chance to reread this article. Looks like someone called Samantha to say she was swatted, presumably the same person who vandalized the property. Cops rushed to the scene and fixed the door amid apologies. Fast forward later, they discover it was a fake number(?) Police report could've been delayed for any reason. I guess the problem is that phone call, which has yet to be determined.

My suspicion so far is that.. As a rental property, there's no harm in showing the address. Looks like a panic decision, and literally nonsensical if it was an elaborate plot (that seems to be the narrative). Time will tell, I suppose.

Unless Samantha fesses up, time won't tell. The likelihood of the police pursuing this is nonexistent. As far as they're concerned, there's just a damaged door. It could've been some random junkie. If that phone call actually happened, there's no reason for it to not be in the police report. That escalates this story from minor property damage to a bonafide stalker physically threatening her. The police would actually investigate that, which likely leads to Samantha's phone records being looked into ...

Phraze wrote:

I took the chance to reread this article. Looks like someone called Samantha to say she was swatted, presumably the same person who vandalized the property. Cops rushed to the scene and fixed the door amid apologies. Fast forward later, they discover it was a fake number(?) Police report could've been delayed for any reason. I guess the problem is that phone call, which has yet to be determined. My suspicion so far is that.. As a rental property, there's no harm in showing the address. Looks like a panic decision, and literally nonsensical if it was an elaborate plot (that seems to be the narrative). Time will tell, I suppose.

If you believe the police fix doors without even verifying a swatting has occurred (it would take them longer to fix the door than check that). The police report was filed a day after the incident. That should've been enough time for those involved to realize what was up. Yet, there's no mention of a swatting or this mysterious phone call in that police report. If Samantha has changed her story to the police, why did she hand ANN an outdated report? She printed it two hours before Lynzee published this article.

If Samantha has changed her story to the police, why did she hand ANN an outdated report? She printed it two hours before Lynzee published this article.

I took the chance to reread this article. Looks like someone called Samantha to say she was swatted, presumably the same person who vandalized the property. Cops rushed to the scene and fixed the door amid apologies. Fast forward later, they discover it was a fake number(?) Police report could've been delayed for any reason. I guess the problem is that phone call, which has yet to be determined.