Forum - View topicNEWS: Kadokawa, Kodansha, Shueisha, Shogakukan Reach Settlement With Cloudflare
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clematis
Posts: 70 |
|
|||||||
Well, for me scanlations have led me to purchase official releases of some manga I liked the most. It was really expensive since I had to order overseas and barely broke even that month, and I was in luck the manga was actually still in print, but it was well worth it. However I cannot do that for most manga/anime I consume, because many aren't even translated to begin with, and none are ever readily available around here. Not to mention having to pay for the entirety of a title in one go is often times prohibitive, too.
While scanlations and fansubs might be hated amongst publishers and creaters alike, I think it would be wrong to ignore to good sides of it - e.g. even if someone never paid a dime to read/watch the stuff they pirated, they will help spread the good word for the works they liked, and that can lead to others purchasing it, instead. Call it 'free advertisement', if you want. It's not good per se, but it's also not all bad, or 'evil', if you will. |
||||||||
roxybudgy
Posts: 129 Location: Western Australia |
|
|||||||
Saying this as a former translator for a scanlation group, I find it pathetic when people treat anime/manga as a human right, or try to justify their piracy by harping on about accessibility, or the classic "it's ok because I bought some stuff". Just admit it, you pirate it because it's easy and there are no consequences to you. I guarantee that's the number 1 reason why people pirate.
I pirate anime because it's easy (I get it all from one site, if it's not on that site, I don't watch it, and automating torrent downloads means I don't even need to remember to check the site each week) and I'm unlikely to be penalised for it. If it somehow became difficult to pirate anime, I would just stop watching anime altogether and find other ways to entertain myself. For manga, there are only two series that I'm currently pirating, because I find it annoying to navigate the various scanlation groups' websites with their unreliable release schedules, and I refuse to 'support' those aggregate sites that have a history of removing credits and watermarks. Instead I find myself purchasing most the manga I consume, usually splurging $100-$200 on things in my Book Depository wishlist whenever they send me one of those 10% off vouchers. I suspect the reason why Japan doesn't go after overseas piracy sites is because the costs involved in navigating unfamiliar legal systems is not something they can afford, or they don't see any net benefit in doing so. |
||||||||
SaitoHajime101
Posts: 283 |
|
|||||||
This thread-line continues to prove how people continually try to black-and-white or use absolutes to describe a situation; usually based upon their own viewpoints, interpretation of the data, and official company statements. I wish life was that easy, it never is.
Reading all the comments carefully, I find valid reasoning in most whether they agree or disagree with piracy. However, I think the anime/manga community argues the "why piracy exists" question too much and not the "what can we do to help ease piracy". Piracy is a double-edge sword, it can be beneficial due to the amount of exposure it can give to a piece of work, however it provides very little monetary gain. Take for example an actor/actress in Hollywood. It's pretty well known that some actors/actress' have done roles for very little money, however did it due to the publicity they would gain. Now the big difference here would be actors/actresses can find more roles to audition for, however making an anime or manga can be costly (mainly for the former) and because the amount of time it takes to make one, can reduce the number of series one can create. The real trick is to find a fair balance between monetary gain and publicity. You can't gain more sales if your manga/anime isn't selling. How much is that on the piracy and artists and more on the marketing for said product? How much is that on the contracts for distribution? Has the industry itself not taken a hard-look at it's own practices and ability to push products beyond a niche crowd? How much is that on Japanese business culture? We can blame piracy (or not at all) we want and debate the morality of it, however no one is doing a thing to fix it. The industry wants to sue for infringement and the pirates want to continue to pirate, a never ending cycle. This Cloudflare situation is just a continuation of the cycle. While I'm personally on Cloudflare's side in this case, it is just but one grey case in the pool of many and I don't think every plantiff is wrong to sue. Legally, this is a correct move, but I believe who they're going after is incorrect. I'm glad there was a compromise to be had, so no one wins or loses (though that can be debated based upon your interpretation of what we know was agreed on). I believe the way to fix this is for the anime/manga industry to rework the entire thing from the ground up. I mean, there's the whole thing regarding overworked animation staff for little pay, so I think both are indicative of a much larger issue. We love this hobby, but it doesn't appear anyone is setup to win, unless if you're the 1% of artists to hit it big, or the major publishing company / animation studio (which again, can be debated). I would be curious to know the positives and negatives in the American comics industry and if there can be anything learned from there that can be incorporated into a much stronger Japanese manga industry, which will help strengthen the Japanese media as a whole. I'm personally enjoying some of the movies (live-action or otherwise) that has come out from some Japanese directors and crew, there's definite potential and talent from our friends in the East, however I'm starting to wonder if Japan may be getting in its own way, based upon some of the business culture there. |
||||||||
Q4000
Posts: 44 |
|
|||||||
Have to agree with you there. When I was a kid who had no money and had all the time in the world, I torrented (Limewired even ) almost all content I wanted for the exact reason you said. If I wanted something, I'd just look it up and pirate it. I did have a personal rule though: of following the releases of specific groups for anime (Dattebayo, Kaizoku) and manga (Mangastream, RedHawkScans) only rather than aggregate sites (except for Batoto, which recognized scanlation groups) and when they stopped their releases, I also stopped and didn't look for them elsewhere. But yeah, when I was a kid, I didn't really care much as long as I had my content. But now that I'm an adult with a paying job and some knowledge about how reality works, perspectives change. I pay for the content I consume, whether it be via streaming service subscriptions or buying physical copies. If something's not available locally, I'll try to buy it online. All the titles that I followed through sub/scan groups, I move to official releases. If none are available, I move on and try another time. And since I have less free time now, I don't have the luxury of discovering more awesome titles that can only be found through groups and just enjoy what are available to me. Besides, this isn't the only hobby that I have that costs money. That's why we work right? To fund our hobbies (and to live of course)? |
||||||||
Lynx Raven Raide
Posts: 412 Location: Central Coast, AU |
|
|||||||
Stop and think about it for a moment: If it wasn't for this kind of situation we wouldn't have Crunchy Roll. I'll admit I'm not sure what their revenue allocation was before they went legit (ie: generate income or solely to cover hosting), but it proved there was a market and helped build the industry up. Managa Rock is heading in the same direction now too. They have good intentions, even if it isn't the best way to go about it, but they were filling a demand that existed at the time. On the other hand, it those which actively profit off those that are effectively evil. Those are the ones that know they can make money off it, and usually poach off those with good intentions like those above in order to do it, not only robbing the original artist but also those who gave up their time for free to translate due to the unwillingness of the original company to do so. This isn't a exactly a black and white issue, as others have pointed out. |
||||||||
Kadmos1
Posts: 13568 Location: In Phoenix but has an 85308 ZIP |
|
|||||||
Sometimes a manga-ka will allow a series to be scanlated after a scanlation group got permission. By this, I mean more so those that start scanlating after getting permission. I suppose reasons why we don't see more of this because of points like the following: While the creator might be O.K. with it, the publisher might not be. Also, even if a scanlation group outside of Japan got permission from both the manga-ka and publisher to scanlate a manga title, perhaps there is some clause or aspect of Japanese copyright laws or the copyright laws of the territory that group is based in that act halts such permission or that would not work out well. For example, if the manga got licensed in the territory that the scanlation group is based out of. In that case, it would be wise to stop the scanlations and let the licensor(s) in that territory do their job(s).
|
||||||||
Zalis116
Moderator
Posts: 6874 Location: Kazune City |
|
|||||||
View numbers on bootleg streaming sites easily reach into the hundreds of thousands or millions for airing anime (the same stuff that legal sites are streaming, so it's not a matter of pirates seeking out old/obscure content), but sales haven't gone up proportionately. Between that, the "too young / can't afford it" crowd, and the rise of "ideological" pirates -- those who refuse to pay because they feel legal services aren't "competing the right way" or some other grievance -- that's a whole lot of anime viewers in the "pirate everything, pay nothing" camp.
|
||||||||
AkumaChef
Posts: 821 |
|
|||||||
Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. People getting mad about their work being pirated is totally expected. What it's not, however, is an accurate or objective gauge of whether or not the piracy in question is really a problem or not.
I agree 100% that there are likely an awful lot of people in the latter camp but I'd still love to see real numbers here. The way I see it there are really 3 ways that piracy can work out from the pirate's perspective: 1) Someone pirates a title and then goes on to buy it or its merch. In this case the piracy is net positive; one can think of it as free advertising. 2) Someone pirates a title but doesn't spend a penny on it because they really don't have any money, or because a legal purchase option doesn't exist for them. This doesn't harm anyone because there's no lost sale. (The "too young, no money" crowd goes here) 3) Someone has money, would be willing to purchase a show, but chooses to pirate it instead and spends their money on something else--ideological pirates like you mentioned, plus those people who like the fact they can do it for free and are unlikely to face any consequences. That obviously harms the creator/publisher. I'm willing to bet that an awful lot of those people racking up huge download numbers are in group #2. But without numbers all we can do is guess.
Nobody tells their friends to buy it, but some % of the people who watch a show will like it enough to buy it or its merch. The more people who see a show the more people will end up purchasing it. This principle remains true regardless if it's 50% of viewers who buy it or if it's 0.001% |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group