×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Woman Charged for Selling 6.5 Million Yen in Unauthorized Demon Slayer Cakes


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ranran-001



Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Posts: 537
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 9:11 pm Reply with quote
Chris Handsome wrote:
Meanwhile Wal-Mart's Bakery sells custom birthday cakes with Snoopy and Cookie Monster on them, nobody gives AF.


Yes, but unbeknownst to the customer, Wal-Mart pays a license to sell Snoopy and Cookie Monster cakes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Handsome



Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 287
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 9:21 pm Reply with quote
ranran-001 wrote:
Chris Handsome wrote:
Meanwhile Wal-Mart's Bakery sells custom birthday cakes with Snoopy and Cookie Monster on them, nobody gives AF.


Yes, but unbeknownst to the customer, Wal-Mart pays a license to sell Snoopy and Cookie Monster cakes.


They don't. They are janky bootleg as hell looking cursed cake jobs with no branding or anything on them, just like their Mario cakes that use recycled unsold Mario Kart Micro Machines from the Toy Aisle to toss on top a cake as an accessory.

Hell this is the stuff alot of local grocers did years ago, most still do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ranran-001



Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Posts: 537
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 7:42 am Reply with quote
Chris Handsome wrote:
ranran-001 wrote:
Chris Handsome wrote:
Meanwhile Wal-Mart's Bakery sells custom birthday cakes with Snoopy and Cookie Monster on them, nobody gives AF.


Yes, but unbeknownst to the customer, Wal-Mart pays a license to sell Snoopy and Cookie Monster cakes.


They don't. They are janky bootleg as hell looking cursed cake jobs with no branding or anything on them, just like their Mario cakes that use recycled unsold Mario Kart Micro Machines from the Toy Aisle to toss on top a cake as an accessory.

Hell this is the stuff alot of local grocers did years ago, most still do.


If you're talking Wal-Mart, then they are paying license. It doesn't matter if the cake looks like shit or not, a company like Wal-Mart isn't going to risk being sued for millions over it.

The example of putting a mario-kart toy on a cake however isn't copyright infringement, since the toy itself would fall under first sale doctrine.

In general, its copyright infringement to create a cake based off a copyrighted character. The selling part only comes into the case when the copyright owners try to prove damages.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BonelessChicken



Joined: 26 Feb 2020
Posts: 20
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:45 pm Reply with quote
DeTroyes wrote:
She should have claimed it was a piece of original fan art made in a medium which utilizes art materials that just so happened to be edible.

If doujin artists can get away with doing fan art and selling it, I don't see why this woman couldn't have done the same with cakes that displayed her original art of the characters.

In Japan it's a bit loose for doujinshi. As long as the copyright holder doesn't file a complaint, you can make doujinshi. There's misunderstanding about doujinshi, Doujinshi isn't as profitable as you think, majority of the Circles (Artists) even lost their money in Comiket because the profit is used to cover printing, tax, flyer, sample, etc. the circles didn't do it for money, they do it because they want to show their work to the other people or just their hobby. There are some circles who only think to earn money but they're hated by the veterans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZephyrVayu



Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 79
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:35 pm Reply with quote
I understand why copyright laws exists, but stories like this really exhibit how absurd they can be. Were her cakes hurting the brand in any way? Was she profiting off other people's work when she still designed and baked the cakes herself? Seems like yet another case of a big company going after a small business. Respect to her for owning the crime and just being like "idgaf".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ming Yi



Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 208
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:47 pm Reply with quote
ZephyrVayu wrote:
I understand why copyright laws exists, but stories like this really exhibit how absurd they can be. Were her cakes hurting the brand in any way? Was she profiting off other people's work when she still designed and baked the cakes herself?.


In a way, sort of? Because if the Demon Slayer production committee wanted to collaborate with a bakery chain to produce cakes, then this would hurt their business. Plus, she is profiting from an intellectual property. At the very least she's using work based on the character designer's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Egan Loo



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 1327
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:10 pm Reply with quote
Ming Yi wrote:
ZephyrVayu wrote:
I understand why copyright laws exists, but stories like this really exhibit how absurd they can be. Were her cakes hurting the brand in any way? Was she profiting off other people's work when she still designed and baked the cakes herself?.


In a way, sort of? Because if the Demon Slayer production committee wanted to collaborate with a bakery chain to produce cakes, then this would hurt their business. Plus, she is profiting from an intellectual property. At the very least she's using work based on the character designer's.


Indeed, the Demon Slayer production committee did grant another bakery the official license to produce cakes.

http://priroll.jp/shopbrand/ct2631/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Meongantuk



Joined: 03 Jun 2016
Posts: 354
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:33 pm Reply with quote
DeTroyes wrote:
She should have claimed it was a piece of original fan art made in a medium which utilizes art materials that just so happened to be edible.

Doujinshi has rules, and the woman unfortunately break three of the most basic ones:

1. No using official materials (screenshots, logo, key visuals, official merchandises) including redraw or traced (game GUI is exempt from the redraw rule if it's not stand alone pieces).
The woman use official screenshot... Essentially this woman made bootleg. Companies might close their eyes to doujinshi, but bootleg isn't doujinshi so...
2. Profit limit (varied, usually from 10k to 500k depends on the franchise). Obviously, 6 millions far exceed the limit. When you get this much, the chance of the IP owner suing you is very high regardless whether or not you break other rules.
3. No mass reproduction (varies, usually few dozens to hundreds). She barely pass this, but considering the price and the other two rules she break...

Doujinshi isn't an excuse to make bootleg, you might think manybdoujin artist can make 6 millions per convention, but it's very unlikely for them to get that much without breaking the mass production rule as doujin merch are cheap (3000 yen already get you fanciest book by the most popular artist) and the more expensive ones (like figures, fancy dakimakura) tend to be limited (maybe few dozens but obviously not hundreds).


Last edited by Meongantuk on Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zrdb





PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:21 pm Reply with quote
WTF? It's not like she was selling counterfeit dvds or blurays of the show-who in the holy hell was she hurting by selling cakes? Totally absurd.
Back to top
ranran-001



Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Posts: 537
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:34 pm Reply with quote
ZephyrVayu wrote:
I understand why copyright laws exists, but stories like this really exhibit how absurd they can be. Were her cakes hurting the brand in any way? Was she profiting off other people's work when she still designed and baked the cakes herself? Seems like yet another case of a big company going after a small business. Respect to her for owning the crime and just being like "idgaf".


Considering that the Demon Slayer IP owners lost a trademark request on Tanjiro and Zenitsu's kimono patterns, the bakery owner could have simply sold themed cakes using their kimono patterns without having to depict the demon slayer characters. The owner of the bakery had some free public domain options, but chose to go with the violating copyright law instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5871
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 12:59 am Reply with quote
zrdb wrote:
WTF? It's not like she was selling counterfeit dvds or blurays of the show-who in the holy hell was she hurting by selling cakes? Totally absurd.


They went after her because she was advertising on the internet. Once she did that, they really didn't have much choice but to go after her. They went after her to protect the IP from everyone else who might jump on the bandwagen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ErikaD.D



Joined: 09 Jun 2019
Posts: 659
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:27 am Reply with quote
It may sounds harsh but Japan's copyright laws is stricter than anti-p*dophilia laws on underage girls. Sad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan45
Village Elder



Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 9875
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:31 am Reply with quote
What she did was against the law. She admits she knew it was illegal and did it anyway. Not only that she broke the law so flagrantly that she attracted attention and got slapped down. Also, as noted above, character cakes are a source of license income for the IP holders.

If you don't like a law or feel it is enforced wrong, you should work to change it. You don't just break the law, hope no one will notice and then get angry when they do. If you feel there is no chance of getting the law changed, you just have to suck it up and live with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
#Neothegreenland



Joined: 07 Oct 2021
Posts: 42
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 10:43 am Reply with quote
for us foreigners, this is an absurd happenstance. since bakeries can illustratively decorate cakes to whatever the costumer want on the west. but it seems that in japan, it requires the IP holder's license.

different places, different laws. ig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
a_Bear_in_Bearcave



Joined: 14 Jan 2019
Posts: 514
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:41 pm Reply with quote
#Neothegreenland wrote:
for us foreigners, this is an absurd happenstance. since bakeries can illustratively decorate cakes to whatever the costumer want on the west. but it seems that in japan, it requires the IP holder's license.

different places, different laws. ig

No, it's the same in the west, it's just sensible people don't put pictures of the cakes customer ordered on Instagram when it has copyrighted stuff, so it never gets prosecuted. Her error was to make thing public. You absolutely cannot make cakes with copyrighted characters and sell them legally, nothing absurd here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group