×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Canadian Man Jailed for 'Anime' & Real Child Pornography


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
firedragon54738



Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 3113
Location: wisconsin
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:22 am Reply with quote
So they finely got a real one
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mdo7



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 6280
Location: Katy, Texas, USA
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:50 am Reply with quote
Can't defend this guy. he had actual child porn so sorry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:29 pm Reply with quote
TsunaReborn! wrote:
Polycell wrote:
So you want to punish people for possessing arrangements of ink that offend you; that's all well and good, but some of us believe crimes require a victim.


It's a crime, for example, for me to drive around without my seat belt on also to take drugs... These are classed as victemless crimes. Should these be in the same catorgary as loli?


No, because they aren't really victimless. Those are there for actual practical reasons, because they have real effects, effects beyond "well, they could maybe, possible influence someone if they're severely lacking in self control or already mentally ill". Not wearing a seatbelt is only victimless until that person is in an accident and is ejected from their car and splattered on the pavement. It's debatable whether certain drugs should be illegal, but the ones that should be are NOT victimless.

But that's all moot here anyway since he had actual child porn, which is illegal for a good reason (because of what's inherently necessary to make it, not what it may or may not cause them to do after they look at it).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:58 pm Reply with quote
Gyt Kaliba wrote:

Secondly, it mentions something towards the end of the article about him being allowed on a computer 'only with adult supervision'. How old is the Canadian man in the first place?



as per article:
http://www.wellandtribune.ca/2013/05/21/st-catharines-man-gets-nine-months-for-child-porn

Quote:
Randy Taylor, 54, of Roehampton Ave. pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography Tuesday.




My Commentary:

1) It's cases like this where persons with faulty BS-detector and poor (or almost non-existent) I.T./security/computer skills that are susceptible to "easy pickings" by LEA.

2) I would not be surprised if western visitors of that "sad panda" website also consume not just 2D, but also 3D in tandem with 2D... just like the real "kimo-otaku" counterparts in Japan where they also get their 3D fix in the form of (grey-area but legal) "junior-idols" (DVDs & magazines sold prominently in some Akihabara stores as Fuji News Network reports https://www.youtube.com/v/xKhBqJC8koo&autoplay=1 and this observer from America illustrates https://www.youtube.com/v/f-jsc5OSEMw&autoplay=1)


Last edited by NGK on Thu May 23, 2013 2:18 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 890
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:02 pm Reply with quote
HitokiriShadow wrote:
TsunaReborn! wrote:
Polycell wrote:
So you want to punish people for possessing arrangements of ink that offend you; that's all well and good, but some of us believe crimes require a victim.


It's a crime, for example, for me to drive around without my seat belt on also to take drugs... These are classed as victemless crimes. Should these be in the same catorgary as loli?


No, because they aren't really victimless. Those are there for actual practical reasons, because they have real effects, effects beyond "well, they could maybe, possible influence someone if they're severely lacking in self control or already mentally ill". Not wearing a seatbelt is only victimless until that person is in an accident and is ejected from their car and splattered on the pavement. It's debatable whether certain drugs should be illegal, but the ones that should be are NOT victimless.

But that's all moot here anyway since he had actual child porn, which is illegal for a good reason (because of what's inherently necessary to make it, not what it may or may not cause them to do after they look at it).


Child pornography is not a victimless crime because after the child is filmed and/or photographed while being sexually abused, the child will remember that event throughout their entire lives & may grow up mentally unstable which will also over time cause depression, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), illegal drug use, sexual confusion & suicide.

However, illustrated drawings such as Lolicon & Shotacon are works of pure fiction & nobody is being victimized or exploited in any way.


Last edited by revolutionotaku on Thu May 23, 2013 1:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
partysmores



Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 284
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:34 pm Reply with quote
This case is much different as this man possessed real child porn, so I have no sympathy for him. I completely disagree with the attorney, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 890
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:57 pm Reply with quote
This is almost as disturbing as the time British rock star Gary Glitter was busted after the police found kiddie porn as well as photos of abused children on his computer after sending it to a computer repair shop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:59 pm Reply with quote
Here's an interesting observation... if framed as an outsider's perspective on the following 2 situations:



1) Hardcore gamer totally immersed & engrossed in chaotic online military-style shooting games and
wants to try out the real thing
2) shows interest in acquiring then purchase high-powered "assault" weapons, bullets and gears as seen in game
3) Learns the "trade"
4)(fill-in for the final, worst case scenario)

1) loli otaku connoisseur ... having "learned" the "positions" and read all the "scenarios" collected in 2D form feels the need to branch out beyond 2D
2) gets engrossed with 3D form through niche websites/forums
3) branches out further
4) (fill-in for the final, worst case scenario)



... isn't these just the natural progression of things? Laughing


Last edited by NGK on Thu May 23, 2013 2:20 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:09 pm Reply with quote
revolutionotaku wrote:
This is almost as disturbing as the time British rock star Gary Glitter was busted after the police found kiddie porn as well as photos of abused children on his computer after sending it to a computer repair shop.



And just like I said above:

NGK wrote:

1) It's cases like this where persons with faulty BS-detector and poor (or almost non-existent) I.T./security/computer skills that are susceptible to "easy pickings" by LEA.


... I guess we might wanna add lack of "common sense" for reasons of "easy pickings" reports lately Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
revolutionotaku



Joined: 19 May 2011
Posts: 890
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:20 pm Reply with quote
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
StormSky92





PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:34 pm Reply with quote
Since some of it was real, I think he deserved a much bigger punishment than just 9 months in prison. This person shouldn't be allowed in public again.
Back to top
Polycell



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:40 pm Reply with quote
That's a bit harsh for twelve images he almost certainly had nothing to do with creating, don't you think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
egoist



Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 7762
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:50 pm Reply with quote
We really should jail anyone able to break a neck. I don't feel safe at night unless I know everybody free isn't able to twist my neck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
dtm42



Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 3:03 pm Reply with quote
angelmcazares wrote:
That sick bastard deserved to go to jail. Some people are implying that if he did not have real life child pornography, they would defend him. What?

Anime child pornography should be prosecuted as real life child pornography. I hate that people want to defend their deviant behaviors under that idea that anime is not real.


Guess what hotshot; Anime isn't real. Neither is Manga. They don't have real victims like real child pornography does and they do not encourage people to abuse real children.

It sounds to me like you don't care about real children and that you simply want to be the thought police and outlaw anything you don't personally agree with.

And you really need to read this thread.

Polycell wrote:
That's a bit harsh for twelve images he almost certainly had nothing to do with creating, don't you think?


Not harsh enough. It's guys like him who create and encourage a demand for real child pornography pictures (even if there's no money changing hands).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
TitanXL



Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 4036
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 3:27 pm Reply with quote
dtm42 wrote:
Not harsh enough. It's guys like him who create and encourage a demand for real child pornography pictures (even if there's no money changing hands).


I don't think that's how supply and demand works.

Technically if he pirated those pictures, he didn't contribute to it at all. It would have happened regardless if he saw them or not. Denying someone from seeing something doesn't mean it doesn't magically exist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group