×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Jason Thompson's House of 1000 Manga - The Greatest Censorship Fails


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
katscradle



Joined: 05 Jan 2013
Posts: 469
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:35 am Reply with quote
Hellfish wrote:
RakuenOokami wrote:

And another manga censorship I'd like to bring up was the fourth volume of Kaori Yuki's Godchild. In one scene, the main character discovers a painting of a woman strangling a baby. In the censored version (which, mind you, they still put a 'mature content' label on the book for) the baby is removed, and all you see is a deranged looking woman. This leaves anyone who hasn't seen the original Japanese version wondering why the main character is so disturbed by a painting of a crazy looking lady.


Ahhh so that was in the painting! I was honestly confused by that reveal but for some reason I always forgot to google it. I actually thought it aluded to incest Anime hyper (which makes it worst but this is Godchild we are talking about Anime hyper)


Thank goodness somebody else brings this up! It's one of the censorship instances that haunts me periodically online because someone will pop up in a discussion asking about the painting. VIZ went farther than just the painting with it though. There were several dialogue changes and other art edits over a headpiece looking like a crown of thorns and a drawing of Michaelangelo's pieta. The religious obfuscation would all be terribly ironic in a series called Godchild if it didn't sort of kill the climax and affect that story's theme a bit.
Being acutely aware of the "culture wars" though I can't beat up VIZ terribly over the concern regarding the painting. It portrays a very blasphemously offensive idea. It's one of my favorite stories for the series though.

I very much wish there was a good reference for censorship issues. So many times I've seen inaccurate things make their way around the internet. People have said series weren't censored (Godchild) or pointed out "changes" that actually aren't true if you look at the original.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14766
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:17 am Reply with quote
katscradle wrote:

Thank goodness somebody else brings this up! It's one of the censorship instances that haunts me periodically online because someone will pop up in a discussion asking about the painting. VIZ went farther than just the painting with it though. There were several dialogue changes and other art edits over a headpiece looking like a crown of thorns and a drawing of Michaelangelo's pieta. The religious obfuscation would all be terribly ironic in a series called Godchild if it didn't sort of kill the climax and affect that story's theme a bit.
Being acutely aware of the "culture wars" though I can't beat up VIZ terribly over the concern regarding the painting. It portrays a very blasphemously offensive idea. It's one of my favorite stories for the series though.


Well, they blaspheme Shinto and Buddhism all the time. Y'know what I'd like them to blaspheme though? The Japanese monarchy. Noitamina should make an anime out of it! So many punchlines! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tasogarenootome



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 593
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:01 am Reply with quote
Very interesting read, thanks Jason!

This is one of the downsides of manga being a visual medium. Someone brought up the fact of novels being allowed to depict things far worse and it really does boil down to visibility. Going into a library and flipping open a manga to a page with nudity or violence while never being aware of the content a few shelves down is pretty understandable.

When I was tutoring Japanese in public school, it was this that made building our Japanese-language manga library so hard. Even children's manga have so much "objectionable content" and we couldn't take the risk (see the Dragonball manga incident that happened in a library in Maryland a few years back!). Thank goodness for Chi's Sweet Home~!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:34 am Reply with quote
enurtsol wrote:
katscradle wrote:

Thank goodness somebody else brings this up! It's one of the censorship instances that haunts me periodically online because someone will pop up in a discussion asking about the painting. VIZ went farther than just the painting with it though. There were several dialogue changes and other art edits over a headpiece looking like a crown of thorns and a drawing of Michaelangelo's pieta. The religious obfuscation would all be terribly ironic in a series called Godchild if it didn't sort of kill the climax and affect that story's theme a bit.
Being acutely aware of the "culture wars" though I can't beat up VIZ terribly over the concern regarding the painting. It portrays a very blasphemously offensive idea. It's one of my favorite stories for the series though.


Well, they blaspheme Shinto and Buddhism all the time. Y'know what I'd like them to blaspheme though? The Japanese monarchy. Noitamina should make an anime out of it! So many punchlines! Laughing

I'm pretty sure there are some Christians who think something as inoffensive as Saint Young Men is blasphemous. But I bet if this would not be a problem if it were not VIZ. See Dark Horse and Blade of the Immortal for example.

In fact, it seems less of a problem with original western content--see Alan Moore, despite getting into "trouble" at schools and libraries as highlighted by CBLDF from time to time. They are a much more resilient to criticism than Viz or Japanese controlled companies who paranoid about reputation, saving face and wrong ideas about sales. Thank goodness there are some mangaka like Oda who will put their foot down and demand some fidelity like the article mentions, but that is still rare.

tasogarenootome wrote:
Very interesting read, thanks Jason!

This is one of the downsides of manga being a visual medium. Someone brought up the fact of novels being allowed to depict things far worse and it really does boil down to visibility. Going into a library and flipping open a manga to a page with nudity or violence while never being aware of the content a few shelves down is pretty understandable.

When I was tutoring Japanese in public school, it was this that made building our Japanese-language manga library so hard. Even children's manga have so much "objectionable content" and we couldn't take the risk (see the Dragonball manga incident that happened in a library in Maryland a few years back!). Thank goodness for Chi's Sweet Home~!

Well, anime is an even more visual medium and a much larger business in the US and does not face the same issue nowadays. But I can see your point about school libraries. Still, American comic authors and publishers other than Viz don't seem anywhere as perturbed by controversy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GVman



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 729
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:55 am Reply with quote
I may just be reading it wrong, but are you saying Viz removed the manji from Neji's forehead in their release of the manga or are you saying that Shueisha later went and retroactively removed the manji from the manga in Japan (or is that just referring to One Piece)? If it's the former, you're either wrong or Viz did this recently; my copies of the Viz Naruto graphic novels have the forehead manji in them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RestLessone



Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 1426
Location: New York
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:35 pm Reply with quote
GVman wrote:
I may just be reading it wrong, but are you saying Viz removed the manji from Neji's forehead in their release of the manga or are you saying that Shueisha later went and retroactively removed the manji from the manga in Japan (or is that just referring to One Piece)? If it's the former, you're either wrong or Viz did this recently; my copies of the Viz Naruto graphic novels have the forehead manji in them.


I think VIZ removed it in the magazine Shonen Jump version, then added it to the manga with a note about what it meant. Memory is a bit fuzzy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Petrea Mitchell



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Location: Near Portland, OR
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:37 pm Reply with quote
This has kicked loose a memory of the funniest anime censorship moment I've ever seen. I watched the first half of R.O.D the TV on TechTV before getting the whole thing on DVD. There's a scene in episode 12 (IIRC) where a woman exploring a cave system finds that there is a small underground lake surrounding the artifact she's after, so she casually flings off her blouse and jumps into the water to swim to the center, to the obvious discomfort of her male bodyguard.

So, for the close-up shot of her doing the backstroke across the lake, TechTV blurred out her chest. The funny part is that as this shot happens, the woman is chiding the bodyguard for his prudish American attitude.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
fuuma_monou



Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 1817
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:56 pm Reply with quote
Petrea Mitchell wrote:
This has kicked loose a memory of the funniest anime censorship moment I've ever seen. I watched the first half of R.O.D the TV on TechTV before getting the whole thing on DVD. There's a scene in episode 12 (IIRC) where a woman exploring a cave system finds that there is a small underground lake surrounding the artifact she's after, so she casually flings off her blouse and jumps into the water to swim to the center, to the obvious discomfort of her male bodyguard.


I think Animax Asia cut that scene entirely. They also cut out the sexually suggestive stills with the Japanese opening credit titles. Until I got the DVDs I thought they had used the text-less version of the opening animation for some reason (they usually leave the OP/ED credits in Japanese). At least they used the excellent Geneon dub.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GVman



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 729
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:49 am Reply with quote
RestlessOne wrote:
GVman wrote:
I may just be reading it wrong, but are you saying Viz removed the manji from Neji's forehead in their release of the manga or are you saying that Shueisha later went and retroactively removed the manji from the manga in Japan (or is that just referring to One Piece)? If it's the former, you're either wrong or Viz did this recently; my copies of the Viz Naruto graphic novels have the forehead manji in them.


I think VIZ removed it in the magazine Shonen Jump version, then added it to the manga with a note about what it meant. Memory is a bit fuzzy.


Ah. I guess Viz censored stuff more in the magazine than in the graphic novels?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Penguin_Factory



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 732
Location: Ireland
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:36 am Reply with quote
I love how snarky Jason is in parts of this. Made me laugh Very Happy

Recently started reading Narutaru. When I got to the end of the volumes Dark Horse published I was like "I wonder why they never put out the rest of this?". Then I looked at some fan translations. "Oh. That's why."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gyt Kaliba



Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 712
Location: Arkansas
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:41 am Reply with quote
GVman wrote:
Ah. I guess Viz censored stuff more in the magazine than in the graphic novels?


Yup, there was a pretty good amount of stuff censored in the magazine version that you could get uncut (or at least closer to it) in the actual graphic novels. I guess they figured that the magazine would be one thing, that any kid could get their parents to buy them a subscription to, but actually getting the graphic novels was something the young kids probably weren't gonna do. Or something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
trilaan



Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 1055
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:31 pm Reply with quote
This is why I prefer to read fiction written by non-human species in their original languages. There's just too many hang-ups with Earth licensing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GVman



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 729
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:20 pm Reply with quote
Gyt Kaliba wrote:
GVman wrote:
Ah. I guess Viz censored stuff more in the magazine than in the graphic novels?


Yup, there was a pretty good amount of stuff censored in the magazine version that you could get uncut (or at least closer to it) in the actual graphic novels. I guess they figured that the magazine would be one thing, that any kid could get their parents to buy them a subscription to, but actually getting the graphic novels was something the young kids probably weren't gonna do. Or something.


Huh. I wonder if a lot of the stuff mentioned in the article didn't make it into the graphic novels?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
configspace



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:58 pm Reply with quote
GVman wrote:
Huh. I wonder if a lot of the stuff mentioned in the article didn't make it into the graphic novels?

For Viz, it's still the case. You would think the ones with a "Parental Advisory: Explicit Content" label in the front would be uncensored, but apparently not, as others mentioned earlier with Godchild vol. 4

The series as a whole is still rated "T" by Viz, so maybe that's why, since their other GNs are also censored or edited. I had assumed their M series, all of which comes with the same Parental Advisory sticker as that example, are uncensored... but with Viz, I am not so sure.

Maybe the only way to know if it's uncensored for sure is if they explicitly say so, in their press release or marketing, like with Tenjo Tenge

For other publishers, like Dark Horse (e.g. Blade of the Immortal), Seven Seas (e.g. Vampire Bund), Yen Press, or the DMP imprints, I am not aware of it happening. Interestingly, Dark Horse and Seven Seas don't sully the front covers with warning labels either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14766
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:26 pm Reply with quote
Gyt Kaliba wrote:
GVman wrote:
Ah. I guess Viz censored stuff more in the magazine than in the graphic novels?


Yup, there was a pretty good amount of stuff censored in the magazine version that you could get uncut (or at least closer to it) in the actual graphic novels. I guess they figured that the magazine would be one thing, that any kid could get their parents to buy them a subscription to, but actually getting the graphic novels was something the young kids probably weren't gonna do. Or something.


Or even late-night TV anime sometimes still censored while the Bluray/DVDs are uncut too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 7 of 9

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group