Forum - View topicNEWS: Singapore's Odex Directors Speak as Protests Continue
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mskala
Posts: 45 Location: Waterloo, Ontario |
|
|||||||
Many people try to draw analogies between theft and copyright infringement, but it really doesn't work. Copying something is not "taking" it. Copyright infringement would be more like test-driving the 2008 truck, returning it, but then going home and building a truck just like it for yourself. The owner of the 2008 truck would probably prefer that you buy it instead of building one of your own, and they might even have a legitimate claim that it's in some way unfair for you to "take" the test drive when you don't plan to buy the truck and you're going to use what you learn during the test drive in order to educate yourself on how to build a copy... but there's no meaningful way that that scenario can be called "taking" the 2008 truck itself. The owner still has it. They can still drive it or sell it. You didn't take it away from them. Even if there's some misconduct of some sort in that scenario (did you lie about why you wanted the test drive?), it's not simple theft. Similarly, all a copyright holder loses from copyright infringement is the hypothetical future profits that they claim to be entitled to because of copyright law. Those hypothetical profits don't have the same kind of natural reality that physical property has. They didn't exist until someone created them through copyright law. (Note: I'm talking about "economic" copyright. In some places there is also something called "moral" copyright, which is a different animal and not relevant here.)
Yes, and if you read this message, then you have to pay me $20. Just because they said it doesn't mean they have any legitimate right to enforce it.
That doesn't work because it has nothing to do with copyright infringement. Look, if you think downloading is "taking," wouldn't it make sense for repentant downloaders to give back their ill-gotten files? Shouldn't they get together all those fansub files and email them to the copyright holders? Wouldn't that be a good idea? The reason it wouldn't be a good idea is a good clue to why copyright infringement is completely different from theft of physical property.
There you go again with equating copyrighted works to physical property. Once you eat the food they can't sell it to somebody else; something physical has actually been taken away. A better analogy to copyright infringement would be "I think the hamburgers at McDonalds are too expensive, so I'll stay home and cook hamburgers of my own instead. Oh, they turned out to be very similar to McDonalds hamburgers." By doing that it could be said that I'm "taking" the profits that McDonalds "should" have gotten for the burgers I would otherwise have bought... but they aren't, and shouldn't be, able to prosecute me for it. Now, all that said, I do think there's some legitimate basis for having a copyright law. It provides a useful incentive for people to create artistic work, if they think they'll have a state-sponsored monopoly that'll help them make money. Rewarding creators is good. Commercial exploitation of work by people who aren't paying the creator, is bad. I don't participate in or encourage commercial piracy operations. But copyright is not a natural right, it isn't above question, and equating copyright infringement with theft of physical property is intellectual dishonesty. |
||||||||
Paploo
Posts: 1875 |
|
|||||||
Your theory would only make sense if you stayed at home, and made your own cartoons and comics. Like you know, drawing them and stuff. Making something of your own.
But you aren't. You're just taking someonelses intellectual property without their permission or compensating them in anyway. Comic artists in North America and worldwide have worked for years to promote and respect creator rights- artists often get the shitty end of the stick. I think anime fandom's serious lack of respect for intellectual property is a slap in the face to everything that's been done. These sort of things are training readers and viewers to expect to get everything for free, and to be able to walk all over the creators respective rights. Downloaders *can* give back. By stopping downloading, buying the official versions of what they've downloaded, and supporting future releases rather then stepping over the rights of anime creators, producers and distributors. It should be the artists choice what they can offer for free to readers, and what they can offer through retail outlets..... there's plenty of artists who make webcomics, and lots of venues for impoverished manga fans to get free reading material. If an artist offers their work with a fee attached, it's their choice, it's their work. Fans should respect that, even if the artist is japanese. The companies that license anime for release in the US pay the japanese creators for their work, and put their and their employees livelohoods on the line to bring us great anime every year. I'm not saying it's always a perfect situation, but the fact is is that they do it in a fair, reasonable, respectable way. If even 1/3 of the people who download and don't buy stopped doing so, and started buying anime, sales would probably go up a good deal, and companies would be able to bring over more series and offer better deals to anime fans. |
||||||||
Dargonxtc
Posts: 4463 Location: Nc5xd7+ スターダストの海洋 |
|
|||||||
I just have a silly, simple question that someone here might know. What relationship, if any, does the Odex that is being discussed in this article have with Odex Private Ltd.? Or are they the same thing?
They are listed separately, and I just wanted to know how close the ADR work that is being done is to this company. |
||||||||
Paploo
Posts: 1875 |
|
|||||||
Both are the same company. http://www.odex.com.sg/?p=aboutUs "Besides distributing Japanese Anime in VCD and DVD formats, ODEX is very much involved in the TV broadcast of Japanese Anime in its 3 licensed territories and is a major service provider for Mandarine and American-English dubbing." "Studio Odex also holds the distinction of being the first and only studio in Asia to dub anime into English for the USA market. With several titles under our belt and more on the way, we plan to grow this market and build worldwide awareness of the talent and technical abilities Singapore has to offer in the field of entertainment." They've done the dubs and dvd production for Bandai's releases of DanDoh and Fantastic Children. They apparently also do Malay dubs. The reviews of Fantastic Children have been really good too btw http://www.animeondvd.com/reviews/seriespage.php?series=10353 http://www.animeondvd.com/studio/studio.php?studio=40 AnimeonDVD has also reviewed several of the titles Odex has produced themsevles for the Singapore market. I'd take their word moreso as a longstanding Anime review website then what some fansubbers say about Odex's quality. Odex is responsible for a lot of good things, and I think fans are being way too harsh on them for simply looking after their intellectual property, and that of japanese producers. I'm not sure if the fines they're supposedly imposing are the best roots [and it looks as if they are changing their game plan a bit in regards to this], but I think anime fandom's reaction to it, and the questionable attacks they've taken on Odex are far more sketchy. http://www.odex.com.sg/product.php?product=37 Any company that offers official editions of the Miss Marple anime is okay in my books. |
||||||||
mskala
Posts: 45 Location: Waterloo, Ontario |
|
|||||||
But they still have it afterwards. It is not "taken." |
||||||||
Zac
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 7912 Location: Anime News Network Technodrome |
|
|||||||
All your argument does is attempt to justify the wholesale copying and distribution of intellectual property. It's all this semantic nonsense that lets people say "It's okay for me to watch the entire animated output of Japan for free and without permission". It's the splitting of hairs, the pedantic definitions, all of that that lets people justify what they're doing. If you can't let the details go and just see the big picture for what it is then you really have no business summing up the situation in the first place. |
||||||||
Dargonxtc
Posts: 4463 Location: Nc5xd7+ スターダストの海洋 |
|
|||||||
Firstly, thanks for clearing that up for me. My main concern is the ADR work. While I am sympathetic to Singaporeans, I would rather there(Odex's) shoddy work ethic not traverse the ocean and enter the R1 market. AoD generally listens to the Japanese tracks as the primary source for reviews, and several of the reviews here have had different opinions on the ADR work.
Well you get the point. Considering how far dubs have come, and how long it has taken them to get there, I would hate to see a reversion to the days of crappy dubs. It's bad for the fans, it's bad for the industry, it's bad for the original creators. And personally I don't think a company that can't even please it's own customers on a relatively small island nation, should be able to work on projects that will potentially reach markets on an invaribly larger order of magnitude. Let them settle there own problems first, which as we can see they are at least trying to do. Whether anything good will come of this will remain to be seen. Note: While I didn't want to get into the whole debate that has been going on here(since for me at least it is ad nauseum), after this I feel I need to at least state it. I am not anti-Odex. Downloading off the internet is illegal, and doing so without supporting(buying stuff) the content you download is morally wrong as well(yes there is a difference). I just feel Odex should get there own act together before infecting problems into our market. |
||||||||
mufurc
Posts: 612 |
|
|||||||
mskala: Dude, this is the ANN boards. The place where some people apparently believe that fansubbers are out to destroy the North American anime business (and then the Japanese one, while they're at it), and where some people apparently can't even begin to imagine that fans in other countries may be in a different situation than American fans. (Disclaimer: the above sentence contains one slight exaggeration. Maybe.) I think you do make some good points, but you certainly didn't pick the best place to express them...
|
||||||||
ikillchicken
Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
|
|||||||
You can blow it off as details, but in response to points like this I think its key:
If you apply this reasoning to stealing something, its obviously BS. Wether you'd buy it is irrelevant, youre still costing them by stealing it. In the case of copyright infringement though, if you wouldnt have bought it anyway, your downloading it really hasn't cost the company a thing. Now you can argue that people actually would buy stuff if they couldnt download it, but thats a whole other debate. You cant avoid that whole debate by cutting right to "its like stealing no matter what." |
||||||||
Zac
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 7912 Location: Anime News Network Technodrome |
|
|||||||
I'm not "blowing it off as details". Anime obviously has no value to people like you and others who think the same way you do. Films, music, TV shows - these things clearly are not worth money to you because you can get them for free. You can, so you do. The end. There's no other argument there - it's not about whether or not it's theft, it's not about morality. You choose to not pay for it because it's easy and there are no consequences. You can argue until you're blue in the face about how it's "not really theft" and "the companies aren't losing any money when hundreds of thousands of people download their product for free" but it all boils down to the fact that we have created a culture here where the chief product - japanese cartoons - are not worth money anymore to anyone who's a big enough "fan" to know how to get it for free. Downloading Japanese animated product en masse is not only encouraged, we have a culture here where you're not a "real fan" unless you download everything you watch and outright refuse to ever pay for any of it because "America always screws it up". |
||||||||
Navak
Posts: 88 |
|
|||||||
Unless your claim is that copyright law is straightforward, I think you have lost sight of the issue when you brush arguments off as being a matter of semantics. The whole issue revolves around those "pedantic" defintions which establish legal rights. |
||||||||
Zac
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 7912 Location: Anime News Network Technodrome |
|
|||||||
Anime is a commercial product, designed to make money. That you CAN get it for free doesn't mean you SHOULD. Liking cartoons does not entitle you to get them all for free simply because you can. I'm screaming at a brick wall here anyway so I don't know why I'm even bothering. |
||||||||
hikaru004
Posts: 2306 |
|
|||||||
Actually, I hope that the money that they obtain from the downloaders is less than their legal fees for making the ISPs release the data and any PR to clean up their image since this looks to be a PR headache. If it's bad enough for riot police, then they've got a big PR problem on their hands.
|
||||||||
Navak
Posts: 88 |
|
|||||||
I agree, however I don't believe you should simply dismiss the argument or any other arguments which "split hairs" when it discusses laws or other legal rights. Using words like "should" indicate a moral question, not one of legal merit which is an enitrely different argument. |
||||||||
Zac
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 7912 Location: Anime News Network Technodrome |
|
|||||||
At what point does common sense kick in? Do you have any idea how many people download fansubs? It isn't like some secret underground thing. If one tenth of the people who download fansubs bought ONE American DVD, that DVD would be considered a massive gigantic mega-success and would probably buoy that company for some time and likely pay for production on a few Japanese series. When do people stop and say "Oh wait if nobody's paying for this and we keep devaluing the product by making it free for everyone then hey the industry will collapse"? Will that ever happen, or is it just "f*ck you I can get it for free and I always will" forever? I mean, for crap's sake, how much product can you download for free before saying "Uh maybe at some point I should pay for some of this so they make some more I can enjoy"? Or does that thought just never enter the heads of these people? Someone else will pay for it, I can just leech off the system forever, I can rely on the Japanese fans to pay for my entertainment and feel guilt-free about getting it all for free, I have no problem being a parasite who contributes nothing to the system at all. |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group