Forum - View topicNEWS: Missouri Man Pleads Guilty to Possession of 'Cartoon' Child Pornography
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sarukah
![]() Posts: 160 |
|
|||||||||
You people are unreal. None of you have any clue at all what the situation was that led to the wife bringing in the cops. Wait until you know the situation before passing such judgements. Not to mention that fact that having fictional porn leads to needing more and more and more until you move up to real little children, which is the what the main issue is and why him having to face consequences could actually save his life in this department. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
walw6pK4Alo
![]() Posts: 9322 |
|
|||||||||
You sound like you're full of crap, full offensive meant. Just like playing violent video games leads to murder on a quantifiable regular basis? You don't even have any anecdotal evidence to back up your nonsense, aside from Tsutomu. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Sailor S
|
|
|||||||||
Just because you call something a fact does not make it so. I've seen no evidence to suggest that getting off to fictional porn leads someone to crossing into actual stuff. Care to show some evidence for this "fact" that you've claimed? |
||||||||||
pluvia33
![]() Posts: 194 Location: Dayton, OH, USA |
|
|||||||||
Wait, what? Proof? Just because a pedophile might have started out with escalating enjoyment of fictional porn does not mean that everyone who might be into such fictional porn is going to become a pedophile. I find such allegations disgraceful and offensive. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
yurihellsing
|
|
|||||||||
What?? |
||||||||||
Konopan
Posts: 397 |
|
|||||||||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDbNaLqVw8c In this episode, Kenan and Kel learn about thought-crime. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
configspace
Posts: 3717 |
|
|||||||||
The blurb about 1466A in the article is partially wrong (though several sites still list the old version of the law)
part 2(A)(B) were struck down in Handley's case, leaving only 1466A, part 1(a)(b) --the obscenity parts as the requirement. Most will plead guilty to get a lighter sentence because most won't get past convincing others it's not obscene (likewise with regular porn) ANN already covered this animenewsnetwork.com/press-release/2008-10-09/cbldf-to-serve-as-special-consultant-in-protect-act-manga-case
Last edited by configspace on Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
BlackJaded
![]() Posts: 332 |
|
|||||||||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0 Every time, every time! |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Mad_Scientist
![]() Moderator ![]() Posts: 3011 |
|
|||||||||
Another one of these cases? Sheesh. Not sure what to say that hasn't already been said a thousand times. I don't think drawings should be illegal, don't think drawn images should be equated with real life child porn, etc, etc.
This is the one part of your post I can somewhat agree with. On principle I don't like what she did, as she turned someone in for a "crime" I feel shouldn't exist, but without knowing the specific circumstances I don't want to judge her too harshly. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Sorraffy
Posts: 161 |
|
|||||||||
The United States Department of Justice's "Project Safe Childhood" = joke
Government to recommend 3-year prison sentence for comics found on man's computer = joke why, all because of one simple headline I saw today:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
MagusGuardian
![]() Posts: 590 |
|
|||||||||
oh great the thought police are polishing their non existent weaponry again. one other thing I had a mental facepalm when sorraffy mentioned the other headline this however involving an Actual child
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
VanGosroth
![]() Posts: 299 |
|
|||||||||
While I strongly agree that Children need to be protected from predators, the keyword is children. Living, breathing children.
All these lolicon arrests are BS. Unless the lolicon drawings are based on actual images of child exploitation, there are no victims. To arrest someone for viewing naked cartoons because it MAY lead to actual molestation is bullcrap. It's like saying just because I own a handgun I'm going to be a homicidal maniac. Have Gun? ---- > Psychotic shooters need to buy guns ---- > I will now be arrested for having a gun because I COULD go psychotic. That's literally how stupid this whole situation sounds to me every time I see one of these news stories. I'm kinda curious. If I draw a flat chested stick figure, will I be arrested for creation of exploitative material unless I verify the characters age is > 18? That's where this crusade will lead to. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
ayashe
![]() Posts: 122 |
|
|||||||||
Those poor, abused drawings! Thank God we have the government to protect the fictional children! Now that we've saved all the real children of the world we can focus on the fake ones. I won't rest until ALL forms of fictional child abuse are illegal, not just sexual (hey England, did you hear about what happened to Harry Potter? What are you going to do about that?!) Because it's not at all a waste of time and money to overreact over some drawings or words. If you can't solve real problems just make up some.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
kanechin
Posts: 447 |
|
|||||||||
oh why this again. YO JUDGES!, the fictional stuff does not mean he effed a little girl. Bet many guys have gotten away with boinking a little girl thanks to money/connections/etc but the guys with limited cash who only have images of some character that can't possibly exist in this world end up screwed.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4nBlue
|
|
|||||||||
You know what makes a man in to a fine law-abiding citizen? Ruining his life, isolating him from the society for three years and having him spend those three years with criminals. That's what makes a man in to a fine law-abiding citizen. ![]()
http://cbldf.org/2012/07/danish-report-discredits-link-between-cartoons-and-child-sex-abuse/
|
||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group