×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Idea Factory Int'l President: 'We Don't Want to Censor Anymore'


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kikaioh



Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Posts: 1205
Location: Antarctica
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 10:51 pm Reply with quote
I don't buy their excuse for an instant. They're complaining that Western "views on the sexualization of women" are holding them back? Or to put it differently, they're blaming the opinions of other people from preventing the release of their works in the West? What is it, are they afraid of being criticized? Unless there's a legal reason, don't bandy around the word "censorship" and fault other people's beliefs for your own embarrassment/shame/cowardess to support your own works. It's a hypocrisy to blame other's freedom of expression for driving a choice to curtail your own. Or, if your fear is that your game won't sell unless it's modified, then that's not censorship, that's the reality of the market. Altogether it just sounds like huffed-up complaining that people dislike their content. "If only Westerners didn't want to view women and little girls as human beings!" That's so childish, if that's the sort of content you want to express and you believe in that, then at least own it, instead of this nonsensical blame-game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hellsoldier



Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 765
Location: Porto,Portugal,Europe,Earth,Sol
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:32 pm Reply with quote
wohdin wrote:
Maybe, and I mean just maybe, they should consider not making every one of their games borderline-pornographic. Have they ever considered that? I mean, whatever happened to just making a solid game and marketing it on its own merits, instead of making it all hypersexualized for no real reason? At least be honest about what you're producing - raw fanservice, softcore porn - instead of blaming "the west" and their "puritanical views" for your own laziness.


I am quite tired of all the third-rate fanservice-rich material with lack of interesting female characters with little-to-no personality and nothing more than walking stereotypes, I really am... But they shouldn't change anything for anyone's sake, only their own. Yes, most of their material is most likely crap, but even if it weren't, we'd still be complaining.


Last edited by Hellsoldier on Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rivailloli



Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 562
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:34 pm Reply with quote
Do these companies realize that just because their games are criticized that it doesn't mean they have to censor them nor does it mean they can't release them? GTA is notorious for its explicit content, it gets complained about with every release, and you know what? The creators just don't give a shit and make more.

Quit making a fuss and just get over your game being shit-talked. Everyone else puts up with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AbZeroNow



Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 519
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:35 pm Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
Yuvelir wrote:
I cannot fathom how the Steam version of MonMon could get away with naked lolis (and lingerie cockatrice) while the Vita version (and subsequent Moero games) can't. It makes no sense to me.


Vita is for mainstream America. Steam is for the PC community, who for the most part don't care what is said. The PC is the wild west.


As a Vita owner myself, I can say that the Vita is more of a JRPG and indie machine than mainstream handheld these days. Also since I can play Asian Vita games that have English subtitles(since Vita isn't region locked), I can import myself some Moero and the social justice scolds can do jack about that. I plan on importing DoAX3 even though I have no interest in Dead or Alive because I hate censorship(self-censorship is still censorship)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wonderwomanhero





PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:37 pm Reply with quote
whiskeyii wrote:
encrypted12345 wrote:


Steam is lax enough to allow a game with lesbian sex without the need of censoring. Granted, none of the genitals are showing, but still.


Genitals showing or not showing tend to be something of a deal-breaker, actually. That's why Bioware can get away with so much nudity in their Inquisition sex scenes; "Mature" = nudity, which is a-okay by that rating, but exposed genitalia would likely land you an "Adults Only".


This is very true. Inquisition was able to push the limits of what is allowed to be shown, but only so far. Breasts and ass but that's about it. Any sign of genitalia is automatic AO.
Back to top
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5865
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:43 pm Reply with quote
Kikaioh wrote:
I don't buy their excuse for an instant. They're complaining that Western "views on the sexualization of women" are holding them back? Or to put it differently, they're blaming the opinions of other people from preventing the release of their works in the West?


This is not some unheard of concept. Not everybody likes getting hate spawn and sometimes when you get too much of it, you just want to crawl in a hole and die.

Even when games are not marketed in the west, westerners still find ways to complain about game content, which has in the past led to restrictions of foreign IP visiting Japanese websites.

So yes this is a thing, and yes it's what they do. Whether or not this is 100% accurate or truthful for this instance, who knows, its a game company. But I see no reason to disbelieve them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sudo



Joined: 04 Nov 2005
Posts: 57
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:46 pm Reply with quote
wonderwomanhero wrote:
whiskeyii wrote:
encrypted12345 wrote:


Steam is lax enough to allow a game with lesbian sex without the need of censoring. Granted, none of the genitals are showing, but still.


Genitals showing or not showing tend to be something of a deal-breaker, actually. That's why Bioware can get away with so much nudity in their Inquisition sex scenes; "Mature" = nudity, which is a-okay by that rating, but exposed genitalia would likely land you an "Adults Only".


This is very true. Inquisition was able to push the limits of what is allowed to be shown, but only so far. Breasts and ass but that's about it. Any sign of genitalia is automatic AO.

Not true, games like GTA V, The Order 1866 and L.A. Noire have shown genitals and received M ratings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WikiSonic



Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 73
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:54 pm Reply with quote
It's not like all the hate from fans calling censorship is any better. Plenty of fan service heavy Japanese games have been localized and have gotten minimal attention. Senran Kagura is doing just fine, for example. Sure, it'll get called out every once in a while but there hasn't been a media blitz or anything.

If they really don't want to censor their games, then guess what? Just release it anyway! There you go; no need to censor anything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KH91



Joined: 17 May 2013
Posts: 6176
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:07 am Reply with quote
Tuor_of_Gondolin wrote:
KH91 wrote:
Words are just words. I want to see bold action.

What kind of action? Your comment is so vague as to be meaningless.


Does this help?

http://i.imgur.com/2GOeBst.gif?noredirect

Or do you want me to start quoting from the article that you and I read so you can understand? lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kikaioh



Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Posts: 1205
Location: Antarctica
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:08 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
This is not some unheard of concept. Not everybody likes getting hate spawn and sometimes when you get too much of it, you just want to crawl in a hole and die.


You know, out of context, most people would think you were talking about how actual women feel in the toxic sea of the internet. This is literally the first (and probably only) time I've heard about companies getting their sensitive feelings hurt that people didn't like their objectified portrayals of women. It's borderline ridiculous.

TarsTarkas wrote:
Even when games are not marketed in the west, westerners still find ways to complain about game content, which has in the past led to restrictions of foreign IP visiting Japanese websites.


So you're saying that these companies actually legit censored people's expression, and are now turning around and complaining when they choose to censor their own work...?

TarsTarkas wrote:
So yes this is a thing, and yes it's what they do. Whether or not this is 100% accurate or truthful for this instance, who knows, its a game company. But I see no reason to disbelieve them.


Companies answer to investors, and "controversial content" certainly hasn't held back companies before. What I see is a butthurt president playing the victim card because he doesn't believe in his artists' content strongly enough to accept/own his company's identity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TD912



Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Posts: 274
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:12 am Reply with quote
WikiSonic wrote:
I find their comments dishonest. If they were really against censorship and always had the intention of releasing a game, they'd release it and not fall on the excuse of "we can't because it would've needed to be censored."

What games does Compile Heart have that need to be censored anyway? How about this: Submit your game to the ESRB and if they give it a bad rating, censor it and blame it on them.

Because in the end, I'd rather see some form of a game then no game at all.


And then we get a bunch of other people claiming "Why did they bother releasing this game censored?? I refuse to buy censored games. It's like you're not getting the whole thing. Either release the full uncensored game or don't bother at all."

You can't please everybody.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5865
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:24 am Reply with quote
@Kikaioh

Oh well, guess we know which side of the censoring argument you are on.

I guess in this new age, selling to the male audience is now evil. Guess we should all put on our monk robes and start praying for the purity of our souls.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SilverTalon01



Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 2404
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:27 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
Vita is for mainstream America. Steam is for the PC community, who for the most part don't care what is said. The PC is the wild west.


No, Vita is not. There are only ~2.5 million Vitas sold in NA. There are way more steam users than that.

Rivailloli wrote:
Do these companies realize that just because their games are criticized that it doesn't mean they have to censor them nor does it mean they can't release them? GTA is notorious for its explicit content, it gets complained about with every release, and you know what? The creators just don't give a shit and make more.


Maybe they are just misunderstanding the overall unimportance of the issue. Apparently some companies that do localizations are run by SJ warriors like the ones that pulled that garbage little girl simulator, the mighty number 9 group, the Blade and Soul group etc. These are the people companies look to in order to localize stuff, and apparently it isn't rare at all that they just aren't comfortable themselves with the games they broker deals to handle. It is entirely possible that IF is being told by whoever they approached to do the localizations that things need to be censored.

We also have nuts like Anita and Zoe getting to speak to the UN about how people saying mean things to them on the internet is equivalent to sexual assault and saying to censor the internet.

Sure, if you look at other games, plenty do exceptionally well that get complained about, but I can see how they could be easily misled because there are very relevant to them and very publicly visible (misleading) indications that most of their potential consumers would care.


Last edited by SilverTalon01 on Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:40 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kikaioh



Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Posts: 1205
Location: Antarctica
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:39 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
@Kikaioh

Oh well, guess we know which side of the censoring argument you are on.

I guess in this new age, selling to the male audience is now evil. Guess we should all put on our monk robes and start praying for the purity of our souls.


I have no problem with the existence of fanservice works and the idea of selling to a male audience (disgusting though I may often find the content to be). What I take issue with is companies trying to pass on the blame for their unwillingness to release their own content. "We're offended that people are offended by our content" isn't an excuse that you bring to an investor's meeting, it's more akin to a childish airing of personal grievances.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
encrypted12345



Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 718
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:44 am Reply with quote
WikiSonic wrote:
It's not like all the hate from fans calling censorship is any better. Plenty of fan service heavy Japanese games have been localized and have gotten minimal attention. Senran Kagura is doing just fine, for example. Sure, it'll get called out every once in a while but there hasn't been a media blitz or anything.

If they really don't want to censor their games, then guess what? Just release it anyway! There you go; no need to censor anything.


Ultimately, I want every Japanese company to adopt this mentality.

That said, I have a feeling that as old as it is, the Rapelay incident still causes the Japanese caution even if most Americans admitted that they didn't care what the Japanese made. Vocal minority ruins things for everyone even if they don't actually have a large amount of power.

There's also how companies have been hassled on Twitter before. It has nearly zero effect on profits, and is more likely to raise them if anything, but it's annoying for a company to handle nonetheless. Even XSEED has limits on what it will localize and won't localize something it is pressured to censor; remember that the original Senran Kagura was a T game and the lewdness of the games is usually overexaggerated. It's no eroge at least even with some nudity.

Given the choice between getting it censored and not getting it at all, I'm for the latter. I know something may seem better than nothing, but standing up for my principles is more important than playing a good game. I simply refuse to reward companies who localizers who censor their products (assuming they don't offer the original unedited version).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group