Forum - View topicHey, Answerman! [2008-01-04]
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar Posts: 16939 |
|
|||||||
Why? According to your own words manga will always outshine anime so why are you trying to forget about one of your precious titles? Isn't it so much better then its counterpart anime filth? |
||||||||
omnistry
Posts: 1015 |
|
|||||||
I mentioned that there were some exceptions. The "Mai-Hime" manga was borderline ecchi! |
||||||||
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar Posts: 16939 |
|
|||||||
And of course those exceptions to this rule of yours are the ones you choose to be right?
|
||||||||
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor
Posts: 9902 Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC |
|
|||||||
Media-mix projects (examples 1, 2, 3, and the last two) shouldn't count. A fair comparison should be original manga serializing in true manga magazines (thus excluding Dengeki magazines from MediaWorks). |
||||||||
Moomintroll
Posts: 1600 Location: Nottingham (UK) |
|
|||||||
The My-HiME anime wasn't adapted from the manga. Both versions, as well as a video game version, were developed independently and concurrently based on the same multi-media concept proposal. I agree that the manga is best avoided though. |
||||||||
Fiction Alchemist
Posts: 438 |
|
|||||||
Delete.
Last edited by Fiction Alchemist on Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||
MokonaModoki
Posts: 437 Location: Austin, Texas |
|
|||||||
No, irregardless isn't a word at all. |
||||||||
Godaistudios
Posts: 2075 Location: Albuquerque, NM (the land of entrapment) |
|
|||||||
You are both wrong. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/irregardless It is a word - though frowned upon, and they both carry the same meaning. |
||||||||
Godaistudios
Posts: 2075 Location: Albuquerque, NM (the land of entrapment) |
|
|||||||
I'm thankful that dormcat did touch upon this because this is where my argument also comes in. When manga derives from the anime as the original source, I find the manga to be... crap. In fact, I find most derivative works to be... lacking, regardless if it be manga to anime, or novel to film, etc. This is why I find that 95% of the time or so, that the manga is inherently better because it is limited to the original author's intent, pacing, writing, etc. It fits better, and you will find the majority of people who do read frequently comment on how the book was better than the movie. When it comes to anime then deriving from it... well, I'll apply the old adage here. Too many cooks spoil the broth. I disagree with your take on the Karin anime since I found the plotline direction in the manga thus far to make more sense - I find it loses characterization, rather than gaining anything from it's different "take" In fact, I find it to be an example of where I turned to the manga and much preferred the read there. That's not to say that there aren't exceptions out there - but that's what makes them so special - they are exceptions, and not the rule. Now as far as the rule goes here... it's not to say that the anime can't still be an enjoyable product - so I tend to (if possible) watch the anime first, because I have frequently been dissapointed the other way around. |
||||||||
CCSYueh
Posts: 2707 Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|||||||
There's no hard rule, but I really don't expect to see the crazy humor like Papuwa from anyone other than ADV. ADV also favors girl-heavy titles & jiggle. They don't seem fond of actual yaoi or much past slashable like DNAngel or Saiyuki. I pretty much expect my yaoi from MediaBlasters Geneon was good for horror like Hellsing, Requiem From the Darkness. Ayakashi Samurai Horror Tales. Most of its fans felt it had some quality titles. No one expects the shojo harem titles to be picked up by anyone now they're gone. Bandai leans more sci-fi Funi was stuck in the shonen titles-DBZ, their desire to license One Piece when 4Kids landed it. They've moved away from it & are actually in position they can probably get whatever they want to put out & that seems to be major eye to profit. They're flirting with shojo, but it's the big titles that will likely do well. |
||||||||
TheVok
Posts: 613 Location: North York, Ontario, Canada |
|
|||||||
And that very page says: "Use regardless instead." |
||||||||
fuuma_monou
Posts: 1821 Location: Quezon City, Philippines |
|
|||||||
Early Maison Ikkoku and Kimagure Orange Road manga looked really horrible. Akemi Takada's character designs in the anime versions were a welcome improvement.
|
||||||||
Ai no Kareshi
Posts: 561 Location: South Africa |
|
|||||||
I thought the reason for this was because this is the Anime News Network and not the Manga News Network. |
||||||||
hentai4me
Posts: 1313 Location: England. Robin is so Cute! |
|
|||||||
Can you present a listing of the titles that Bandai (for example) has licensed and show that this trend plays out? Or is it jst that the sci-fi titles you have bought have mainly been Bandai ones? Can you similarly show listings of other anime companies to show that they lack, in comparison, in the sci-fi section. While I'm sure that as far as you know you are correct, we don't know how far you know (er..) though so you'll need to present some kind of tangible information to assess. Hell we could go statistical and run the t-test on it for kicks. t = |x1 – x2|/ ((σ1^2/n) + (σ2^2/n))^1/2 Or not... (actually that would be stupid, we'd lack numerical values for the t-test to work anyway.) |
||||||||
Key
Moderator
Posts: 18222 Location: Indianapolis, IN (formerly Mimiho Valley) |
|
|||||||
I have much less of a problem with it being cast as a "the original source is usually the better one" argument, and am glad to see acknowledgments that "mixed media" productions and manga-second productions are at least as often worse than the anime as people say about anime versions of manga series. The poster I was responding to wasn't doing that. Still think that too many people give too much weight to the value of the "creator's original intent" when judging the relative quality of a secondary production, though. That makes the assumption that the original creator is almost always right or using the content in the best possible way, and across all media I have not found that to be the case anywhere near 95% of the time. |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group