Forum - View topicNEWS: ADV Court Documents Reveal Amounts Paid for 29 Anime Titles
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dragonrider_cody
Posts: 2541 |
|
|||||||
[quote="bllanosr"][quote="dragonrider_cody"][quote="bllanosr"][quote="dragonrider_cody"]
I never disputed that. I simply said that writing off something on your taxes doesnt immediately mean you now have that money in your pocket to spend. Even in the case of Ford, it's all tax gains and most of the money will takes years to come in. They don't physically possess the twelve billions dollars this exact moment in time. It's why they showed a huge profit last quarter, but the overall equities only increased slight. If they had actually, physically received $12 billion dollars, their cash on hand would have increased by about 50%. However, it only increased by a little over a billion. The reverse is also true. That's why companies can write off huge multi-billion dollar loses that can equal their equity, but still have money to pay their bills. It's also why some companies can keep running despite years and years of losses on paper. |
||||||||
bayoab
Posts: 831 |
|
|||||||
"Season 2" appears on later documents thus this should only be for S1 (1-26-ish).
No, the agreement was very clear that ADV would decide on titles, lead negotiations, and everything in acquisitions and that ARM was just supposed to approve spending. Now the question is who at ADV was making which decisions for titles. |
||||||||
dragonrider_cody
Posts: 2541 |
|
|||||||
Actually no it didn't. The contract made t quite clear that Sojitz could override ADVs decisions. Even if it didn't, the personnel who were in charge of making those decisions were employees of ARM/Sojitz. So effectively Sojitz had put themselves in charge of acquisitions. That's why there was such a conflict of interests here. It would be like putting your credit card company in charge of balancing your checkbook and budget. |
||||||||
bayoab
Posts: 831 |
|
|||||||
1) The agreement does not mention Sojitz. 2) ARM could not override, only reject. Now you can try and argue that the guys were acting as proxies. But it has to be considered that ADV only claims that they were intentionally overpaying. ADV never claims they were acting on their own by licensing stuff ADV didn't want to license. |
||||||||
CKSqua
Posts: 38 |
|
|||||||
While I wouldn't know how some of those prices got so high, they partly reflect the line of thinking at the time. For instance, GONZO was still seen as a weapon for the US market (despite the fact that the studio had run into financial trouble and had gained a spotty reputation), so the western-oriented works would've commanded high prices. Pumpkin Scissors and Red Garden were such offerings during the second half of 2006, and ADV may have been inclined to guarantee their acquisition. I also recall a lot of enthusiasm for Guyver (a key to attracting older fans) and Coyote Ragtime Show (Funimation really wanted this one too), with ADV boasting that they had to run out and grab the latter as soon as they watched the premiere episode. Keeping these titles away from the competition would've cost money. In addition to being a big license, Ah! My Goddess had to be wrestled away from Media Blasters, who wanted the second season but couldn't hope to match what ADV/ARM offered to pay. Finally, AIR TV was perceived as a risky, experimental (IIRC, one of the ADV reps even described it as such) title with unknown prospects in the US. Competing distributors didn't seem too eager, and observers argued that the DVD buying market wouldn't be interested (i.e. only hardcore Japanophiles would want to watch that stuff, and they already leech fansubbed offerings as soon as they're available). I suppose the fee never had to get too high for ARM to close a deal. That said, it's completely possible that ADV dictated what they wanted, and ARM followed through with higher bids than was necessary. |
||||||||
enurtsol
Posts: 14796 |
|
|||||||
ADV already paid for the Air TV series, so they may had gotten a discount on the movie. Utawarerumono seems to be outstanding debt still owed, not total payments. For comparison, IIRC Disney gave Tokuma $10 million upfront for the Ghibli films in 1997, Saban paid $8 million for 7 years of Sailor Moon way back in 1995, and Nelvana paid ~US$2.4 million (~CAN$4 million) for 4 years of Card Captor Sakura. (It's usually easier to get info from publicly-traded companies that have to file annual financial reports.) Also IIRC, it used to be that it takes 40,000 unit sales to be considered a hit. Last edited by enurtsol on Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:46 am; edited 2 times in total |
||||||||
dragonrider_cody
Posts: 2541 |
|
|||||||
I was using the name Sojitz as they were the lead investor in ARM and even claimed ADV as a partially owned subsidiary on their website when the deal was active. ARM was composed of employees primarily from Sojitz. Also, none of that changes the fact that ARM clearly appointed executives at the company that had conflicts of interest. The CFO who was ultimately in charge of finances was also an employee of a major creditor. The CSO would have likely had a huge say in what they acquired and what titles to pursue. And as the poster above noted, it is possible that ADV may have chosen what they were interested in but ARM ultimately had final approval over the amounts they paid. You said yourself that ARM had to approve the expenditures per their agreement. ARM had executives in place that would have been responsible for the decisions that would have lead to the overpaying or could have stopped them before they risked their investment. Last edited by dragonrider_cody on Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||
dragonrider_cody
Posts: 2541 |
|
|||||||
Air TV was a TBS title. The movie was from Toei. They wouldn't have been able to license them together. |
||||||||
configspace
Posts: 3717 |
|
|||||||
Yeah that's what I don't understand either, when ADV already paid $8,963,006 for these titles which they have lost and are now in Funi's possession from the time they folded... I know very little about the history and the lawsuit itself other than Funimation's claim that ADV owes them $8 million, so can someone recap and distill the situation? |
||||||||
BigOnAnime
Encyclopedia Editor
Posts: 1233 Location: Minnesota, USA |
|
|||||||
Saw a screenshot of what was listed a few days ago. That's what I figured licensing costs were like as I heard a few years ago it isn't uncommon to see the fees being $20,000 an episode.
Also on the comment about how much it costs to make anime, think again. It's apparently $110,000-$220,000 to make an episode, and as that article is from two years ago, I'd say the costs are higher now. animenewsnetwork.com/news/2009-10-09/producer/no-square-enix-anime-lost-money-in-8-years |
||||||||
Polycell
Posts: 4623 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Nayu
Posts: 676 |
|
|||||||
Wow, looking at these numbers and comparing them to what I've spent on anime and manga.... I could have licensed a show by now....
|
||||||||
Kimiko_0
Posts: 1796 Location: Leiden, NL, EU |
|
|||||||
I don't get it either. Take Kurau for example. ADV tried to get the license for it, but couldn't pay. Funimation did get the license, and have been releasing it on DVD (I just checked my copy, and it says "Funimation" on the spine). So how can they claim now that Sentai owe them money for it?
It sounds like Funimation have their cake, and have been eating from it for a while, but are now trying to bully (Funimation are clearly the stronger party in this dispute) someone else into paying for their meal. A big Booooh! to them if that's true. |
||||||||
Mesonoxian Eve
Posts: 1858 |
|
|||||||
I'm curious if there will be any unintentional fallout from this lawsuit enough to cause Japanese businesses to tread with trepidation future partnerships or licenses.
It's well regarded Japaneses businesses do not like to have their dealings made public. Coming from an industry terrified of reverse importation, such actions could have a ripple effect. I understand this is a very rare situation, but I can see it prone to growth as the industry moves into the digital distribution age and copyright infringement suits can truly open up these cans of worms while defendants protect themselves, regardless who they are. I did finally listen to the podcast addressing this issue, and while I do agree there's no way to know who "wins", I'd like to point out one of the biggest problems facing this industry is the fact they're not playing well together. It's rather pathetic, really, because both are trying to fight the same enemy (market change) while at the same time pointing their cannons at each other. This situation screams "Pyrrhic Victory". |
||||||||
agila61
Posts: 3213 Location: NE Ohio |
|
|||||||
These are international licensing fees from a single overseas region ... and whether or not it was the single largest overseas region at that time, it certainly is not the only one. So when I see $32,500/episode licensing fee for Pumpkin Scissors, I am not thinking that the license fee is "only a small factor" ... I'm thinking its a big windfall. If production costs for those episodes were, say, $200,000/episode (I don't recall where exchange rates were back in 2006), then that would be 16%+ of production costs on international license fees from a single overseas region. Wow! Add the fact that there's Animax Asia, Animax India and Animax Korea broadcast deals and a German license, and they must have hit way, way over their international license income budget on that show. When the Sojitz deal was described as a deal gone bad, forcing the ADV restructure into TeamSentai, these numbers really put some meat on that description. |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group